Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Friday, April 12, 2002

NOW THAT DIDN'T TAKE LONG
Not six hours after I posted
this, a Reuters item tells us what the frisky generals are up to in Venezuela.
A Venezuelan general said on Thursday that President Hugo Chavez's government had "abandoned its functions" and the country was under the control of the armed forces.

National Guard Gen. Alberto Camacho Kairuz made the announcement on local television after senior military officers blamed the president for violence during a huge anti-Chavez protest march in which at least 10 people were killed.


posted by Steven Baum 4/12/2002 04:43:21 PM | link

BIG, MANLY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
It's time to seriously dive into a couple of construction projects this weekend. The materials have all been obtained, so all that's left is the sweating and swearing. The first project is
The Rack, an audio shelving unit made of 3/4" zinc all-thread, 3/4" oak plywood, and several hundred nuts and washers. It'll look something like this:

The Rack (audio)

I debated whether to use marble or granite for the shelves rather than oak plywood but, being impatient and there being no ready supply of either of the stony materials in the area, I got the latter. The only design choice left is what to do in the middle. The current thinking is along the lines of two or three shelves at the bottom for vinyl albums, with a shelf for a telly at or near the top. The shelves will be gently sanded and cherry stain will be applied until a dark enough shade is obtained. I've not decided whether or not to put anything on top of the stain.

The second project is a sort-of giant folding fan to hide the BBQ equipment on the porch. It will be constructed out of two 4X8 lattice panels, each cut in half to make four panels. Lattice edging will be used on all four sides, and three hinges will be used to join each of the four panels. They'll probably be cut down a bit from the 8' height as well. I'm also thinking of constructing and attaching rectangular pots at the bottom of each panel, with 360 deg. swivel wheels on each. This will enable climbing plants to be planted and crawl up the latticework for a more aesthetically pleasing, natural effect. Perhaps I'll use morning glories so I can snort the seeds later and get really high. One end of the panel will have to be attached to a wall if I go for the plant pots on wheels. Unlike the first project, this second one isn't trademarked. It came to me while downing a few beers and listening to the SACD version of "Louis Armstrong Play W. C Handy", a sweet, sweet album in whatever format you find it.
posted by Steven Baum 4/12/2002 03:22:26 PM | link

SHIVA REPORT
I took Shiva in for her second round of chemo today. It looks pretty good. While the tumors haven't shrunk, what were obscenely fast growing lumps haven't gotten any bigger in three weeks. All her blood work was normal, too, and she's in pretty good spirits as far as this non-canine can tell. For examnple, yesterday she enjoyed plopping down on some nice fluffy and cool soil I'd just finished digging up with a garden fork, same as (most) every year for the past decade. And I got the same psychic "Enough digging already! Grab a beer!" message from her I've been getting (almost) every year as well. All the same, I snagged a Panasonic Handycam on eBay a few days ago to preserve that which entropy will make all too fuzzy all too soon. Yep, I'd better stay away from The Anatomy of Melancholy for a few days.
posted by Steven Baum 4/12/2002 03:10:25 PM |
link

BOOK SALE REPORT
It's time again for the annual Texas A&M Library Book Sale report or, how many scrumptious tomes I got my grubby little fingers on for a pittance. This year's haul includes:
  • Volcanoes of the World: A Regional Directory, Gazetteer, and Chronology During the Last 10,000 Years - TOm Simkin, et al., eds. (1981)
  • Global Volcanism 1975-1985: The First Decade of Reports from the Smithsonian Institution's Scientific Event Alert Network (SEAN) - Lindsay McClelland, et al., eds. (1989)
  • Atlas and Glossary of Primary Sedimentary Structures - F. J. Pettijohn and Paul E. Potter (1964)
  • Famous Trees of Texas (2nd Ed.) - Texas Forest Service (1971) - I wonder how many of these suckers are left standing
  • Paleocurrents and Basin Analysis - P. E. Potter and F. J. Pettijohn (1963)
  • Terraforming: Engineering Planetary Environments - Martyn J. Fogg (1995)
  • Advanced Dynamics of Marine Structures - J. P. Hooft (1982)
  • Methods of Celestial Mechanics - D. Brouwer and G. M. Clemence (1961)
  • The Foundations of Astrodynamics - A. E. Roy (1965)
  • Facts and Principles of World Petroleum Occurrence - A. D. Miall, ed. (1980)
  • Introduction to Paleolimnology - C. C. Reeves, Jr. (1968)
  • Encyclopedic Dictionary of Exploration Geophysics (3rd Ed.) - R. E. Sheriff
  • Modern Factor Analysis (2nd Ed.) - Harry H. Harman (1967)
  • The Art of Tunnelling (2nd English Edition) - Karoly Szechy (1973)
  • Theoretical Astronomy - James C. Watson (1964)
  • Berlin Diary: Journal of a Foreign Correspondent 1934-1941 - William L. Shirer (1941)
  • Boswell on the Grand Tour: Germany and Switzerland, 1764 - F. A. Pottle, ed. (1928, 1953)
  • Boswell in Holland: 1763-1764 - F. A. Pottle, ed. (1928, 1952)
  • Boswell for the Defence: 1769-1774 - F. A. Pottle, ed. (1929, 1959)
I got 'em all for $20. [Insert crass gloating dance here.]
posted by Steven Baum 4/12/2002 02:49:00 PM |
link

VENEZUELA: THIS YEAR'S CHILE
Narco News reports on the U.S. and the IMF sowing the seeds for another coup against a democratically elected government in South America. This time it's Venezuela. And what horrible evils is Hugo Chavez, the twice-elected leader of Venezuela, visting on the world, i.e. the money men in Washington D.C. and New York?
Criticism by George Tenet, head of the CIA, and US Secretary of State Colin Powell has intensified, as Chavez was reprimanded some three times last week. They stated that Chavez is undercutting American foreign policy by providing oil to Cuba, opposing US counter-narcotics aid to Colombia, and giving political support to guerrillas and anti-government forces in neighboring Andean nations.
And we all know there's no greater sin in this or any other universe than "undercutting U.S. foreign policy." If Dante were to update his masterpiece today, the first thing he'd do is add another circle for just such malefactors.

And what is the IMF, which is nothing much more than a front and a bagman for the big banks, doing to "help" the situation?

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Morgan Stanley have come out in support of a 'transitional government' for Venezuela, supporting Chavez's removal from office. Petras says that " a number of stories have just come out in the daily La Nacional mentioning that the IMF is willing to bankroll a transitional government, a government that will replace Chavez." He believes that, "the only way you do that is by coup."

The investment firm Goldman, Sachs and Company estimates that "Venezuela is entering a profound recession," stating that "there is fear of a political and economic collapse, the financial situation is in chaos, petroleum prices have fallen, the country has suffered massive capital flight."

Petras believes that "the IMF and financial institutions are fabricating a crisis. There is no economic crisis. The economic problems facing Chavez have always been there, they are problems that Chavez inherited. Venezuela is an oil rich country that pays its debts and follows IMF guidlines etc."

Recall that Goldman, Sachs and Company is one of the same investment firms that kept pushing Enron stock hard even after they saw the writing on the wall. And the machinations of the IMF in South America and elsewhere have been thoroughly exposed by Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz.

So just what has Chavez done to really piss off the power boys? Not even the bully-boys ranting about Chavez doing the wrong things vis a vis Cuba and Colombia believe their bullshit is anything more than a convenient excuse. Here are his "real" sins:

Chavez won Presidential elections in 1998 and again in 2000 by the largest majority in four decades. He has been governing Venezuela following the principles of a new social movement called the Bolivarianism, named after the South American independence hero, Simón Bolívar. Nearly all Venezuelans were eager for drastic change. They wanted a new government that would eradicate corruption and graft, and redirect the money from the vast oil fields away from the multinationals towards the 80% of the Venezuelans living in poverty.

Using his enormous popularity, Chavez has managed to implement an unprecedented amount of reforms. To highlight just a few, Chavez has ratified a new Constitution that now provides guarantees for indigenous rights and women's rights, free health care and education up to the university level. To reduce corruption Chavez has restructured the judicial and legislative branches. The government serves breakfast and lunch to schoolchildren year round and enrollment has increased by over a million students. In a change that affected the world economy, Chavez reinvigorated OPEC, raising oil prices from $8 a barrel to $27 - currently the price is $18 a barrel.

That is, the only threat Chavez is making to the rest of the world, i.e. those with the money and power, is - in the phrase coined by Chomsky a long time ago - the "threat of a good example," i.e. a democracy wherein those who run companies like Enron and their ilk don't get their cake (and yours) and eat it, too.
posted by Steven Baum 4/12/2002 10:51:45 AM | link

Thursday, April 11, 2002

THE RENEWABLE ENERGY BUDGET WAS JUST SITTING THERE
So what's the Bush Cabal doing with the meagre funds available for solar and other renewable energy sources? Using them to
promote drilling in ANWR.
While environmentalists have slammed the White House national energy plan for not doing enough to promote renewable energy, the Bush administration found those government research programs useful in paying the bill for printing copies of the 170-page plan.

The administration took money from the Energy Department's solar and renewable energy and energy conservation budgets to pay for the cost of printing its national energy plan.

Documents released under court order by the Energy Department this week revealed that $135,615 was spent from the DOE's solar, renewables, and energy conservation budget to produce 10,000 copies of the White House energy plan released last May.

Another $1,317.39 was spent for producing 16 "briefing boards" used by administration officials to illustrate and explain the White House energy plan.

The newly released documents also show that $176.40 was taken from the energy conservation program to pay for an Alaska trip by Andrew Lundquist, the White House energy task force's staff director, to promote the energy plan. The administration's energy policy called for drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a proposal strongly opposed by environmentalists.

At the same time the White House tapped the renewable budget for funds to print the energy plan, the administration was urging Congress to cut the renewable and energy efficiency research budgets by more than 50 percent.

But, to be fair, the DOE's fossil energy program was also tapped for a whopping $100.
It dipped into the DOE's fossil energy program, which covers primarily oil research, to pay $100.92 for a hotel room near the Government Printing Office where the policy publication was being produced. The documents did not name the official or if the hotel offered a government rate.

posted by Steven Baum 4/11/2002 03:18:43 PM | link

SACRED TERRORISM
Livia Rokach's
Israel's Sacred Terrorism is based largely on the Personal Diary of Moshe Sharett (Yoman Ishi. Tel Aviv: Ma'ariv, 1979, in Hebrew). Who was Sharett? From 1933 to 1948 he guided the foreign relations of the Zionist movement; from 1948 to 1956 he was Israel's foreign minister; and he was the prime minister from 1954-1955. His diary demonstrates unambiguously the opposite of several things currently taken as fact by most in the Israel/Palestine conflict. These include:
  • The Israeli political /military establishment never seriously believed in an Arab threat to the existence of Israel. On the contrary, it sought and applied every means to exacerbate the dilemma of the Arab regimes after the 1948 war.
  • The Israeli political/military establishment aimed at pushing the Arab states into military confrontations which the Israeli leaders were invariably certain of winning.
  • Use of tactics such as military operations aimed at civilian populations across armistice lines and against Arab military installations in borders areas, as well as covert terrorist operations inside the Arab world.
A single quote from Sharett should be sufficient to pique the interest of even the most skeptical:
"I have been meditating on the long chain of false incidents and hostilities we have invented, and on the many clashes we have provoked which cost us so much blood, and on the violations of the law by our men-all of which brought grave disasters and determined the whole course of events and contributed to the security crisis".
It would take a herculean effort of linguistic prestidigitation to imagine that quote in a context wherein it supposedly doesn't mean exactly what it says, so we'll just have to assume that he was old, senile and probably deep into that self-loathing thing when he wrote it. And, of course, self-loathing Livia Rokach deliberately mistranslated that from the Hebrew, putting false words in the mouth of a great man who was actually trying to say "man those Arabs are a surly bunch."
posted by Steven Baum 4/11/2002 11:22:24 AM | link

THE WONDERFUL WORLD OF PHYSICS
The
Jerusalem Post writes of the latest alleged suicide bombing, a bus explosion in Haifa, although the article doesn't mention whether the Hamas suspect found dead in the bus left a suicide video. Here are some excerpts from about halfway down in the article, after the second paragraph tells us of "the powerful blast inside the vehicle".
An additional body found inside the bus is that of the suicide bomber.
...
Northern Police Chief Yaakov Borovsky said the suicide bomber wore an explosive belt and detonated it shortly after boarding the bus.
...
The bomb blew a large hole through the roof of the front of the vehicle, which was stopped on the side of the highway.

The wheels were also blown off the bus.

Cars driving alongside the bus were reportedly blown aside from the force of the blast.
...
One witness, identified only by his first name, Motti, told Israel Radio that he was driving 20 meters behind the bus when he heard the explosion and saw the bus fly about two or three meters into the air.
...
A few hours after the blast, the bus frame was hauled away and a street-cleaning vehicle was vacuuming away the remaining traces of the blast.

Let's see if I've got this straight: according to a Jewish newspaper, a suicide bomber inside the bus detonated a bomb wrapped around his waist that managed to blow a hole in the roof of the bus, blow a large hole through the bottom of the bus (the bus couldn't be lifted without such a hole, at least not in a world not governed by cartoon physics), blow the wheels off the bus, and blow sideways cars parked beside the bus. And, to top it off, he left a corpse rather than bits of hamburger inside the bus. This would be a fascinating case for an explosives expert to examine, except that the bus was removed and the street swept of all evidence within a couple of hours.
posted by Steven Baum 4/11/2002 10:29:54 AM | link

Wednesday, April 10, 2002

NEIL'S BIG ADVENTURES
Blackest of the family sheep Neil is
making the rounds amongst worldwide Bush pals, ostensibly to raise funds for his new education company Ignite Inc. Before I get to the Bush-bashing, it's only fair to provide a sample of what Neil's interactive American history education software offers. He commissioned the following rap tune to educate the homeys about the Founding Homeys:
It was 55 delegates from 12 states
Took one hot Philadelphia summer to create
A perfect document for their imperfect times
Franklin
Madison
Washington
A lot of cats
Who used to be in the Continental Congress way back
Now on to the good stuff. First a bit of history (albeit not in easily digestable rap format) concerning Neil and Silverado, and I don't mean the pick-up truck.
In 1990, Bush paid a $50,000 fine and was banned from banking activities for his role in taking down Silverado, which actually cost taxpayers $1.3 billion. A Resolution Trust Corporation Suit against Bush and other officers of Silverado was settled in 1991 for $26.5 million. And the fine wasn't exactly paid by Neil Bush. A Republican fundraiser set up a fund to help defer costs Neil incurred in his S&L dealings. Friends and relatives contributed -- but not then-President and Barbara Bush, which would have been unseemly.
...
Bush wasn't just an average S&L exec drawing a big salary and recklessly pushing a federally insured institution beyond its lending limits. As a director of a failing thrift in Denver, Bush voted to approve $100 million in what were ultimately bad loans to two of his business partners. And in voting for the loans, he failed to inform fellow board members at Silverado Savings & Loan that the loan applicants were his business partners. Federal banking regulators later followed the trail of defaulted loans to Neil Bush oil ventures, in particular JNB International, an oil and gas exploration company awarded drilling concessions in Argentina -- despite its complete lack of experience in international oil and gas drilling. It probably helped that the Bush family had cultivated close ties with the fabulously corrupt Carlos Menem, former president of Argentina.
...
To put it simply, after Neil defrauded taxpayers out of two orders of magnitude more money than was lost in the Whitewater land deal - and, not to put too fine a point on it, was directly connected to Silverado and not indirectly connected as were the Clintons to Whitewater - Daddy George's lawyer friend serving as Neil's defense attorney met with Daddy's other lawyer friend acting as head of the SEC and, after a long Solomon-like process of weighing the pros and cons of the case against Daddy's Boy, decided not to prosecute Daddy's Boy. Instead, they decided that the best way to teach Daddy's Boy a lesson would be to levy a fine to be paid by some more of Daddy's Friends. Talk about "tough love". We could turn the prisons into flower gardens if all the crooks got that kind of treatment.

Even though contrition and guilt are probably still haunting Neil 24 hours a day, he still finds time in his busy blue collar, "just a working stiff like the rest of youse" schedule to take the occasional vacation to keep in touch with more of Daddy's Many, Many Friends.

Protected by Secret Service agents, Neil Bush travels an average of two or three days a week.

He took a Red Sea vacation in March 2001 with Egyptian business magnate Hamza El Khouli, an Ignite investor. "It's a good company, a sound company, an investor in education," El Khouli said.

Bush visited the Dubai crown prince, Gen. Shayk Muhammed Bin-Rashid Al Maktum, in the United Arab Emirates in October. Bush said he is not pursuing business opportunities there, although the prince has a program that installs computers in schools.

Chinese President Jiang Zemin threw a private dinner for Bush in Beijing in December, even serenading him at one point with a military song he learned as a youth, one of those present said.

It just brings tears to these jaded, cynical eyes to see how Neil is working to get past that tragedy called Silverado in his past without tripping over all those silver spoons fate has seen fit to strew in his path.
posted by Steven Baum 4/10/2002 04:13:49 PM | link

PAKISTANI MACHINATIONS
Tariq Ali clues us in on what's happening in Pakistan, and also expounds on the absurdity of the official explanation of the death of Daniel Pearl.
In recent months, the jihadis have scored three big hits: the kidnapping and brutal murder of the Wall Street Journal reporter, Daniel Pearl; the assassination of the interior minister's brother; and the bombing of a church in the heart of Islamabad's tightly protected diplomatic enclave. There have also been targeted killings of professionals in Karachi: more than a dozen doctors belonging to the Shi'a minority have been shot.

All these acts were designed as a warning to Pakistan's military ruler: if you go too far in accommodating Washington, your head will also roll. Some senior journalists believe an attempt on Musharraf's life has already taken place. Are these acts of terrorism actually carried out by hardline groups such as Jaish-e-Mohammed and Harkatul Ansar, which often claim them? Probably, but these groups are only a shell. Turn them upside down and the rational kernel is revealed in the form of Pakistan's major intelligence agency - the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), whose manipulation of them has long been clear.

Those sections of the ISI who patronised and funded these organisations were livid at "the betrayal of the Taliban". Being forced to unravel the only victory they had ever scored - the Taliban takeover in Kabul - created enormous tensions inside the army. Unless this background is appreciated, the terrorism shaking the country today is inexplicable.

Colin Powell's statement of March 3, exonerating the ISI from any responsibility for Pearl's disappearance and murder, is shocking. Few in Pakistan believe such assurances. Musharraf was not involved, but he must know what took place. He has referred to Pearl as an "over- intrusive journalist" caught up in "intelligence games". Has he told Washington what he knows? And if so, why did Powell absolve the ISI?

Ali then provides us with background on the dogged and talented Pearl that allows him to be seen as more than just a convenient and useful victim.
The Pearl tragedy has shed some light on the darker recesses of the intelligence networks. Pearl was a gifted, independent-minded investigative journalist. On previous assignments he had established that the Sudanese pharmaceutical factory - bombed on Clinton's orders - was exactly that and not a shady installation producing biological and chemical weapons, as alleged by the White House. Subsequently, he wrote extensively on Kosovo, questioning some of the atrocity stories dished out by Nato spin-doctors to justify the war on Yugoslavia.

Pearl was never satisfied with official briefings or chats with approved local journalists. Those he was in touch with in Pakistan say he was working to uncover links between the intelligence services and terrorism. His newspaper has been remarkably coy, refusing to disclose the leads Pearl was pursuing.

It was basically an agreed-upon fact pre-9/11 that the ISI had set up the Taliban in Afghanistan and was still deeply involved with them. This fact sort of disappeared as the cooperation of Pakistan was needed to invade Afghanistan and swap one group of vicious ruling bastards for another.

Now on to surpassing the rational bounds of suspension of disbelief.

Any western journalist visiting Pakistan is routinely watched and followed. The notion that Daniel Pearl, setting up contacts with extremist groups, was not being carefully monitored by the secret services is unbelievable - and nobody in Pakistan believes it.
...
So mysterious has this affair become that one might wonder who is really running Pakistan. Official power is exercised by General Musharraf. But it is clear that his writ does not extend to the whole state apparatus, let alone the country. If a military regime cannot guarantee law and order, what can it hope to deliver? Meanwhile, Daniel Pearl's widow is owed an explanation by her own state department and the general in Islamabad.
In a separate interview, Ali suggests what Pearl was investigating that made him so death-worthy.
Q: And Al Qaeda?

A: This is the story I think Danny was investigating... I have a feeling he got too close to something. The story everyone wants to know is Al Qaeda's links to Pakistani military intelligence. Most people believe the links are there, and they were there on Sept. 11. Whether [the military] knew about [bin Laden's plans] no one knows. People don't even speculate-they don't want to know. But the links were definitely there. These people were going in and out of Pakistan, landing in Pakistani airports. The circumstantial evidence is there to suggest that Daniel Pearl had got close to this story, and that rogue elements within the intelligence agencies laid a trap for him and he fell into it.

The thing is, the United States must know this. This is the shocking thing. They must know it. Whereas Colin Powell has gone out of his way to say, "We know the Pakistan government was not involved." How do you know that? No one in Pakistan believes that. General Musharraf himself described Daniel as "an over-intrusive" journalist.

And as to the (un)intended consequences of overthrowing the Taliban in Afghanistan, as well as a brief overview of who's who in the drug trade.
Q: What's the feeling about this in Pakistan?

A: Well, they're feeling, "We told you so." They warned the Americans behind the scenes what would happen if the Taliban was dislodged. This was a regime we could have controlled. Now there'll be Russian influence, Iranian influence, Indian influence, no one power will be able to control the situation and it's going to lead to chaos and intra-fighting.

Basically, the struggle-if one's being utterly straightforward and cynical-has been between the Taliban and the Northern Alliance regarding who runs the drug trade through which part of the world. The Taliban-until the United States paid them some hundreds of millions of dollars to stop in 2000-used to smuggle drugs out of Pakistan, through Peshawar and Karachi to come to Europe. The Northern Alliance drug trade came through the Russian mafia, Central Asia-Kosovo was the big base, and from there it went all over Europe. With the defeat of the Taliban, the Northern Alliance people are openly laughing. "We've now got the monopoly on the drug trade." The Russian mafia will be having a field day. Pakistani heroin traffickers are going to lose a lot of money now.


posted by Steven Baum 4/10/2002 01:19:52 PM | link

THE ROT SPREADS
Kurt Eichwald and Michael Brick describe how the banks were complicit in the massive fraud that was Enron.
In an expanded lawsuit expected to be filed today, Enron shareholders accuse some of the country's top financial institutions of knowingly participating in a scheme to defraud them, adding new details about deals involving banks and investment firms that kept Enron afloat even as its finances were falling apart.

According to a draft of the complaint, a group of nine financial institutions repeatedly structured deals to funnel millions of dollars in cash to Enron and a series of related partnerships, all to allow transactions that improperly increased Enron's profits and hid debt. In many of those transactions, the complaint says, senior bank officers themselves secretly invested in the partnerships, receiving quick, outsized profits for participating in deals that disguised Enron's true financial health.

While many of the allegations involving banks and brokerage firms have previously emerged in the months since Enron's collapse, some are raised for the first time in the 501-page amended complaint. For example, the complaint contends that, in the closing days of 1999, banking institutions and their executives advanced nearly all of the money to finance an Enron partnership known as LJM2. That money - provided in both loans and equity investments - allowed Enron to engage in a rapid series of deals with the partnership, the draft complaint says, selling off assets in "sham" transactions, enabling the company to report large, fictitious gains for the quarter and the year.

In the months that followed, the complaint says, those sales were unwound, essentially moving all of the assets back into Enron. At the same time, it says, the transactions created enormous profits for the banks and banking executives who participated in the partnerships as investors. Other transactions, including what the suit describes as bogus natural gas trades used to disguise bank loans, paid out huge fees to the financial institutions while disguising the troubles in Enron's books.
...

I'm sure all those wealthy bank execs are feeling very guilty about all this, so isn't their sincere contrition enough punishment? After all, they'll have to spend the rest of their lives alone with nothing but their consciences, their trophy wives, their mansions, their vacation homes, extensive foreign travel, etc. to get them through. It'll be like the Gulag Hilton.
posted by Steven Baum 4/10/2002 12:44:33 PM | link

EVIL SOMEBODY OPPRESSING GOOD SOMEBODY, OR VICE-VERSA
Rory Carroll tells of the current Afghan government's anti-opium campaign. Note that in most of the Western media, this campaign is written about as a "good thing" wherein the evil farmer/druglords - who are basically putting drugs in the mouths of your children - are being stopped from perpetuating their evil, while an identical campaign by the Taliban a few years ago - which reduced the crop by over 90% - is usually written about in terms of the evil oppressors stifling the right of the freedom-loving farmers to grow what they want to grow.
When the Islamist regime fell last December, farmers invested in seeds and materials for renewed cultivation, gambling that the new government would not have the will or ability to prevent a harvest which offers the only income for many communities.

The government is offering some $500 (£350) for each destroyed acre, but farmers claim that fertiliser, seeds, tractor rental, water pumps, fuel and labourers cost them $800 an acre.

Warlords expecting a cut of the profits have warned the government not to interfere, an official in Kabul said.

The article also points out that a recent assassination attempt on the Afghan defense minister just might have been due to angry farmers rather than the "Islamist guerrillas" (i.e. BOO!!! the Taliban is back!) originally blamed. As an exercise, imagine how the following paragraph would have been written (and undoubtedly was) during the reign of the irredeemably evil Taliban.

In the southern province of Helmand on Sunday, security forces fired on a rally of 2,000 farmers that was allegedly turning into a riot. Eight farmers were killed and 16 injured, said the provincial governor, Sher Mohammed. Others said that at least 35 were wounded.

posted by Steven Baum 4/10/2002 11:33:08 AM | link

ANOTHER "PITIFUL, HELPLESS GIANT"
According to
David Wood, even the U.S. probably doesn't want to get into a rumble with "helpless and defenseless" Israel.
...
Israel can field 19 divisions of ground troops, by some counts; the United States boasts 13 divisions worldwide and would need weeks to move any significant military force into the region.

Israel's air force, which flies souped-up U.S. F-15 and F-16 fighters, can generate nearly 3,000 sorties, or combat missions, per day. The United States can sustain about 1,600 sorties a day. That kind of combat punch has given Israel unprecedented freedom of action, not just against lightly armed Palestinian street fighters, but against its traditional enemies of Syria and Egypt as well.

"We have created an 800-pound gorilla," said Kenneth Brower, an independent military consultant in Washington, assessing decades of U.S. military aid to Israel.

Yesterday, the 11th day of its invasion of Palestinian territories, Israel appeared to respond to U.S. pressure by announcing it would begin withdrawing its troops from two of the six West Bank cities it had occupied, Qalqiliya and Tulkarem, but would maintain a cordon around them. The Israeli defense ministry gave no indication when it would pull out of the other four target cities, where fighting with Palestinian guerrillas continued yesterday.

The United States has given Israel about $3 billion a year for weapons purchases since the late 1970s, and has transferred new or used weapons and military technology for free or at deeply discounted prices under other government programs and commercial arrangements.

In addition, the United States has stored millions of dollars worth of ammunition, fuel, spare parts and even a field hospital in Israel, ostensibly for use by American forces. The agreements under which the equipment was stored in Israel are secret. But most analysts assume Israel has access to the storage sites.

"It's always been said there are 'tripwires' that would permit Israel to use that stuff," said Shoshana Bryen, an analyst for the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a think tank in Washington. "My guess is if Israel needed the stuff, they'd get it."
...

For those not keeping track, that's about $60 billion (officially) from the U.S. for weapons purchases in addition to all the free and deeply discounted stuff, not to mention all the technology and strategic knowledge transferred via unofficial conduits like Jonathan Pollard.

The upshot of this is that even if the entire Arab world declares war on Israel, it can basically kick all their asses combined for about 2 years without the U.S. having to send in the troops. But, if such a war was declared, it would give an immediate green light for the U.S. to "help out" by, say, invading Iraq.
posted by Steven Baum 4/10/2002 11:15:56 AM | link

A NEW TWIST
Joe Vialls offers a new twist to the contention that the Hamas organization is, if not under Israeli control, easily manipulated by the latter. He contends that Arafat is the Israeli pawn, and that Hamas is being set up by a New Stern Gang that's running False Flag Operations to "start and perpetuate World War III." He starts out by claiming a three-pronged campaign starting in 2001.
In reality, more than simple timing was involved. Intelligence research proves that preparations for this lethal attack and the subsequent reoccupation of Palestine started back in 2001, in what at first appeared to be three completely unrelated campaigns. The first was a concerted attempt by various Jewish-American lobbies to frighten and divide Palestinians by claiming that Hamas was controlled and directed by Israel. The second was a cyber war designed to hack into enemy [Arab] web sites and change page content for propaganda purposes, and the third campaign was the intended invasion of southern Iraq, code named "Operation Shekhinah".
...
Probably the most verifiable part of his various claims concerns the March 27 suicide bombing at the Park Hotel in Netanya, alleged to have been perpetrated by a member of Hamas. He claims that the damage at the hotel, e.g.

Park Hotel damage from March 27, 2002

would require much more explosives than could be carried by a single suicide bomber.

Check with any explosives expert anywhere [apart from American or Israeli talking heads], and they will confirm the minimum charge-shrapnel combo for this awesome damage would be about 100 pounds of high explosive, packed inside 200 pounds of shrapnel. That comes to a total of 300 pounds folks, or three times the normal maximum payload for a [very bulky] SAS trooper.
There's also a bit about "death videos" of which I've not previously heard.
Before any Hamas member departs on a real suicide bombing mission, he always makes a "death video", later used to prove that the bombing was fully sanctioned by Hamas command headquarters and is therefore not a bombing by the revitalized Israeli Stern Gang, which carries out major "proxy" attacks on its own people in order to generate maximum hatred against the Palestinians. Because Israeli covert ops like these are very well known in Palestine, Islamic Jihad makes identical death videos for identical reasons. This time there was no death video made by Abdel al-Baset Odeh, proving he did not die as a Hamas or Islamic Jihad suicide bomber.
The Terrorism Q&A page of the CFR seems to back up the "death video" contention.
Q: How does Hamas train the bombers?

A: The recruits undergo intense religious indoctrination, attend lectures, and undertake long fasts. The week before the bombing, the volunteers are watched closely by two Hamas activists for any signs of wavering, according to Nasra Hassan, writing in The New Yorker. Shortly before the "sacred explosion," as Hamas calls it, the bomber records a video testament. To draw inspiration, he watches this video and the videos made by his predecessors repeatedly and then sets off for his would-be martyrdom after performing a ritual ablution and donning clean clothes. The bombers are assured by Hamas clerics that their deaths will be painless and that they will be met in paradise by dozens of virgins. The cost of the average bombing itself runs around $150.

It's certainly a new and interesting theory, and adds yet more twists to a situation that already makes a Robert Ludlum tome seem like a "See Spot Run" picture book. Any explosives experts out there, assuming of course that the given picture is indeed of the Park Hotel damage?
posted by Steven Baum 4/10/2002 10:33:13 AM | link

FUNNIER STUFF
What a fun and creative bunch over at the
Infinite Jest ("like the Onion, only bitter"). They've come up with some damned colorful and fun American Crusade 2001+ Trading Cards.

American Crusade Trading Cards - Manual

American Crusade Trading Cards - Tribunal


posted by Steven Baum 4/10/2002 10:19:15 AM | link

FUNNY STUFF
Troy Pickard finds an entertaining parallel.
Envision a troubled country. People are desperate; the economy has turned sour; except for the very rich. Everyone else is struggling and doing terribly. The people want change. A charismatic, right-leaning leader, who had failed at almost everything he?d done up until now, seizes the opportunity to become the un-elected ruler of the country.

At first, some people resist this seizure of power. The leader realizes that his position is indeed in jeopardy, so he takes advantage of a tragic situation that will rally the people behind him, and will simultaneously allow him to entirely restrict their civil liberties. One of the country?s major buildings burns down, and even though his government may have been involved, he blames it on his political enemies.

Next, he takes steps to assure that the people he considers ?traitors? are put on trial, not in a civilian court, but in a special tribunal, which is almost certain to convict people of any illegal act, simply because the tribunal?s judges will be entirely biased. Then, he ramrods new, broadly-worded laws through the legislature, which gives him, and the rest of his executive branch, vastly increased powers, specifically in the areas of surveillance and harsh repression of those who speak out against the government.

In this streak of new legislation, he also creates new governmental departments meant to provide strict internal security. These new security departments are mainly intended to disorganize or otherwise silence any people who disagree with his government. He manages to get the press in his pocket and even though thousands, or perhaps even millions, of people take to the streets to protest this man?s seemingly tyrannical rule, the press reports almost none of it. And, eventually, Time magazine names him "Man of the Year."
...

Of course this probably says more about the proclivities of Henry Luce (and indirectly his fellow "titans of industry and finance" in the 1930s, e.g. Prescott Bush) than anything else.
posted by Steven Baum 4/10/2002 10:08:57 AM | link

HIGH RENT AMMO DUMP
A May 7, 2001
Washington Post story tells of what one might call a $10+ billion per year ammo dump for the U.S. military.
...
At the same time Peru was in the headlines, there were press reports that the United States and Israel had conducted an unusual joint military exercise in the Negev desert. Jane's Defence Weekly called it Israel's "first" exercise with the U.S. Air Force. The Jerusalem Post called it a "marked boost in military cooperation." Neither assertion is true, but that is the problem of an underground military policy. It is hard to know exactly what is going on.

In fact, the United States and Israel have a regular series of military exercises, going under the code names Juniper Stallion, Juniper Cobra, Noble Shirley, and other Juniper variations. A month before March's Juniper Stallion exercise, another American contingent was in Israel for Juniper Cobra, a tactical missile defense exercise which included test-firing Patriot missiles while the U.S. Navy Aegis destroyer USS Porter operated off the coast. The exercise, perhaps coincidentally, ended just five days before the February 16 U.S. and British air attacks against Iraqi air defense sites.

Last year's Juniper Stallion exercise involved the aircraft carrier battle group USS Eisenhower, and was from March 19-26. Eight U.S. aircraft operated from Nevatim airfield in Israel and U.S. Navy SEALs went ashore to train with their Israeli counterparts. During Juniper Stallion 2000, according to the Eisenhower public affairs office, U.S. aircraft were able to drop live bombs at two desert ranges in Israel, giving crews valuable experience given the temporary prohibition from dropping live ordnance on Vieques Island in Puerto Rico.

Juniper Stallion 99, held in August 1999, was an even more extensive, and secret, exercise. U.S. Air Force munitions personnel from Italy were deployed to officially non-existent sites where they inspected and maintained the $500 million worth of ammunition the United States keeps in Israel for wartime contingencies. Their bases, called Sites 51, 53, and 54, don't appear on any map. Their specific locations are classified and highly sensitive.

And it's not just munitions. The United States has "prepositioned" vehicles, military equipment, even a 500-bed hospital, for U.S. Marines, Special Forces, and Air Force fighter and bomber aircraft at at least six sites in Israel, all part of what is antiseptically described as "U.S.-Israel strategic cooperation."

Such cooperation may or may not enhance American security, may or may not be a prudent part of planning to defend a close friend. The extent of U.S. involvement may or may not be known and understood by U.S. decision-makers and the Congress. But the reason for all the secrecy is clear: All around Israel, in Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Oman, and the Gulf states, the U.S. has newly built up an enormous and yet officially non-existent military presence.
...

That is, "an enormous and yet officially non-existent military presence" was being built before 9/11. There must be psychics in the White House.
posted by Steven Baum 4/10/2002 10:02:41 AM | link

PERES CALLS A SPADE A SPADE
Ha'aretz reports on some comments by Shimon Peres and some IDF officers.
Foreign Minister Shimon Peres Peres is very worried about the expected international reaction as soon as the world learns the details of the tough battle in the Jenin refugee camps, where more than 100 Palestinians have already been killed in fighting with IDF forces. In private, Peres is referring to the battle as a "massacre."

IDF officers also expressed grave reservations Monday over the operation in Jenin. "Because of the dangers," they said, "the soldiers are almost not advancing on foot. The bulldozers are simply 'shaving' the homes and causing terrible destruction. When the world sees the pictures of what we have done there, it will do us immense damage."

"However many wanted men we kill in the refugee camp, and however much of the terror infrastructure we expose and destroy there, there is still no justification for causing such great destruction."

Peres, who is feeling increasingly isolated in the government - Sharon added three hardline ministers to his cabinet Monday - believes Arafat is still irreplaceable at this stage.

He does not regard the documents that Sharon presented Monday in the Knesset as a "smoking gun" that irrefutably proves that Arafat was directly linked to ordering terrorist activity. And Israel's isolation of the Palestinian leader, he believes, only enhanced his prestige and turned him into the key player.

Despite his harsh criticism, however, and his belief that Labor will not be able to remain much longer in the government, Peres is in no hurry to quit. He is telling his closest associates that after the fighting ends and U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell has visited, the decision will be made. If Powell presents a political plan, Labor will want to fight for it in the government.


posted by Steven Baum 4/10/2002 09:51:43 AM | link

Tuesday, April 09, 2002

TAG TEAM
The Holy War on Drugs has a partner in fomenting misery in Colombia: the IMF.
Tony Avirgan expands:
As the United States drifts deeper into the Colombian quagmire of drugs and war, policy-makers need to take a new look at the problems of poverty, joblessness and hopelessness that have made that country such a trouble spot.

And if they explore how unemployment in Colombia nearly doubled from 10.5 percent in 1990 to 19.7 percent in 2000, they will find a surprising pair of culprits -- not drug kingpins and leftist guerrillas, but the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

They sponsored draconian "economic reforms" that damaged the nation's industries and agriculture.

The policies promoted by these international lenders, including privatizing many industries and public services, eliminating subsidies of all kinds, raising interest rates and cutting public services, thrust the economy into a tailspin and wiped out tens of thousands of jobs.

A new report by the Medellin-based Global Policy Network (whose initials in Spanish are ENS) paints a grim picture of where Colombia stands and how it got there.

The devastating rise in unemployment has its roots in a series of economic reforms initiated in 1990, with World Bank and IMF guidance, to meet the demands of globalization.

In exchange for an IMF structural adjustment loan, Colombia agreed to privatize many industries and public services, eliminate subsidies, increase tariffs for public services, raise interest rates, downsize the public sector and open the nation's economy to world competition.

Some Colombian officials feared the effects of a rising tide of imports. But World Bank and IMF economists assured them that job gains in export industries would more than make up for the inevitable job losses in domestic industries.

As in other countries throughout the world, however, these assurances proved empty. Colombia now imports far more than it exports, and unemployment has soared.

Colombia's once-vital agricultural sector, which previously met the nation's needs and exported the surplus, has been devastated.
..

And what's the only crop left with which the peasant farmers can make any money at all? That's right, the one the U.S. wants to eradicate - with the eradication of many of the farmers an "unfortunate side-effect" - so it doesn't have to arrest any of the upstanding, SUV-driving, cellphone-using, stock-trading, campaign-funding yuppies on the demand side of the equation.
posted by Steven Baum 4/9/2002 02:30:22 PM | link

ANOTHER BUBBLE?
Nick Beams takes a look at a "peculiar" economic recovery in the U.S.
...
Now Wall Street investment bank Merrill Lynch is predicting a major increase in the rate of the growth of the gross domestic product. According to the firm's latest forecast, GDP growth will rise to 4.8 percent by the fourth quarter of this year, while the economy will grow by 3.2 percent overall in 2002-about half a percentage point above its previous forecast.

But even as the economic revival numbers continue to flow in, there are fears in some quarters that all is not as it seems and that the upturn may be simply the outcome of another financial bubble. These concerns centre on the fact that the recession of 2001 is unlike any other in the post-war period. Generally in a recession, there is a fall in debt, a decline in the balance of payments deficit and a fall in consumption spending. None of these things has happened this time around.

One of the main reasons for this peculiar outcome has been the maintenance of high levels of consumption spending, fuelled by increases in house prices. At least that is the view of the Economist magazine. In an article entitled "The houses that saved the world", published on March 28, it noted that increased house prices may have helped "shelter the world economy from deep recession."

The downturn in the US economy in 2001 was the outcome of a rapid decline in corporate profits-estimated to be the steepest since the 1930s depression-the collapse of the share market bubble and a sharp drop in business investment.
...

It should be noted that a goodly portion of the decline in corporate profits was due to the profits never having been there in the first place, i.e. all the unethical and/or illegal accounting practices that are now causing various card houses to come tumbling down.

Now more on the "houses that saved the world":

...
While the interest rate cuts ordered by the Federal Reserve Board made little impact on investment decisions, or even the share market, they have had a significant effect on housing. With official interest rates at a 40-year low, and mortgages consequently cheaper, house prices have risen sharply. According to the Economist, the average rise in US house prices of nine percent in real terms over the past year is the biggest increase ever. With two-thirds of Americans owning their own homes, the rising value of this asset has tended to encourage increased spending.

The boom has not been confined to the US. In countries such as Britain, Spain, Australia and France, the article notes, "house prices have been rising at their fastest pace in real terms since the late 1980s boom."

"The boom in house prices stands in sharp contrast to previous economic downturns, when house prices typically stagnated or fell. Unlike in previous post-war cycles, this downturn was not caused by a spurt in inflation which forced central banks to raise interest rates sharply, thereby killing off a housing boom."

Instead the US entered recession with low and even falling inflation rates, enabling the Fed to cut interest rates in order to provide a cushion for consumption spending to counter the rapid decline in business investment. While these measures may have prevented a deep recession they have not resolved the underlying economic problems and could well be deepening them.

As the Economist put it: "Massive monetary easing by central banks has succeeded in propping up consumer spending around the world, partly by boosting housing prices. To put it crudely: as one bubble burst another started to inflate."
...

It should also be noted that the Bush Cabal's current tariff (i.e. protectionism) on Canadian lumber will raise lumber prices in the U.S. and basically throw a monkey wrench into the housing spurt that's currently "saving the world."
posted by Steven Baum 4/9/2002 01:41:01 PM | link

JUNK STOCKS
The Growth Stock Outlook Newsletter (via
Progressive Review) writes that a rating system for public corporations is needed similar to that used for bonds. Here are the recommended triggers for "junk stock" status:
  • Removing debt from the balance sheets by using off-the-books entities.
  • Executive pay based on stock price
  • Use of stock options that are not expensed on income statements
  • Capitalizing operating expenses
  • 'Pro forma' profit reporting
  • Failure to report insider trading within ten days
  • Abuses of goodwill reporting on balance sheets
  • Excessive debt relative to book value
  • Borrowing money to buy back shares to dispense as stock options
  • Forgiving loans to executives
  • Pension fund assets used to cover operating expenses ("the pension fund was just sitting there")
  • Nondisclosure of all parties in derivatives contracts.
Those who qualify as "junk stocks" include IBM, Tyco, Cisco, Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac.
posted by Steven Baum 4/9/2002 11:41:32 AM | link

13 DAYS OF BLOODSHED
You can't tell who's playing without a
program.
posted by Steven Baum 4/9/2002 11:32:59 AM | link

MILITARY PROTECTIONISM - POWER GRAB, SHEER IDIOCY, OR BOTH?
UPI Business and Economics Editor
Martin Hutchinson opines about the Pentagon's plan to get in on the protectionism racket. He also adds a bit of history to dispel the myth that the U.S. has ever been a bastion of free trade.
...
It's difficult to see, what, economically, the Bush administration hopes to achieve by its recent burst of protectionism. Steel is a decreasingly important industry both in the United States and internationally, the companies most benefited by the protection are those whose costs are most hopelessly out of line with world levels, and the U.S. job losses from increased steel costs are likely to exceed the jobs saved in steel itself. On lumber, raising the prices will be a severe blow to the housing industry, the principal support of a staggering U.S. economy recently, while at the same time annoying severely one of the United State's most reliable allies, and its neighbor.

It is extremely odd that the Pentagon wants to control foreign takeovers when it lacked such explicit control for 50 years during the Cold War. Of course, Sept. 11 provides a pretext for the takeover, but it is difficult to see why al Qaida is more likely to engage in secret ownership of U.S. defense contractors than was the Evil Empire. How the Pentagon expects to judge the effects of a takeover, or what competence it will have to do so, is altogether unclear. Certainly it calls into doubt the drumbeat of advice to the Third World over the last decades from the U.S. Agency for International Development and the international institutions, to allow foreign capital into their industries, even to the extent of taking them over entirely. The United States, because of its size and highly developed capital market, must be the least vulnerable of all countries to foreign takeover of the commanding heights of its economy. Even Britain, which allowed the London merchant banks to be ground into sausage meat by insensitive German and other foreign buyers, has managed to meet this national disaster with the usual Stiff Upper Lip.

The theme running through all three of these initiatives, taken within the space of a month, is that the majority constituency in the United States for free trade has disappeared. The sharp increase in agriculture subsidies over the last few years further confirms that this is indeed the case.

Historically speaking, this is hardly surprising. Since Abraham Lincoln, the Republicans always have been the party of protectionism, successfully in the case of the McKinley Tariff of 1890, disastrously in the case of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930. The difference, at least in McKinley's day as in that of Alexander Hamilton, the inventor of U.S. high tariff policy, was that tariffs were protecting infant U.S. industries and allowing them to grow to full strength behind a high tariff wall. This principle was fuzzied at the time of Smoot-Hawley, but has now been thrown overboard completely -- it is the dying industries, not the infant ones, protected by the Bush administration.
...


posted by Steven Baum 4/9/2002 11:30:24 AM | link

IRAQ INVASION METER
Check
here for the best predictor for the invasion of Iraq. The troops will be mobilized when the average hits below 70%, and the tanks will roll at about 60%.
posted by Steven Baum 4/9/2002 10:36:44 AM | link

PRESS FREEDOM DETERIORATES IN OCCUPIED TERRITORIES
Reporters Without Borders tells of the deteriotation of press freedom in Israel and the territories it occupies.
Since Israel began its offensive against towns and cities administered by the Palestinian Authority 10 days ago, there have been about 40 cases of journalists being obstructed in their work (wounded, injured, arrested, expelled or threatened).

The Israeli army is knowingly targeting journalists in a deliberate policy of intimidation. The Israeli authorities are treating many journalists as "enemies" and accusing them of being "Palestinian sympathisers." They are also doing everything they can to hide their military operations and accompanying abuses from the world's media.

Attacks on press freedom have increased in recent days. Since Israel declared Ramallah a "closed military zone" on 31 March, journalists have found it harder to do their job. They have been arrested, threatened, roughed up, hindered in their movements, expelled, wounded or injured and had their accreditations or passports confiscated as part of efforts by the Israeli authorities to restrict the free flow of information.

Israel has signed and ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, whose Article 19 guarantees the "freedom to seek, receive and impart information.." But the Israeli army is trying to prevent journalists from reporting freely on its latest offensive. The press freedom situation has deteriorated as never before in Israel's history.

At least five journalists have been wounded since 29 March. They include Carlos Handal, a cameraman for the Egyptian Nile TV station, Anthony Shahid, an American correspondent for the US daily The Boston Globe, Majadi Banura, a cameraman for the Qatari TV station Al-Jazeera, Iyad Hamad, a Palestinian working for APTN, and Jérôme Marcantetti, a cameraman for the French TV station LCI.

At least eight Palestinian journalists have been arrested. Hamdi Farraj, head of the Palestinian TV station Al-Rouah, said two of his journalists, Ashraf Farraj and Jalal Hameid, arrested on 3 April, are still being detained. Some Palestinian journalists have been roughed up or humiliated. Atta Iweisat, a photographer working for the Israeli daily Yediot Aharonot and the Gamma agency, was arrested by Israeli soldiers when they said he was not properly accredited. He was held for more than an hour, on his knees in the rain, head down and hands tied behind his back. In Ramallah, two cameramen working for Reuters and MBC were forced at gunpoint to undress in the middle of the street during a security check.

About 20 journalists have come under fire. At least four shots were aimed at Nasser Nasser, a photographer working for the Associated Press, who was taking pictures of armoured vehicles in Ramallah. Warning shots were fired at a foreign press convoy of seven armoured vehicles on their way to cover the arrival of US mediator Anthony Zinni at Palestinian President Yasser Arafat's headquarters and five stun grenades were thrown at them. When the convoy turned round, the CNN vehicle was hit by a bullet that broke the rear window. The City Inn Palace hotel in Ramallah, where many journalists are based, is regularly fired on.
...


posted by Steven Baum 4/9/2002 10:30:23 AM | link

Monday, April 08, 2002

"LIBERAL" PBS
FAIR contrasts, in the context of an upcoming six-hour PBS series singing the glories of corporate globalism, some recent series accepted and rejected by the wild-eyed liberals in charge of PBS. Apparently not all conflicts of interests are equal. First, those accepted:
  • The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power, a 1993 series funded by PaineWebber, a company with significant oil interests. The series? main analyst was Daniel Yergin, a consultant to major oil companies. Almost every expert featured was a defender of the oil industry.
  • Living Against the Odds, a 1991 special on risk assessment that asserted, "We have to stop pointing the finger at industry for every environmental hazard." Funded by Chevron, a petrochemical company often criticized for environmental pollution.
  • James Reston: The Man Millions Read, a flattering documentary about the New York Times? most famous pundit. The film was funded by and produced "in association with" the New York Times. The director and producer, Susan Dryfoos, is part of the Sulzberger family that owns the paper, and is the daughter of a former Times publisher.
Now those that got the thumbs down:
  • Out At Work, a 1997 film about workplace discrimination against gays and lesbians. Why? It was partially funded by unions and a lesbian group. PBS acknowledged that the underwriters had clearly not controlled the program's content, and that it was "compelling television responsibly done," but still refused to distribute it.
  • Defending Our Lives, a 1993 Academy Award-winning documentary about domestic violence. Why? One of the producers was the leader of a battered women's support group, and PBS felt that gave her a "direct vested interest in the subject matter of the program."
  • The Money Lenders, a 1993 film about the World Bank. Why? PBS was concerned that "Even though the documentary may seem objective to some, there is a perception of bias in favor of poor people who claim to be adversely affected."
That is, PBS finds no bias in a series ("The Prize") in which damned near every "expert" is an unabashed supporter of Big Oil, but nukes a documentary ("The Money Lenders") because of a "perception of bias in favor of poor people." Geez, what'll those overly demanding poor bastards want next? Voting rights?
posted by Steven Baum 4/8/2002 02:06:39 PM | link

FRANK BURNS LIVES
This year's "How Can We Preserve Our Precious Freedoms If We Don't Give Them Up Indefinitely?" or "Frank Burns" Award goes to
Monsoor Ijaz, who offers the following advice to his fellow Arabs:
The anger of U.S. Arabs and Muslims, while heartfelt, is irresponsible and misplaced. Rather than becoming beacons for America's ideals by showing a willingness to submit to federal law enforcement questioning instead of grandstanding about racial profiling, we are hiding behind the guarantees afforded to us by the very Constitution the terrorists sought to dismantle on Sept. 11. Our anger demonstrates an inability to put citizenship before religious and ethnic allegiances and U.S. national security interests before dubious claims of civil rights violations.
...
America's Arabs and Muslims bear a special responsibility at this moment not to play the role of aggrieved victims. Rather, we should offer ourselves as resources to federal law enforcement agencies interested in learning more about the complexities of our religious and ethnic roots; we should police our communities for sleeper agents; and we should stop the flow of foreign money -- and its corrosive influence -- into our political and religious nonprofit organizations.
Identical rhetoric obtained from the newspapers of Cuba, North Korea, etc. would of course obtain shrieks of outrage from Ijaz and his ilk about how wrong it is to submit to the injustices of the evil state.

Sam Smith comments:

By now we're accustomed to declarations by the American elite - although not to be found in the Constitution - that our rights are contingent on the fulfilling of certain responsibilities as they from time to time shall determine. But now a member of Council on Foreign Relations, with the help of the Washington Post, has come up with an even more dramatic revisionist view of our status as Americans. As the headline put it "Citizenship before civil rights." The idea of separating citizenship from civil rights is one that not even George Orwell thought of, but Manzoor Isjaz wants Muslim Americans to be the guinea pigs for this new dichotomy.

posted by Steven Baum 4/8/2002 01:50:04 PM | link

DAKOTA
It's no longer just a state or a pick-up truck for sturdy women.
DAKOTA is also, in the heavy jargon of its creators, "a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty qualification, and sensitivity analysis." It seems quite useful if you have need of such things, and it's being released under the GNU GPL. For those insufficiently confused as to just what this thing does, here's a lengthier description that clears things up marvelously:
The DAKOTA (Design Analysis Kit for Optimization and Terascale Applications) toolkit provides a flexible, extensible interface between analysis codes and iteration methods. DAKOTA contains algorithms for optimization with gradient and nongradient-based methods; uncertainty quantification with sampling, analytic reliability, and stochastic finite element methods; parameter estimation with nonlinear least squares methods; and sensitivity/primary effects analysis with design of experiments and parameter study capabilities. These capabilities may be used on their own or as components within advanced strategies for surrogate-based optimization, mixed integer nonlinear programming, or optimization under uncertainty. By employing object-oriented design to implement abstractions of the key components required for iterative systems analyses, the DAKOTA toolkit provides a flexible and extensible problem-solving environment as well as a platform for research and rapid prototyping of advanced solution methodologies. Software Design
For those masochists still left unsatisfied, there's a 205 page user's manual in PDF format as well as reference and developer's manuals.
posted by Steven Baum 4/8/2002 01:36:18 PM | link

AYN RAND'S CORPSE
Today's humorous tidbit comes courtesy of alt.philosophy.objectivism, in a thread (that's no doubt eternal) entitled "A Critique of Objectivism".
A - As I've always said, a "cult" is merely what you call a religion you do not happen to believe in.

B - It can't even be a cult without a cult compound. Where's the compound?

C - Welllll,

Because of zoning ordinance issues here in Colorado, cult compounds are difficult to get past the local authorities, but it *has* been done...

The Thornton Cult of Objectivists, Cigarette Smokers, and Trailer Residing In-Breds (the T-COCSTRI) has succeded in setting up an Objectivist Compound in a local Non-Stationary Home Residential Area and have proceeded with the usual array of cult activity.

Here is a list of activities...

Monday - 19:00 --- Cigarette Smoking and general bitch session about the current state of Objectivism. This week's topic: how non-smokers have invaded the sacred territory of the One True Philosophy.

Tuesday - 08:00 --- Exercise Session. This week: Exercising your right to live in Non-Stationary Residential Homes. Beer is optional.

Wednesday - 12:00 --- Lecture. This week's guest lecturer: Ayn Rand's Corpse. Ayn's Corpse will address the group on the necessity of coercing individuals to think for themselves. Non-Attendance will result in immediate ex-communication.

Thursday - 20:00 --- Mandatory "Disregarding External Authority" meeting.

Friday - 19:00 to 24:00 --- Ritual Sacrifice of non-believers and residents of homes attached to foundations.

Saturday - Free Time --- Explore "other" ideas and immediately reject them.

Sunday - Church O' Objectivism --- Attendance strongly advised. Cigarettes required.

Anyway, it's kind of nice here but the lung cancer thing seems to have taken its toll.

Always happy to update those behind the curve...

Frank


posted by Steven Baum 4/8/2002 01:30:29 PM |
link

HWOD HAPPINESS SPREADS
The Holy War on Drugs just
brings out the best in everybody, doesn't it?
The bogus drug busts are notorious: Mexican immigrants were jailed, went broke or got deported, only to have the evidence against them fall apart. The bricks of white powder they were charged with peddling turned out to be plaster of Paris--not cocaine or speed, as police had claimed. In all, more than 70 arrests have come unstrung this winter in a very public crescendo of bad cop work and shoddy prosecution.

Now Dallas is in an uproar. Federal investigators are probing the police department. Scores of drug prosecutions have been dismissed. Two narcotics detectives have been suspended. And a scandal that started in the dingy streets on the outskirts of town has worked its way into the city's political machinery.

"It's like watching a slow train wreck," said Paul Coggins, former U.S. attorney for the northern district of Texas. "We may never know exactly what happened."

If truth can be gleaned at all, it will be extracted from a tangled constellation of cops, drug pushers and immigrants. The informants blame crooked detectives. The detectives blame corrupt tipsters and drug dealers who, they say, were trying to rip off their clients with worthless products. The onetime suspected drug dealers--who are expected to file a bevy of civil rights lawsuits against the city--blame a vast, racist conspiracy.
...


posted by Steven Baum 4/8/2002 11:44:33 AM | link

WORLD SPENDING
Suzanne Elston compares the spending on the Holy and Forever War on Terrorism with what it would cost to save more lives than terrorists could possibly take if they worked overtime.
North American governments are now planning to spend more than 20 billion dollars a year to help fight terrorism. Coincidentally, 20 billion dollars a year just happens to be the amount the World Health Organization has estimated it would take to end hunger in the world. On September 11th alone it's estimated that:
  • 24,000 people died of hunger
  • 6020 children were killed by diarrhea
  • 2700 children were killed by measles
  • 1411 women died in childbirth
  • 3288 children were made homeless by war
For an additional investment of 48 billion dollars a year (or less than 0.4% of world military spending), mankind could:
  • ensure that all children both boys and girls - receive a primary education
  • reduce the number of maternal childbirth deaths by three-quarters
  • reduce the number of children who die before the age of 5 by two-thirds
  • stop the spread of AIDS.
Well sure, but that wouldn't require any sexy guns or bombs, and it's all the fault of the commies anyway.
posted by Steven Baum 4/8/2002 11:39:12 AM | link

OBSTRUCTING HOLOCAUST VICTIMS
Guess who tried to deprive Holocaust victims of their share of the humanitarian fund established by the Swiss as penance for their collaborations with the Nazis? According to
Ha'aretz, it was Israel ... you know, the government that's always invoking the Holocaust to justify its actions. By the way, Ha'aretz is an Israeli daily.
In 1997, at the height of negotiations with the Swiss banks over compensation for dormant bank accounts belonging to Holocaust victims, the Swiss - in a gesture of goodwill - established a humanitarian fund of $180 million to be distributed among needy Holocaust survivors.

All the Jewish communities in the world hurried to form agencies to distribute the money as quickly as possible. After all, the potential beneficiaries were both needy and elderly. Only the Israel dragged its feet (despite the fact that it was supposed to distribute one-third of the money - $59 million - among its citizens).

First, and although the money was expressly designated for needy Holocaust victims, finance ministry officials demanded that most of the money go to the treasury - on the argument that the state was "the heir of the Holocaust victims."
...


posted by Steven Baum 4/8/2002 11:17:19 AM | link

SHARON AND HAMAS
Here's an interesting and prescient article from
Pravda dated 7/13/2001.
Highly placed U.S.-based sources have provided this news service with details of Ariel Sharon's plans for a new Mideast war, in the works within days of his taking office as Israel's Prime Minister earlier this year. According to the sources, shortly after he was elected, Sharon met with a small group of trusted political and military allies, and spelled out, in confidential memos, a war plan targeting the Palestinian Authority, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, and other Arab neighbors.

Two factors were identified by the sources as key to the "Sharon Plan:" Sharon's ability to use Hamas as a tool for destabilizing Jordan, ultimately overthrowing King Abdullah II and establishing Jordan as a "Palestinian homeland" under Hamas control. To this end, Sharon, who was instrumental in the launching of the Hamas movement earlier in his career, has dispatched his son as a personal back-channel emissary to the Islamist group. Key Hamas personnel have already been infiltrated into Jordan, in preparation for Sharon's provocation of a new general Mideast war - in the days or weeks ahead, the sources said. In many ways, the Sharon-backed Hamas targetting of Jordan is a replay of the early 1970s "Black September" destabilization which involved Abu Nidal, long suspected of being an asset of British and Israeli intelligence. In the 1970s, Hamas was built up by Israeli occupying forces as a "countergang" to the PLO of Yasser Arafat. Hamas leaders were granted licenses by Israeli authorities to set up food kitchens, clinics, schools and daycare centers, to create a governing structure alternative to Arafat's Fatah.
...


posted by Steven Baum 4/8/2002 11:00:26 AM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger