Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Thursday, December 13, 2001

"I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE"
There's some very interesting iconography going on over
here.
posted by Steven Baum 12/13/2001 09:24:06 AM | link

WHERE IS OSAMA?
This week's Focus of Evil in the World is apparently also safe and sound in Pakistan, according to the
Christian Science Monitor. The Pentagon version is that the increasing number of "daisy cutters" gently and surgically floating down from the skies to pick off the evildoers one by one are going to nail Mr. Evil sooner rather than later. There are also unconfirmed reports that Rumsfeld is claiming that he is the walrus.
Osama bin Laden escaped the embattled Tora Bora base to Pakistan 10 days ago with the help of tribesmen from the Ghilzi tribe, according to a firsthand account Wednesday by a senior Al Qaeda operative and Saudi financier. Abu Jaffar, who spoke from an Afghan village still sympathetic to Mr. bin Laden and his fighters, says that several days later, bin Laden sent his 19-year-old, married son Salah Uddin back to act on his behalf. He is now the only bin Laden family member inside the Tora Bora terror base.

posted by Steven Baum 12/13/2001 09:13:54 AM | link

TALEBAN LEADERS SAFE IN PAKISTAN
The Times reports that most of the Taleban leaders are safe and sound inside the borders of new U.S. extra special friend Pakistan. Pentagon spokesman Wolf Blitzer accused The Times of having "ties" and "links" to terrorism.
HUNDREDS of Taleban officials who have fled Afghanistan and taken refuge in Pakistan look likely to escape investigation by either the United States or the new Kabul Government.

All the top Taleban leadership, including Mullah Muhammad Omar, who have survived US airstrikes are either hiding in Afghanistan or have moved to Pakistan, where they have strong links with Islamic religious parties. Nine former Taleban ministers surfaced in Islamabad last week, when they announced the formation of a new party.

Most Taleban officials - there are many of them, the Pakistani Foreign Ministry said yesterday - are living in different parts of Pakistan?s North West Frontier Province and in western Baluchistan and are waiting before deciding their political futures.

They have entered the country despite heightened security measures on the borders because of their strong tribal links and association with the Islamic parties in Pakistan.

Pakistani officials believe that despite recent defections, the Taleban have remained largely intact because of deals made with Pashtun warlords in eastern and western Afghanistan, providing the Taleban leaders and the soldiers with a passage to safety. As a result, no senior Taleban leader has been killed or arrested so far.


posted by Steven Baum 12/13/2001 09:08:22 AM | link

THE AMERICAN WAY
The
International Herald Tribune reports how the allies of the U.S. in Afghanistan are describing how it ignores deals for surrendering and keeps dropping bombs.
The cease-fire had been set to culminate in a Qaida surrender at 8 a.m. Wednesday.

Instead, the deadline passed with no surrender, and several Afghan leaders said the Americans had adamantly resisted the terms of the deal, which would have allowed Mr. bin Laden's mainly Arab and other foreign fighters to hand themselves over to the United Nations and diplomatic representatives of their own countries.

"The Americans won't accept their surrender," Hazrat Ali, regional security chief for eastern Afghanistan, said just after emerging from hours of negotiations with U.S. officials. "They want to kill them."

A discernably turgid Pentagon spokesman denied the existence of the surrender deal and also that the sun rises in the east.
posted by Steven Baum 12/13/2001 08:59:49 AM | link

EVIL ENRON
Robert Weiss provides further details of Enron and Bush supporter and advisor Kenneth Lay's perfidious behavior.
The employees of Enron were prohibited by the terms of their company administered retirement plan from diversifying. Meanwhile Kenneth Lay, a close friend and major contributor to both Bush presidents made off with over $300 million over the last few years. The top brass did equally as well. Directors included former Treasury Secretary Jim Baker, former Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher, and former Commodities Future Trading Commissioner Wendy Gramm, wife of Republican Senator Phil Gramm.

Enron had as its supporters some of the top people on Wall Street; respected analysts were touting the company to the very end. The entire tale would be comic if it were not for the very real pain of small investors and lower level employees whose retirement was decimated by a power play that reads as a primer of what goes wrong and who gets hurt when government and business get too way too close.

Kenneth Lay was one of the first political supporters and fundraisers for a young gubernatorial candidate in 1994. He had helped George Bush "41" become president. Virtually no donor had done more than Lay to get George W. Bush elected in 2000. With access to the highest level of government, Enron under Lay virtually created a complex derivative market for energy futures, which it subsequently controlled. Any regulatory issues they may have had were smoothed over by board members who included former cabinet members as well as the former speaker of the British House of Commons.

Walls Street firms were heavily invested and their analysts hopelessly conflicted. In order to access huge fees in investment banking and underwriting, basic questions as to the company's viability were left unasked. Their own auditors, Arthur Anderson, were co-opted and John Q. Public was sold a bill of goods that upon reflection no one really understood. When the house of cards came crashing down and investors began asking the hard questions, regulators and politicians feigned shock as to how this could happen. The fact is they know exactly how it happened. This is a variation on the oldest story in business and politics: The insiders grab and the suckers lose. Most of us were not insiders.

"Shocked" professionals "discovered" undisclosed liabilities in the billions. Furious employees vainly tried to sell as shares once valued as high as $92 slunk to $.25. The former Treasury Secretary, Commerce Secretary, and Commissioner of the CFTC, all of whom owed a fiduciary duty to shareholders, had no comment. It will be up to the reviled Trial Lawyers to sort this out with drawn out, complex cases that will no doubt be defended with the best legal talent that the impoverished shareholder's money can buy. The Trial Lawyers will no doubt be labeled as "greedy," but the real bad actors in this can certainly teach us all a lesson in greed.
...
There is one ray of hope for poetic justice here. The directors owed a fiduciary duty to their shareholders. The breach of this duty gives rise to liability. Companies routinely purchase a policy for "Directors and Officers Errors and Omissions." Enron certainly had such a policy but there are limits. $100 million would be a very large policy limit, but would not begin to bring justice to the investors. After that the directors are on their own.

Even Kenneth Lay would not be able to repay the billions his malfeasance cost investors. Therefore he along with the former Treasury Secretary, Commerce Secretary and others could be forced into personal bankruptcy. How truly tragic.


posted by Steven Baum 12/13/2001 08:39:21 AM | link

THE BUSH-LAY CONNECTION
In February
James Ridgeway described the intimate connections between Kenneth Lay and Enron and the Bush Empire.
Following the money is the key to understanding the Bush administration. Once you figure out who gave how much, look for the quid pro quo. Take, for example, Enron, the big Texas natural gas and trading company, and its current chairman Ken Lay. He's friends with, and was a backer of, the president's father. As Business Week sets it out, Lay stepped in after Bush Sr. got beaten by Clinton in 1992, arranging a stopover at Enron for ex-secretary of state James Baker and former commerce secretary Robert Mosbacher, who became consultants.

Enron ponied up $500,000 for Dubya's Texas gubernatorial campaigns, making it his largest single contributor. During last year's presidential campaign, the firm contributed corporate jets to the Republicans and gave $250,000 for their convention in Philadelphia, Business Week reports, while Lay himself plunked down $100,000 for the inaugural committee and was Bush's adviser on energy during the campaign. Enron's total listed contributions to the Republicans during last year's presidential race ran to $1.8 million, according to Public Citizen.

Lay currently is a prominent adviser to Spencer Abraham, the free-trade maniac who is secretary of energy. From Enron's point of view, this puts Lay in the catbird seat. Abraham is the member of the Bush team who deals with the energy crisis in California, where Enron is a major supplier. Recently, Abraham infuriated Western governors-some of them Republicans-by refusing to consider government price controls to halt runaway energy prices.


posted by Steven Baum 12/13/2001 08:33:13 AM | link

PROGRESS REPORT
Eric Margolis weighs in with a progress report on the bombing ... uh, invasion ... uh, subjugation ... uh, liberation (that's the ticket!) of Afghanistan.
On Dec. 3, 2000 - one year ago - this column said that overthrowing the Taliban would "pave the way for a second Russian occupation of Afghanistan." This has now happened. The Northern Alliance, armed and funded by Russia, directed by the Afghan Communist party and under the overall command of the chief of the Russian general staff, Marshall Viktor Kvashnin, deputy KGB director Viktor Komogorov, and a cadre of Russian advisers, seized Kabul and all of northern Afghanistan. U.S. President George Bush committed a colossal, inexcusable blunder. If this column could foresee Russian intervention, why didn't the White House?

* Last week's much-ballyhooed Afghan "unity" conference in Germany produced precisely what this column predicted: a sham "coalition" government run by the Northern Alliance. One of the CIA's Pashtun "assets," Hamid Karzai, who represents no one but himself, was named prime minister. There was no other real Pashtun representation, though they comprise half the population.

Of 30 cabinet seats, two-thirds went to Northern Alliance Tajiks, notably the power ministries of defence, the interior and foreign affairs. Two women were added for window dressing to please the West. The 87-year old deposed Afghan king, Zahir Shah, widely blamed for allowing the communists to infiltrate Afghanistan in the 1970s, was invited back as a figurehead monarch. In short, a communist-dominated regime, ruled by a king, whose strings are pulled by Moscow. Quite a bizarre creation.

The very next day, feuding broke out among Alliance members. Old communist stalwart Rashid Dostam, who had just finished massacring hundreds of Taliban prisoners with American and British help, threatened war if his Uzbeks did not get more spoils. My old friend, the Alliance's figurehead president, Prof. Burhanuddin Rabbani, a respected Islamic scholar, was shoved aside by young communists.

* The Bush administration was apparently too preoccupied chasing Osama bin Laden to notice its new best friend, Russia, had broken its agreement to wait for formation of a pro-U.S., pro-Pakistani regime, and seized half of Afghanistan. Marshall Kvashnin rushed his men into Kabul, just as he outfoxed the Americans in 1999 in a similar coup de main in Kosovo.

* The hunt for bin Laden and his Al-Qaida continues. A few senior figures have been killed, likely including Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri, leader of Egypt's Islamic Jihad. The net is closing around bin Laden's possible hiding places. Unless he has escaped Afghanistan, his capture or death appear imminent. This will be welcome news for the Bush administration. If bin Laden somehow escapes, or his body is never found, Bush will be accused of blowing apart Afghanistan, killing large numbers of civilians, and allowing the Russians to grab back the country, all for nothing.

* The late Pashtun leader Abdul Haq, whom I knew from my Peshawar days, warned the U.S. before his death that bombing Afghanistan was unnecessary and a grave mistake. Taliban control could be broken, where needed, by financing tribal uprisings - the standard form of Afghan warfare - without foreign intervention. Otherwise, he warned, the Northern Alliance would take over and bring in the Russians. He pleaded with Washington for restraint, but to no avail. Haq was captured by the Taliban during a bungled CIA operation and hanged.

But Haq was right. U.S. forces could have hunted bin Laden in southern Afghanistan with relative impunity, as they are now doing, without having to launch a total war against the Taliban. U.S. air power totally dominates barren Afghanistan. Taliban forces could not move or communicate. There were only a small number of Taliban fighters in southern Afghanistan where bin Laden was hiding.

Bombing Afghan civilian centres was absolutely unnecessary. The only real military targets offered by the Taliban were its entrenched troops facing the Alliance. It was remarkable the Taliban managed to withstand five weeks of carpet bombing by U.S. B-52s - particularly, as one Pakistani writer wryly noted, after his nation gave in to the U.S. after only a threatening phone call from Washington.

he U.S. could have hunted bin Laden without allowing the Russians to recapture half of Afghanistan, a severe geopolitical defeat for American ambitions to use that nation as a gateway to Central Asian oil and gas. And without blasting to rubble what little remained of demolished Afghanistan, and without driving 160,000 civilians into terrified flight.

So, after eight weeks of war, the Taliban is out, the communists are in power in Kabul and the south is in chaos. The war has cost Washington US$60 billion to date. Afghanistan is a bloody mess. And Vladimir Putin is smiling.

Oh yeah, buddy! Well, Bush's approval ratings are nearly 90%. So take that, you evil canuck!
posted by Steven Baum 12/13/2001 08:26:31 AM | link

Wednesday, December 12, 2001

DAMNED CLEVER DAMIAN
In an
interview, Damian "Cleverer Than a Convention of Really Clever Foxes" Conway discusses his recent and planned work on various Perl modules. Doesn't it violate some law of physics when one persons shoots off so many cleverons?
I have big plans for the Lingua::EN::Inflect module. Currently it provides some very useful grammatical manipulations on English, such as forming participles from verbs, or converting nouns from singular to plural. But there are many other things I want to teach it to do: convert plural words back to their singular forms, detect whether a word is singular or plural, convert adjectives (e.g. "happy" or "good") to adverbs ("happily", "well"), take an adjective (e.g. "happy" or "good") and generate comparative ("happier", "better") and superlative ("happiest", "best") forms, etc., etc.

Many people are sending me interesting ideas about the NEXT module (which allows you to re-dispatch a method call if you're not happy with the method that initially intercepted it). In fact, I just released an important upgrade to that module which I'm planning to talk about in depth in a forthcoming article on Use Perl (use.perl.org)

Another module that people seem to love is Text::Autoformat. And I must get one or two suggestions a week for improvements to it. Some of the ways I'll be enhancing it in the not-too-distant future include: Smart conversions between various character sets (Unicode, Latin-1, MacOS, ASCII), better handling of abbreviations, detecting and ignoring POD, detecting and ignoring (or reformatting) Perl code, and preserving mail headers.

I'm also looking at upgrading the Tie::Securehash module to make it much easier to port existing hash-based classes to use the encapsulation the module provides.

I'm very keen to start work on my new Attribute::Multimethods module. It will be a successor to Class::Multimethods, but with a much simpler interface, a faster dispatch mechanism, and seamless integration with the NEXT module.

I'm also contemplating a module called Data::Units, which will allow programmers to specify the units for values and variables. It will then track all the computations done on those values and variables and ensure that their units stay consistent. So, if you divide a distance by a time, you'd better store the result in a variable whose unit is velocity, otherwise you'll get a run-time exception. That can be a very useful and natural way of error-checking numerical computations.

For a long time now, I've been promising to develop a successor to the very popular Parse::RecDescent module, which creates text parsers from a grammatical specification. I want this new module (tentatively called Parse::FastDescent) to be faster, more powerful, and easier to use. I learnt a great deal writing RecDescent, and a great deal more supporting it over the past few years, and I'm keen to apply those lessons to this new project.

And once I have Parse::FastDescent working, my next big project (and, indeed, my testbed for those "faster, more powerful, and easier to use" claims) will be a module called Parse::Perl. Just as the name says, its goal will be to provide a pure Perl parser that parses Perl itself. It will be a huge challenge, but one I'm looking forward to.

nother new project is Regexp::Configurable. This is a semi-serious module that will make it simple (well, maybe only simpler) to roll-your-own regex syntax. For example, you would be able to set up a module that makes a \i match an identifier. Or you could even change the entire regex syntax (something like Chromatic's idea for Regexp::English http://wgz.org/chromatic/perl/Regexp-English.tar.gz).

An idea I'm very excited about is a module called Data::Tangible, which would be a kind of cross between a visual debugger and an interface design tool. Can't say too much yet, but keep an eye out for this one.

And, of course, I'll soon be releasing the infamous Lingua::tlhInganHol::yIghun module, so that people will finally be able to program perl in the original Klingon!


posted by Steven Baum 12/12/2001 09:22:56 AM | link

Tuesday, December 11, 2001

CIVILIAN CASUALTIES
Common Dreams, in a report that has yet to be independently confirmed by the Pentagon, reports that 3500 civilians have been killed by the "surgical" strikes in Afghanistan. To put it simply, either every media outlet in the world (apart from the compliant U.S. mainstream media) is lying, or the Bush Regime is lying.
More than 3,500 civilians have been killed in Afghanistan by U.S. bombs, according to a study to be released December 10 by Marc W. Herold, Professor of Economics, International Relations, and Women's Studies at the University of New Hampshire. Professor Herold will announce his findings on Monday, December 10 in a discussion with award-winning journalist, Amy Goodman of Democracy Now! in Exile's War and Peace Report

Professor Herold has been gathering data on civilian casualties since October 7 by culling information from news agencies, major newspapers, and first-hand accounts. "I decided to do the study because I suspected that the modern weaponrywas not what it was advertised to be. I was concerned that there would be significant civilian casualties caused by the bombing, and I was able to find some mention of casualties in the foreign press but almost nothing in the U.S. press," said Herold.

Herold's data will be available at http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mwherold/.

For each day since October 7, when the U.S. bombing of Afghanistan began, he lists the number of casualties, location, type of weapon used, and source(s) of information.
...
Professor Herold has sought whenever possible to cross-corroborate accounts of civilian casualties. He relied upon British, Canadian, and Australian newspapers; Indian newspapers, especially The Times of India; three Pakistani daily newspapers; the Singapore News; Afghan Islamic Press; Agence France Press; Pakistan News Service; Reuters; BBC News Online; Al Jazeera; and a variety of other reputable sources, including the United Nations and other relief agencies.

The Pentagon has repeatedly denied reports of civilian casualties in Afghanistan, and most U.S. media outlets have qualified their reports of casualties with the statement "could not be independently confirmed." But Professor Herold has been able to confirm the number of casualties and has found that the number is climbing toward 4,000. "People have to know that there is a human cost to war, and that this is a war with thousands of casualties," said Herold. "These were poor people to begin with, and, on top of that, they had absolutely nothing to do with the events of September 11."


posted by Steven Baum 12/11/2001 11:32:55 AM | link

KUWAIT: THE 51ST STATE
The
Daily Telegraph tells us that the headquarters of the 3rd Army have been moved from the U.S. to that thriving democracy Kuwait. This will make it much easier for General Tommy Franks and the Pentagon War Machine to send lots and lots of wogs and nig-nogs shuffling off this mortal coil so the world will be a safer and happier place. You'd think the mud races would be a lot more grateful what with the honor of being killed via high-tech surgery weapons rather than dropping over from dysentery. It's a heavy burden, it is, but it's good to see the mantle being picked up by so many warblogs. It's a lot cheaper than buying a sports car or a year's supply of Viagra.
THE Pentagon has moved the headquarters of its 3rd Army from America to Kuwait, apparently in preparation for expanding the war on terrorism to Somalia and elsewhere.

Military analysts said the transfer of several hundred headquarters staff from Fort MacPherson, Georgia, to an undisclosed location in Kuwait was "significant".

They said it would give Gen Tommy Franks, commander-in-chief of the coalition forces, a base from which to expand his campaign.

Gen Franks said last week that he was considering sending more troops to Afghanistan. When asked which other areas his planners had been looking into, he mentioned Somalia, Sudan and Iraq.


posted by Steven Baum 12/11/2001 11:20:03 AM | link

NEXT STOP: SOMALIA
The Times tells us that the Pentagon - still discernably turgid from being ato drop all those bombs on Afghanistan - is looking to Somalia as a way to keep that loving feeling.
Military officials have met rebel leaders in the lawless East African state as the Pentagon prepares the ground for the second phase of President Bush?s war on terrorism.

The officers held talks at the weekend with leaders of the Rahanwein Resistance Army (RRA), a faction opposed to the fledgeling Somali Government which has no control over much of the country.

Mohamed Aden Ali Qalinle, an official with the RRA, yesterday invited coalition forces to use its bases and men as part of the international war against terrorism. "We made the offer because there are terrorist groups in Somalia. The RRA would welcome in its fiefdom of Bay and Bakol region outside military forces who are truly fighting terrorism," he said.

Project Ploughshares provides some recent background on Somalia for those who wish to venture beyond the Pentagon's predictable boilerplate manicheanism. Basically, the Pentagon will bomb the shit out of whatever it wants to bomb the shit out of, kill hundreds to thousands, claim some sort of military and moral victory, and then move on to the next bombing range.
The conflict in Somalia has its roots in deep-seated clan alienation which deepened during the administration of President Mohamed Siad Barre.5 Barre gained power in a military coup in 1969, after successive democratic governments failed to balance clan interests. Also failing to promote equality among clans, and resorting to force to maintain power, Barre was ousted from power in January 1991 by United Somali Congress (USC) militia led by General Mohamed Farah Aidid. The USC victory quickly degenerated into factional fighting after General Mohamed Farah Aidid challenged the formation of an interim government and the selection of Ali Mahdi Mohamed, another leader from his group, as president.

The fighting between the USC factions resulted in a humanitarian crisis of great proportions. Militia attacks disrupted normal economic activities and caused insecurity, starvation, and the flight of hundreds of thousands of Somalis to neighbouring countries. In 1992, the international community intervened in Somalia in various peacekeeping missions, but all peacekeeping efforts ended in 1995 after the 1993 killing of 18 American servicemen by militia loyal to Aidid.

When the international forces left Somalia, clan feuding resumed, albeit at a much lower intensity. Most of the fighting was concentrated in the central and southern parts of the country. With the security situation in the south so fluid, and no central authority in Mogadishu, Oromo and ethnic Somali groups fighting against Ethiopia began to use Somalia as a convenient place to train recruits and launch attacks. These rebel groups felt that the Tigrayan leadership in Ethiopia had excluded other nationalities from power.

However, the presence of these rebel groups in Somalia provoked repeated Ethiopian incursions as early as 1996. It was also responsible for the Ethiopian government's involvement in factional politics in Somalia. Ethiopia provided arms to several Somali factions, particularly the Rahanweyn Resistance Army (RRA), which had been engaged in military confrontations with Hussein Aidid's (the son of the late General Aidid) militia for control of the southwestern city of Baidoa.

During its border war with Eritrea, Ethiopia stepped up its military activities in Somalia. In June 1999, Ethiopia was reported to have actively participated in an RRA military operation that captured Baidoa. Ethiopia's increased military involvement followed reports that Eritrea was channeling weapons to Ethiopian opposition groups in Somalia through Hussein Aidid, who was critical of Ethiopian operations in Somalia and its support for his rivals. Eritrea was reportedly interested in taking the war to Somalia to deflect the Ethiopian attention from the battle fronts around Badme.

The situation in Somalia has been showing signs of recovery. A new interim government was formed in neighbouring Djibouti in August 2000. Led by President Abdulqassim Salad Hassan, who has his mandate from 245 assembly members largely chosen by Somali clans, the first central government since the ouster of Barre is attempting to revive state institutions. But it will be a long time before the new regime can play a viable role in domestic and regional security. Leaders in the breakaway region of Somaliland and the regional administration of Puntland, both in the north, oppose the new central government and have rejected separate Italian and Libyan mediation efforts. Mogadishu-based warlords also pose a challenge to Hassan's administration. The militia of one of these leaders, Muse Sudi Yalahow, fought with government forces in December 2000 after the government attempted to intercept an arms consignment from Ethiopia.


posted by Steven Baum 12/11/2001 10:42:29 AM | link

Monday, December 10, 2001

MORE BLOOD ON KISSINGER'S HANDS
The
National Security Archive reports of new documents released that show Ford and Kissinger giving the green light to Indonesia's invasion of East Timor in 1975. This is one of the many things about which Kissinger has denied complicity over the years, and one by one all his lies are being exposed.
The Indonesian invasion of East Timor in December 1975 set the stage for the long, bloody, and disastrous occupation of the territory that ended only after an international peacekeeping force was introduced in 1999. President Bill Clinton cut off military aid to Indonesia in September 1999—reversing a longstanding policy of military cooperation—but questions persist about U.S. responsibility for the 1975 invasion; in particular, the degree to which Washington actually condoned or supported the bloody military offensive. Most recently, journalist Christopher Hitchens raised questions about the role of former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in giving a green light to the invasion that has left perhaps 200,000 dead in the years since. Two newly declassified documents from the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library, released to the National Security Archive, shed light on the Ford administration’s relationship with President Suharto of Indonesia during 1975. Of special importance is the record of Ford’s and Kissinger’s meeting with Suharto in early December 1975. The document shows that Suharto began the invasion knowing that he had the full approval of the White House. Both of these documents had been released in heavily excised form some years ago, but with Suharto now out of power, and following the collapse of Indonesian control over East Timor, the situation has changed enough that both documents have been released in their entirety.

Other documents found among State Department records at the National Archives elucidate the inner workings of U.S. policy toward the Indonesian crisis during 1975 and 1976. Besides confirming that Henry Kissinger and top advisers expected an eventual Indonesian takeover of East Timor, archival material shows that the Secretary of State fully understood that the invasion of East Timor involved the "illegal" use of U.S.-supplied military equipment because it was not used in self-defense as required by law.


posted by Steven Baum 12/10/2001 04:27:11 PM | link

THE "CELEBRATING" PALESTINIANS
This one just won't go away. As most will recall, a prominent feature of the post-Sept. 11 attack coverage was film of Palestinians supposedly celebrating the attack. At one time it was reported that the film was archive film from 1991, but that was shown to be incorrect. Now the German magazine
Spiegel has run an article claiming that the celebrations were staged by offering treats to children. An article at Think Again explains:
The full story, as yet unreported in America, is really startling. The people who pulled off this public relations stunt know all too well the power TV pictures have. As reported in Spiegel, "Politmagazin" panorama reported ten days after the original airing of the video clips the fact that manipulations took place. Annette Krueger Spitta explains "that is explosive material".

A full viewing of the video tape reveals the games the video crew played. They wanted video of celebrating Palestinians and that is what they orchestrated in front of the camera. The full video clearly shows a few Palestinians jubilant with many more pedestrians, indifferent to their "performances", hurrying past. The Palestinian woman who was offered cake, abhors the acts in New York and Washington. She was shocked to see how the video of her enthusiastically reacting to cake was used. The video clips shown to Americans have the man with the cake edited out in order to create a false impression. The video clips the crew produced are intended for one purpose: to deceive Americans into further support for Israel. The point of the video clips ( which if you think about it, was insensitive to air right after the terrorists' attacks ) is to make Palestinians look bad. And to further show their lack of respect for American viewers, the networks are STILL NOT REPORTING the truth about these video clips. Big Media cannot claim that they can't present this story on television ( an often used excuse when they don't want Americans to know about something. ) This deception is documented on video, all honest reporters have to do is view the whole tape and show it on TV. But that would mean exposing lies that they would rather not.


posted by Steven Baum 12/10/2001 02:51:57 PM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger