Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Friday, June 28, 2002

FIGHTING FIRE WITH DRUGS
From the Wilderness details how the Reagan/Bush crime syndicate has even managed to screw up the fire fighting capabilities of the Forest Service via one of their infinity of frauds. A truly fascinating account of criminal behavior, although not nearly as interesting as Chandra or a Pledge of Allegiance interpolation conjuring up images of a collective rogering by the almighty overspook.
...
In 1987 [Roy, no relation to the other] Reagan and Fuchs came up with a plan to literally steal airplanes from the federal government which had a noble sounding stated purpose. According to documents filed in an Arizona federal criminal prosecution, which led to the conviction of the two for fraud and theft in Oct. 1997, they said they were going to save the nation's forests.

The scheme was simple. All around the country the U.S. Forest Service had relied for years on the services of private contractors who owned, operated and maintained air tankers used to drop water and retardant on forest fires. The problem was that by 1987 most of the Korean War and WW II vintage aircraft then in use were wearing out. They were not capable of carrying the loads necessary and spare parts were hard to find. If Reagan and Fuchs got their way, which they did, the Forest Service would obtain surplus C-130s, Navy P-3 Orion anti-sub planes and even jet powered A-10 Warthogs, used as tank killers during desert Storm, and "trade" them to private contractors on a one-for-one basis and place the aging aircraft in museums. The government would then hire the planes as needed to fight fires and the title to the aircraft would pass into private hands.

In reality, according to a lawsuit filed by whistleblower Gary Eitel under the False Claims Act, (a little known civil war era statute that allows citizens to file suit on behalf of the government), Evergreen Air, as a behind the scenes player, was using Reagan in a scheme to move as many as 50 C-130s into "private" hands for use in a variety of covert operations. These included drug smuggling and the direct enrichment of a number of private contractors including Reagan and at least five private companies in California, Arizona and Wyoming. Eitel has been quoted in news sources as saying that one purpose of the conspiracy was to defraud even the CIA, which would help obtain the aircraft. However, in an interview with From The Wilderness he acknowledged that Evergreen Air had card carrying CIA officers on the property and had admitted being a CIA contractor. "What happened also was that Reagan was going to put about one out of every three C-130s back in his own pocket for his own use."

From The Wilderness has obtained a copy of a Dec. 1989 memorandum to Forest Service Associate Chief George Leonard from Assistant General Counsel Kenneth Cohen, which seems to show that the Forest Service knew it was having problems with the scheme all along. Listing requirements from the Federal Property Management Regulations Cohen laid out three specific requirements which had to be met before the transfer could be deemed legal. First the transfer had to result in a greater return for the government. That could hardly be the case if a C-130 valued at $3.5 million were traded for a junk aircraft valued as low as $19,000 which was inoperable. Second, aircraft and airframe structural components were specifically prohibited from transfer. Third, the items to be exchanged could not have been acquired for the purpose of transfer and they had to have been used by the Forest Service for a period of one year before being transferred out of Forest Service inventory.

In spite of the fact that none of the above conditions were met the transfers continued under the control of Fuchs and Reagan through approximately 1989 when the last of the C-130's were placed in the hands of five private air contractors. Out of 35 aircraft transferred into private hands twenty-eight were actually re-titled. Some changed hands several times before turning up in the control of drug dealers in Panama and Mexico. Reagan and Fuchs tried to justify their actions by stating that the C-130s, obtained from Air Force storage facilities and active Air Reserve and National Guard units were historic planes themselves and obsolete. That is hard to justify since the Air Force currently has the C-130 slated for active duty until the year 2015.

Last year, in the Tucson criminal trial of Reagan and Fuchs, which was prompted by Eitel's 1994 lawsuit, three Air Force generals testified that when they approved of the transfer to the Forest Service they believed the titles would remain with the Forest Service as they approved the transfer out of military inventory."

Did the Forest Service know or suspect that the planes, under CIA control, might be used for drug dealing? In the same memorandum Kenneth Cohen states, "Apparently, DoD [Department of Defense] thinks that by having the Forest Service as the intermediary, if any future aircraft are used in drug smuggling, the Forest Service and not DoD will suffer the adverse publicity." He was right.
...


posted by Steven Baum 6/28/2002 05:04:20 PM | link

FORMER BLOW MONKEY PUSHES WAR AS ECONOMIC STRATEGY
Lawrence Kudlow, the former cokehead who somehow managed to get over his addiction despite serving no time for committing numerous major felonies, has offered up an
exciting new economic plan to jumpstart the economy.
...
Decisive shock therapy to revive the American spirit would surely come with a U.S. invasion of Iraq.
...
Further evidence that Kudlow didn't overcome his addiction as much as switch from alkaloids to hallucinogens can be found in an American Spectator interview from 1999.
TAS: What do you think of George W. Bush?

LK: You know, to meet him is reassuring. He's fascinating, because he's real smart, and yet he doesn't have to prove it to you.

TAS: What does that remind us of?

LK: Right. Reagan. Marty Anderson told me there was a bit of Reagan in George W. I was still in my anti-Papa Bush mode, thinking one Bush was enough for any country. But W. wound up with the best of the Bush character and family values - which Papa Bush always had - without the squishy policy thinking.
...

Methinks another trip to the Betty Ford Clinic might clear up that nasty case of mental astigmatism.

His idea isn't so terribly original either, as a brief perusal of the famous "hoax" Report from Iron Mountain will show. At least it's refreshing to see one of the "hoaxsters" come out of the woodwork and offer a bit of honesty, even if it's probably drug-induced.
posted by Steven Baum 6/28/2002 04:37:45 PM | link

TOP 50 LIVE ALBUMS
The management at
drat fink tells me of the Top 50 Live Albums of All Time as chosen by the House of Blues. The only things that make me want to reach for my ouzi are the Frampton and Diamond sets, if only because I had to spend so much damned time in used album shops in the late 70s and early 80s thumbing past the billions of copies of these to get to the good stuff. The Ramones, Elvis Costello and Otis Redding sets are the ones that immediately catch my eye and prompt the "why didn't I think of that? headslap.
posted by Steven Baum 6/28/2002 04:14:47 PM | link

KEY LAY THE TORT REFORMER
This could be construed as kicking a man when he's down, except that Ken Lay is down only in the sense that an axe murderer who's been stopped is down. One of the big goals of the Lay/Bush cadre after they obtained the Texas governorship was "tort reform", conservative shorthand for attempting to deprive the non-wealthy of one of the very few weapons they have against the predations of the wealthy, e.g. corporations.
Texans for Public Justice posted a 2/12/02 article entitled Bush, Lay Shielded Errant TX Businesses from Lawsuits, which details the various machinations the cadre went through to pass laws to restrict lawsuits, i.e. shield corporations from that horrible special interest group called the general public. It's a good read, but the best part is the "Lay litigation" section, where we find out just how much Kenny Boy loathes such litigation.
...
In 1986 Ken Lay sued a motorist who rear-ended his daughter's car. Represented by Vinson & Elkins, Lay sued a special education aide, seeking $6,025 for car damages and another $4,000 for such things as Robyn Lay's "pain and suffering" and "mental anguish." Under questioning, the plaintiffs admitted that Robyn did not seek medical attention until a week after the accident and that their insurer had paid their car repair bill - which was half of what they demanded.

Lay committed tort-reform heresy as chair of the University of Houston Regents in 1991 by pursuing justice through litigation. After the regents voted to sue university financial officers who were indicted in a $600,000 kickback scheme, Lay said, "We hope this action will help us recover lost funds and bring this matter to justice."
...

While we can excuse the second case, the first case provides yet another example of the high ethical standards we've come to expect from such as Lay. Although I haven't bothered to contact him, I'll presume that Moral Fuhrer William Bennett declines to comment on this matter. I hear he and the Moral Clarity Flying Squad are way too busy in New York these days ... lecturing the poor on their evil and immoral ways, that is.
posted by Steven Baum 6/28/2002 03:54:20 PM | link

AND THE HITS JUST KEEP ON COMIN'
Craig suggests a few more for the live album list.
  • Live at Antone's by Joe Ely - One of the original Flatlanders (who, by the way, just recently released their second album in 30 years) is another Austin legend and great live performer. To make some feel old and some feel young, I'll fess up that the first time I saw Ely live was when he opened for the Clash (the day after which I popped into Schoolkids at Ohio State and snagged his now deleted Down on the Drag).
  • Interstate City by Dave Alvin and the Guilty Men - I've been a big Dave fan since the first time I heard the Blasters (whose marvelous two-disc compilation Testament: The Complete Slash Recordings was recently released). His LP Romeo's Escape helped me get through a tricky period back in 1988, and this is the best thing he's done since then.
  • Where's the Money? by Dan Hicks and His Hot Licks - I'll freely but not proudly admit that I've never heard this one, at least not that I can remember. That part of my cultural deprivation will soon be remedied, though.
Bonus points for whoever gets the allusion in the title. As soon as I finish my other audio set-up, I'll have to start offering custom compilations instead of these no-prizes so the winners won't be hungry again in an hour.
posted by Steven Baum 6/28/2002 02:18:01 PM | link

AFTER ARAFAT
Richard Bennett ponders the Arafat thing, and doesn't see a pretty future for anyone involved, except of course the arms merchants.
The fact that Israel has finally decided to ignore the limited protests still coming from Washington and has moved a considerable portion of its Army into Palestinian territory in a last attempt to prevent the steady trickle of successful suicide bombings will have little effect on the chances of an independent Palestinian State. The Oslo Agreement was shot through with faults and inconsistencies, largely unenforceable and ignored by both sides. It failed to deliver a definite time scale for the creation of a Palestinian State, nor did it offer genuine guarantees for Israel's long term security. It was a typical cobbled together diplomatic compromise that invariably leads nowhere and often creates even more bitterness, distrust and ultimately conflict.

The Palestinian Authority was a sham, controlled by Yasser Arafat, probably a CIA asset for many years and who ruthlessly murdered or betrayed to the Israelis many of his opponents within the Palestinian community. The disturbing relationship between one of the Middle East's leading terrorists and his American paymasters may now be at an end, however because most of those surviving potential leaders are extremely hostile to Arafat's legacy and to both the USA and Israel, it may well prove extremely difficult to find a replacement for Arafat who will be acceptable to the Palestinian people and to both Washington and Jerusalem.
...
Israel has little to gain in the short term from encouraging a more moderate Palestinian leadership and indeed much to fear from the need to respond to viable peace negotiations. Israel would stand to loose control over vital water resources, strategically vital defensive military positions and hundreds of illegal settlements on Palestinian land. It will prove virtually impossible for the present or any foreseeable Israeli Government to give up so much and at the same time accept the creation of a fully fledged sovereign Palestinian State on its borders.

President Bush with the launch of his new initiative has probably disappointed moderate Arab opinion despite a broadly positive public first response. The equivocal US stance has only alienated further the majority of Palestinians and confirmed the more hostile Arab regimes in their view that Washington is still firmly in Sharon's pocket. It appears that once again a serious opportunity for peace has been squandered by The Whitehouse and further highlights the totally moribund nature of the United States present Middle East policy.


posted by Steven Baum 6/28/2002 11:43:00 AM | link

HELD OVER FOR A SECOND NIGHT
A tour through the vinyl stacks, some suggestions, and further ruminations have yielded further live gems for a second night of live fun. I'll still go for the stuff on the
original list first, but depending on mood, phase of the moon, etc. the following are also damned fine in the a aural pleasure department. Some of these will probably also appeal to a more narrow audience than the previous batch, what with several of them being basically regional picks.
  • SRV by Stevie Ray Vaughan - Three CDs and a DVD of mostly live stuff, much of which wasn't seen until this release. The DVD is of an Austin City Limits he did in 1989, and contains stuff that wasn't included on the original broadcast. The sound quality is variable, but after a few beers and some good BBQ you're transported back to a hot summer night in Austin circa 1985. A marvelous book containing reminiscences by his friends and peers is also included. Come to think of it, this should've been on the original list.
  • Friday Night in San Francisco - Wherein Paco De Lucia, Al DiMeola and John McLaughlin damned near start another San Francisco fire with their acoustic guitars. One of the reasons I dropped a shitload of money on a new sound system last year was to be able to better appreciate the SACD version of this. Well, that and to make Limey Bob jealous.
  • Live With a Little Help from Our Friends by Govt Mule - Four CDs documenting a New Year's concert in Atlanta in 1998 by guitar god Warren Haynes et al. As I alluded to in yesterday's Allman Brothers entry, the Mule is the best band to come out of the south since Duane Allman died. If you've bemoaned the lack of a quality follow-up to "Live at Fillmore East", then give this a try. Have a few beers, sit back and listen to the 30 minute version of Coltrane's "Afro Blue." There's a two CD version of this available, but there's just too damned much good stuff left out from the complete set to recommend it as an option.
  • More Miles Than Money: Live 1994-96 by Alejandro Escovedo - Alejandro got a deserved PR boost when "No Depression" named him the alt.country artist of the decade for the 90s, although he ranges over a whole lot more of the musical landscape than the honorific suggests.
  • Live at the Old Quarter, Houston, Texas by Townes van Zandt - This is by far the sparest of the albums I've listed, being just Townes and his guitar during a five-night stand at a famous and very small Houston club. Townes, the writer of "Pancho and Lefty", is quite simply the source for Texas folk.
  • Live Art by Bela Fleck and the Flecktones - Think of the Mahavishnu Orchestra with a banjo. A combination of jazz, folk, blugrass, etc. by four guys with chops and tunes to spare. This is also one of the best recorded live albums I've ever heard.
  • Leon Live by Leon Russell - Leon's worked with everybody from Phil Spector to Eric Clapton to Willie Nelson, and should be a lot more well known than he his. This was originally released as a 3 LP set in 1973 and is now available on 2 CDs. It may be a touch dated, but it still sounds good to me.
  • Live at the Fillmore by Derek and the Dominoes - All other live Clapton (except for some Cream tracks) pale in comparison to this. Sure he's all mature and subtle and nuanced on the Unplugged thing, but this is Clapton at his creative peak, before the heroin brought him down and he entered rehab, to exit a healthier person (well, at least until he had to enter alcohol rehab a few more years down the road) but a less exciting artist. He'd just finished the Layla studio sessions and hit the Fillmore chomping at the bit. The only gripe I have is that Duane Allman, who played extensively on Layla, didn't do the Fillmore concert (although he did manage to show up there another time to good effect).
  • Roadwork by Edgar Winter - I had to get a Winter live album on the list, and this is probably the best of the bunch, seeing how it has both Edgar and (in a guest role) Johnny as well as Rick Derringer on guitar. Those albino chaps were always better live than in the studio, and they were better than most live.
  • Ellington at Newport 1956 - What some consider the best live jazz recording ever. It's certainly the most exciting one I've heard. It's most famous for a 27-chorus Paul Gonsalves saxophone solo that damned near started a riot. If you're not into jazz (except of course for "Kind of Blue") then give this a try.

posted by Steven Baum 6/28/2002 09:16:53 AM | link

Thursday, June 27, 2002

WOLF CRY OF THE WEEK
Al-Bawaba reports of another supposed planned terrorist attack.
Islamic terrorists are planning an attack against a U.S. nuclear power plant to coincide with the July 4 celebrations, U.S. intelligence sources were quoted as saying by The Washington Times. U.S. officials are taking the threat seriously, though they maintain it is not necessarily wholly reliable, the newspaper added.
...
So where is it?
...
According to the newspaper, the nuclear plant threat indicated that an unidentified Islamic group is planning to attack the Three Mile Island (TMI) nuclear facility in Pennsylvania, or another nuclear facility in the state or elsewhere in the Northeast.
...
Or maybe one in the midwest or the southwest or the northwest or on the moon. As the folks at What Really Happened point out, the primary target, Three Mile Island, is "a facility already at the end of its useful life and already contaminated from a previous nuclear accident. If you have to sacrifice a nuke plant to start a war, why not pick one that should be torn down anyway?" It would make those in charge of saving the commonweal from the godless "terrists" look really fucking stupid and incompetent if, even after a supposed real threat was discovered, they were unable to stop the supposedly devastated Al-Qaeda organization from blowing up a nuke plant. With the manpower and resources the new gestapo has, they could erect a 100 foot barrier made of money around the damned thing, and fly a squadron of jet fighters and attack helicopters in the air above.

That presumes, of course, the reality of the supposed threat, a topic addressed further down in the item.

Some doubt, however, has been cast on the Abu Zubaydah claims. "He seems to be supplying some good information to enhance his credibility," said one official familiar with debriefing reports on the captured terrorist. "On the other hand, it could be part of a larger deception effort."
On the one hand, it could be the supposed terrorist blowing smoke up our asses, but on the other hand, we've found crying wolf to be so fucking entertaining and politically expedient that we'll flog this horse until there's nothing left but quarks, or until you docile morons start calling us on our bullshit.
posted by Steven Baum 6/27/2002 05:53:27 PM | link

MR. FROWNY BOMB
Today's (6/27)
Progressive Review provides a hilarious anecdote of corporate whoredom. If you don't already know, it reads a lot funnier if you're aware that Disney owns ABC.
From an article on airport security by ABC: "Passengers going through the new checkpoints will line up in switchbacks, similar to the lines at Walt Disney World, as animated signs tell them how to speed their passage through security. They will then be directed to walk through a metal detector."

Hey! They worked in a plug for Disney World in a story on airport security. That takes all the skill of a PR man with a nervous client. Such reporting is usually found in USA Today. Nice to see that ABC is carrying on a fine tradition of pandering to their corporate masters. But now I worry that the animated signs are also Disney owned. Mr Frowny Bomb not allowed on this flight. That will stop the terrorist for sure.


posted by Steven Baum 6/27/2002 05:43:27 PM | link

A LIBERAL BIAS FOR CONSERVATIVES
The
Washington Times provides another chapter in the never-ending saga of supposed liberal bias in the media. The Media Research Center recently claimed to have rebutted Geoff Nunberg's rebuttal of Bernard Goldberg's claim of liberal media bias. Nunberg describes how their supposed rebuttal backfires on them.
Geoff Nunberg, the Stanford researcher who challenged Bernard Goldberg's claim that the media is quick to label someone or something "conservative," has responded to a Media Research Center study earlier this week that backed up Mr. Goldberg's claim.

The center's study corroborated ex-CBS reporter Mr. Goldberg's charge, finding that ABC, CBS and NBC are four times as likely to label someone conservative as they are to label someone liberal, based on a Nexis search of transcripts.

"In fact it shows no such thing," Mr. Nunberg responded to us by e-mail from Edinburgh, Scotland. "Not unless the names of liberal and conservative politicians and groups occurred with equal frequency on the broadcasts. But in my own data, I found, for example, that the Heritage Foundation was mentioned in press stories five times as much as the [Americans for Democratic Action], and that Jesse Helms was mentioned five times as often as Barney Frank.

"By choosing not to report the use of labels as proportions of the frequencies of the names of groups, or to report those frequencies at all, the MRC loaded the results - in fact, it implies that the fact that the networks generally talk about conservatives more than about liberals is evidence for their liberal bias!"


posted by Steven Baum 6/27/2002 05:39:46 PM | link

MARSH ON GREED
Dave Marsh comments on the consequences of the recent Library of Congress decision establishing fees for webcasting recorded music.
...
Just as broadcast "deregulation" virtually wiped out small radio stations, the LoC's new rates ensure that webcast survivors will belong to very wealthy companies who can afford them. Clearly, that's now government policy, summed up by the LoC's rationalization: "...many Webcasters are currently generating very little revenue, [so] a percentage-of-revenue rate would require copyright owners to allow extensive use of their property with little or no compensation." As I've pointed out many times, protecting "copyright owners" means protecting big business, not artists. That the Librarian of Congress views songs solely as property, discarding their status as culture, is even more appalling.

As the stranglehold of big broadcasters became too much to endure in the '80s and '90s, one result was the rise of a pirate (so-called micropower) radio movement. Pirate radio became so pervasive that the FCC tried to create micropower licenses; big broadcasting stopped that in its tracks by corralling a batch of its pet legislators to object.

Some pirates became Webcasters. They (and many others) will likely become "pirates" again rather than pay rates set to destroy them. If the FCC couldn't police such stations when they needed relatively large transmitters, how is the government going to catch Web "pirates"?

All Web pirates will be aware that it was the cartel labels who drove them out of legitimacy. This means an opportunity to expose more of the RIAA's music will be turned into one more salad of snarling hatred. You don't even have to hope the RIAA chokes on it. Plummeting sales figures show it already is.

On a related note, has anyone else noticed that many new CD releases are being sold at around $10 rather than the usual $15+ pricetag? That is, the non-superstar new CDs they don't expect to sell in the millions. They still price the stuff they expect to sell in the millions at the highest rates.
posted by Steven Baum 6/27/2002 05:26:20 PM | link

RIDGE THE STRIKEBUSTER
Counterpunch reports how Homeland Uberfuhrer Ridge and coverboy Rumsfeld are interfering in labor negotations, the first step towards defining those evil labor unions as terrorists (i.e. enemies of the state) and getting rid of them for good.
At the rate things are going, it won't be long before labor organizers are being thrown into military prisons, held without warrant as "enemy combatants". Tom Ridge, director of the Office of homeland Security has been phoning Jim Spinosa, head of the West Coast's Longshoremen's Union, saying that a strike would be bad for the national interest. Next Monday sees the expiration of the current three-year contract between the Longshoremen and the employers, grouped in the Pacific Maritime Association. If the 10,000-strong longshoremen go on strike, ports from Seattle to San Diego could shut down, meaning a big jolt to the already floundering US economy.

A call to Spinosa by the Secretary of Labor would not be surprising, given the stakes, but a call from the man in charge of coordinating the battle against terrorism on America's home turf confirms all the Left's deepest fears that, as so often throughout the twentieth century, national security is being used to justify strike-breaking, invocation of the Taft-Hartley Act and declarations of national emergency to shut down labor activism and if necessary throw labor organizers in jail.
...

They also remind us it won't be the first time the U.S. government has done such things.
...
Longshoremen don't need to be told this. They know it's what happened to their most famous leader, Harry Bridges. In World War II the US government, particularly through the US Navy, cut deals with the Mob (mainly involving a hands-off posture on the drug trade), giving the Mobsters specific orders on which labor leaders to rough up and murder. Between 1942 and 1946 there were 26 unsolved murders of labor organizers and dockworkers, dumped in the water by the Mob, working in collusion with Navy Intelligence. (For more, reade our book Whiteout, which contains a chapter on this nasty affair.)
...

posted by Steven Baum 6/27/2002 05:19:27 PM | link

LIVE FROM ETHEL'S
After listening to several of my favorite live albums in recent weeks, I decided to engage in a little self indulgence and come up with yet another damned list. The older I get, the more I prefer live over studio albums. Good bands make good live albums. Bands that are not so good can make albums that initially sound okay, but which become increasingly sterile the more you listen to them. Here are some of the great live rock and/or roll albums.
  • Waiting for Columbus by Little Feat - This is the deluxe CD edition which, as opposed to the initial CD release, includes everything from the original 1978 vinyl release, plus includes several previously unreleased outtakes. Lowell's been gone 25 years now, but this album will never get old.
  • Live at Leeds by the Who - An expanded version of the 1970 vinyl release. Or should I say an exploded version since the remastered 1995 CD contains 14 tracks while the original album only had 6? This album will demonstrate why the real Who died with Keith Moon.
  • Cheap Trick at Budokan - Another expanded version of the original vinyl, with 9 tracks added to the original 10. I've not yet decided whether I prefer the expanded version to the original, although since both contain "Surrender" and "Ain't That a Shame" the point's probably moot.
  • Stop Making Sense by the Talking Heads - Another expansion job with the 9 original and 7 extra tracks. I saw the Heads live back in the late 1970s. They were a last minute replacement for a Halloween show at Ohio State that Lynyrd Skynrd would've played had their airplane stayed in the air. They rework many of their classic tunes on this disc, to very good effect.
  • Rust Never Sleeps (Live) - by Neil Young and Crazy Horse - The most powerful album ever released by one of the most powerful performers ever.
  • Rock of Ages by the Band - The best easily available live performance by one of the most incredibly tight live bands ever. Yes, it's better than even the rereleased Last Waltz 4-disc set, although the latter probably also belongs on any top 25 live list. This is another expanded set with a full second disc of previously unreleased stuff, including four with Dylan.
  • Bob Dylan Live, 1966: The Royal Albert Hall Concert - The (as in "THE") great and (in)famous live Dylan concert that's only been available via various bootlegs for the last quarter century. This includes an acoustic set and an electric set with the Band, the latter not overwhelmingly appreciated by the audience.
  • The Allman Brothers at Fillmore East - Duane died shortly after this album shipped in 1971, and southern blues/rock didn't get nearly this good again until Govt Mule.
  • It's Too Late to Stop Now by Van Morrison - The best live material from Van. This is the first of three official live releases, recorded in the early 1970s with his Caledonia Soul Orchestra.
  • Live at the Apollo, Vol. II by James Brown - What can I say that the hardest working man in show biz can't say better?
  • Complete Live at San Quentin by Johnny Cash - Yet another expansion of the original vinyl release. The bowdlerism practiced on the initial release has also been relaxed, with the full, unexpurgated version of the hit "A Boy Named Sue" available for the first time.
  • Band of Gypsys by Jimi Hendrix - The last official release from Hendrix before he died. He had ditched the Experience and replaced them with bassist Billy Cox and drummer Buddy Miles. The result is the best recorded and best played live Hendrix you're likely to find.
  • BBC Sessions (Live) by Led Zeppelin - Infinitely better than the wretched, egregious "Song Remains the Same", the latter having been recorded at the end of a long tour during which, as was the fashion in those days, to lads attempted to redefine wretched excess. Like the Dylan Albert Hall thing, this was only available as a bootleg until Jimmy Page recent digitally remastered and officialy released it.
  • No Sleep 'Til Hammersmith by Motorhead - The ultimate live heavy metal album cut in 1981 by Lemmy and the rest of that year's Motorhead version (i.e. Fast Eddie and Philthy Animal Taylor). This makes most other heavy metal live albums sound like Abba (not that I'm begrudging the lads in Metallica the megabucks they've pulled in since they discovered the enormous crossover potential of power ballads).
  • Lotus by Santana - This was a very rare 3 LP Japanese import until released on 2 CDs in 1991. It's nice to see Carlos becoming a pop star and getting some recognition and rewards after some lean years, but he'll never top this. His guitar work alone renders most of what he did afterwards superfluous.
  • Fandango by ZZ Top - Although only half of this was live, it was one hell of a half. Unfortunately, to appreciate the non-live half you'll have to dig up a copy of the original vinyl release (I found a cherry copy a few months back), since they "remastered" the studio stuff for the CD release, to the great detriment of the music. This was the real ZZ Top, before Billy Gibbons discovered that lucrative disco beat.
  • Kick Out the Jams by MC5 - A killer live album from 1968 Detroit, which gets extra points for ending with an 8 minute jam on a Sun Ra tune. Full appreciation of this requires a copy on 8-track, a muscle car with at least 400 cubes, and a case of Stroh's or PBR circa 1968.
I'll entertain any suggestions for additions to the list. I should also mention that I didn't include Springsteen's "Live 1975-1985" because the best live Springsteen (besides being there) is the bootleg compilation "All Those Years" which, if you look hard enough, you might be able to find somewhere on the web.
posted by Steven Baum 6/27/2002 02:14:56 PM | link

WEISBROT ON ARGENTINA
Mark Weisbrot explains how the IMF is "helping" Argentina.
..
Very simply, the IMF is practicing a form of extortion, and a fairly brutal one at that. A couple of months ago the World Bank was supposed to release some $700 million in funds for the unemployed—now numbering about a quarter of Argentina's labor force. But they decided to wait for the IMF's approval. On a recent visit to Argentina, I met with Dr. Nestor Oliveri, a physician who runs a health clinic for the poor in the neighborhood of Matanza, on the outskirts of Buenos Aires. He pointed to children jumping over an open drainage ditch. "They touch their mouths, and they get parasites. We have 30% malnutrition among children in this neighborhood."

And it is getting worse, in a country that was until recently the richest in Latin America.

What does the IMF want from Argentina? After more than six months of talks and pressure, it is not even clear. The government has already agreed to just about everything that the Fund demanded, including drastic spending cuts (especially for the provincial governments) and rewriting their bankruptcy laws to make these more favorable to creditors. Yet the IMF keeps moving the goal posts, and coming up with new demands. Some financial analysts have concluded that the IMF is deliberately punishing Argentina for defaulting on its international debt, so as to discourage others from taking this path.

The Fund's policy conditions will probably worsen the depression, by causing layoffs of hundreds of thousands of workers and reducing aggregate demand in the economy. For four years, the IMF has been arguing that the only way to get the economy growing is to first restore the confidence of investors, especially foreign investors.

But the measures that they have recommended to do this, such as cutting government spending, have further weakened the economy. These policies have therefore had the opposite effect. And now, by choking off credit from most other sources—i.e., its extortion—the Fund is accelerating the decline.

Unlike most countries that turn to the Fund, Argentina is currently running a trade surplus. This means that it does not really need external financing. Nor does it need dollars to fix its banking system, which now runs on pesos.

In other words, the country is capable of recovering on its own. At this point the biggest obstacle to re-starting growth may be the Fund itself. As the crisis drags on, Argentina may have to find a way to get around the IMF.



posted by Steven Baum 6/27/2002 11:09:58 AM | link

QUESTION
Does the fact that you have to ask for and obtain permission to protest - thus giving the "authorities" a legal justification for arresting you if you fart too loud - in just about all parts of the "last, best hope of freedom and democracy" make anyone else pause for thought?
posted by Steven Baum 6/27/2002 11:02:55 AM |
link

ANOTHER PITIFUL, HELPLESS GIANT
Ha'aretz tells us that Israel can now send a missile anywhere in the world. This means that now they could hit, say, the U.S.S. Liberty in U.S. waters should such an act be deemed necessary.
"From the moment the State of Israel has the capability to launch a satellite into orbit around the earth at a height of hundreds of kilometers, it established [its] capability to launch, by means of a missile, a payload to any location on the face of the earth," says the head of the Asher Institute at the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Prof. Moshe Gelman, in the wake of the launch of the Ofek 5 satellite.
...

posted by Steven Baum 6/27/2002 10:32:31 AM | link

FUN NEWS ITEM OF THE WEEK
This was obtained via A Dog's Life which, by the way, adds a very funny related joke to the mix.
OXLEY, Ala. -- Authorities in Loxley, Ala., are investigating the alleged beating of a preacher by funeral mourners who didn't like his blunt eulogy.

Glynis Bethel told The Associated Press that her husband -- the Rev. Orlando Bethel -- was attacked during a June 14 funeral and dragged out of the church.

That's because Bethel told mourners the deceased was in Hell and that they were headed the same way.

The dead man was Glynis Bethel's uncle.

Orlando Bethel referred to him as a "drunkard and a fornicator."

Glynis Bethel, who's also a preacher, says "the fornicators didn't like what he said so they got up and beat him."

She says police didn't make any arrests, so she and her husband -- who may have a broken nose -- are taking out warrants.


posted by Steven Baum 6/27/2002 10:07:39 AM | link

Wednesday, June 26, 2002

A LACK OF MORAL CLARITY
In a story apparently missed by William Bennett when writing his latest screed about the failed morals of the liberal and the poor,
USA Today (via Cursor) reports that CEOs also cheat at golf.
Chad Struer has played golf with almost 20 Fortune 500 CEOs. One in three cheats, he says. Struer finds that rather peculiar, because those same CEOs hire him and his Salinas, Calif., company, USA Diligence, to investigate the honesty of start-up companies so the CEOs can decide whether to invest. One CEO, whom Struer calls "good-hearted," so habitually shaves strokes that he consistently scores in the mid-80s when it is obvious he would never break 100. Another, in the middle of a frustrating round, intentionally drove his cart over Struer's ball. "They're used to having things their way," Struer says. "He who holds the gold makes the rules." This might pass unnoticed in normal times, but in these post-Enron days of rampant skullduggery and the taking of the Fifth Amendment, it may be fair to wonder whether golf cheating is another symptom of an anything-goes mentality. Moreover, if a survey being released Wednesday is any indicator, Struer might be low in his estimate of one in three cheating.

posted by Steven Baum 6/26/2002 04:39:47 PM | link

THE FILTH ON "MINORITY REPORT"
The Filthy Critic gives the business to Speilberg's "Minority Report."
...
This movie is as powerfully overblown as Kirk Member was on Lip Planet in Suck Rodgers in the 69th Century. Sure Minority Report looks nice, but so do those Franklin Mint figurines of little boys taking their first shits. And just like those, the question is why be so extravagant? The point that everybody poops does not require a limited-edition, hand-painted porcelain doll. This crime thriller doesn't need similar treatment. I guess what I'm saying it that just because the futuristic element of the story sounds like something off a Rush album that doesn't mean it has to be just as overproduced. And for God's sake, someone shut Geddy Lee up.

It's a story that would have worked a hell of a lot better on the cheap, down and dirty and starring unknown people that don't have the baggage of that asshole Cruise. Spielberg is so fucking anal that his dirty and gritty looks like it came from "Architectural Digest." He is eager to please the people and to assume we're idiots looking for nothing more than eye candy so he makes his dark and dingy aesthetically appealing and full of gee-whiz techno crap. He smothers the story in layers and layers of "look-at-this" moments that don't add anything. He should watch Touch of Evil to get the right look and to see how a big-shot director really can make a dirty, ugly movie.

The cool bits, like the way people's privacy has slowly been eroded to the point that they are automatically identified by retina scanners wherever they go, are totally undermined. Holy shit, it would be creepy to go to the liquor store with Mrs. Filthy and hear some disembodied voice say "Welcome back, Mr. Filthy. We set aside the latest issue of Naked Amputee for you." I'd be fucked. But, in this movie that angle is sold to the highest bidder. Gap, Pepsi and about a dozen others sell their shit through Spielberg's dystopian vision, and they sure as hell aren't trying to look bad doing it.
...


posted by Steven Baum 6/26/2002 04:14:33 PM | link

BUSH'S FANTASY
Jonathan Freedland does the best job I've found of dissecting Bush's "Is there anything I missed, Mr. Sharon, sir?" speech.
...
It bore so little relation to reality that diplomats around the world spent yesterday shaking their heads in disbelief, before sinking into gloom and despair. Our own Foreign Office tried gamely to spot the odd nugget of sense in the Bush text - but, they admitted, it was an uphill struggle. Israelis committed to a political resolution of the conflict were heartbroken. Even Shimon Peres, foreign minister in Ariel Sharon's coalition, reportedly called the speech "a fatal mistake", warning: "A bloodbath can be expected."

The core of the president's message was that the Palestinians must embark on a sweeping process of internal reform before they can even think about getting back to the negotiating table. They must transform themselves into a democratic market economy, free of corruption and with a separate judiciary and legislature if they are to be considered eligible for statehood - which, when it comes, will be merely provisional.

Shall we count the ways in which this is completely absurd? George Bush is demanding that Palestine become Sweden before it can become Palestine: it must be stable, prosperous and boast constitutional arrangements which still elude Britain - our judiciary and legislature are not separate - let alone the Arab world before it can become even a state-in-waiting.

This would be laughable if Palestine were in tranquil Scandinavia. Even there it would count as putting the cart before the horse, asking a nation to create the institutions of a highly developed country before it becomes a state. But this, remember, is being demanded of the Palestinians - statebuilders with every possible obstacle in their way.

Like the fact that they are under military occupation. As the New York Times noted yesterday: "How the Palestinians can be expected to carry out elections or reform themselves while in a total lockdown by the Israeli military remains something of a mystery." Palestinian ministers complain they cannot visit a village 10 minutes away; they can pass laws but not implement them. They are Potemkin ministers, existing on paper only. Yet now they are to build the Switzerland of the Levant, where the streets are clean and government functions like clockwork. This is George in Wonderland stuff.

Monday's speech even had a touch of black comedy. The president said the new Palestine should be taught good governance, nominating the Arab states for the role. Imagine it: democracy lessons from Saudi Arabia, a masterclass in liberty from Kuwait.

But that is not the president's greatest fantasy. Yasser Arafat must go, he says, though without naming him. It may be refreshing to hear a US president come clean in his conviction that he has the right to pick other nations' leaders, but this demand exposes fully the vacuousness of Bush's thinking.

For who does he imagine might replace Arafat? Does he not realise that Palestinians are angry with their leader not because he has been insufficiently pro-American but because they see him as too moderate, too willing to do Israel's bidding. The Palestinian street is not clamouring for a man who will crack down harder on Islamist militants or sing a western song about free trade and local elections.
...


posted by Steven Baum 6/26/2002 04:01:15 PM | link

BUT THIS IS DIFFERENT
An
AP report describes an event in Argentina which would, if it took place in Venezuela, be trumpeted by the usual suspects as a necessary and sufficient justification for a coup.
Police and national guardsmen fired tear gas Wednesday at hundreds of jobless protesters trying to blockade highways around the capital. Two people were reported killed and about 60 were arrested.

Demonstrators said dozens of their colleagues were injured, claiming police fired on them from rooftops, shops and an elevated pedestrian walkway. The claim could not be independently verified.
...

Note especially that last sentence, not seen in the NYTimes when it parroted statements by Otto Reich et al. that Chavez ordered his troops to fire on the protesters in Venezuela, despite several accounts to the contrary. Note also the attempted justification of the Argentine incident via the "jobless protesters trying to blockade highways" line, as opposed to the peaceful hundreds of thousands (if not trillions) in Venezuela who, despite their numbers, apparently managed to keep to the sidewalks.
posted by Steven Baum 6/26/2002 03:18:50 PM | link

U.S. AGRICULTURAL SUBSIDIES
U.S. govt. ag. subsidies
An Economist article tells who gets the vast majority of agricultural subsidies, and it sure isn't the small farmers.
In 1996 the Republican-led Congress passed the Freedom to Farm Act. Among other things, the measure let farmers receive subsidies while planting whatever they wanted, rather than what the government told them to. In return, Congress mandated that the government would, over time, stop supporting America's farms. Commodity prices were good then, and federal payments were low enough to make the plan seem feasible.

But commodity prices plummeted, and five years later federal farm aid soared to $32 billion (bringing the total disbursements over the past 40 years to around $350 billion). Net farm income shows no signs of increasing without federal intervention. Government spending per head in the Great Plains is higher than anywhere else in the country (see map).

According to Ford Runge, a professor of applied economics at the University of Minnesota, "the public does not seem to be getting what they think they are getting." Roughly 20% of farmers, he estimates, are receiving some 80% of the federal subsidies. This 20% also happen to own the largest farms. They are using the federal subsidies mainly to remain viable, but also to bid land away from other farmers. The cap for federal subsidies is very high; so the larger farms get, the more subsidies they receive. As large farms bid up land prices, capital costs for smaller operations rise, and young people find it harder to buy land. In this way, say Mr Runge and others, the federal government, far from propping up small farming towns, is hastening their decline.
...


posted by Steven Baum 6/26/2002 02:33:26 PM | link

SWEATSHOPS VS. CRACK WHORES
Phil Jones responds to Nicholas Kristof's troll about third world sweatshops. The latter would have us believe that the only choices are the sweatshops or AIDS-ridden prostitution.
Sweatshops can be criticised on 3 grounds : unhealthy, dangerous working conditions and mistreatment of workers (of which many cases are well documented); low wages; and young "underage" workers.

Of the three, the first is most serious and inexcusable. Arguments of Kristof's kind - that it's OK because the alternative are worse - wouldn't be acceptable in any other context. Compare "it's good that pickpockets relieve you of your money, because otherwise you might get violently assaulted for it." Given the choice we'd all prefer the pickpocket to the mugger, but this doesn't excuse or make the pickpocket tolerable.

Assuming we remain right to be critical of (and boycott) abusive and dangerous workplaces wherever they occur, then we do have some room for sensible thinking about well run, healthy employers of cheap, child labour.

Of course if the wage is comparable or better than other forms of employment, in agriculture or construction, then we shouldn't be too worried that it seems outrageously low by Western standards. There is a caveat. We should remember that many countries which are being encouraged to sell their workforce as cheap labour for Western manufacturers, are also countries where Western import restrictions on agricultural products keep their farming sectors from expanding and perhaps becoming richer, better employers. The same goes for the sex industry, where Western tourists are major consumers. If the West doesn't tax Cambodian prostitution, but taxes Cambodian rice, aren't we partly responsible for pushing the inhabitants in that direction?

Finally there is an economic argument to be made as to whether it is good value for a nation's children to be working in low-skilled industrial assembly. On the one hand, the argument can go, that an industrial phase is good for changing the economy of a nation, and bringing in technology and technological skills. On the other hand, young children going into sweatshops are potentially missing education. And in a time when the West believes it's moving to a service oriented economy, it may be that kids in third world countries would be better off learning traditional crafts coupled with entrepreneurial and service skills on the street, than learning to punch clocks in factories.

We desperately need good research as to, for example, whether workers in sweatshops do develop and leave to become manufacturing entrepreneurs or craftsmen; or whether they are precisely *so badly* educated and prepared for other work, that when the sweatshop closes they're only fit for slavery in the sex industry?

Anyone care to guess who definitely isn't going to fund such research?
posted by Steven Baum 6/26/2002 01:36:28 PM | link

PENSIONS UNDER ASSAULT
Ross Eisenbrey explains how the GOP-dominated House, under the guise of the Pension Security Act of 2002, ostensibly designed to protect employee pensions, is attempting yet another scheme to make the wealthy wealthier at the expense of the middle and lower class.
In response to the Enron scandal and the terrible losses its employees experienced in their 401(k) retirement plans, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 3762, the Pension Security Act of 2002. While most of the bill is of debatable merit, one provision - Section 204 - runs completely contrary to the goal of protecting employee pensions. This provision would permit employers to dump lower-paid employees from their pension plans while covering 100% of the most highly compensated executives. If Section 204 of this bill becomes law, it will put at risk the pension coverage and retirement security of millions of workers.
...
The House-passed bill would return the test of pension fairness to its pre-1986 uncertainty, giving employers the opportunity to restructure their pension plans and exclude most of their lower-paid employees. Under the guise of encouraging small employers to create pension plans, Section 204 in reality would allow plans that fail both of the 70% tests to still qualify for tax subsidies. Thus, a plan that covers 100% of the highest paid executives but only 35% of the lower-paid employees could qualify for these tax incentives even though the average benefit percentage for top executives is far more generous than for lower-paid employees. This almost certainly would lead to the creation of new pension plans, but it would skew the tax benefits of the pension system even more radically to the wealthy and do little to broaden employee coverage, which ought to be the foremost goal.

Supporters of the House bill argue that the Treasury Department can be trusted to prevent abuses of this new "flexibility." Section 204, however, provides that plans must be submitted to the treasury secretary for approval only if the secretary takes action to require it. If the treasury secretary does not act affirmatively to issue regulations and to specify conditions to "appropriately limit" this new flexibility, no limits will apply. In essence, unless the agency acts, the 70% tests are effectively repealed by the statute.

President Bush has called on Congress to make sure that the rules that apply to the "top floor" apply equally to the "shop floor." That laudable goal could be accomplished by strengthening the law that requires top executives and the highly compensated to get no greater or better coverage than the lower-paid employees. Instead, the House has taken a sharp turn in the opposite direction to undo the rules that maintain any semblance of fairness between the shop floor and the top floor.

Bush's comment about equal rules applying to the top and shop floors - given that at least his handlers and speechwriters know what's going on - just further belies the rhetorical bullshit behind that nauseauting oxymoron "compassionate conservatism".
posted by Steven Baum 6/26/2002 10:56:08 AM | link

FIFTEEN FALLACIES
The late
William Vickrey penned a document in 1996 entitled "Fifteen Fatal Fallacies of Financial Fundamentalism". Here are the fallacies. See the site for details. Technical terms are used, so some familiarity with the language of economics would be helpful in ingesting the following, especially the longer explanations.
  1. Deficits are considered to represent sinful profligate spending at the expense of future generations who will be left with a smaller endowment of invested capital. This fallacy seems to stem from a false analogy to borrowing by individuals.
  2. Urging or providing incentives for individuals to try to save more is said to stimulate investment and economic growth. This seems to derive from an assumption of an unchanged aggregate output so that what is not used for consumption will necessarily and automatically be devoted to capital formation.
  3. Government borrowing is supposed to "crowd out" private investment.
  4. Inflation is called the "cruelest tax." The perception seems to be that if only prices would stop rising, one's income would go further, disregarding the consequences for income.
  5. "A chronic trend towards inflation is a reflection of living beyond our means." Alfred Kahn, quoted in Cornell '93, summer issue.
  6. It is thought necessary to keep unemployment at a "non-inflation-accelerating" level ("NIARU") in the range of 4% to 6% if inflation is to be kept from increasing unacceptably.
  7. Many profess a faith that if only governments would stop meddling, and balance their budgets, free capital markets would in their own good time bring about prosperity, possibly with the aid of "sound" monetary policy. It is assumed that there is a market mechanism by which interest rates adjust promptly and automatically to equate planned saving and investment in a manner analogous to the market by which the price of potatoes balances supply and demand. In reality no such market mechanism exists; if a prosperous equilibrium is to be achieved it will require deliberate intervention on the part of monetary authorities.
  8. If deficits continue, the debt service would eventually swamp the fisc.
  9. The negative effect of considering the overhanging burden of the increased debt would, it is claimed, cancel the stimulative effect of the deficit. This sweeping claim depends on a failure to analyze the situation in detail.
  10. The value of the national currency in terms of foreign exchange (or gold) is held to be a measure of economic health, and steps to maintain that value are thought to contribute to this health. In some quarters a kind of jingoistic pride is taken in the value of one's currency, or satisfaction may be derived from the greater purchasing power of the domestic currency in terms of foreign travel.
  11. It is claimed that exemption of capital gains from income tax will promote investment and growth.
  12. Debt would, it is held, eventually reach levels that cause lenders to balk with taxpayers threatening rebellion and default.
  13. Authorizing income-generating budget deficits results in larger and possibly more extravagant, wasteful and oppressive government expenditures.
  14. Government debt is thought of as a burden handed on from one generation to its children and grandchildren.
  15. Unemployment is not due to lack of effective demand, reducible by demand-increasing deficits, but is either "structural," resulting from a mismatch between the skills of the unemployed and the requirements of jobs, or "regulatory", resulting from minimum wage laws, restrictions on the employment of classes of individuals in certain occupations, requirements for medical coverage, or burdensome dismissal constraints, or is "voluntary," in part the result of excessively generous and poorly designed social insurance and relief provisions.
    posted by Steven Baum 6/26/2002 10:41:28 AM | link

AMTRAK BASHING
Derrick Jackson of the Boston Globe (via
Progressive Review) provides rebuttal to those riding on the Amtrak bashing bandwagon. Apparently some transportation subsidies are better than others.
Last year alone the nation's highways and roads received $32 billion from the Department of Transportation, more than the $24 billion Amtrak has received in its entire 31 years. Air travel, at $13 billion last year, receives more funding in two years than Amtrak has in its three decades. The General Accounting Office this year said the cost of modernizing America's passenger rail system would be $30 billion over the next 20 years. That is still less than what America spent last year on highways. In its budget request for 2003, the Department of Transportation spent most of the section devoted to Amtrak complaining about the money it has lost, $20.4 billion since 1971. The White House says that Amtrak has ''utterly failed.'' The White House says that Amtrak's stupid mortgaging of Penn Station in New York to cover losses was a ''financial absurdity.'' It concluded that Amtrak is ''clearly in desperate financial condition.'' Amtrak is so beaten down by this bad-mouthing that it has asked for only $1.2 billion next year, less than half of what GAO says it would take for modernization. There is no such bad-mouthing for highways and airlines. The roads get their money even though last month Kenneth Mead, the inspector general of the Department of Transportation, reported that the amount of money recovered from highway construction fraud has tripled in the last three years to $43 million. The Big Dig will get finished by the feds and Massachusetts taxpayers even though a project that began with a projected price tag of $2.5 billion will now cost about $15 billion.

posted by Steven Baum 6/26/2002 10:04:19 AM | link

SMITH PONTIFICATES
L. Neil Smith, a most tendentious libertarian, pens an entertaining piece called War of the Weenies. The phrase "collectivist trash" and the summation of William Bennett are worth the price of admission.
...
In time of war, for example, the more hawkish types among us would dearly love to be relieved of that burdensome moral obligation we all labor under to behave justly and decently toward other human beings. If they can only fight back against specific individuals who attacked them, they can't very well justify dropping explosives, incendiaries, microorganisms, poison chemicals, or thermonuclear bombs on entire populations -- not two percent of which, in most cases, ever raised a hand against them, bears them any ill will, or even thinks about them very much. The Non-Aggression Principle allows no room for "collateral damage".

Disagree with the above -- with any of the above -- and you're not a libertarian, nor are you an individualist. You're just another piece of collectivist trash, attempting to whitewash taking it on yourself to mete out group-punishment to folks as a whole who never did you any harm.

To me, the most astonishing and dismaying part about everything that's happened since the murderous events of September 11, 2001, is the fact that all of this seems to need explaining, all over again, to people who've been calling themselves "libertarians" for decades. It's almost as if they've been waiting all these years for some phenomenon that would allow them to tear off their principles -- like a campaign button for an unsuccessful candidate -- and at long last, join the "mainstream".

It wasn't all that long ago that I wrote an article commenting on a fact that seems to characterize the current unpleasantness. Every conservative my age who was enrolled in a seminary during the war in Vietnam, and every pencil-necked neocon who can't lift his own volume in plastic packing peanuts, is screaming for blood -- any blood -- as long as it can be connected, even falsely, with the World Trade Center hijackers. What they want is to wallow on the sofa, watching TV and stuffing Cheetos in their fat faces while young, strong, healthy men are expected to go in harm's way for them and do their dangerous dirtywork. It's what I called "the unquenchable bloodlust of the sedentary".
...
By the way, if you entertain any doubt whatever regarding exactly who and what William Bennett is, I cordially invite you to check him out yourself on the web. He is no friend of freedom -- and never has been. I doubt that the man has said anything in public over the past ten years that Benito Mussolini himself wouldn't have approved of thoroughly.
...


posted by Steven Baum 6/26/2002 09:36:36 AM | link

JOLLY OLD ENGLAND
England caricature map

posted by Steven Baum 6/26/2002 09:17:16 AM | link

Tuesday, June 25, 2002

THE FORTUNE 7
The revolutionaries at Fortune Magazine summarize and prescribe solutions for what they call a
System Failure.
  1. First, there's the problem of earnings reports which Fortune says are about as credible as Olymmpic figure skating judges.

    First, get rid of the absolute funniest numbers--the so-called pro forma earnings companies use to divert attention from their real results. We're talking about things like adjusted earnings, operating earnings, cash earnings, and Ebitda (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization). If companies want to tout such random, unaudited, watch-me-pull-a-rabbit-out-of-my-hat figures in their press releases, well, fine. But investors should immediately be able to compare these figures with full financial statements prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) rather than have to wait 45 days or more for the company's SEC filing.
    ...
    Next, stop the abuse of restructuring charges. The cost of things like plant closings and lay-offs is just part of doing business and should count as an operating expense, not as a special one-time charge. Plus, companies too often set up a reserve to cover restructuring costs, then later quietly shift some of that money back into profits. If that happens, investors ought to know about it. The SEC should make sure they do.

    Another favorite accounting trick that has to go: the use of overfunded pension plans to boost income. Standard & Poor's, in its newly formulated "core earnings'' measure, excludes pension income altogether, while including any pension costs. That's not a bad solution, since pension expenses are real, but a company can get its hands on pension income only by dissolving the plan, distributing benefits, and then paying ridiculously high taxes on the remaining money. At the very least companies should be forced to recognize the actual gains and losses of their pension plans--not simply estimate them based on prior years' returns.
    ...

  2. Then there's the conflict of interest problem, wherein what used to be called the Chinese Wall has gradually disappeared.

    We should know by now that research with integrity is simply not possible without a Chinese wall. But the most common reform proposal being kicked around--that researchers should not be paid directly for their investment-banking work--doesn't go nearly far enough in resurrecting it. It's way too easy to get around. Still, there is a surprisingly simple fix: Enact a regulation that forbids analysts from being involved in banking deals, period.

    Think about it for a second: Why are analysts involved in deals in the first place? The standard answer you get from Wall Street is that they are there to protect investors. They are supposed to "vet" deals on behalf of the investing public--and if they think an IPO doesn't pass the smell test, they are supposed to have the power to force the firm to pass on it. But we all know that is not how it works in reality--if it ever did. In fact, analysts serve as a marketing tool, implicitly (and sometimes explicitly) promising favorable coverage if their firm is allowed to underwrite the deal.

  3. Next, we learn of the long and deliberate emasculation of the SEC's ability to police the thieves.
    ...
    The agency by law is charged with reviewing the financial filings of 17,000 public companies, overseeing a universe of mutual funds that has grown more than fourfold (in assets) in the past decade, vetting every brokerage firm, ensuring the proper operation of the exchanges, being vigilant against countless potential market manipulations, insider trading, and accounting transgressions--and investigating whenever anything goes wrong. Yet as the $12 trillion stock market becomes ever more complex, the SEC hasn't been given enough resources even to read annual reports. Seriously. One of the agency's chief accountants admitted in a speech last year that only one in 15 annual reports was reviewed in 2000. Take your guess on Enron.

    How many lawyers, you ask, does the SEC have to study the disclosure documents of 17,000 public companies? About 100, says Laura S. Unger, the commission's former acting chairwoman. The number of senior forensic accountants in the enforcement division--the kind of experts who can decipher Enron's balance sheets--is far fewer than that. And as if that isn't bad enough, staffers are leaving in droves. The reason is a familiar one: money. Forget about how poor civil service pay is compared with that of the private sector. The SEC's attorneys and examiners are paid 25% to 40% less than those of even comparable federal agencies, like the FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller.
    ...

    And it's not even that the SEC is underfunded. It takes in over $2 billion in processing fees per year, which Congress diverts to other uses. This serves a double purpose of ensuring that their buddies don't get policed, and allowing the deleterious effects of further tax cuts (mostly for those not being policed) to be masked.

  4. Then we have the ridiculously high rates of compensation for CEOs, which are only tenuously correlated with company performance. There's one very easy and quick way to reign a lot of this in.
    ...
    Force companies to stop pretending that the stock options they give their executives are free.

    t's probably safe to say that Oracle's board would never have paid Larry Ellison $706 million in cash or any other form that would have to show up on the company's earnings statement. All that money (Ellison didn't get a salary last year) came from exercising stock options that the company had given him in earlier years. And because of the current screwed-up accounting for stock options, Oracle's earnings statement says that Ellison's bonanza didn't cost the company a cent.
    ...

  5. Then there are those hotbeds of chicanery called corporate boards, a problem currently being addressed by a NYSE report proposing sweeping reforms.

    The report calls for nearly everything Minow and other shareholder activists have been clamoring for--from a shareholder vote on stock option grants to annual performance evaluations of directors to the requirement that each board publish a code of ethics. The big one, though, concerns the independence of boards.

    As Enron and its ilk have shown, too often directors aren't really independent. Even so-called outsiders end up having some ties to the CEO. "On the surface Enron's board looked independent,'' says Jay Lorsch, a governance professor at the Harvard Business School. "But everybody on that board was selected by Ken Lay." And when the CEO dominates, the rest of the board is often too cowed to question his leadership. "Right now in many board meetings there is no dialogue," a prominent board consultant told Fortune. "Directors will just sit and watch the presentations. At the end they nod and say, 'Great.' "
    ...

  6. Next we have the IPOs that were worshipped more than a little too much during the high tech bubble. Fortune's not candycoating this one.

    ...
    The main source of corruption in America's financial markets is the sordid, antiquated world of initial public offerings.

    It's the ultimate kickback business: Wall Street firms set offering prices for startups far below their real value, then offer the cheap shares to their best customers--mutual and hedge funds--in exchange for inflated commissions. The funds then make a killing when the shares invariably zoom on the first day of trading.

    Nice for them. Nice for Wall Street. But it's an awfully raw deal for the startups--and for the rest of us. During the tech bubble, underpricing became outrageous. In 1999 and 2000, new companies raised $121 billion through IPOs, but shares soared so high the first day that they left $62 billion on the table, money they could have used for R&D or building brands. In addition, startups must pay a 7% fee that Wall Street refuses to negotiate. The upshot: For every dollar startups raised in 1999 and 2000, they paid 58 cents in a combination of fees and forgone proceeds. Meanwhile, according to Jay Ritter, a professor at the University of Florida, the grateful funds repaid Wall Street with at least $6 billion in inflated commissions over that period.
    ...

  7. Finally, they say that shareholders should act like owners.

    ...
    A mere 75 mutual funds, pensions, and other institutional shareholders control $6.3 trillion worth of stock--or some 44% of the market. With power like that, real reform is only a proxy vote away.

    posted by Steven Baum 6/25/2002 02:07:35 PM | link

ANOTHER CORPORATE AVATAR
The
NYTimes reports on another fine, upstanding corporate citizen. This one is Wal-Mart, and it's extorting its employees to work overtime and not get paid for it.
After finishing her 10 p.m. to 8 a.m. shift, Verette Richardson clocked out and was heading to her car when a Wal-Mart manager ordered her to turn around and straighten up the store's apparel department.

Eager not to get on her boss's bad side, she said, she spent the next hour working unpaid, tidying racks of slacks and blouses and picking up hangers and clothes that had fallen to the floor. Other times after clocking out, she was ordered to round up shopping carts in the parking lot.

Some days, as soon as she walked in a manager told her to rush to a cash register and start ringing up purchases, without clocking in. Sometimes, she said, she worked for three hours before clocking in.

"They wanted us to do a lot of work for no pay," said Ms. Richardson, who worked from 1995 to 2000 at a Wal-Mart in southeast Kansas City. "A company that makes billions of dollars doesn't have to do that."

But she and 40 other current and former Wal-Mart workers interviewed over the last four months say Wal-Mart has done just that, forcing or pressuring employees to work hours that were not recorded or paid. Federal and state laws bar employers from making hourly employees work unpaid hours. Wal-Mart's policies forbid such work. But many current and former workers and managers said an intense focus on cost cutting had created an unofficial policy that encouraged managers to request or require off-the-clock work and avoid paying overtime.
...

Wal-Mart's official policy, of course, forbids working overtime for pay. Corporate spokespersons will undoubtedly spin this as the evil federal government's laws against overtime forcing workers who really, really want to work overtime for free to leave and not be able to please their benevolent employers.

You can also expect to hear how they've learned their lesson, they're very contrite, and it will never, ever happen again. And they have some land in Florida they want to sell you.

...
Two years ago, Wal-Mart paid $50 million to settle a class-action suit that asserted that 69,000 current and former Wal-Mart employees in Colorado had worked off the clock.

But legal papers and interviews with workers suggest that the off-the-clock problems go far beyond Colorado. In depositions and in interviews with The New York Times, Wal-Mart employees in 18 states described these types of off-the-clock work:

  • Former employees at stores in California, Louisiana, New York, Ohio, Oregon and Washington said that many evenings when their stores closed, managers locked the front door and prevented workers - even those who had clocked out - from leaving until everyone finished straightening the store. Workers said these lock-ins, which aim to prevent theft, forced many employees to work an hour or two unpaid and enraged parents whose school-age children worked at Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart officials acknowledged that employees were sometimes locked in but said the policy was to pay workers for every hour they were.
  • Employees at stores in six states said managers ordered them to clock out after their eight-hour shifts and then continue working.
  • Some employees said they frequently took it upon themselves to clock out after their regular shift and then return to work, with their managers' knowledge and approval. They said they feared that if they did not finish their daily tasks before going home, they would be written up or fired.
  • A dozen Wal-Mart workers, including four in the payroll department, said managers deleted hours from employee timecards to avoid paying overtime. Wal-Mart officials said the company strictly forbade this practice and disciplined managers who did it.
But to be fair, the largest and wealthiest retail chain on the planet (with $220 billion in annual sales) pays each hourly employee an exorbitant $8.50 per hour, which amounts to a Rockefeller-like $17,680 a year for a full-time worker.
posted by Steven Baum 6/25/2002 01:42:12 PM | link

FIGHTING GUNS WITH BUTTER
That Israel is overwhelmingly superior to the Arab world in military power is doubted by few.
Marcus Cohen speculates that the Arabs may choose to wage economic war against an Israel whose economy is quickly spiraling downwards, being kept afloat presently only via U.S. dollars.
...
The Arab world is slowly, but dangerously building up a consensus on the Palestinian issue. Both the United States and Israel are likely to become the targets of increasing hostility and even Turkey may be hard pressed to maintain its current relationship with Israel. The Arab states have three huge advantages over Israel despite its military prowess, until now however a co-ordinated and determined use of these has not occurred. The Arab nations simply put, have a much greater combined population and the imbalance is set to increase making Israel's continued survival somewhat problematical should the Arab world find a way to successfully use this advantage in war, but undoubtedly the biggest potential threat to Israel is America's need of secure Middle Eastern oil supplies and the fact that if the Arab nations could finally get their act together, they can outspend Israel many times over. There is no reason to believe that those Arab analysts who argue that the chronic inability to defeat Israel on the battlefield should not preclude the destruction of Israel economically by challenging and destabilising Jewish business, industry and its financial community on world-wide basis are not now winning the attention of many Arab leaders including those of Saudi Arabia and other oil rich states.
...
The question isn't whether Israel would respond militarily to those waging economic war against it (seeing how they've done that before), but rather where they'd draw the line. The bloodthirsty butcher of Sabra and Shatila has the only real nukes in the Middle East, and probably has over 100 of them.
posted by Steven Baum 6/25/2002 11:34:16 AM | link

HUH?
From our "Having Your Cake and Eating It, Too" department, we learn that the Cabal is now
sneering at Al-Qaida when it claims it's 98% intact and ready to invade (via Harlingen, of course).
The US military yesterday dismissed as "wishful thinking" new threats from an al-Qaida spokesman who said Osama bin Laden's terrorist network was still intact and preparing new attacks.

"We felt that we have had a significant impact on their ability to perform, command and control," Colonel Roger King, a US army spokesman at the military base at Bagram in Afghanistan, said.

In an audiotape handed to the al-Jazeera television station at the weekend, a known al-Qaida spokesman said "98%" of the network was still intact and claimed Bin Laden was alive and well. The spokesman warned America to expect more attacks "in the coming days and months".

But Col King said the US military believed al-Qaida no longer maintained a viable central command. "We don't feel that they can effectively do that with their bodies of forces at this time," he said. "We think that is a direct result of our actions and I feel if someone from al-Qaida says that 98% of their command and control is still effective, it's wishful thinking on their part."
...

This supposedly devastated Al-Qaida is the very same bogeyman the Cabal invokes as justification every time it announces yet another attempt to encroach on civil liberties and the Constitution. That is, the hucksters and con men running the Cabal want us to simultaneously believe that their mercenaries dealt a stunning blow to Al-Qaida (thus justifying further massive increases in military spending for foreign adventures), but that the danger to the precious chilluns and other flag-waving, god-fearin' Americans has not only not been decreased, but may be greater than ever (thus justifying further massive increases in military spending for domestic adventures). I look forward to seeing the usual pack of bloviators attempting to explain this latest steaming, antinomic pile from the Forever War Cabal.
posted by Steven Baum 6/25/2002 10:24:07 AM | link

Monday, June 24, 2002

MORE MISSILE "DEFENSE" CHICANERY
The
Colorado Springs Independent (via Progressive Review) tells of fraud in the missile defense program. This time it's financial fraud rather than fraudulently reporting negative test results as positive. Most mlitary spending involves some illegal diversion of funds to the wealthy and well-connected, in addition to the legal transfer of wealth to the upper financial classes.
The national missile-defense system is supposed to protect America against a nuclear attack. Biff Baker's job was to protect American taxpayers against getting ripped off by the agencies and contractors developing the system.

When he did his job too well, he says, he was fired.

Now, federal investigators are looking into Baker's allegations that agencies working on the missile-defense program are engaging in fraud, waste and abuse.

Baker of Colorado Springs, claims the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency and the Army Space and Missile Defense Command have been awarding sole-source contracts to a defense contracting company run by a retired high-ranking general, who at one point served as assistant vice chief of staff for the Army.

This, Baker maintains, not only raises questions about business dealings between current and retired command staff, but also violates federal regulations that require contracts to be awarded through a competitive bid process.

Baker, himself a former Army Space Command lieutenant colonel, says he discovered the questionable practices in late 2001 and early this year while working as a civilian employee on the missile-defense program. When he brought his concerns to the attention of a high-ranking missile-defense official in March, slanderous rumors about his personal character began circulating within days, he says.
...


posted by Steven Baum 6/24/2002 05:27:00 PM | link

CEONISTAS HEAD FOR THE HILLS
Martha's on the lam
Satire Wire tells of thousands of renegade CEOs heading for the hills. In the words of outlaw Martha Stewart, "Call me mint jelly because I'm on the lam."
Unwilling to wait for their eventual indictments, the 10,000 remaining CEOs of public U.S. companies made a break for it yesterday, heading for the Mexican border, plundering towns and villages along the way, and writing the entire rampage off as a marketing expense.

"They came into my home, made me pay for my own TV, then double-booked the revenues," said Rachel Sanchez of Las Cruces, just north of El Paso. "Right in front of my daughters."

Calling themselves the CEOnistas, the chief executives were first spotted last night along the Rio Grande River near Quemado, where they bought each of the town's 320 residents by borrowing against pension fund gains. By late this morning, the CEOnistas had arbitrarily inflated Quemado's population to 960, and declared a 200 percent profit for the fiscal second quarter.

This morning, the outlaws bought the city of Waco, transferred its underperforming areas to a private partnership, and sent a bill to California for $4.5 billion.

Law enforcement officials and disgruntled shareholders riding posse were noticeably frustrated.

"First of all, they're very hard to find because they always stand behind their numbers, and the numbers keep shifting," said posse spokesman Dean Levitt. "And every time we yell 'Stop in the name of the shareholders!', they refer us to investor relations. I've been on the phone all damn morning."
...


posted by Steven Baum 6/24/2002 04:21:14 PM | link

AMERICA'S MERCENARIES
Uncle Sam is financing a 1500 person extra-legal mercenary army in Bolivia whose ostensible purpose is to battle that fierce, unrelenting foe known as coca leaves. The
article fails to mention if only the Marxist coca leaves are being targeted.
The wary residents of this sweltering town in Bolivia's remote Chapare jungle have a nickname for the uniformed newcomers: "America's mercenaries."

The Expeditionary Task Force, the official name for an armed unit of 1,500 former Bolivian soldiers, is paid, fed, clothed and trained by the U.S. Embassy in La Paz, the Bolivian capital. Since setting up camp 18 months ago on three bases around this town of 2,000 inhabitants, the troops and their assault rifles have become a common sight on the local highway, putting down protests along the steamy jungle road by peasants combating a sweeping, U.S.-backed campaign to eradicate the area's biggest cash crop -- coca.

The force, which has tripled in size since its inception, has become one of the most contentious signs of Washington's involvement in the drug war.

U.S. and Bolivian military officials say the unit has played a vital role in an aggressive attempt to eradicate coca from the Chapare jungle, a region larger than Connecticut that provided the basic ingredient for almost half the world's cocaine during the 1980s and 1990s. Although the soldiers are directly salaried by the U.S. government, American and Bolivian officials describe the outfit as "a group of reservists" within a regular Bolivian army brigade and commanded by regular Bolivian officers.

But a growing number of critics are calling the force an abusive irregular army whose existence violates Bolivian law. And the unit, described by Latin American scholars as the first of its kind in the drug war, has been accused of using excessive force and committing human rights abuses, including murder and torture.

A Bolivian civil court judge issued a preventive arrest order this past week for the unit's commander, Col. Aurelio Burgos Blacutt, pending investigation of charges from witnesses that Burgos shot and killed an unarmed man during a peasant protest Jan. 29. However, legal sources said the order has yet to be carried out and the military is bringing pressure to get it annulled.
...


posted by Steven Baum 6/24/2002 03:44:50 PM | link

TERROR ON THE FOURTH
Over
half of all Americans believe their country is going to be attacked on the 4th of July holiday. These are, of course, many of the same people who will be drinking and driving more than usual to contribute to an expected total of 500 traffic deaths during the holiday period. They'll also be shooting off the usual excess of fireworks which, according to the NFPA, cause more fires in the U.S. than all other causes combined during the holiday. Given the drought conditions that hold over much of the country, this presents an even greater threat than usual this year. I'm going to do the patriotic thing: get likkered up real good, join the Neighborhood Watch lynch mob team, and learn those goddamn foreigners not to fuck with God's country.
posted by Steven Baum 6/24/2002 03:25:45 PM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger