Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Saturday, December 01, 2001

FLOYD ON THE HOLY WARS
Chris Floyd discusses the similarities between the two Holy Wars currently being waged.
After all, as U.S. Attorney General "Jailin' John" Ashcroft tells us, the "war on terrorism" is just like "the war on drugs" -- that is to say, a never-ending fount of profitable corruption for the ruthless, the murderous and the well-connected.

Certainly, the "war on drugs" makes little sense otherwise. We all know that if the ingestion of various arbitrarily chosen substances were no longer prosecuted, the level of violence, crime and repression in society would be reduced immeasurably. "Substance abuse" would then become what is it is now for drugs like alcohol and nicotine: a matter of personal character and private consequence.

A crack addict, for example, could have his nightly pipe in the safety of his own home, for the same price as a six-pack of beer, a carton of cigarettes, or the latest Disney video. He wouldn't need to resort to crime to feed an expensive criminalized habit. And his resulting stupefaction would be no more harmful to the public good than that of millions of his fellow citizens sitting slack-jawed in front of the tube.

But decriminalization will never happen. Illegal drugs are simply too profitable for the various powerful criminal elements known as "mafias," "warlords" -- and "intelligence agencies." For drug-running is the perfect way to fund your black ops -- no budget restraints, no legal niceties, no pesky legislators looking over your shoulder.

That's how they did it back in those high old Iran-Contra days, as investigator Robert Parry reports on Consortiumnews.com. Buried in the papers of that thwarted investigation are outright admissions of CIA connivance with the drug dealers who helped finance the murderous Reagan-Bush terrorist network in Latin America.

This is -- in part -- what Bush Jr. is covering up with his recent autocratic edict sealing past presidential papers. And the fact that his Daddy lied about his own involvement in the criminal enterprise -- lies that he drowned certain fathoms deep by pardoning his co-conspirators. Some of these criminal connivers with drug-running now hold high office in the new Bush administration.

You know, the one that "restored honor and integrity" to the White House.

It should be added that the drug war also gives stupefied, booze-soaked couch potatoes a reason to feel superior to evil takers of evil drug evilness.
posted by Steven Baum 12/1/2001 09:26:59 AM | link

BOEING BAILOUT
POGO reports on a couple of deals the Pentagon's trying to ram through Congress to bail out Boeing, i.e. more corporate welfare.
Congress is being pressured to approve a pair of costly proposals that are hidden taxpayer bailouts of Boeing Company. One would allow the purchase of 60 Boeing C-17 cargo aircraft under a special "commercial" provision removing financial oversight; the other calls for the lease of 100 Boeing 767 tankers at a cost that is nearly $7 billion more than if the aircraft were purchased outright.

"These two handouts are being characterized as good business practices when in fact the U.S. taxpayers are paying more to get less," said Danielle Brian, Executive Director of the Project On Government Oversight (POGO).
...
This C-17 commercial proposal would allow the Air Force to bypass important pricing oversight which is only intended to be lifted for items which are truly commercial and therefore regulated by market force. A $200 million outsize military cargo carrier with 173,300-pound capacity is simply not an item where the price tag is determined by free market forces.

Likewise, the plan to lease 100 converted Boeing 767 air refueling aircraft for a period of 10 years would rip off the taxpayers. The Office of Management and Budget estimates that the lease plan would cost $22 billion, while purchasing the aircraft outright would cost just over $15 billion.


posted by Steven Baum 12/1/2001 09:14:20 AM | link

Friday, November 30, 2001

AND GUESS WHO'S INVOLVED?
The
Sacramento Business Journal reports how someone plans to make big bucks via media consolidation.
Frank Washington, the CEO of System Integrators Inc. until the Sacramento newspaper-software company was sold in June 2000, heads a new company these days called Moon Shot Communications. And his new goal is to make a lot of money in the next several years by buying TV stations across the country, waiting for their value to increase, and then selling them to the highest bidders.
Big deal. So a capitalist wants to make more money. Where's the story? Well, let's see what needs to happen for him to starting making the big bucks.
Washington believes the stations will command higher prices if the Federal Communications Commission loosens rules limiting the number of broadcast TV stations a media company can own in the same market -- a change he expects to happen over the next few years.

The change would uncork a consolidation-driven buying frenzy like the one that began in radio 10 years ago. By buying now and selling later, Moon Shot would try to pocket some fat capital gains.

Once again, what's the big deal? So he's waiting for an FCC ruling. Where's the beef? Okay, let's see who he's working with:
Washington and four partners are working with investors and the Carlyle Group of Washington, D.C., a major private-equity firm, to line up stations they might buy.
That would be the Carlyle Group, as in the Carlyle Group with whom former President George Bush is intimately associated, as in the father of the current President George Bush whose appointee as head of the FCC is going to make the ruling that will make Mr. Washington and the Carlyle Group lots of money.
posted by Steven Baum 11/30/2001 02:57:31 PM | link

THE MASSACRE
The
Times and the Independent provide interesting accounts about the massacre at Kala-i Janghi. The "official" story has degenerated by now to something along the following lines: A group of Taliban prisoners, none of whom had been searched for weapons and all of whom were maniacally suicidal and armed to the teeth, were taken to a prison where the revolted without provocation and had to be put down with air strikes. The facts in these two articles tell a different story if you wade through all the extra speculation put in as camouflage.

First, we discover the only version of why the rebellion started that has been related by more than one witness, i.e. "a persistent explanation from a number of sources." A key paragraph from the Independent article:

A persistent explanation from a number of sources is that a handful of the prisoners were provoked into launching the rebellion by the sight of the two Americans questioning selected prisoners, possibly for information on the whereabouts of members of bin Laden's al Qaida organisation.
In other places in both articles the less benign "interrogating" is used rather than "questioning", that is, it's highly likely that the prisoners were being beaten by the CIA interrogators or, if they wanted to retain plausible deniability, by Northern Alliance personnel. In other words, it's hard to believe that a rebellion could have been provoked by the sight of a couple of CIA operatives merely asking prisoners questions.

A relatively well established fact is that the day before, two Taliban prisoners had committed suicide by detonating hand grenades. In the process they killed a couple of Northern Alliance personnel and injured a reporter. But then the articles start to churn out a lot of spin attempting to convince that all the Taliban prisoners were suicidal maniacs, e.g.

It was not the first time that we had heard of bin Laden's "foreigners" committing suicide rather than be taken alive. The Northern Alliance claimed that a group of around 60 of them jumped into a river and drowned themselves. Another group were found kneeling in positions of prayer, each with a single bullet wound from behind. A Northern Alliance commander alleged that one of them had killed all of the others in a suicide pact before turning the gun on himself.
That is, the Northern Alliance "claims" this and "alleges" that, and all of a sudden every single prisoner is a walking, psychotic time bomb. While convenient for apologetics, recall that there's reasonable evidence for only two prisoners having been suicidal. Recall also the constant statements by various Northern Alliance leaders that all non-Afghan prisoners will be summarily executed.

Next we find out that around 250 of the prisoners had their arms tied after being searched for weapons. The Independent tells us:

Ghaisuddin says prisoners who had been searched and were found to be clean had their arms tied behind their backs above the elbow with their own black turbans - the state in which some of the bodies were found.
and the Times:
But the main explosion did not take place until the CIA intervention on Sunday morning. Rebellion may also have been sparked by efforts to tie up the Taleban prisoners, many of whom apparently believed they were about to be killed. About 250 [of a total estimated to be about 400] had been bound, according to one report, before the rest rebelled.
So significantly less than half of the prisoners had the use of their hands when the rebellion started. So how many of the rest were supposedly armed to the teeth? The Times article tells us:
On arrival at the dusty fortress, at least two of the vehicles containing the Taleban were not searched.
This most likely means that somebody had knowledge that two weren't searched, with the "at least" tacked on to imply that many more weren't. So assuming, say, 20 trucks with 20 Taliban apiece we have 40 prisoners who weren't searched. And if 250 were tied up, then 150/250 times 40 or 24 of the remaining 150 might have not been searched. The Independent article tells us:
Some sources said yesterday that there were as few as 50 men guarding up to 400 dangerous prisoners.
So at the time of the uprising, at least 50 guards were available to watch over 250 men who had been tied up, 150 who hadn't, and perhaps 24 who hadn't been searched and may have still had weapons on them.

This doesn't exactly jibe with the version of the story that would have us believe that 400 heavily armed prisoners took over for no reason (other than a collective death wish) and had to be quelled via airstrikes. It sounds more like a few of those who hadn't been tied up saw the CIA interrogating, i.e. torturing, their fellow prisoners and fought back rather than suffer the same fate. They did get plenty of guns, but they got them after the start of the rebellion from the large weapons repositories that were also in the castle in which they were being held.

The apologists would have us believe that 400 prisoners who hadn't been searched and were all heavily armed just decided to rebel, probably because they all had death wishes, and that there was no other option than killing them all via airstrikes. While that version undoubtedly makes it easier to rationalize the massacre, it's a far cry from the more likely reality of a rebellion prompted by the fear of interrogation, i.e. torture, and summary execution. 250 prisoners tied up with perhaps a couple dozen not having been searched is also a far cry from 400 heavily armed prisoners. I can't claim to speak for anyone else's sense of morality, but mine doesn't allow me to justify the massacre of 400 prisoners who are rebelling because they don't want to be tortured or executed. Just imagine what the reaction would be if this sort of thing had been brought up at Nuremberg, with the captors being Germans and the massacred being Allied prisoners.
posted by Steven Baum 11/30/2001 11:16:53 AM | link

GOOD INSPECTIONS AND BAD INSPECTIONS
Geov Parrish writes of the silly game being played about inspections in the propaganda build-up for an invasion of Iraq. Basically, one side of the mouth is saying that inspections of Iraq are essential to ensure that "weapons of mass destruction" aren't being manufactured, while the other side refuses to sign a biological weapons treaty because inspections don't prove anything.
Now, though virtually nobody has suggested that Iraq had any direct involvement in the September 11 attacks, cold warrior opportunists are using our desire for permanent war to press the idea they've had for eleven years: that we never "finished the job" and assassinated Saddam or otherwise removed his government from power -- an act that, as in Afghanistan, the U.S. has absolutely no legal right to do. These armchair executioners apparently have at least one of Dubya's ears, and, as throughout the history of the largely disgraced economic sanctions, Bush is now paving the way by insisting that Iraq allow "weapons inspections" in his country.

There are a number of problems with all this, many of which are familiar to anyone who has followed the sanctions tragedy throughout the last decade. In brief: Iraq is little threat to its immediate neighbors, let alone the United States. When I spoke earlier this month with Hans von Sponeck, the former deputy secretary general who ran the U.N.'s Food for Oil program and who, like his predecessor, quit in protest over American intransigence, he called Iraq "effectively disarmed," and most impartial observers agree. But it is impossible to prove a negative (that there are no easily concealed weapons, anywhere), and through the history of U.S. weapons inspection demands, Von Sponeck says, Clinton's teams would keep moving the goalposts; Iraq would comply with one requirement, and then the U.S. would change and tighten its requirements, Iraq would balk, the U.S. would bomb.

Saddam also eventually refused, starting in 1998, to allow U.N. inspectors into the country, because, the Iraqi dictator charged, the U.S. had planted spies among the inspection team. And, as it turned out, the United States had done exactly that. (Ironically, Bush has pulled the U.S. out of negotiations for an enforcement protocol for the Biological Weapons Convention, arguing that inspections don't prove anything and that inspecting U.S. facilities would violate our sovereignty and security. Hmm.) It takes a lot to make a genocidal creep like Saddam Hussein look like a victim, but the U.S. has managed it.


posted by Steven Baum 11/30/2001 10:40:38 AM | link

THEY USED DRAMATIC IRONY
The
Sydney Morning Herald reports of another massacre of Taliban prisoners.
Opposition forces battling Taliban resistance near the southern Afghan city of Kandahar are reported to have massacred up to 160 captured Taliban fighters in the presence of United States military personnel.

An opposition commander said the Taliban who refused to surrender last week during a battle to control the strategic town of Taktha Pul, east of Kandahar, were executed despite attempts by US special forces to intervene.

"We tried our best to persuade [the Taliban] to surrender before we attacked," the unnamed commander told Reuters. "We asked them many times, quoted the Koran and even offered them money.

"They replied with abuse, so we had no choice. We executed around 160 Taliban that were captured. They were made to stand in a long line, and five or six of our fighters used light machine-guns on them."

Okay, now let's get this straight. They lined 160 of them up against the wall and shot them because "they replied with abuse." Not because they were armed and shooting back, not because they were trying to escape, but because "they replied with abuse." They must have invoked that Geneva Convention subsection that allows you to kill prisoners if they flip you off. The "light machine gun" line is also priceless, as if using "heavy" ones would have been crossing the line.
posted by Steven Baum 11/30/2001 10:19:38 AM | link

HOT DIGGITY! MORE BLACKADDER!
Okay, it's
just a parody (via wood s lot) wherein Blackadder meets the Prisoner, but it's still more of that which I crave.
posted by Steven Baum 11/30/2001 09:58:24 AM | link

THE TRUTH THING
There's an interesting discussion about the "T"-word going on at
Keep Trying and Doc Searls (via wood s lot). The question that started it all:
Do writers, columnists and bloggers want to look for the truth or just get others to accept their opinions?
I just wanna get rich, although I'm obviously going about it in all the wrong ways.
posted by Steven Baum 11/30/2001 09:52:32 AM | link

ALL THINGS MUST PASS
Laughter being the best medicine, I'm remembering a National Lampoon special "Beat the Meetles" issue from the 1970s. They had a full page "ad" about George's next album, to be entitled "Lifting Material from the World." It featured such tunes as "My Sweet White Christmas," "My Sweet Beethoven's Fifth Symphony", etc. I also remember a couple of jokes from that issue:

Q: What disease caused George's wife to leave him?
A: The Clapton.

Q: When did Paul McCartney write "Silly Love Songs"?
A: From 1961 to the present.

A remastered version of All Things Must Pass, the Phil Spector produced meisterwork from 1970, was recently released. I'm gonna have to give it a listen while the world gently weeps.
posted by Steven Baum 11/30/2001 09:00:48 AM | link

Thursday, November 29, 2001

KURDISTAN
The Kurd situation in Iraq (and in Turkey, for that matter) is not nearly as simple as its been painted in the mainstream media. That is, it's a bit more complicated than the usual picture of evil Saddam killing Kurdish babies while cackling sinisterly. A good summary can be found in Robert Pelton's
The World's Most Dangerous Places (4th Ed.), the most interesting and useful book I've found this year. It's much, much more than merely a guide to traveling in dangerous places. It's the best single summary of world conflict available, and by "best" I mean most complete, least politically motivated and wittiest. I can't recommend it highly enough. That being said, let's get to part of his chapter called "Kurdistan". There is, of course, no such beast as Kurdistan on the world map, although there are quite a few Kurds. As Pelton puts it:
Historically, the Kurds have been cut something of a raw deal. When the Ottoman Empire collapsed after WWI the Kurds were promised an independent Kurdistan by the British under provisions made by the 1920 Treaty of Sevres. In 1923, though, the Brits changed their minds and cut a deal with Kemal Ataturk, the calculation being that it would be better to have an anti-communist Turkey than an independent Kurdistan. The 1923 Treaty of Lausanne left the Kurds viciously shortchanged, but then you'd expect that from perfidious Albion. Since then modern Kurdish history has been one of rebellion and repression.
So today the Kurds dwell in several countries: 12-15 million in southeastern Turkey, 5-7 million in Iran, 1.5 million in Syria, 4 million in northern Iraq, and 1.5 million or so scattered over the former Soviet Union.

The Kurds in northern Iraq are divided into two main factions, the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), who control the northwest, and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), who control the southeast (of the northern part of Iraq). After a safe haven for all the Kurds was created in 1991 after the Gulf Fracas, the first ever free election was held in 1992. The KDP beat the PUK, but decided to split the seats in the new parliament evenly. That was about it for harmony. Pelton continues:

The nice guy stuff didn't last for long, though. In 1994 warfare erupted between the PUK and KDP. The PUK accused the KDP of hogging the cash from the border trade with Turkey. With as many as 1000 trucks crossing the border every day it is estimated that the revenue derived from taxing the trucks is about US$100 million a year. Needless to say, the KDP control the border. The KDP said "don't." The PUK said "do," leveled the antiaircraft guns and started blasting. In 1995 the PUK took the self-declared Kurdish capital of Arbil after fierce fighting. There was a breather for a while when the U.S. brokered an agreement between the two parties in Dublin, Ireland. When the U.S. then refused to put up the cash for the elections (a whole $2 million), both factions decided to resolve their differences with artillery instead.

This time, though, [KDP party head] Barzani dumped Uncle Sam for Uncle Saddam and invited the latter into Iraqi Kurdistan to kick the PUK out. On August 31, 1996, 10,000 Republican Guards plus tanks rocke dup outside the gates of Arbil. With Saddam's elite soldeirs issued with real bullets the PUK left in a hurry. Saddam's folks got down to the busy taks of blowing up the Iraqi National Congress, rounding up and shooting a number of CIA-trained flunkies, and leaving behind a number of Iraqis who had changed into Kurdish uniforms.

At this point, Clinton decided to toss 44 cruise missiles at Saddam's troops, i.e. the ones who'd been invited in by one of the warring Kurdish factions. Pelton continues:
Saddam was totally unfazed. His new Kurdish allies went on to capture the rest of Kurdistan over the next few days. The PUK retreated to their headquarters in Zahle, way up on the Iranian border, for some counseling and weapons.

It didn't take long for the PUK to hatch a plan. A month later they stormed down from the border (with a bit of help from Iran), recapturing most of their traditional areas. This time Saddam didn't come running to Barzani's aid. He simply informed the PUK that if they took the town of Degala then he would come back into the conflict again. A tad miffed, the PUK called a halt to the offensive, sat back in Sulymanya and waited for their next opportunity. Things really went haywire in October 1997. Earlier in the year the KDP had allied themselves with the Turks in their war against the PKK [i.e. the separatist Kurdish movement in Turkey] operating from the border area. With most of the KDP peshmerga tied up along the border the PUK rubbed their hands with glee and started planning the next offensive. October saw the beginning of the PUK blitzkrieg, and boy, was the KDP in trouble. It was double double, toil and trouble, when the PKK kids then moved down from the border and joined in the offensive for a lark. The KDP dialed 911 (or 312 as the case was) and the Turkish military came storming in with everything they had. A month of fighting saw the PUK reluctantly call a halt to the offensive. With the preferred option of exterminating the KDP no longer an option, the PUK decided to negotiate. After months of wrangling, both Kurdish leaders went to Washington in September 1988, where they signed a temporary - sorry, a permanent - peace agreement. Totally fixed and unfair elections were due to be held in June 1999, but as this book goes to press have yet to be held.

So much for the cartoon version of a unified Kurdish front in Iraq standing up to the evil evilness of Saddam. Pelton's book is a whopping 1010 pages of such interesting tidbits, chock full of maps, historical background, summaries of the players (you can't tell who's killing who without a program), and just plain reading pleasure. Joe Bob sez check it out.
posted by Steven Baum 11/29/2001 04:55:54 PM | link

GOOD MISSILES VS. BAD MISSILES
The lead paragraph in a
USA Today item tells us:
Congress is looking into reports North Korea is providing Egypt with long-range missiles even as the Bush administration plans to sell the Arab country more than 50 surface-to-surface missiles in a $400 million arms deal, a congressional source said Tuesday.
The missiles North Korea is selling Egypt will of course be used to spread terrorism, while the U.S. missiles will spread freedom and justice. I for one just can't wait to hear Ari Fleisher "explain" this one.

A marvelous place to get daily news about who is selling weapons to who in the Middle East is the Middle East Newsline. At least a couple of items a day are about arms sales, as in "guess who's going to win this war no matter what happens?".
posted by Steven Baum 11/29/2001 04:43:50 PM | link

CHILLING INDEED
A
Times of India item illustrates how utterly ridiculous the mainstream media has become, not to mention their use ad nauseaum of the word "chilling." The article is about how a couple of Pakistani scientists working in Kabul were supposedly designing a balloon to drop anthrax on unsuspecting victims. The paragraph containing the "C"-word is:
The "most chilling" items found from the Kabul premises included small bags of white powder and the "mass of calculations and drawings" of weather balloons with arrows indicating the suggested height of 10 km or 33,000 feet, said The Economist in its print edition.
To begin with, a balloon ain't rocket science. Despite what you see in the Roadrunner cartoons, you don't need Wile E. Coyote in a white coat carefully drawing blueprints to get one off the ground. You buy a balloon from, say, Edmund Scientific or any of dozens of other outlets, you inflate it with helium, and you let it go. It's just that easy. It certainly doesn't require a "mass of calculations and drawings". The only thing that might require even a little design would be a release mechanism for the anthrax, if that was the intended use.

The Economist, usually a fairly sensible bunch, really needs to hire an average science student to help them separate the wheat from the chaff. You'd think they'd be more careful, especially after that incident where the "super secret atomic bomb plans" turned out to be an Internet download from the "Journal of Irreproducible Results." As for the bags of white powder, they're bags of white powder until they're shown to be anthrax.
posted by Steven Baum 11/29/2001 04:24:33 PM | link

Wednesday, November 28, 2001

MORE CRASS THUGGERY IN BOLIVIA
Narco News reports on an attempt by Bolivia to jail a labor leader for sedition for the "crimes" of speaking and organizing. One would hope that this might be a first step to halting the egregrious stupidities of the Holy War on Drugs, especially those involving the brutal repression and killing of poor farmers in Latin America so yuppie cokeheads in the U.S. can be spared the inconvenience of being busted. But, given the additional egregious stupidities of the Holy War on Terrorism, this will most likely only lead to a few thousand more dead dirt poor farmers, to be branded as "terrorists" after the fact.
Fearful of the popular response to government threats of resuming coca eradication in the Chapare region -- where eradication was suspended and 4,000 military troops had to be withdrawn last week -- the Bolivian regime and its Embassy puppetmaster tried to invoke fear. On Tuesday, one of the nation's most important labor leaders and a global environmental hero, Oscar Olivera, was forcibly detained. A message from his family appears below. It says that this patriot has been charged with "sedition" among other crimes.
...
It is obvious that as the US Embassy and its obedient government in Bolivia are trying to spread fear of repression, as they attempt to jump-start the eradication of small coca gardens, grown by families, for use as a food, but they have not quelled the social revolt. Olivera, and the labor and water movements that he has helped to lead, have demonstrated active solidarity with the plight of the coca growers. That is his only crime: Speaking and organizing, within his rights under law, against a brutal tyranny imposed from far away.

The US government has long portrayed Bolivia as its Latin American "success story" in the "war on drugs." It was able to do that through a dictator-turned-"president" named Hugo Banzer, who fell ill last summer and no longer inspires fear among the public. The new president, Jorge Quiroga, does not have the same iron grip. And because the Bolivian regime has misdirected too large a percentage of its wealth toward the drug war, the national economy is in tatters. As Narco News has reported in recent days, virtually every sector of Civil Society is lined up in opposition to the regime's policies that are imposed by the US Embassy.
...
Olivera was released from government custody on Tuesday afternoon, but the State warned him that if he does or says anything that the regime dislikes in the next three days, he may be arrested again. By arresting Olivera, the Embassy and the regime had hoped to intimidate the social movements in Bolivia at this key hour in the struggle. Instead, they have sparked global attention and local outrage: the world is watching you, Ambassador Rocha, and you will be held responsible by Civil Society within the United States and throughout the world for any more repressive measures against Olivera or any citizen leader on your watch. Because you, Mr. Viceroy, are under our watch. That's not sedition, ambassador. It's called democracy.


posted by Steven Baum 11/28/2001 11:11:42 AM | link

PAKISTAN IS AIDING AND HARBORING TERRORISTS
According to the Braying Ass Doctrine, Pakistan is therefore a terrorist state. I expect to hear a demand for the return of all those Al Qaeda troops and, if refused, an invasion of Pakistan, despite the fact that it will be much more difficult and costly to invade Pakistan. If you're going to talk the talk, then either walk the walk or shut your braying, festering gob and stop babbling inanely about how supporting, harboring, training or giving enemas to terrorists makes you a terrorist.
According to DEBKAfile's military experts, 3000 of these men, some injured, were evacuated from Konduz in a secret nocturnal Pakistani airlift, run before the Taliban enclave fell to the Northern Alliance.
...
Correspondents who entered Konduz with the Northern Alliance quoted local inhabitants as reporting that two nights before the town fell - and immediately after the Pakistani planes flew in - heavy Russian Antonov air transports touched down at Konduz airport and gathered up the al Qaeda "Arabs" - with their weapons. DEBKAfile's military sources, after checking on this lead with army intelligence sources in the Indian subcontinent, present this explanation of the mystery as the most plausible. Those Antonovs were chartered by the Pakistani ISI to lift the al Qaida contingents together with a few Taliban units out of Konduz in north Afghanistan into north Pakistan. Their landings were masked by the US-authorized flights extricating the Pakistani combatants and therefore went undetected. And that was not the end of the transfer. It is still going on. Our sources report that al Qaeda and their Taliban allies are streaming out of Kandahar in the south and crossing east into Pakistan.

posted by Steven Baum 11/28/2001 10:44:51 AM |
link

MORE ON CARLYLE GROUP
Judicial Watch - which has apparently taken another day off from its main quest of filing lawsuits against Clinton until the day he dies, and then probably going after Chelsea - is filing a FOIA lawsuit over documents pertaining to the Carlyle Group, the government behind the government.
Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today announced that it would be filing a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State and Defense Departments in order to obtain documents concerning the Carlyle Group, an international consulting and investment firm which retains former President George H.W. Bush.
...
In the wake of Judicial Watch and other criticism of its ties to the bin Laden family business, the Carlyle Group reportedly no longer does business with the bin Laden conglomerate. Yet it has also been reported that the Group has had significant business contacts with the Saudi Arabian government, which many have criticized for its lack of diligence in reigning in bin Laden and its tepid support for America?s war against terrorism.

And documents recently uncovered through Judicial Watch?s FOIA to the Department of Defense shows that the Carlyle Group has high-level access to the U.S. government. The documents include a February 15, 2001 letter on Carlyle Group letterhead to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld from former Defense Secretaries Frank Carlucci and William Perry, both now with Carlyle Group. The documents also include Secretary Rumsfeld?s April 3 response to Messrs. Carlucci and Perry. The letters seemingly discuss the restructuring of the Defense Department. The Carlyle Group is listed in the documents as Defense Department contractor. Copies of the letters will be available on the Judicial Watch Internet site at www.judicialwatch.org.

"It is time for former President Bush to leave the Carlyle Group. The questions raised by his and others involvement with the Saudi-connected firm can only cause problems for the U.S. war effort," stated Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman.

The documents obtained so far include an exchange of letters wherein we discover that the Carlyle Group is going to be making decisions about changing the infrastructure of the military. That is, they're going to be making decisions about things that directly affect their investments. By the way, it should also be mentioned that the only evidence that the Carlyle Group no longer have "ties" to the Bin Laden conglomerate is that they claim they no longer have ties. They are a private company and therefore are not required to reveal anything to anybody, except of course to their chief military liaison Dr. Rumslove who will certainly remain mum on such matters.
posted by Steven Baum 11/28/2001 10:27:19 AM | link

ANOTHER TERRORIST ON TRIAL
Robert Fisk reports on new condemnatory evidence coming to light about another terrorist who's never been prosecuted for his crimes and almost certainly never will.
Chilling new evidence suggests that more than 1,000 Palestinian survivors of the Sabra and Chatila camp massacres in Beirut were "disappeared" within 24 hours of the slaughter, often in areas under direct Israeli military control.

The testimony - which describes in detail how the victims were last seen by their families in the hands of Israeli troops and Israel's militia allies - will be among the material to be considered by a Belgian judge, who could decide today whether the Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, should be prosecuted for the slaughter.

Mr Sharon was judged "personally responsible" for the massacre by the Israeli Kahan Commission in 1983. Its report concluded that hundreds of Palestinian civilians, including women and children, were all butchered between 16 and 18 September in 1982.

But among the female witnesses cited by lawyers in Belgium, who are seeking the indictment against Mr Sharon, are at least five who claim that more than 100 men were detained by the militiamen and handed over to the Israelis alive. They were never seen again.

Separately from the court action,film taken by a television crew at the time, which has recently come to light, appears to show Israeli officers in the presence of Phalangist gunmen - long after the Israelis knew their Phalangist allies had carried out the massacre, which caused worldwide outrage and led Mr Sharon, then Defence Minister, to resign.

Ah, but we all know how fucking silly and Clouseau-esque those Belgian lawyers are, how much those Palestinian wogs lie, and how camera footage can be faked. Enough of these irrelevant tangets, dammit! They're just getting in the way of the Holy War on Terrorism and the Inevitable March for Freedom and Justice!
posted by Steven Baum 11/28/2001 09:51:46 AM | link

FLOGGING THE KOREA HORSE
An
AP item shows that the Pentagon is apparently bored with provoking only Iraq in preparation for the next "march of freedom", i.e. invasion.
U.N. officials were investigating a brief exchange of gunfire across the heavily armed border between North and South Korea on Tuesday.

The South Korean military said there were no reports of injuries during the shooting, which came during an impasse in inter-Korean reconciliation efforts. It said the North fired first, but added the gunfire appeared to be accidental.
...
The statement said two or three shots were fired from a North Korean guard post inside the 2.5 mile-wide Demilitarized Zone.

A shot from the North broke a window at a South Korean guard post, and another hit a wire fence, but there were no South Korean soldiers injured, it said.

South Korean guards broadcast warnings and fired back about 15 rounds, but there also were no reports of injuries on the North Korean side, South Korean officials said.

Noting that the North Korean fire did not last, the South Korean military said it did not appear to be an intentional attack.

The article doesn't say if other such incidents occur or, if so, how often and from where they originate. Further on down in the article we get to the provocation.
In the past week, North Korea charged that South Korea's military brought a howitzer and two armored tanks into the DMZ. The 1953 Korean armistice agreement allows only rifles and other small arms inside the buffer zone.
Note that in the first part of the article we read that South Korea "said" that North Korea fired first in the supposed incident, while later we read that North Korea "charged" that the tanks were rolled into the DMZ. It would be highly unlikely that such tank action would go unnoticed by the 37,000 U.S. troops permanently stationed near the DMZ in South Korea, a deployment that costs over $30 billion per year, by the way.

The titular head of the Regime is also braying at North Korea, as reported in an AP item:

He said the leaders of North Korea must allow inspectors in if they want good relations with the United States.

"And they ought to stop proliferating," Bush said, adding that "part of the war on terror is to deny terrorists weapons."

Since the presidential campaign, Bush has urged Iraq and North Korea to allow weapons inspectors into their nations. He has warned Iraq of undisclosed consequences if they don't comply. The administration has long suspected both countries of trying to develop weapons of mass destruction.

The Braying Ass in Chief also reiterated his condemnation of and threat to all things terrorist:
If anybody harbors a terrorist, they're a terrorist. If they fund a terrorist, they're a terrorist. If they house terrorists, they're terrorists. I mean, I can't make it any more clear to other nations around the world.
The Commander in Thief did not go on to elaborate how the U.S. would be punished for, among other things, harboring terrorist thug Emmanuel Constant in New York and continuing to train and house Latin American terrorists at the School of the Americas/WHISC at Fort Benning in Georgia.
posted by Steven Baum 11/28/2001 09:27:22 AM | link

BONN TALKS A JOKE
Burhanuddin Rabbani, the head of the sainted Northern Alliance, has as much as said that the touted Bonn talks are a dog and pony show. According to the
Times of India:
Former Afghan President Burhanuddin Rabbani said Tuesday that talks under way in Germany to determine Afghanistan's political future were unlikely to yield substantial results.

"The International Conference on Afghanistan held in Bonn should be the last meeting held outside Afghanistan. I don't expect decisive results from the meeting," Rabbani said at a press conference in Dubai. He did not elaborate.

It'll be the usual sort of circle-jerk wherein all the Afghan factions who are ostensibly going to share power in the New Improved Government will get seats at the big, round table, say whatever it is they want to say, and then be completely ignored by Rabbani and the real power brokers. But it'll look good on CNNPentagon as the announcers somberly intone platitudes about "the slow and steady march of peace and democracy."
posted by Steven Baum 11/28/2001 09:15:18 AM | link

HERE COME THE IVANS
The
Independent tells of the Russians bringing their humanitarian mission into Kabul.
The official explanation, given by President Vladimir Putin on Monday, was that staff, construction crews and diplomats had been sent to Kabul for aid work. Russia's Ministry of Emergency Assistance was formerly part of the Defence Ministry. Now its identity is separate but the antecedents are still apparent. The contrast with Britain's Department for International Development (DfID) could not be starker. "They come in like that,'' said a British diplomat in Kabul last night, "We send in three blokes with cheque books.''
...
Just as the Taliban are seen as the foster children of Islamabad, the Northern Alliance is seen as the creature of Moscow, which kept Ahmed Shah Masood's resistance to the Taliban alive with money and supplies throughout the bad years after the Taliban seized Kabul in 1996. Emerging on the world's stage since 11 September, the Northern Alliance has tried to rebrand itself as the "United Front'' but the yawning absence of their forces in the fight for Kandahar and their inability to bring order to major roads in Pashtun-dominated areas close to the capital exposes the limits of their authority.

posted by Steven Baum 11/28/2001 09:10:24 AM | link

Tuesday, November 27, 2001

SOURCEFORGE DRIFTING
Loic Duchary writes of problems with SourceForge.
Over the past few months the SourceForge development facility, which hosts a large number of Free Software projects, has changed its policies. Features for exporting a project from SourceForge have been removed. The implementation used to be exclusively Free Software but is now based on non-free software. Finally, VA Linux has become rather underhand in their attempts to grasp exclusive control of contributors' work.
...
The move to non-free software was the culmination of a series of steps designed to lock users in. There never was a way to fully extract projects from SourceForge, but efforts were made in this direction--then this year they were removed. At present the only things you can get are the CVS tree and tracker data /export/sf_tracker_export.php. Few people are aware of the later because it is undocumented. The export page explains how to use scripts that don't exist anymore; implementation of facilities to ease project extraction was stopped. The developer community is exclusively made of VA Linux employees and a few people who are asked not to disclose the current code.
...
It's time for people who value freedom to escape from SourceForge. It has become a tar pit from which escape will become increasingly difficult. Development hosting platforms based completely on Free Software flourish all over the world. You can create your own, join an existing one or help write the underlying software. Some months ago I helped to launch Savannah for the GNU project because I felt the need of a collaboratively run platform. With friends and co-developpers we are now re-writing and packaging distributed development hosting software. The idea is to be able to install and operate a SourceForge-like site within hours. Savannah will run this software at the end of this year. At first it may have less functionality than SourceForge, but it has a bright future because it is rooted in a cooperative effort of people sharing Free Software.

posted by Steven Baum 11/27/2001 10:28:15 AM | link

XINETD
If you've found yourself a bit confused (and I know I have) about the transition from inetd to xinetd in more recent Linux distributions, Teodor Zlatanov's
Using the xinetd Program for System Administration contains information and pointers to other resources that just might help clear up the confusion.
posted by Steven Baum 11/27/2001 10:20:51 AM | link

ADVANCED FILESYSTEMS ON LINUX
IBM Developerworks has a long series on the whys and hows of various advanced filesystems for Linux. It's well worth a look-see if you're thinking about using one of them. The series is written by Daniel Robbins. The installments released thus far are:
  1. Journalling and ReiserFS
  2. Using ResierFS and Linux 2.4
  3. Using the Virtual Memory (VM) Filesystem and Bind Mounts
  4. Introduction to devfs
  5. Setting up devfs
  6. Implementing devfs (using the init wrapper)
  7. Introducting ext2

posted by Steven Baum 11/27/2001 10:16:34 AM | link

DEMOCRACY MARCHES ON IN PAKISTAN
The
Dawn reports how the sweet, sweet breeze of freedom and democracy - having cleansed the evil from Afghanistan - is turning to work its magic on new extra special pal Pakistan. One can almost hear the Bush Regime grinding their teeth in envy upon hearing about this.
History seems to be repeating itself once again following the announcement that President Pervez Musharraf intends to carry on as president after October 2002, when the Supreme Court has decreed that elections to the national and provincial assemblies must be held. He had made his intentions clear in an interview during his recent US tour and has reiterated this position once again in a meeting with editors in Islamabad on Friday.

Musharraf, who also holds the post of chief of army staff, made it clear that while the scheduled elections will take place as planned he will remain the president in order to safeguard the institutional and economic reforms his government has undertaken. He also stated that there would be no interim government in the build-up to the elections.

While the announcement does not come as a surprise, it raises a number of important questions. The most contentious issue is the manner in which the general intends to extend his term as president. Rather than seeking some kind of legitimacy by getting himself elected via a referendum or through a future assembly, President Musharraf seems set to use powers vested in him by the Provisional Constitutional Order to extend his tenure by three to four years.


posted by Steven Baum 11/27/2001 09:40:31 AM | link

IMF AID FOR ISRAEL VIA TURKEY
Now here's an
interesting little item (via Antiwar) telling how IMF loans given to Turkey to ostensibly rescue their economy from a drastic recession is instead being transferred to Israel to bail out a failing weapons manufacturing company.
The Turkish daily Millet said that it is expected that a sum of USD 700 million of the IMF loans will be transferred to the Israeli manufacturing company " AMA" and this loan will rescue the company from the drastic financial crisis it has been suffering since a long period of time. This facility will be given for an agreement to be signed between the Turkish ministry of defense and the said company in order to renovate 170 tanks used by the Turkish land forces.

posted by Steven Baum 11/27/2001 09:31:48 AM | link

PAKISTAN HELPS TALIBAN ESCAPE
New special U.S. buddy Pakistan
airlifted an unknown number of Taliban members out of Kunduz before the Northern Alliance took over. This item represents a real dilemma for the pathological liars in the Pentagon. They've spent months painting the Northern Alliance as saintly freedom fighters out to rescue Afghanistan from evil evildoers of evil, and now they've having to either call their saints liars or be caught in their own lies. Dr. Rumslove and his minions have gotten to the point where they'd deny that the sun rises in the east, but this makes life easier for those of us who wish a more close and personal relationship with reality. Whatever Dr. Rumslove etc. say, just assume the opposite is probably closer to whatever might have happened in physical reality.
For two weeks Gen Daoud's men had surrounded the last Taliban stronghold in northern Afghanistan, held at bay, he claimed, by 6,000 foreign fighters. He had been up all night overseeing the final advance.

Yet at the last, he complained, he had been robbed of putting the foreigners "on trial" after Pakistan, the original sponsor of the Taliban, sent transport planes to spirit away unknown numbers of them.

"We were not able to prevent the Pakistani air force from landing, and taking away the terrorists," he said.

The Pentagon denied the claims. Gen Richard Myers, chairman of the chiefs of staff, said Kunduz airfield had been "disabled" by US attacks. Although parts could be used, the runway was not long enough to take transport aircraft.

Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, said: "I have received absolutely no information that would verify or validate statements about airplanes moving in or out. I doubt them."

But the city seethed with talk of planes landing and taking off throughout Sunday evening. Commanders who fought for control of the airport reported seeing three planes land and take off, and a fourth circle before disappearing, as alliance forces attacked.


posted by Steven Baum 11/27/2001 09:25:04 AM | link

PILGER ON APOLOGISTS
John Pilger's piece in the Nov. 26
New Statesman is worth a read. Here are the last couple of paragraphs.
As one who has seen a great deal of bombing, I have been struck by the capacity of those calling themselves "liberals" and "progressives" wilfully to tolerate the suffering of innocents in Afghanistan. What do these self-regarding commentators, who witness virtually nothing of the struggles of the outside world, have to say to the families of refugees bombed to death in the dusty town of Gardez the other day, long after it fell to anti-Taliban forces? What do they say to the parents of dead children whose bodies lay in the streets of Kunduz last Sunday? "Forty people were killed," said Zumeray, a refugee. "Some of them were burned by the bombs, others were crushed by the walls and roofs of their houses when they collapsed from the blast." What does the Guardian's Polly Toynbee say to him: "Can't you see that bombing works?" Will she call him anti-American? What do "humanitarian interventionists" say to people who will die or be maimed by the 70,000 American cluster bomblets left unexploded?

For several weeks, the Observer, a liberal newspaper, has published unsubstantiated reports that have sought to link Iraq with 11 September and the anthrax scare. "Whitehall sources" and "intelligence sources" are the main tellers of this story. "The evidence is mounting . . ." said one of the pieces. The sum of the "evidence" is zero, merely grist for the likes of Wolfowitz and Perle and probably Blair, who can be expected to go along with the attack. In his essay "The Banality of Evil", the great American dissident Edward Herman described the division of labour among those who design and produce weapons like cluster bombs and daisy cutters and those who take the political decisions to use them and those who create the illusions that justify their use. "It is the function of the experts, and the mainstream media," he wrote, "to normalise the unthinkable for the general public." It is time journalists reflected upon this, and took the risk of telling the truth about an unconscionable threat to much of humanity that comes not from faraway places, but close to home.


posted by Steven Baum 11/27/2001 09:05:28 AM | link

Monday, November 26, 2001

PRISON RIOT "QUELLED" VIA AIR STRIKES
Ahmed Amr asks some questions about the prison riot massacre that aren't going to see the light of day in the usual apologist outlets. The media's gotten so utterly docile and servile that they're incapable of even raising an eyebrow when airstrikes are used to control a prison riot. The only thing certain about the incident is that everything the Pentagon says beyond that it bombed caged prisoners will be a lie.
Stories are emerging today that a 'prison riot' by Taliban soldiers and their 'foreign allies' in which apparently nearly all the rioters were killed. We may never know exactly how these combatants who had already surrendered were slaughtered. But the details are certainly worthy of an investigation. The scene of the latest carnage was a fort near the northern Afghan City of Mazar-e-Sharif. According to the BBC the riot was 'brought under control' with US air strikes and American special forces troops fighting alongside the Northern Alliance.

The mass media morons, just recently recruited from Chandrala, have not bothered asking why a prison riot was 'controlled' by air strikes.

It is not too difficult to imagine that forces under warlord Rashid Dostum were involved in yet another war crime. Dostum has a history which is vulgar even by the standards of Afghan warlords. What is disturbing to know is that Dostum had the luxury of calling in American air strikes to finish off the killing of POWs, some of whom apparently were non-Afghans. Perhaps it is now sufficient to tag POWs as Chechens, Pakistanis and Arabs to justify covering up what could be a crime of mass murder. Just last week, in Mazar-e-Sharif, there was another scene of mass slaughter after the city was surrendered to Dostum.
...
This 'POW riot' needs to be investigated. Don't hold your breath for the intellectual degenerates who toil for our mass media lords. They are chasing Bin Laden with the same inane tunnel vision they used to chase Lewinsky, O. J. Simpson, Chandra and the sharks. They are already preoccupied with reporting their own personal predicaments in following a 'war so far from home.' As moral morons go, these are the bottom fish in the muddy swamp of modern American journalism. Somebody should send them back to Fantasy Island to find out whether the plane has landed. They would not begin to understand why it would be worth while to investigate this 'prison riot.' Attica. Remember Attica. I don't recall New York's governor Nelson calling in the Air Force to quell that prison riot. Don't bother our intellectually challenged tabloid 'journalists' with history. They think Attica is a place near Woodstock.


posted by Steven Baum 11/26/2001 04:54:59 PM | link

ANOTHER ARGUMENT AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY
MSNBC reports on two decades of injustices in Oklahoma. Well, at least the ones involving a specific police chemist. If she was responsible for the conviction in the death penalty case, the chemist should be put on trial for murder a la the recent "Law and Order" fictionalization of a previous instance of this happening. The maddening part is that questions about her work have been raised for over a decade by judges, defense attorneys, and her peers. It's easy enough to see why the questions have been ignored, though.
HAROLD "GENE" WEATHERLY, then 25, maintained his innocence through numerous voluntary interrogations, a trial in which forensic evidence nailed him, and two parole hearings in which his refusal to admit guilt cost him early release. He served 15 years in prison.

He was sure, he says now, that one day the truth would rescue him, the truth that - contrary to the damning testimony of now disgraced police chemist Joyce Gilchrist - he was never in the victim's home. The truth, the FBI declared this year, was that the fibers on his tennis shoes did not match those from the crime scene, as she had testified.

Weatherly is just one of hundreds of inmates - former and current - caught up in arguably the biggest law enforcement scandal in Oklahoma history. Gilchrist, who was fired in September, has been accused of egregious misrepresentations of forensic evidence over two decades. Already, a reexamination of her work has freed a convicted rapist and a death row inmate, overturned a death sentence, and called into question the evidence used to execute a man last year.

Gilchrist, through her lawyer, declined a request for an interview. She has said she has done no wrong. Separate state and federal investigations have spent months scrutinizing Gilchrist's work in more than 1,200 felony cases, and $650,000 has been appropriated to perform DNA analysis, which was unavailable in the 1980s, on many of her cases.

And this isn't just an "isolated case".
In the most high-profile incidents nationally, at least 10 convictions have been overturned in Illinois, West Virginia and Texas because of the work of two criminal scientists. The 1987 testimony of Illinois forensic scientist Pamela Fish in a rape and murder case is under review now because recent DNA testing showed semen recovered from the victim did not match any of the four men convicted of the crime. And in West Virginia, a jury deadlocked in September when the state tried Fred Zain for fabricating blood-test findings after convictions that relied on his testimony were overturned.

posted by Steven Baum 11/26/2001 04:05:23 PM | link

NORMAN GRANZ
Norman Granz was one of the most important producers in the history of jazz music. He died last Thursday, but about the only mention I've heard of his death was
on NPR. The best biography of Granz I could find is the following by Scott Yanow:
At the height of his career, Norman Granz was one of the most powerful non-musicians in jazz. He always fought for the music he believed in (having a love for freewheeling jam sessions), for his artists (who he accurately considered to be among the greatest in the world) and against racism, forcing many hotels and concert venues to become integrated in the 1940s and '50s. He studied at UCLA, served in the Army and then in 1944 began to make an impact on jazz. Granz supervised the award-winning film short "Jammin' the Blues" (which featured Lester Young) and put on a concert at the Philharmonic Auditorium in Los Angeles that he dubbed Jazz at the Philharmonic.

The latter was such a big success that soon Granz was able to take the all-star jam sessions on domestic and eventually worldwide tours. The producer loved to team together top artists from the bop and swing worlds in "battles" and, although these rousing concerts were often criticized by conservative and somewhat humorless jazz critics, the jam resulted in a great deal of rewarding music. Not content with merely presenting concerts, Granz often recorded the performances even though, at 10-15 minutes, they were too long for a conventional three-minute "78."

Granz founded Clef (1946) and Norgran (1953), eventually consolidating his music when he founded Verve in 1956. The rise of the LP in the early 1950s was perfect timing and Granz was able to release many JATP performances on records. In addition to his work as a record company head and a concert promoter, Granz managed Ella Fritzgerald and in 1956 he largely started Verve as a label to feature her recordings.

Among the many other artists who prospered in the 1950s due to Granz were Oscar Peterson (who he discovered and managed), Lester Young, Roy Eldridge, Dizzy Gillespie, Art Tatum, Count Basie and Ben Webster. By the late 1950s JATP was drastically slowing down and in 1960 Granz sold Verve to MGM. He functioned mostly as a concert promoter and the manager of Ella and O.P. in the 1960s but in 1973 he returned full force to the record business, founding the very successful Pablo label. Many of Granz's favorite artists had had erratic recording careers in the 1960s (including Ella, Basie, Roy Eldridge and Dizzy Gillespie) but the rise of Pablo resulted in their discographies being uplifted and greatly expanded. Granz extensively recorded his artists (including Joe Pass who soon found fame, Zoot Sims, Sarah Vaughan, Eddie "Lockjaw" Davis and especially Oscar Peterson), emphasizing the spontaneity of jam sessions. The number of Pablo releases slowed down during the 1980s and in 1987 Granz sold the label Fantasy where most of his sessions were eventually reissued on CD. Norman Granz has since retired to Switzerland, having greatly helped the music he loves.

The most complete overview of the artists produced by Granz can be found in the huge set The Complete Jazz at the Philharmonic on Verve: 1944-1949, 9 CDs worth of jazz from the series he pioneered and made famous.
posted by Steven Baum 11/26/2001 03:36:55 PM | link

ICH BEIN EIN HOMELANDER
Chris Floyd's
latest column wittily summarizes the current situation in Der Fatherland.
But what about malcontents in what Bush now calls "the Homeland?" Hey, we got it covered. The U.S. government now has the power to prosecute any public expression of dissent as an act of "domestic terrorism," thanks to the super-duper new "U.S.A. Patriot" Act passed, in the dead of night, by Congress late last month -- a law which most of the dangling legislative appendages freely admit they never read before the vote.

Under the new law, you are a "domestic terrorist," subject to 25 years in prison, if you engage in acts intended to "influence the policy of government by intimidation or coercion." Which is, of course, the very definition of public protest: the attempt to force policy changes on reluctant governments through an unsettling display of popular will.

In this case, the Imperial Executive has delegated power to his most faithful minion: Attorney General John Ashcroft. It is Ashcroft -- the only senator in U.S. history to be rejected by voters in favor of a dead man -- who will now define the limits of freedom in America.

And Ashcroft -- a prissy religious crank like his boss -- has gone about his task with Christian zeal. (After all, your true believers know there is a higher law than that secular humanist rag, the constitution.) For example, just last week, Ashcroft stripped prisoners of the ancient right to confer with legal counsel in private, conferring upon himself the power to monitor any such conversation whenever he sees fit.

This also applies to people being held without any charge at all -- and there are hundreds, perhaps thousands, in that category now. We don't know the exact number, because Ashcroft no longer tells anyone -- including the Appendages -- how many people he's holding, or why he's holding them, or who they are, or where they might be, or what he's going to do with them. But not to worry; he's taking good care of his nameless captives. Why, only one has died in custody so far. At least that we know about.

Because Ashcroft's not telling.


posted by Steven Baum 11/26/2001 11:31:09 AM | link

PUTIN OUTFOXES THE REGIME
While you'd expect Shrub himself to be easily outsmarted by a dim cactus, you'd think there'd be someone in the Regime smart enough to know their anus from a hole in the ground. Apparently not. Toronto Sun columnist Eric Margolis
tells how Putin's completely outfoxed the boobs who've been too busy putting on a fireworks show - to impress the video game-addled proles and keep their ratings up - to pay attention to what's been going on in the real world.
When Pakistan ditched its ally, the Taliban, in September, and sided with the U.S., Islamabad and Washington fully expected to implant a pro-American regime in Kabul and open the way for the Pak-American pipeline. But this was not to be.

In a dazzling coup, Russian President Vladimir Putin stole a march on the Bush administration, which was so busy trying to tear apart Afghanistan to find bin Laden it failed to notice the Russians were taking over half the country.

The wily Russians achieved this victory through their proxy Afghan force, the Northern Alliance. Moscow, which has sustained the Alliance since 1990, re-armed it after Sept. 11 with new tanks, armoured vehicles, artillery, helicopters and trucks. The Alliance's two military leaders, Gen. Rashid Dostam and Gen. Muhammed Fahim, were stalwarts of the old Communist regime with close links to the KGB.

Putin put the chief of the Russian general staff, Viktor Kvashnin, and the deputy director of the KGB, in charge of the Alliance. During the Balkan fighting in 1999, the hard-charging Kvashnin outfoxed the U.S. by seizing Pristina's airfield, thus assuring a permanent Russian role in Kosovo.

Now, he's done it again. To the fury of Washington and Islamabad, Kvashnin rushed the Northern Alliance into Kabul, in direct contravention of Bush's dictates. The Alliance is now Afghanistan's dominant force and, heedless of multi-party political talks in Germany this weekend, styles itself the new "lawful" government, a claim fully backed by Moscow.

The Russians have regained influence over Afghanistan, revenged their defeat by the U.S. in the 1980s' war, and neatly checkmated the Bush administration which, for all its high-tech military power, understood little about Afghanistan.

America's ouster of the Taliban regime meant Pakistan lost its former influence over Afghanistan and is now cut off from Central Asia's resources. So long as the Alliance holds power, the U.S. is equally denied access to the much coveted Caspian Basin. Russia has regained control of the best potential pipeline routes. The "new Silk Road" will become a Russian energy superhighway.

By charging like an enraged bull into the South Asian china shop, the U.S. handed a stunning geopolitical victory to the Russians and severely damaged its own great power ambitions. Moscow is now free to continue plans to dominate South and Central Asia in concert with its strategic allies, India and Iran.

The Bush administration does not appear to understand its enormous blunder, and keeps insisting the Russians are now our friends.

To put it bluntly, the Regime's obsessive need to keep its approval ratings up by giving the droids shiny things to watch on TV caused it to lose control of what it and its oil company paymasters have wanted so badly for so long. And they've lost it to the very same people they spent 10 years and billions of dollars chasing out of Afghanistan, creating the fundamentalist Muslim jihad movement that spawned Bin Laden and the Taliban in the process. One often wonders how U.S. foreign policy would operate if those running it had more than two neurons to rub together and a strategic sense slightly more advanced than "Og blow up and fix."
posted by Steven Baum 11/26/2001 11:06:09 AM | link

DOUBLEPLUSUNGOODER INVESTIGATED
The following poster
Bush the Hangman
was deemed sufficiently "anti-American" to earn its owner a visit from the New Gestapo. Dissent is terrorism; up is down; ring the chimes of freedom in New Oceania.
posted by Steven Baum 11/26/2001 10:38:50 AM | link

SURGICAL NOTES
The UN is
checking out the surgery being performed by the U.S. on Kabul. Remind me not to have my appendix removed by the U.S. military. Their reports have not, of course, been independently verified by Ari Fleischer, Paul Wolfowitz or Bill O'Reilly, so the skeptics can get back to their grazing now.
While the Pentagon has acknowledged a few individual bombing errors that killed a handful of civilians, U.N. ordnance specialists say they find evidence of a broad pattern of erroneous bombing that killed 30 civilians over the 37 days of air raids on this city.

"The Pentagon likes to show the impressive videos" -- the ones that display U.S. jets launching bombs that find and destroy a target without killing the neighbors, said Ross Chamberlain, coordinator for the U.N. mine-clearing operations in much of Afghanistan. But the lesson of the U.S. bombing of Kabul, he said, is this: While any given bomb may find its mark accurately, only a percentage of them will do so.

"There's really no such thing as precision bombing," he said.

Chamberlain and his colleagues have been inspecting the sites, such as Sahib Dad's house, where U.S. bombs landed in Kabul. Having examined 12 of 15 sites reported to his office so far, Chamberlain said, "We are finding more cases of errant targeting than accurate targeting, more misses than hits."


posted by Steven Baum 11/26/2001 10:20:32 AM | link

BUSH GRABS FOR MORE POWER
The Bush Regime continues to attempt to
expand its police state powers, using the "bioterror" bogeyman as the wedge this time. At this rate, the basic freedoms will be whittled down to the "right to buy Regime-approved goods" and the "right to cheer on the Regime's foreign adventurism" in a year or so. But then again, that'd hardly be a sea change for most of the sheep.
Worried that decades-old public health laws could prevent authorities from battling a 21st century bioterror plague, the Bush administration is urging states to grant health officials sweeping powers in such an epidemic.

The administration wants all 50 states to adopt a law allowing public health authorities to take over hospitals, seize drug supplies, quarantine people exposed to infectious pathogens, draft doctors to treat them, force patients to be vaccinated, and order police to restrain residents from leaving contaminated areas.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention rushed out the proposed legislation, at the request of Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson, within weeks after the Sept. 11 hijackings and the ensuing anthrax attacks.

In California, Assemblyman Keith Richman, D-Granada Hills, has drafted a measure nearly identical to the CDC model and plans to introduce it early next year.

The restrictions on civil liberties that his bill would allow during a bioterror attack are bound to raise controversy, Richman acknowledged. But he said health officials must be allowed to resort to them if the nation faces an outbreak of smallpox, one of the worst possible biological weapons.


posted by Steven Baum 11/26/2001 10:04:33 AM | link

THE GREEN EGG
On a routine drool stop at the
Barbecues Galore store on Westheimer in Houston this weekend I discovered - to my utter delight - a sale on the medium-sized Big Green Egg, a ceramic smoker/grill that I've coveted for several years. Needless to say, the coveting period is over and the using period has begun. Their site, in addition to offering the inevitable accessory line, has a recipes and techniques section well populated by fellow fanatics and their advice.
posted by Steven Baum 11/26/2001 09:34:41 AM | link

FREE BOOK!
The latest
NA Digest brings the happy news of a free online version of really, really damned clever Nick Trefethen's textbook Finite Difference and Spectral Methods for Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations. The chapters are:
  1. Ordinary differential equations
  2. Fourier analysis
  3. Finite difference approximations
  4. Accuracy, stability and convergence
  5. Dissipation, dispersion and group velocity
  6. Boundary conditions
  7. Fourier spectral methods
  8. Chebyshev spectral methods Of probably even greater interest to those involved with such topics is the republication of John Boyd's classic Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods by Dover. Boyd has made a PDF version of the second edition of this book available online. You can also obtain his marvelously titled review paper "The Devil's Invention: Asymptotic, Superasymptotic and Hyperasymptotic Series" at his site. It reviews ways to obtain more accurate solutions via singular perturbation methods. Boyd wrote several science fiction novels back in the 60s and 70s, a couple of which are even mentioned in the first edition of his book.
    posted by Steven Baum 11/26/2001 09:09:41 AM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger