Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Saturday, November 17, 2001

CYCLONE
Slashdot reports a new C-like programming language called Cyclone. It is ...
... as C-like as possible while preventing unsafe behavior (buffer overflows, dangling pointers, format string attacks, etc.).
Safety and C-compatibility are achieved by:
  • Enforcing type safety (e.g., a cast from t1 to t2 is allowed only if it is safe to view a t1 as a t2);
  • Maintaining easy inter-operability with C by not changing data representation or calling conventions;
  • Providing region-based memory management
  • Using a combination of type information and run-time checks to prevent array-bound violations
  • Wrapping the C standard library with appropriate run-time checks as necessary (e.g., has a FILE already been closed)
The language provides additional features such as:
  • Tagged unions
  • Parametric polymorphism
  • Pattern matching
  • Exceptions
  • Anonymous structs equivalent by structure
  • Parameterized typedefs
  • An extensive library for container types and other common utilities
  • A lexer generator and parser generator
  • Function-level debugging with gdb and profiling with gprof
Cyclone works on x86 Linux systems and on Windows using Cygwin. It has also been successfully installed on various other systems. Peruse the documentation for further enlightenment.
posted by Steven Baum 11/17/2001 10:17:39 AM | link

Friday, November 16, 2001

ROBERT MITCHUM
Gadfly reviews Lee Server's bio of Robert Mitchum, Baby I Don't Care>, the latter of which provides this anecdote:
A devout Catholic, [Loretta] Young frowned on unseemly behavior of all kinds and particularly disapproved the use of bad language in the workplace. It was generally understood that there was to be no swearing by anyone within miles of Loretta's delicate ears, a tall order considering that in the movie business even the child actors cursed like sailors. To enforce this edict, Loretta instituted her infamous "curse box," requiring an immediate donation (to be forwarded to one of her Catholic charities) by anyone on the set uttering a forbidden epithet. This provoked one of the most durable of Mitchum anecdotes. In the pithiest version of the story, an assistant explained to Bob how the curse box worked, with its sliding scale of penalties.

"It's fifty cents for `hell,' a dollar for a `damn,' a dollar-fifty for `shit'-"

"What I want to know is," said Mitchum, in a voice that could be heard throughout Oregon, "what does Miss Young charge for a `fuck'?"


posted by Steven Baum 11/16/2001 03:59:16 PM | link

MY HOGS
James Buchan on his hogs:
Sometimes, standing in the small wood that shields my house from the north, I whisper the word 'Pigs!' Within a second, bursting from the laurels, alert and obedient as no dog could be, comes a pair of Gloucester Old Spot gilts to nuzzle my hand. Or sometimes, if I am late with their afternoon bucket of scraps, they break out of their enclosure and hurtle across to bang their rumps against the kitchen door. As I contemplate these animals, my mind's eye fills with placid agricultural visions. More and extensive areas of the woods are cleared of brambles and brush. My cow begins to produce milk and the pigs take the surplus, like a Denmark in miniature; or they are turned out when the corn is cut to glean the spilled grain; or when the orchard is up, they manure the trees and eat the insect-tainted fruit. In this beautiful and frictionless economy (in the old Xenophontic or Aristotelian sense of household rather than state management, which is, properly, political economy), the pig is the heart and soul, the wild card, the blockbuster, the Maxim gun. Indeed, to me a wood without pigs is like a ballroom without women.
Writing about pigs hasn't been this good since William Hedgepeth's The Hog Book, although if you ain't raised 'em your mileage will probably vary.
posted by Steven Baum 11/16/2001 03:29:50 PM | link

VINTAGE READING
Being a sucker for such tomes, I just picked up Robert Kanigel's
Vintage Reading: From Plato to Bradbury, A Personal Tour of Some of the World's Best Books. While it's not as pleasingly chock-full of interesting obscurities as is Philip Morrison's Long Look at the Literature - which I've praised here before - it's still a good bathroom reading type of book. Kanigel - who's also written The Man Who Knew Infinity: A Life of the Genius Ramanujan and Apprentice to Genius: The Making of a Scientific Dynasty - reviews 100 of what he considers to be classic books, dividing them into nine categories. If find particulary interesting his "One-of-a-Kinds" category: Kanigel is bang-on in his opening paragraph about the Mencken tome (and it is indeed a tome):
H. L. Mencken never wrote anything that wasn't a delight to read. And The American Language - a footnoted, indexed, annotated, exhaustively researched philology text, for God's sake! - is no exception. It begins with an essay, on the centuries-old linguistic warfare between the snooty British and the endlessly inventive Americans, that has no business being anything but incorrigibly dull. Except it's not; it's fascinating and fun.

posted by Steven Baum 11/16/2001 02:43:48 PM | link

JEFFERSON PLAYS NOSTRADAMUS
Al Martin dug up an appropriate quotation from Thomas Jefferson.
"Our rulers will become corrupt, our people careless... the time for fixing every essential right on a legal basis is [now] while our rulers are honest, and ourselves united. From the conclusion of this war, we shall be going downhill. It will not then be necessary to resort every moment to the people for support. They will be forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded. They will forget themselves, but in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to effect a due respect for their rights. The shackles, therefore, which shall not be knocked off at the conclusion of this war, will remain on us long, will be made heavier and heavier, till our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion."
Note that although it's now trendy and hip to disparage Jefferson and elevate John Adams - mostly because it's been trendy and hip to read (or at least obviously carry it around like Shrub did) David McCullough's John Adams - it was Adams who passed the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798. The Encyclopedia.com tells us a little something about them:
Alien and Sedition Acts, 1798, four laws enacted by the Federalist-controlled U.S. Congress, allegedly in response to the hostile actions of the French Revolutionary government on the seas and in the councils of diplomacy (see XYZ Affair), but actually designed to destroy Thomas Jefferson's Republican party, which had openly expressed its sympathies for the French Revolutionaries. Depending on recent arrivals from Europe for much of their voting strength, the Republicans were adversely affected by the Naturalization Act, which postponed citizenship, and thus voting privileges, until the completion of 14 (rather than 5) years of residence, and by the Alien Act and the Alien Enemies Act, which gave the President the power to imprison or deport aliens suspected of activities posing a threat to the national government. President John Adams made no use of the alien acts. Most controversial, however, was the Sedition Act, devised to silence Republican criticism of the Federalists. Its broad proscription of spoken or written criticism of the government, the Congress, or the President virtually nullified the First Amendment freedoms of speech and the press. Prominent Jeffersonians, most of them journalists, such as John Daly Burk, James T. Callender, Thomas Cooper, William Duane (1760-1835), and Matthew Lyon were tried, and some were convicted, in sedition proceedings. The Alien and Sedition Acts provoked the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and did much to unify the Republican party and to foster Republican victory in the election of 1800. The Republican-controlled Congress repealed the Naturalization Act in 1802; the others were allowed to expire (1800-1801).

posted by Steven Baum 11/16/2001 02:12:41 PM | link

OIL WASN'T EVEN MENTIONED
A
Daily Torygraph item from Dec. 1997 tells us of the good old days before the Taliban became doubleplusungood.
THE Taliban, Afghanistan's Islamic fundamentalist army, is about to sign a £2 billion contract with an American oil company to build a pipeline across the war-torn country.

The Islamic warriors appear to have been persuaded to close the deal, not through delicate negotiation but by old-fashioned Texan hospitality. Last week Unocal, the Houston-based company bidding to build the 876-mile pipeline from Turkmenistan to Pakistan, invited the Taliban to visit them in Texas. Dressed in traditional salwar khameez, Afghan waistcoats and loose, black turbans, the high-ranking delegation was given VIP treatment during the four-day stay.

The Taliban ministers and their advisers stayed in a five-star hotel and were chauffeured in a company minibus. Their only requests were to visit Houston's zoo, the Nasa space centre and Omaha's Super Target discount store to buy stockings, toothpaste, combs and soap. The Taliban, which controls two-thirds of Afghanistan and is still fighting for the last third, was also given an insight into how the other half lives.

The men, who are accustomed to life without heating, electricity or running water, were amazed by the luxurious homes of Texan oil barons. Invited to dinner at the palatial home of Martin Miller, a vice-president of Unocal, they marvelled at his swimming pool, views of the golf course and six bathrooms. After a meal of specially prepared halal meat, rice and Coca-Cola, the hardline fundamentalists - who have banned women from working and girls from going to school - asked Mr Miller about his Christmas tree.

They were interested to know what it was for and what the star was," said Mr Miller, who hopes that Unocal has clinched the deal. "The first day, they were stiff and cautious. But before long they were totally relaxed and happy," he said. Unocal, which heads an international consortium of companies from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Japan, has been bidding for the contract since vast oil and gas reserves were discovered in Turkmenistan, one of the southernmost states of the former Soviet Union, in 1994. The fuel has so far been untapped because of Moscow's demands for high transport fees if it passes through Russian-controlled territory. The quickest and cheapest way to get the reserves out is to build a pipeline through Afghanistan.

It will supply two of the fastest-growing energy markets in the world: Pakistan and India. The Unocal group has one significant attraction for the Taliban - it has American government backing. At the end of their stay last week, the Afghan visitors were invited to Washington to meet government officials. The US government, which in the past has branded the Taliban's policies against women and children "despicable", appears anxious to please the fundamentalists to clinch the lucrative pipeline contract. The Taliban is likely to have been impressed by the American government's interest as it is anxious to win international recognition. So far, it has been recognised only by the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

Unocal has promised to start building the pipeline immediately, despite the region's instability. There is fighting just 87 miles from the planned entry point of the pipeline in the northwest of the country. The Taliban has assured Unocal that its workers and the pipeline will be safe, but it cannot guarantee that it will not be attacked by opposition forces.

The consortium has also agreed to start paying the Taliban immediately. The Islamic army will receive tax on every one of the million cubic feet of fuel that passes through Afghanistan every day. Unocal has also offered other inducements. Apart from giving fax machines, generators and T-shirts, it has donated £500,000 to the University of Nebraska for courses in Afghanistan to train 400 teachers, electricians, carpenters and pipefitters. Nearly 150 students are already receiving technical training in southern Afghanistan.

But it was the homely touches which swayed the Taliban. When the delegation left Texas, one of their entourage stayed behind. Mullah Mohammad Ghaus, the former foreign minister and a leading member of the Taliban ruling council, remained in Texas for medical treatment. Years on the front line damaged his eyesight. Unocal bought him a battery-powered magnifying glass and are paying for him to go to an optician.


posted by Steven Baum 11/16/2001 01:28:04 PM | link

THE SMOKING TAPE
The
NYTimes tells of the tape on which OBL is reported to have said, "I did it". One would think that such a thing, if it does indeed exist, would be played over and over again by those in charge of the Holy War on Terrorism as justification for their invasion of Afghanistan. Blair released a list of 80 "proofs" a month ago, of which only half a dozen were even relevant, so why isn't proof from the horse's mouth being shown as such?
When asked about the tape, a White House official suggested that questions be directed to 10 Downing Street. Anna Perez, a spokeswoman for the National Security Council, said, "We have not seen it."

The reticence to release the videotape may have led to one of the more paradoxical twists in the coalition's media campaign: the footage that is said to show Mr. bin Laden at his worst, gloating over the thousands killed on Sept. 11, and that is at the core of the coalition's legal case against him, has not been shown to the public.

According to British officials and CNN, which has a contract with Al Jazeera, the Arab-language network that has aired other bin Laden videotapes, the Oct. 20 videotape was not shown on Al Jazeera. But even after The Sunday Telegraph reported its existence, noting that a correspondent had "obtained access to the videotape in the Middle East," the video has not surfaced - even though the newspaper said the tape had circulated among Mr. bin Laden's supporters for 14 days.

Matthew Furman, a CNN spokesman, said the network was seeking a copy. He noted that the Sunday Telegraph reporter told CNN that he had not actually seen the video, but only the transcript. To date, no news organization has located the videotape, let alone broadcast it. And that surprises 10 Downing Street, which seems to think reporters should have found it by now.

"We know that bin Laden has recorded far more than has been broadcast, and we know that a large number of people have seen the videotape we used to update the documented evidence against him," Alistair Campbell, a spokesman for Mr. Tony Blair, said. "We can only assume that the video was not shown either because his supporters thought it was damaging or the media just thought it was just him ranting."

Mr. Campbell said that he had only seen a transcript. "We do not have the videotape," he said.


posted by Steven Baum 11/16/2001 11:22:58 AM | link

HITCHENS INTERVIEW
A most provocative
interview with Christopher Hitchens ends with the following paragraphs:
Marx's original insight about capitalism was that it was the most revolutionary and creative force ever to appear in human history. And though it brought with it enormous attendant dangers, [the revolutionary nature] was the first thing to recognize about it. That is actually what the Manifesto is all about. As far as I know, no better summary of the beauty of capital has ever been written. You sort of know it's true, and yet it can't be, because it doesn't compute in the way we're taught to think. Any more than it computes, for example, that Marx and Engels thought that America was the great country of freedom and revolution and Russia was the great country of tyranny and backwardness.

But that's exactly what they did think, and you can still astonish people at dinner parties by saying that. To me it's as true as knowing my own middle name. Imagine what it is to live in a culture where people's first instinct when you say it is to laugh. Or to look bewildered. But that's the nearest I've come to stating not just what I believe, but everything I ever have believed, all in one girth.

Hitchens has always been and will always be interesting no matter how agreeable he is at any given moment.
posted by Steven Baum 11/16/2001 11:12:06 AM | link

MEANWHILE BACK AT THE OTHER HOLY WAR
NarcoNews tells us of another impending triumph of realpolitik in Bolivia.
Bolivia is one of only three countries (with Colombia and Perú) in the world where the coca plant - source for cocaine and crack - grows.

Bolivia is the only one of these three countries with no groups on the U.S. State Department's list of "terrorist organizations."

But today, U.S.-imposed drug policy is sowing the seeds of a violent storm in Bolivia that, although entirely preventable, is leading toward a rebellion that the hypocrites in Washington will later label as "terrorist" even as U.S. policy creates the phenomenon.

The fall of Bolivian General Hugo Banzer last summer - who came to power decades ago through a military coup - has provided Civil Society in Bolivia with a renewed hope to restore democracy, justice and human rights to this impoverished South American nation.
...
Unfortunately, neither the end of the Banzer dictatorship nor the fall of a corrupted journalist have brought change to Bolivia or to the media blockade of hard news from the country.

Every sector of Civil Society in Bolivia seeks to bring democracy to the nation. The indigenous want equal rights and autonomy. The coca growers want a drug policy for Bolivia that is decided by Bolivians and not imposed by the United States. A quarter-million retirees in this country of 8 million citizens - one out of every 30 Bolivians - have recently been denied their pensions because the government has squandered the nation's budget on the unwinnable drug war. The urban unions have repeatedly joined the rural farmers in social protest of the situation. Residents have repeatedly risen up against government plans to export Bolivia's water to copper mines in Chile as it attempts to privatize this natural resource and force Bolivians to buy their own water from private companies. Teachers and students alike have united in opposition to Bolivia's illigitimate government and the impositions from the North.

In other words, the Bolivian regime of President Jorge Quiroga faces opposition from every sector except two: the brutal military forces and the United States government, which, in the latest atrocity, is directly funding a "paramilitary" model of the kind it created, years ago, in Colombia, in order to attempt to stamp out the surge of democracy with repression.

Yesterday, three unarmed peasant farmers were assassinated by Bolivian soldiers on the nation's major highway. The farmers have begun blockades of the country's roads to demand that the government comply with land use agreements (known as the INRA law) it signed last year but has now broken.

Expect to hear, as soon as the first farmer raises a gun in self-defense against the Bolivian soldiers, how another "terrorist" group has been formed in Bolivia.
posted by Steven Baum 11/16/2001 10:36:14 AM | link

MILITARY TRIALS
Thomas DiLorenzo offers one example of a successful and judicious military tribunal.
In 1851 the Santee Sioux Indians in Minnesota sold twenty-four million acres of land to the federal government for $1.4 million. By August of 1862 thousands of white settlers continued to pour into the Indian lands even though none of the money had been paid to the Santee Sioux. There was a crop failure that year, and the Indians were starving. The Lincoln administration refused to pay them the money they were owed, breaking yet another Indian treaty, and the starving Sioux revolted.

A short "war" ensued, with Lincoln putting one of his favorite generals, General John Pope, in charge of federal forces in Minnesota. Pope announced that "It is my purpose to utterly exterminate the Sioux . . . . They are to be treated as maniacs or wild beasts, and by no means as people with whom treaties or compromise can be made." (Similar statements were being made at the time by General William Tecumseh Sherman, who said that to all Southern secessionists, "why, death is mercy").

The Santee Sioux were overwhelmed by the federal army by October of 1862, at which time General Pope held hundreds of Indian men, women, and children who were considered to be prisoners of war. The men were all herded into forts where military "trials" were held, each of which lasted about ten minutes according to David A. Nichols in Lincoln and the Indians. They were all found guilty of murder and sentenced to death even though the lack of hard evidence was manifest and they were not given any semblance of a proper defense. Most were condemned to death by virtue o the fact that they were merely present during a battle, during a declared (by the Indians) war.

Minnesota political authorities wanted the federal army to immediately execute all 303 of the condemned men. Lincoln, however, was concerned that such a mass execution of so many men who had so obviously been railroaded would be looked upon in a bad light by the European powers who, at the time, were threatening to support the Confederate cause in the War for Southern Independence. His compromise was to pare the list of condemned down to 39, with a promise to the Minnesota political establishment that the federal army would eventually kill or remove every last Indian from the state. As a sweetener to the deal Lincoln also offered Minnesota $2 million in federal funds.

On December 26, 1862, Abraham Lincoln ordered the largest mass execution in American history in which the guilt of the executed could not be positively determined beyond reasonable doubt. (The cartel of "Lincoln scholars" actually praises Lincoln for this act, claiming that it is yet another example of his humanitarianism and his "culture of life." He may well have killed 39 innocent people, they say, but it could have been much worse).

Well, they started it, didn't they?
posted by Steven Baum 11/16/2001 10:25:27 AM | link

REALPOLITIK
Given the apparent popularity of the doctrine made (in)famous by Henry Kissinger, it's probably a good idea to provide a definition.
Patrick Garrity defines "realpolitik" as:
Seymour Hersh's The Price of Power provides further details on our favorite realpolitiker. Kissinger's mea non culpas can be found in vast quantity in his memoir trilogy: Years of Renewal (1152 pages), The White House Years (1069 pages) and Years of Upheaval (1123 pages). Kissinger's approach to the world is based on the great European diplomatic tradition often referred to as realpolitik as it developed from the 17th to the 19th centuries. This tradition can be summed up in two ideas. First, raison d'etat, where the interests of the state justify whatever means are necessary to pursue them. The national interest thus replaced the medieval notion of a universal morality that guided all men and nations. The second key concept is the balance of power an international order in which no nation is dominant. Each nation maintains its independence by aligning itself, or opposing, other nations according to its calculation of the imperatives of power. All status quo nations benefit from this arrangement: they can check the pretensions of the most aggressive nation, and thereby achieve international stability and moderation. Kissinger's pantheon of practitioners of balance-of power politics includes Cardinal Richelieu, William of Orange, Fre derick the Great, Metternich, Castlereagh, and Bismarck. (He also places the American Founders, Theodore Roosevelt, and Richard Nixon in this category.)
Those interested in some of the consequences of Dr. K's application of realpolitik might want to refer to Christopher Hitchens' The Trial of Henry Kissinger. While Hitchens sounds as of late like he's auditioning to become Paul Wolfowitz's speechwriter, he hasn't as yet retracted his case against Dr. K. Further Dr. K adventures are detailed in Seymour Hersh's The Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House.

Dr. K's mea non culpas can be found in dizzyingly vast quantity in his memoir trilogy: The White House Years, Years of Upheaval and Years of Renewal. Each of these bricks contains 1100 or more pages of Kissinger on the universe revolving around Kissinger. There's an old joke that Henry's so full of himself that he once wrote a book called Famous People Who Have Met Me. His latest - practically a pamphlet for him at only 350 pages - is Does America Need a Foreign Policy?. I've never heard one way or another whether Kissinger himself actually churns out all that verbiage or, like Churchill, creates outlines and has a cadre of sub-scribblers fill in all the details.
posted by Steven Baum 11/16/2001 09:53:27 AM | link

WHAT A DEAL!
A couple of places I check on a semi-regular basis for deals on computer equipment and various other things are
DealNews and TechBargains. They both list ongoing sales, rebates, etc. I'm not involved with either but just find them useful. Enjoy.
posted by Steven Baum 11/16/2001 09:31:36 AM | link

Thursday, November 15, 2001

PLUNDERPHONICS
I've written about
Plunderphonics before, but I figured that since a certain performer has recently released another album it might be pertinent to again let it be known that all the tracks from John Oswald's original 1990 Plunderphonics album are available in both WAV and MP3 formats. The Canadian Recording Industry Association forced all copies of the original release to be destroyed in 1990, so free feel to burn your own Plunderphonics CD. Other recordings currently unavailable due to music industry thuggery can also be found in various places, e.g. Negativland's The Letter U and the Numeral 2 and the KLF's What the Fuck's Going On?. Feel free to enjoy them before doing so joins the ever lengthening list of actions considered to be domestic terrorism.
posted by Steven Baum 11/15/2001 04:22:31 PM | link

YES I WILL
Given that the World Trade Organization (WTO) has recently asked the upstream provider for the WTO parody site
gatt.org to threaten to shut it down if it didn't mend its ways, i.e. stop parodying the WTO, the Yes Men have released a software package called YesIWill that enables parody sites to be quickly and easily constructed. With this software, it takes five minutes to set up a convincing, evolving, personalized parody of the WTO or any other web site. Example parodies include DuPont, CNNPentagon and, of course, the WTO. The package will work on Apache servers with Perl and the mod_rewrite package.
posted by Steven Baum 11/15/2001 04:04:09 PM | link

THE RUMSFELD PLAN
WorldNetDaily reports on a "Rumsfeld Plan" where Dr. Rumslove plans to continue the enrichment of the Carlyle Group by invading Iraq.
The United States plans to launch a campaign to oust Saddam Hussein in Iraq as part of the international campaign against terrorism. The plan calls for U.S. aerial bombing to support anti-Saddam opposition forces in the country.

The plan was revealed by Turkey's Hurriyet newspaper, which reported last week that the so-called "Rumsfeld Plan" - named after Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld - calls for setting up a secular, pluralist, democratic Iraq and preserving Iraq's current borders after Saddam is ousted. The newspaper is Turkey's largest circulation daily.

The plan was said to have been discussed during Rumsfeld's trip to Ankara, Turkey, last month.

The newspaper listed the main features of the plan:

  • Iraq's territorial integrity will be preserved, and there will be no autonomous regions or federative structures within the country.
  • All the various ethnic groups will be represented in the central government that is formed after Saddam's ouster, including Kurds and Turkmens.
  • Turkey will enter northern Iraq and obtain a share of the oil at the Karkuk field. Business and foreign trade in Iraq will exceed $50 billion, a key benefit to Turkey. Discussion of the transfer of energy, specifically a natural gas pipeline from Iraq to Turkey, will be a priority.
The planned coalition government will be very similar to the one shaping up in Afghanistan, where the Northern Alliance is saying "piss off" to promised plans for a coalition government. Look forward to the Kurds in Iraq being armed and supported similarly to the Northern Alliance, Baghdad being bombed to the ground via the usual "surgical" techniques, and the Kurds going wild with revenge killing if and when they gain control. The Turks will undoubtedly be given weapons and carte blanche to massacre the "evil" Kurds in southern Turkey while they move into northern Iraq to liberate the "good" Kurds and grab their piece of the oil bounty. But if it makes the U.S. feel just 1% safer, the massacre of every "evil" Kurd in Turkey will be well worth the effort.
posted by Steven Baum 11/15/2001 11:32:55 AM | link

ARIZONA DEFINES DOMESTIC TERRORISM
An Arizona pamphlet defining domestic terrorism and giving examples is reproduced over at
Democratic Underground. The definition is:
Groups or individuals operating entirely inside the US, attempting to influence the US government or population to effect political or social change by engaging in criminal activity.
Note that by this definition non-violent protesting is defined as domestic terrorism if it isn't performed in a designated "First Amendment Zone", i.e. if it isn't done miles away from what's being protested.

The pamphlet goes on to provide examples in various categories.

Right-Wing Extremists

  • "defenders" of US Constitution against federal government and the UN (Super Patriots)
  • Groups of individuals engaged in para-military training

Hate Groups

  • Skinheads, Nazis, Neo-Nazis (usually recognized by tattoos)
  • Black Separatists
  • KKK
  • Christian Identity
  • White Nationalists

Common Law Movement Proponents

  • Fictitious license plates
  • No license plates
  • Fictitious drivers license
  • No drivers license
  • Refuse to identify themselves
  • Request authority for stop
  • Make numerous references to US Constitution
  • Claim driving is a right, not a privilege
  • Attempt to "polie the police"

Left-Wing Terrorists

  • Political motivation is usually Marxist/Leninist philosophy

Single Issue Terrorists

  • Targeting of law enforcement and emergency personnel
  • Animal Rights
  • Eco-terrorism
  • Violent anti-abortion extremism
  • Urban riot agitators
  • Cyber penetration
  • Non-aligned terrorists
  • Doomsday/Cult-Type Group
  • Insurgents/Rebels
  • Lone Individuals

Weapons of Mass Destruction

  • Nuclear
  • Chemical
  • Biological
Have they missed defining any form of domestic protest by the left, right or middle as terrorism? My personal favorite is "lone individuals" being defined as "single-issue terrorists." I'm looking forward to "protesting anti-terrorism" being self-referentially added to the list when it goes national. Are there any recalcitrants who still don't feel safe?
posted by Steven Baum 11/15/2001 10:19:30 AM | link

RAWA ABOUT THE "FOUNDING FATHERS"
The Revolutionay Association of the Women of Afghanistan, who were useful back when they were criticizing the Taliban for human rights violations, have
released another statement about the Northern Alliance that will almost certainly be ignored by the Bush Regime.
Now it is confirmed that the Taliban have left Kabul and the Northern Alliance has entered the city.

The world should understand that the Northern Alliance is composed of some bands who did show their real criminal and inhuman nature when they were ruling Afghanistan from 1992 to 1996.

The retreat of the terrorist Taliban from Kabul is a positive development, but entering of the rapist and looter NA in the city is nothing but a dreadful and shocking news for about 2 million residents of Kabul whose wounds of the years 1992-96 have not healed yet.

Thousands of people who fled Kabul during the past two months were saying that they feared coming to power of the NA in Kabul much more than being scared by the US bombing.

The Taliban and Al-Qaeda will be eliminated, but the existence of the NA as a military force would shatter the joyful dream of the majority for an Afghanistan free from the odious chains of barbaric Taliban. The NA will horribly intensify the ethnic and religious conflicts and will never refrain to fan the fire of another brutal and endless civil war in order to retain power. The terrible news of looting and inhuman massacre of the captured Taliban or their foreign accomplices in Mazar-e-Sharif in past few days speaks for itself.

Though the NA has learned how to pose sometimes before the West as "democratic" and even supporter of women's rights, but in fact they have not at all changed, as a leopard cannot change its spots.

RAWA has already documented heinous crimes of the NA. Time is running out. RAWA on its own part appeals to the UN and world community as a whole to pay urgent and considerable heed to the recent developments in our ill-fated Afghanistan before it is too late.

Sorry ladies, but your documentation of human rights abuses in Afghanistan is no longer very useful for achieving the only goals that matter in Afghanistan. Enjoy your month or so of not wearing veils until the U.S. attacks another country and the CNN/Pentagon cameras are pointed towards the next Threat of the Century of the Month, because then it'll be back to the good ol' days.
posted by Steven Baum 11/15/2001 10:08:02 AM | link

NORTHERN ALLIANCE ACTS LIKE NORTHERN ALLIANCE
In a move that surprised no one except perhaps the Bush Regime, the sainted, Founding Father-esque Northern Alliance is refusing to establish the broad-based coalition government the Regime's propaganda machine's been touting as the yellow brick road to freedom and democracy in Afghanistan. I guess Afghanistan is just one more of those countries Robert Kaplan's
described as having "no alternative except tyranny or anarchy" or, more correctly, no alternative convenient to the needs of the U.S. Not to worry, though, with the Afghan HQ of those evil propagandists Al-Jazeera destroyed by U.S. bombs the government-controlled U.S. networks can pass off reruns of "The Andy Griffith Show" - with turbans and beards added to all the characters via computer graphics - as the current state of affairs in Afghanistan. The Guardian supplies the details:
The victorious Northern Alliance provided a foretaste of trouble by insisting yesterday that it would take care of security in Afghanistan and that an international peacekeeping force was unnecessary.

Within the last 48 hours, the alliance has defied the US by capturing Kabul and has rejected calls from America, Britain and the United Nations to create a broad-based government that would include moderate elements of the Taliban.

The latest alliance rebuff and the re-emergence of feudal warlords in the south of the country dampened celebrations in Washington and London over the ease with which Kabul fell on Tuesday.

Both the US and Britain are anxious to see an international force in Kabul as soon as possible. The UN, too, has been making arrangements for a multinational force.

But the Northern Alliance foreign affairs spokesman, Abdullah Abdullah, said he saw the future role of the UN mainly as "observers".

Asked about allowing in an international peacekeeping force, Mr Abdullah said: "The obstacle to achieving peace is, of course, the Taliban and the terrorists. After getting rid of the Taliban and the terrorists, there won't be war and won't be a need for international peacekeeping forces."

And why can the Northern Alliance attempt to get away with saying that once the Taliban are gone there will be no more problems in Afghanistan? Could it be because the Regime's spent a couple of months painting what are not any more than another pack of vicious drug-runners as democratic freedom fighters battling valiantly to establish a fledgling democracy? Is anyone else getting a feeling of deja vu? Was Santayana right? Does Santana really kick ass with his axe?
posted by Steven Baum 11/15/2001 09:38:36 AM | link

Wednesday, November 14, 2001

A LESSON IN DEFINITIONS
Al-Jazeera, the Qatar-based independent Arab TV network, was forced to broadcast CNN's coverage of the invasion and capture of Kabul. Why? The U.S.
bombed the building in which they were based in Kabul, claiming (at least for today) that they had "compelling" evidence that it was an Al-Qaeda headquarters. It will probably eventually be revealed that the U.S. bombed the building because it was an Al-Jazeera station and they didn't want them to broadcast any "propaganda" during the takeover. After all, Al Jazeera is the network that, in addition to showing pictures of civilian victims of U.S. carpet-bombing and Osama Bin Laden's speeches, also gave air time to anyone from the U.S. war machine who wished to speak. Meanwhile, CNN and the other U.S. networks kowtowed to the U.S. war machine's demand that they not show either speeches by Bin Laden and that they minimize reports and pictures of civilian casualties. The U.S. networks were also sure to include disclaimers about reports not being verifiable for anything other than a Pentagon press release. Thus has propaganda become truth and truth propaganda. If any other nation were to do this sort of thing, the self-proclaimed gladiators of independent journalism and truth in the U.S. would be screaming about propaganda and censorship at the top of their lungs.
posted by Steven Baum 11/14/2001 03:17:49 PM | link

SOMETHING AWFUL
The finest redneck stream of unconsciousness prose I've encountered in quite a while can be found at
Something Awful. A sample:
So anyway I was sitting on my porch yesterday, sweating out concentrated gin and trying to figure out why I couldn't move my legs, when I noticed that the hellborn mutants walking around this Godforsaken town are even more bloated than usual. You're probably wondering how I could tell this, since most of the human errors in this town weigh more than an entire cattle car, but I got a good eye for detail. For example, one time I remember driving my car through the inside of the Sears in Eastside Mall, and when I got home there was a scarf stuck on the front of my car's grille and I remembered the price that it said on the rack when I first hit it. I didn't remember the right price or anything, but I did remember hitting the rack. That's why I'm a highly decorated war veteran and you're just some unemployed cellulite monster sitting on his fat ass and reading my computer machine TV show.

Like I was saying, the Crisco circus tents in this town are getting even fatter than I thought was humanly possible, like the Blob from the movie "The Blob" where Steve McQueen fought some red space gravy. Steve McQueen was also in "Bullitt", which is a real man's movie for real men, not all those idiot fruitcups you seen reading books with Oprah these days. Real men don't read. Real men light fires. Real men drive fast cars or slow tanks or those boats with the guns welded onto them. Real men don't talk about emotions. Real men light men who talk about emotions on fire. Real men don't buy innertubes, wine, fashion magazines, spices, or margarine. Steve McQueen was a real man and if you don't think so then he'd kick your ass eight ways from next Saturday unless he's already dead. I don't remember if he's dead or not, but if he died then God bless his dead corpse because Steve McQueen was a true hero and you'll never be able to amount to the pile of shit that Steve McQueen stepped in while filming "Hell is For Heroes."

You can almost hear the voice of the guy what does all the Miller Beer manly man commercials.
posted by Steven Baum 11/14/2001 02:42:45 PM | link

REALPOLITIK CLAPTRAP
Robert Kaplan is one of the favorite realpolitiker scribes of those in power over the last decade. In a
recent interview, we see why he's so comforting to that crowd. He's been asked about the current Pakistani dictator Pervez Musharraf:
Well, it's impossible for a Pakistani leader under these circumstances to be more pro-American than he has been. It's an irony, but I will state it: the United States is fortunate, because there are two dictators who are in power. One is Musharraf in Pakistan. Let nobody be under any delusion: had we still had the democratic regime of Benazir Bhutto, we would be in a much worse situation now, because we wouldn't get nearly the cooperation we're getting, and the government we'd be dealing with would be far weaker internally. The other dictator is Islam Karimov, the ruler of Uzbekistan, who has allowed us relative carte blanche. And if Karimov had been overthrown or had held elections, as people had been demanding, Uzbekistan would be in even worse shape than Pakistan. It's another country where there seems to be no alternative except tyranny or anarchy. Because of two dictators, the United States is able to place troops on the ground, in places contiguous to Afghanistan. Karimov and Musharraf have really come through for us, and there is no chance whatsoever that any other kind of regime in either of those countries would have performed as well.
You read it correctly. He states very clearly that the United States is fortunate that Pakistan and Uzebekistan have dictatorships rather than democracies. Not that those countries are better off, but that the U.S. is better off. When he states that there is "no alternative except tyranny and anarchy" in either country, he doesn't mean that other options are impossible, but that the other options are inconvenient to the aims of U.S. foreign policy, i.e. oil companies, in the region. That is, freedom and democracy for the wogs is fine and all that, but it's not a realistic option when it gets in the way of whatever this week's goals are for the "last bastion of freedom and democracy."
posted by Steven Baum 11/14/2001 10:26:38 AM | link

EXECUTIVE ORDERS
While looking for the details of the
latest Bush Regime executive order which, by the way, is not yet available, I encountered the Executive Orders Disposition Tables at the National Archives. The Bush Regime's executive orders are all available in PDF format. At least the titles of EOs are available reaching all the way back to the Truman administration.
posted by Steven Baum 11/14/2001 09:59:42 AM | link

JUXTAPOSITION
Let us compare (via
What Really Happened) the actions of the Bush Regime to the words of Thomas Jefferson from a document that's apparently been stolen or burned. First, the Regime's latest diktat:
"President Bush signed an order Tuesday that would allow for the trial of people accused of terrorism by a special military commission instead of civilian courts, The Associated Press has learned."
Then, the words of Mr. Jefferson from the Declaration of Independence, wherein he lists why the U.S. was splitting away from tyrannical England:
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power:
...
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
...
For depriving us in many cases of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

posted by Steven Baum 11/14/2001 09:34:44 AM | link

Tuesday, November 13, 2001

TWO BY BOURNE
Here are a couple of pieces by Randolph Bourne, who was mentioned a few items back as one of the few folks to publicly oppose WWI.
A sample:
War is the health of the State. It automatically sets in motion throughout society those irresistible forces for uniformity, for passionate cooperation with the Government in coercing into obedience the minority groups and individuals which lack the larger herd sense. The machinery of government sets and enforces the drastic penalties; the minorities are either intimidated into silence, or brought slowly around by a subtle process of persuasion which may seem to them really to be converting them. Of course, the ideal of perfect loyalty, perfect uniformity is never really attained. The classes upon whom the amateur work of coercion falls are unwearied in their zeal, but often their agitation instead of converting, merely serves to stiffen their resistance. Minorities are rendered sullen, and some intellectual opinion bitter and satirical. But in general, the nation in wartime attains a uniformity of feeling, a hierarchy of values culminating at the undisputed apex of the State ideal, which could not possibly be produced through any other agency than war. Loyalty - or mystic devotion to the State - becomes the major imagined human value. Other values, such as artistic creation, knowledge, reason, beauty, the enhancement of life, are instantly and almost unanimously sacrificed, and the significant classes who have constituted themselves the amateur agents of the State are engaged not only in sacrificing these values for themselves but in coercing all other persons into sacrificing them.

posted by Steven Baum 11/13/2001 03:28:21 PM | link

USEFUL QUOTATIONS
Today's homework is to identify the three countries not eligible to be carpet-bombed, invaded and subjugated based on the premises given below.

"Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." - G. W. Bush, 9/20/01

"If you harbor a terrorist, if you aid a terrorist, if you hide terrorists, you're just as guilty as the terrorists." - G. W. Bush, 9/25/01


posted by Steven Baum 11/13/2001 02:32:21 PM |
link

THE BITE MODEL
We learn of the BITE theory of mind control over at
Freedom of Mind. It explains how cult members are controlled by their leaders.
There are three components to Festinger's theory - control of behavior, control of thoughts, and control of emotions. Each component can be effected by the other two. It is by manipulating these three elements that cults gain control over a person's identity. Through my experience working with former cult members, I have identified a fourth component that is equally importantÑcontrol of information. When you control the information that a person is allowed to receive, you limit his capacity for independent thought. These four factors, which can be more easily remembered as BITE (Behavior, Information, Thoughts, and Emotions), will serve as the foundation for your understanding of mind control. It is important to understand that destructive mind control can be determined when the overall effect of these four components promotes dependency and obedience to some leader or cause. It is not necessary for every single item on the list to be present. Mind controlled cult members can live in their own apartments, have nine-to-five jobs, be married with children, and still be unable to think for themselves and act independently.
The information control component includes:
  • use of deception;
  • access to non-cult sources of information minimized or discouraged;
  • compartmentalization of information, e.g. insider vs. outsider doctrines;
  • spying on other members encouraged;
  • extensive use of cult-generated information and propaganda;
  • unethical use of confession.
The thought control element includes:
  • need to internalize the group's doctrine as "truth";
  • use of loaded language, e.g. platitudinous buzzwords and cliches;
  • encourage of only "good" and "proper" thoughts;
  • use of hypnotic techniques to induce altered mental states;
  • manipulation of memories and implantation of false memories;
  • use of thought-stopping techniques, which shut down "reality testing" by stopping "negative" thoughts and allowing only "good" thoughts;
  • rejection of rational analysis, critical thinking, constructive criticism, i.e. all questions about the leader or policy are seen as illegitimate;
  • no alternative belief systems viewed as legitimate, good or useful.
Beware of these techniques! If you're ever approached by anyone using such techniques, you are to call the Office of Homeland Security immediately, so the malefactors can be appropriately dealt with under the New Constitution.
posted by Steven Baum 11/13/2001 02:17:53 PM | link

NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN
Gilles d'Aymery reminds us that propaganda wasn't invented yesterday, and that it was used by a certain country long before it supposedly lost its innocence. He tells of Woodrow Wilson who, after a few years of using the slogan "He kept us out of the war", saw the light in April 1917.
"Lead this people into war, and they'll forget there was ever such a thing as tolerance. To fight, you must be brutal and ruthless, and the spirit of ruthless brutality will enter into the very fibre of national life, infecting the Congress, the courts, the policeman on the beat, the man in the street."
Confronted by a public insufficiently bloodthirsty for the needs of the moment, Wilson created the Committee on Public Information (CPI) on April 13, 1917. It was headed by a muckraking journalist named George Creel who quickly became neither muckraking nor a journalist.
Although George Creel was an outspoken critic of censorship at the hands of public servants, the CPI took immediate steps to limit damaging information. Invoking the threat of German propaganda, the CPI implemented "voluntary guidelines" for the news media and helped to pass the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. The CPI did not have explicit enforcement power, but it nevertheless "enjoyed censorship power which was tantamount to direct legal force." Like modern reporters who participate in Pentagon press pools, journalists grudgingly complied with the official guidelines in order to stay connected to the information loop. Radical newspapers, such as the socialist Appeal to Reason, were almost completely extinguished by wartime limitations on dissent. The CPI was not a censor in the strictest sense, but "it came as close to performing that function as any government agency in the US has ever done."
Hundreds of writers were recruited and thousands of stories were released every month to appropriately tune public opinion. There were a very few dissenters, with Randolph Bourne striking a chord particulary appropriate to the present:
"The German intellectuals went to war to save their culture from barbarization. And the French went to war to save their beautiful France!... Are not our intellectuals equally fatuous when they tell us that our war of all wars is stainless and thrillingly achieving for good?"
Apparently the innocence lost in WWI was regained soon afterwards, in plenty of time to be nursed back to health and lost again in WWII.

The Germans were the Taliban of the day, as they were to be again a quarter century later. Thus they had to be demonized.

A particularly effective strategy for demonizing Germans was the use of atrocity stories. "A handy rule for arousing hate," said Lasswell "is, if at first they do not enrage, use an atrocity. It has been employed with unvarying success in every conflict known to man." Unlike the pacifist, who argues that all wars are brutal, the atrocity story implies that war is only brutal when practiced by the enemy. Certain members of the CPI were relatively cautious about repeating unsubstantiated allegations, but the committee's publications often relied on dubious material. After the war, Edward Bernays, who directed CPI propaganda efforts in Latin America, openly admitted that his colleagues used alleged atrocities to provoke a public outcry against Germany. Some of the atrocity stories which were circulated during the war, such as the one about a tub full of eyeballs or the story of the seven-year old boy who confronted German soldiers with a wooden gun, were actually recycled from previous conflicts. In his seminal work on wartime propaganda, Lasswell speculated that atrocity stories will always be popular because the audience is able to feel self-righteous indignation toward the enemy, and, at some level, identify with the perpetrators of the crimes. "A young woman, ravished by the enemy," he wrote "yields secret satisfaction to a host of vicarious ravishers on the other side of the border."
The Lasswell mentioned is Harold Lasswell.
This American political scientist wrote and published a book in 1927 called Propaganda Technique in the World War. This now famous book is a "dispassionate description and analysis of the massive propaganda campaigns conducted by all the major belligerents in World War I." Propaganda is basically the systematic effort to manipulate other people's beliefs, attitudes, or actions. Lasswell's book was said to have given a "central place to the phenomenon of power in the same time that gave a central place to the phenomenon of power in the empirical study of politics." "Lasswell discusses four objectives of wartime propaganda: to mobilize the enemy, to preserve the friendship of allies, to preserve the friendship and, if possible, to procure the cooperation of neutrals, and to demoralize the enemy."

posted by Steven Baum 11/13/2001 01:51:19 PM | link

TRADING WITH THE ENEMY
An excerpt from
Trading With the Enemy, written by Charles Higham in 1983. Much of the same information can be found in Antony Sutton's Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler. The business of war is business.
To this day the bulk of Americans do not suspect The Fraternity. The government smothered everything, during and even (inexcusably) after the war. What would have happened if millions of American and British people, struggling with coupons and lines at the gas stations, had learned that in 1942 Standard Oil of New Jersey managers shipped the enemy's fuel through neutral Switzerland and that the enemy was shipping Allied fuel? Suppose the public had discovered that the Chase Bank in Nazi-occupied Paris after Pearl Harbor was doing millions of dollars' worth of business with the enemy with the full knowledge of the head office in Manhattan? Or that Ford trucks were being built for the German occupation troops in France with authorization from Dearborn, Michigan? Or that Colonel Sosthenes Behn, the head of the international American telephone conglomerate ITT, flew from New York to Madrid to Berne during the war to help improve Hitler's communications systems and improve the robot bombs that devastated London? Or that ITT built the Focke-Wulfs that dropped bombs on British and American troops? Or that crucial ball bearings were shipped to Nazi-associated customers in Latin America with the collusion of the vice-chairman of the U. S. War Production Board in partnership with Goring's cousin in Philadelphia when American forces were desperately short of them? Or that such arrangements were known about in Washington and either sanctioned or deliberately ignored?

For the government did sanction such dubious transactions-both before and after Pearl Harbor. A presidential edict, issued six days after December 7, 1941, actually set up the legislation whereby licensing arrangements for trading with the enemy could officially be granted. Often during the years after Pearl Harbor the government permitted such trading. For example, ITT was allowed to continue its relations with the Axis and Japan until 1945, even though that conglomerate was regarded as an official instrument of United States Intelligence. No attempt was made to prevent Ford from retaining its interests for the Germans in Occupied France, nor were the Chase Bank or the Morgan Bank expressly forbidden to keep open their branches in Occupied Paris. It is indicated that the Reichsbank and Nazi Ministry of Economics made promises to certain U.S. corporate leaders that their properties would not be injured after the Fuhrer was victorious. Thus, the bosses of the multinationals as we know them today had a six-spot on every side of the dice cube. Whichever side won the war, the powers that really ran nations would not be adversely affected.

And it is important to consider the size of American investments in Nazi Germany at the time of Pearl Harbor. These amounted to an estimated total of $475 million. Standard Oil of New Jersey had $120 million invested there; General Motors had $35 million; 111 had $30 million; and Ford had $17.5 million. Though it would have been more patriotic to have allowed Nazi Germany to confiscate these companies for the duration-to nationalize them or to absorb them into Hermann Goring's industrial empire-it was clearly more practical to insure them protection from seizure by allowing them to remain in special holding companies, the money accumulating until war's end. It is interesting that whereas there is no evidence of any serious attempt by Roosevelt to impeach the guilty in the United States, there is evidence that Hitler strove to punish certain German Fraternity associates on the grounds of treason to the Nazi state. Indeed, in the case of ITT, perhaps the most flagrant of the corporations in its outright dealings with the enemy, Hitler and his postmaster general, the venerable Wilhelm Ohnesorge, strove to impound the German end of the business. But even they were powerless in such a situation: the Gestapo leader of counterintelligence, Walter Schellenberg, was a prominent director and shareholder of ITT by arrangement with New York-and even Hitler dared not cross the Gestapo.

As for Roosevelt, the Sphinx still keeps his secrets. That supreme politician held all of the forces of collusion and betrayal in balance, publicly praising those executives whom he knew to be questionable. Before Pearl Harbor, he allowed such egregious executives as James D. Mooney of General Motors and William Rhodes Davis of the Davis Oil Company to enjoy pleasant tete-a-tetes with Hitler and Goring, while maintaining a careful record of what they were doing. During the war, J. Edgar Hoover, Adolf A. Berle, Henry Morgenthau, and Harold Ickes kept the President fully advised of all internal and external transgressions. With great skill, he never let the executives concerned know that he was on to them. By using the corporate leaders for his own war purposes as dollar-a-year men, keeping an eye on them and allowing them to indulge, under license or not, in their international tradings, he at once made winning the war a certainty and kept the public from knowing what it should not know.


posted by Steven Baum 11/13/2001 11:33:34 AM | link

DON DURITO OF THE LACANDON
Don Durito of the Lacandon is a beetle, the literary creation of Subcommandante Marcos, principle spokesperson for the indigenous Zapatista National Liberation Army in Chiapas, Mexico. Don Durito plays Don Quixote (on a turtle named Pegasus) to Marcos' Sancho Panza and the dialogs between the two provide a comical frame for introducing outsiders to the problems, analyses and solutions being discussed within the Zapatista communities. A complete (so far) set of the dialogs has been
translated into English and illustrated.

Don Durito

posted by Steven Baum 11/13/2001 11:08:11 AM | link

CHEMICAL WEAPONS FOR IRAQ
Eric Margolis, author of
War at the Top of the World: The Struggle for Afghanistan, Kashmir and Tibet, tells of chemical warfare elsewhere.
In late 1990, after Iraqs invasion of Kuwait, I was in Baghdad, Iraq, covering the impending Gulf War. In a futile effort to prevent threatened US air attacks, Saddam Hussein rounded up foreigners and held them hostage in Baghdad hotels. This brutish act which provoked outrage around the world was a typical example of the Muslim worlds uncanny knack for negative, self-defeating, public relations.

Among the hostages, I discovered three British scientists who had been employed at Iraqs top secret Salman Pak chemical and biowarfare plant. Two of the Britons confided to me they had been working to develop a weaponized form of anthrax for Iraqs army.

At the time, the public did not yet knew that Iraq was trying to use anthrax as a weapon. My dispatches from Baghdad were the first indication that Iraq had progressed beyond crude, World War I - style chemical weapons. The Iraqis threatened to hang me as a spy.

What made this news so fascinating was: 1. the British scientists told me they were part of a large technical team secretly organized and `seconded to Iraq in the mid-1980s by the British government and Secret Intelligence Service, MI6. And 2: the feed stocks for all of the germ weapons being developed by Iraq came from an American laboratory in Maryland. Iraq received full approval from the US government to buy anthrax, plague, botulism, and other pathogens. Here is a prime case of what spooks call `blowback.

Why did Britain and the US covertly help Iraq to develop biological weapons? When an Islamic revolution overthrew the US-backed shah of Iran in 1979, the US and Britain determined to overthrow the new regime in Tehran, which was seen as a threat to their Mideast oil interests. Washington and London urged Saddam Hussein to invade Iran in 1980 and march on Tehran. US and British money, arms, and military assistance flowed secretly to Baghdad.

But by 1983, Iraq was on the defensive and near to losing the war. Iran, with nearly four times Iraqs population, was fighting back ferociously, swamping Iraqi defenses with human wave attacks. In desperation, Iraq, US and Britain began a crash development program to produce chemical and biological weapons to break Irans attacks and offset its numerical superiority. Iraqs chemical arsenal savaged Irans infantry and helped Iraq win the war by 1988. Over 500,000 soldiers died in the conflict.

In the Anglo-American view, chemical and biological weapons were fine - so long as they were used to kill or maim Iranian Muslims who opposed western interests. Such monstrous weapons, it seems, are only associated with terrorism when used against westerners.


posted by Steven Baum 11/13/2001 10:17:45 AM | link

REALITY INVERSION
Shrieking hellbat Lynne Cheney, wife of the President and one of the Regime's chief thought police,
released an attack on free speech via her conservative group, Operation Mindcrime. The culture commissars begin by ...
... blasting 40 college professors as well as the president of Wesleyan University and others for not showing enough patriotism in the aftermath of Sept. 11.

''College and university faculty have been the weak link in America's response to the attack,'' say leaders of the American Council of Trustees and Alumni in a report being issued today. The report names names and criticizes professors for making statements ''short on patriotism and long on self-flagellation.''

After publicly nailing up their hit list of the insufficiently patriotic, the group goes on to accuse those they're trying to silence of trying to silence the truly patriotic.
Anne Neal, an author of the report and council official, said that while she is sure many professors and students support the US government, they are afraid that if they speak out, liberal colleagues might shout them down.
The remainder of the 250,000 university professors across the nation were unable to comment as they were cringing over in the corner after being shouted down by the Nogoodnik 40. Terrorism Czar Tom Ridge has thus far declined to comment on if and when the 40 will be declared official enemies of the state and concentrated in one location for their own safety.
posted by Steven Baum 11/13/2001 09:37:59 AM | link

FOLLOW THE MONEY, PART LXIII
Common Dreams tells of a Public Citizen report on the marvelous rate of return pharmaceutical industry lobbying dollars are getting.
While the Bush administration claimed to negotiate a tough deal for a government stockpile of Cipro, a drug industry lobbying campaign has pushed Congress to quietly pass legislation that will give a six-month monopoly patent extension to Cipro and more than 100 other drugs, according to a new Public Citizen study.

The patent extension legislation, which passed the Senate on Oct. 18 and will be voted on by the House of Representatives as early Monday, Nov.12, is based on this premise: If drug companies test their products for safety in children, they should receive a six-month patent extension.

The costs of the safety and efficacy tests sought by pediatricians, children's advocates and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is estimated at $727 million, according to Public Citizen's report, Patently Offensive. The reward, in terms of added sales, to patent-holding drug companies is $29.6 billion, according to the FDA - a return 40 times the industry's projected investment in pediatric tests. Cipro's maker, Bayer, would garner an extra $358 million in sales due to the anthrax-fighting drug's patent extension, according to the report.

"The drug industry has put on a cynical PR front about its patriotic efforts to fight bioterrorism," said Frank Clemente, director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch. "Meanwhile, it has refused to sacrifice a penny - not even for children?s health - in its uncontrolled drive for monopoly patent extensions and sky-high profits."


posted by Steven Baum 11/13/2001 09:24:09 AM | link

THE "O" WORD
The
NYTimes reports that one of the dead heroes of 9/11 thought the U.S. was stalling on investigating OBL because of his deep connections to the Saudis. Ah, but you know how those dead heroes lie.
A former F.B.I. antiterror official who was killed at the World Trade Center on Sept. 11 complained bitterly last summer that the United States was unwilling to confront Saudi Arabia over Osama bin Laden and that oil ruled American foreign policy, according to a new book published in France.

The former official, John P. O'Neill, was the director of antiterrorism for the F.B.I.'s New York office when he resigned in August to become chief of security for the twin towers.

"All the answers, everything needed to dismantle Osama bin Laden's organization can be found in Saudi Arabia," Mr. O'Neill is quoted as saying in the new book, "Ben Laden: La Vérité Interdite" ("Bin Laden: The Forbidden Truth"), which argues that Saudi support for Mr. bin Laden has been extensive.

One of the book's co-authors, Jean- Charles Brisard, a security expert who has spent several years examining Mr. bin Laden's financial empire, says in the book that he met with Mr. O'Neill in June and July. Mr. O'Neill is quoted as lamenting "the inability of American officials to get anything at all from King Fahd," the ailing Saudi ruler.

He explains the failure in one word: oil.

The Pentagon dcclined to comment on this, although they did confirm that Paul Wolfowitz was indeed the walrus.
posted by Steven Baum 11/13/2001 09:15:31 AM | link

CNN TAKE NOTE
The
Times of India reports of the sweet, sweet smell of freedom wafting into Kabul on the wings of a dove.
A US warplane dropped at least two bombs on the Afghan capital Kabul in the early hours of Tuesday morning, sparking a large fire in the southeast of the city, residents said.

One of the buildings targeted was the office of the Qatari-based satellite television channel, Al-Jazeera, which has broadcast video-taped messages from alleged terrorist Osama bin Laden and his deputies since the September 11 atrocities in New York and Washington.

The office was destroyed in the attack but neighbours said they believed it was empty and there were no known casualties. The plane flew over Kabul at 1:30 am (2100 GMT Monday) and two loud explosions were heard.

Minutes later an AFP reporter saw a fire burning in the southeast of Kabul, casting a red glow over the night sky. The bodies of several Taliban soldiers, apparently victims of the overnight raids, were seen lying on the streets in the morning as opposition security forces moved into the city.

The reality of the bombing raid, the targeted buildings, the fires, the emptiness of the buildings, the Taleban, the AFP reporter, and the Times of India are all as yet unconfirmed. Timothy Leary is being consulted in the afterlife via John Edward.
posted by Steven Baum 11/13/2001 08:26:53 AM | link

FOUNDING FATHERS EXTRACT REVENGE
The
Sunday Times reports of massacres perpetrated by those wascally freedom fighters in the Northern Alliance. I haven't checked to see if there are any "unconfirmed reports" from the Pentagon denying this yet.
SUMMARY executions, abductions and looting have followed the capture of Mazar-i Sharif by Northern Alliance forces, the United Nations said yesterday.

As Red Cross staff buried the victims of the battle for the city, unconfirmed reports emerged of a massacre of Taleban and Pakistanis in a school in the northern capital. UN officials said that it was unclear how many had died or how many such incidents had occurred, but Peter Bouchaert, of Human Rights Watch, said that early reports suggested that up to 500 people had died and 2,000 Taleban had been taken captive.

It's also been reported that flag waving is up 73.4%, although this has also not yet been confirmed by the Pentagon.
posted by Steven Baum 11/13/2001 08:15:43 AM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger