Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Wednesday, August 29, 2001

OFF TO CAROLINA
I'm going to be in Durham, N.C. for the next ten days and probably won't get much of a chance to update things hereabouts. I'll be setting up the computers for my former research group's new location, writing and revising too bloody many papers, scoping out the havens of rich beery goodness, etc.
posted by Steven Baum 8/29/2001 10:00:32 AM |
link

Tuesday, August 28, 2001

ANOTHER GOP MORAL AVATAR
An interesting
article by Alan Bisbort at AMPOL offers details on the scandalous shenanigans of former GOP rising star Philip Giordano, mayor of Waterbury, Connecticut. Since you probably won't be seeing any of this on the "All Condit, All the Time" outlets I'll repeat some of the juicy bits:
Bad boy mayors of Waterbury, Connecticut are nothing new.

The last three mayors of the state's fifth largest city have ended up in a courtroom, and two of the three (both Republicans) have ended up in jail.

But the latest batch of nastiness facing current bad boy mayor Philip A. Giordano, a 38-year-old rising Republican star, stands out in a way that can only be done justice by the Marquis de Sade.

Besides the obligatory federal and state corruption and kickbacks involving city contracts, possible ties to the Mob and dubious sources of campaign cash funnelled to his ill-fated bid to unseat Joe Lieberman last year, Mayor Giordano is facing charges that he used an interstate facility (the Internet) to entice a child, or children, under age 16 to engage in sex. The children in question are girl cousins, aged 9 and 10. He is also said to have fathered a 7 year-old boy by the mother of one of these children, meaning he may have been having sex with his son's sister. Also, the teenaged daughter of the mother of these two young girls has said she was paid money by Giordano to watch him have sex with her mother -- in his City Hall office!

So vile are the charges against Giordano that U.S. District Judge Alan Nevas took the unprecedented step on August 7 of banning the press from the courtroom AND suggesting that Giordano's family be ushered out as well. The bail hearing was then held in secret, a kick in the head to our Constitutional right to know about a public legal proceeding. The judge (a Republican) also denied the mayor's bid for bail, saying he presented a danger to his community.

An additional funny bit involves Giordano's unsuccessful bid to unseat Joe Lieberman in the last senatorial election. Among the predictable GOP tactics he used was mudslinging, with one of his accusations being that Lieberman supported legislation making it easier for pedophiles to prey on the community. I guess Giordano would know.
posted by Steven Baum 8/28/2001 10:05:45 AM | link

Monday, August 27, 2001

MR. BALANCE BECOMES UNBALANCED
On November 1, 2000, the folks at
Tom Paine ran an advertisement twitting Fox "News" for their constant trumpeting of how fair and balanced their news coverage is as compared to the supposedly liberal media, e.g. CNN, CBS, NBC, etc. Among other things, the ad suggested they call themselves "GOP-TV". Fox attempted to counter the ad by having the author of the ad, John Moyers, appear on their flagship program "The O'Reilly Report," a daily program hosted by former tabloid journalist Bill O'Reilly. The usually cool and composed O'Reilly got so irate at one point during the interview that he literally screamed, "You're either a moron or a liar, Mr. Moyers, a liar or a moron."

They repeated the interview on August 23, 2001. This prompted many of their thoughtful, unbiased fans to send thoughtful letters of disagreement to Tom Paine and Moyers. Here are a couple:

Let us not waste time. Fuck you, you low life, bill klinton, racists, lying, bigoted, liberal,mean spirited, communist, dick sucking son of a bitch. I would be nice to read the paper in the next week and someone had given you an attkitude adjustment. Such as, someone broke every fucking bone in your body, one at a time. Have a nice day and fuck you, your dog, your cat and any son of a bitch that will speak to you. You are one braindead motherfucker.

You are a worthless piece of shit. A no goood fucking liberal cocksucker, who does your best t fool the people, like the cocksuckers Clinton and Condit. You will rot in hell you fucking no-good-son-of-a-bitch.

Some of the evidence Moyers presented to make O'Reilly and his fans reveal their true natures can be found in his most recent article. The folks at Extra! offer additional evidence supporting Moyers' contention. For example, a study of 19 weeks of the "Special Report with Brit Hume" found that of 56 partisan guests during that period, 50 were stated Republicans and 6 stated Democrats. Of all guests during that period, 65 of 92 were avowed conservatives (i.e. "those affiliated with openly conservative think tanks, magazines or advocacy groups, or who promote openly conservative views"). That is, of 92 guests, 65 were openly conservative while 27 represented all other points of view on this supposedly even-handed, balanced "news" program. In comparison, during the same period on the supposedly liberal CNN's "Wolf Blitzer Reports" 38 of 67 partisan guests were Republicans, and 35 out of 107 total guests were avowed conservatives. Thus we find Fox's pragmatic definition of "balanced" being that 90% of partisan guests be Republicans, and 70% be avowedly conservative.
posted by Steven Baum 8/27/2001 02:40:28 PM | link

TAX CUT SHELL GAME
Elizabeth Drew on the various sleights of hand behind the shrub tax cut:
The tax bill that emerged from Congress is, according to several tax experts, the most peculiar, misshapen, and irrational one in memory. To comprehend the full fiscal folly of the tax bill, it has to be understood that Congress's work on it was almost totally disconnected from a real federal budget, into which it was supposed to fit. This was a deliberate strategy on the part of the administration. The House passed the President's $1.6 trillion tax cut (more when interest on the debt is counted) pretty much intact on March 8, long before there was even a budget resolution on which it was supposed to be based. The budget resolution sets forth the overall amounts for spending on various government activities and for revenues to be collected in the next fiscal year; it also projects spending and revenues over ten years. But the budget resolution adopted by Congress in mid-May wasn't based on reality. The administration didn't even submit a real budget before the House or the Senate had to consider a budget resolution, because it didn't want to disclose the implications of the tax cut for other programs, including some popular ones that would have to be cut.

Instead, the administration sent to Congress a few vague details. The figure for defense, for example, didn't include the increase that would be needed as a result of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's ongoing review of ways to restructure the military. The ten-year budget resolution adopted by Congress in mid-May went along with this rather large omission and also didn't take into account money that would be needed for natural disasters (which require additional funds every year), or the new money that would be required for the education bill, or funds for popular tax credits that are routinely extended, or for other things in the President's agenda. As part of the budget resolution, Congress provided for a tax cut of $1.35 trillion.

James Jeffords was one of three Senate Republicans who voted to reduce the tax cut in the budget resolution below the President's $1.6 trillion. This angered his more intemperate Republican colleagues and was one of the episodes that led to his resignation from the Republican Party. Kent Conrad, Democrat from North Dakota and now, as a consequence of Jeffords's decision, chairman of the budget committee, says of the budget resolution, "It was a tax cut masquerading as a budget." After the Senate, shortly before Memorial Day, voted on the tax bill itself, reducing the tax cut to $1.2 trillion, a Senate and House conference agreed on the $1.35 trillion tax cut. (The top rate was cut to 36 percent, rather than the 33 percent the President sought.)

Many of the peculiarities of the tax bill arose from a Senate rule that forbids commitments on budgets beyond ten years, unless there are sixty votes for such commitments (which no one then believed could be mustered for this tax bill). The House-Senate conferees, realizing that there were not enough projected revenues to keep the tax bill going for ten years, decided to terminate ("sunset") it after nine years. Further, the cuts in tax rates will be phased in slowly, so that the full reductions don't take effect until 2006, a few years before the bill comes to an end. And one of the most peculiar provisions of the final bill is the one governing the estate tax. Because of its cost ($138 billion over ten years), the repeal is phased in gradually and will take full effect only for one year. Then, since the tax bill will be terminated, the estate tax will return, and all the other tax breaks, including the income-tax rate cuts, will revert to what they were before the bill became law. Moreover, the bill leaves millions of taxpayers newly subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT), which disallows large deductions; and, for many of those taxpayers, the AMT will cancel out the rate cuts. To remedy this problem was considered to be too expensive. But it's widely agreed that it will have to be fixed somehow.

According to Drew, the tax cut was designed to appeal to two groups whose support shrub needed to get elected and to govern should he succeed in hijacking the election:
One, whose influence is widely underestimated, but which provides activists and votes, was small business; the other consisted of the leaders and organizations of the Republican right.
Big business didn't get all the tax breaks it wanted, although certain segments did very well otherwise, e.g. the energy industries with the proposed energy program, the steel industry with a quota on imports, etc. There are also those who want to reduce or eliminate the capital gains tax. Even those for whom the bill was designed are still unhappy, with small business wanting the estate tax permanently repealed, and all the other cuts in the present bill made permanent instead of being rescinded after 9 years. This would cost about $4.1 trillion for the second ten years, as opposed to about $2.5 trillion its going to cost over the next decade.
posted by Steven Baum 8/27/2001 01:55:44 PM | link

PRES. BLOW MONKEY's PRESS CONFERENCE
Robert Parry tells of a shrub press conference you probably won't be hearing about on CNN, Fox, etc.
The moment arrived as the press conference in Crawford, Texas, was going poorly for George W. Bush. He had just struggled through an answer about why he had believed there were 60 stem-cell lines that could be used for finding cures to debilitating human ailments, from spinal-cord injuries to Alzheimer's disease.

Beyond the question of whether those 60 stem-cell lines actually exist for federally funded research, it now appears that most or all of those lines have been mixed with mouse cells and might be dangerous if used to develop cures for humans. The stem-cell lines were intended for only initial stages of research, though Bush's stem-cell decision of Aug. 9 now prevents untainted lines from being created for the advanced research. [Washington Post, Aug. 24, 2001]

Bush, who had made his intensive personal research into the stem-cell issue a counterpoint to critics who consider him intellectually lazy, put the blame for this crucial oversight on scientists at the National Institute of Health. He said they "came into the Oval Office and they looked me right in the eye and they said, 'We think there is ample stem cells - lines to determine whether or not this embryonic stem-cell research will be - will work or not.'"

Seemingly flustered by this embarrassment to his widely lauded stem-cell decision, Bush turned to a familiar reporter who had covered him as Texas governor. In a boisterous bonhomie, Bush called the Texas reporter "a fine lad, fine lad," drawing laughter from the national press corps.

The Texas reporter began to ask his question, "You talked about the need to maintain technological ..."

But Bush, acting like an excited party guest who couldn't keep a funny comment inside, interrupted the reporter to deliver the punch line. "A little short on hair, but a fine lad. Yeah," Bush said, provoking a new round of laughter at the reporter's expense.

The young reporter paused and acknowledged meekly, "I am losing some hair."

The reporter then soldiered on with a question about whether the administration would "go forward with the V-22" warplane, a question of particular interest to the economy of Fort Worth, Texas.

Bush, however, wasn't through having fun with the young reporter, who "represents Fort Worth," Bush noted, prompting another round of knowing laughter from the national press corps.

This is the behavior of the man who would return dignity to the oval office, and the behavior of a press corps still patting itself on the back for its fierce independence in covering all the real and imagined foibles of Clinton. Shrub is yet again revealed as as dumbass frat boy, and he reacts by childishly taunting a reporter who's going bald. Meanwhile, the press that can't wait to offer breathless daily "updates" about how Chandra Levy hasn't been found sits there and giggles like the rest of the frat boys at the kegger.
posted by Steven Baum 8/27/2001 10:35:37 AM | link

DOUBLE STANDARD
David Podvin offers some delicious verbiage over at Media Whores about what constitutes a scandal in the corporate media these days.
No matter what the facts are, Condit is guilty of murdering Chandra Levy for the same reason that President Clinton is guilty of Whitewater and Travelgate and Filegate and killing Vince Foster and raping Juanita Broaddrick. Condit is guilty for the same reason that Vice President Gore is guilty of lying, being emotionally unstable, and trying to steal an election in which he got the most votes. Condit is guilty for the same reason that Ronald Reagan is not guilty of raping Selene Walters and bankrupting the country through class warfare and lying under oath about Iran Contra and committing genocide in Central America. Condit is guilty for the same reason that George W. Bush is not guilty of paying for the illegal abortion of his girlfriend and going AWOL during Vietnam and lying about every major issue that he has ever discussed, from the budget to missile defense to stem cell research.
...
Republicans have provided a phenomenal amount of scandal material for America's most prominent journalists to ignore. Iran-Contra was no less than an attempt to divorce foreign policy from the Constitution and then lie about it under oath. President George H. W. Bush sold to Barrick Corporation ten BILLION dollars worth of taxpayer gold for ten thousand bucks and then went to work for Barrick in order to collect his well-earned kickback. On the floor of the House of Representatives, Rep. John Boehner gave to his Republican colleagues envelopes full of Phillip Morris cash immediately prior to a vote on tobacco legislation. George W Bush began his corrupt regime by falsely accusing the outgoing administration of felonies involving the destruction and theft of taxpayer property.

If it's the lust angle that reporters crave, then the Republican sexcapades of recent vintage have been far more entertaining than those of the Democrats. Bill Clinton only cheated on one wife; Newt Gingrich has cheated on three. Bob Livingston has had such an entertaining life that his wife literally begged Larry Flynt not to publish the War and Peace-sized list of Livingstone's playmates. Holier-than-thou Afro Saxon leader J.C. Watts has sired more children out of wedlock than Jesse Jackson, Gary Condit, Bill Clinton, and Al Gore combined. Dan Burton was able to take enough time off from assassinating watermelons to have an extramarital child of his own. While Sonny Bono was dying in the snow after having tried to impeach a Ponderosa pine, his wife and current congresswoman Mary was spreading good holiday cheer (among other things) with one of their beefcake constituents.

And, of course, there's always Gotham City's caped moralizing crusader, Rudolph Giuliani, for whom ?family values? consists of cheating on your wife in the most public way possible in order to achieve the maximum humiliation of your children.

And as to the current ongoing media frenzy, which has at least temporarily displaced Clinton's pardons of Attila the Hun, Adolf Hitler and Ted Bundy among the shreiking heads:
Gary Condit is under siege because he rejected Tom DeLay's offer to reregister as a Republican.

If Condit had joined the G.O.P., then he would now be afforded the consideration that the media is showing to former Rep. Joe Scarborough. A young female staffer was found dead in Scarborough?s office. There was no apparent cause of death to this athletic woman who was in her twenties and did not have a history of illness. Scarborough was known to be cheating on his wife with some of his employees. The only difference between the Condit scandal and the Scarborough non-scandal is the willingness of the media to pay attention.

And the minor point that Chandra Levy was not found dead in a Congressman's office.

How many have even heard of the Scarborough situation, as opposed to those who can name the lawyers involved in the Condit situation?
posted by Steven Baum 8/27/2001 09:36:42 AM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger