The Rolling Stones didn't make rock anymore after the
mid-Seventies; they made stadium events. By the 1990s,
the Stones' brand of colostomy rock had become not an
isolated freak show but a regular - and popular - feature of
the summer concert season. Every year, ancient rock bands
rise up from their graves and rule the nights again. Lynyrd
Skynyrd, Jethro Tull, Yes, the Allman Brothers: pale
ghosts of their youthful selves, they have become their own
nostalgia merchandise. There can be only one motivation: as
the Rutles declared, 'All You Need Is Cash'.
I find this terribly dispiriting. When Eddie Van Halen
needs to be careful how he moves onstage because of his hip
replacement surgery, Eddie should sit down and become
strictly a studio musician. When bands calling themselves
Little Feat or Jefferson Starship are made up almost
entirely of ringers and replacements and include none of the
talents that originally made those names so recognisable,
they should stop calling themselves Little Feat or
Jefferson anything. When Pete Townshend decides in his
mid-fifties that he wants to record a six-CD rock opera
(Lifehouse) made up entirely of songs he wrote 30 years
ago, the best of which he and his band already played to
death during the 1970s ('Baba O'Riley', 'Behind Blue Eyes',
'Won't Get Fooled Again'), and that he is now going to
rerecord in wimpy old-man's versions, with insipid string
orchestrations laid on top for a false air of gravity...
someone should say, 'No, Pete, that's a bad idea' and lead
him by the elbow back to the old folks' home - where
Eddie, Mick, and the rest of the geezers might have a good
laugh and remind him of the lyrics to a certain song he
wrote decades earlier, famously addressing precisely this
topic of ageing.
...
Were you, for instance, a Fleetwood Mac fan? I never quite
got their massive appeal myself. To me, Fleetwood Mac -
the mid-to-late-1970s edition of Fleetwood Mac,
'Rhiannon' and all that - was just Abba with a decent
drummer. Be that as it may, if you were a fan of Fleetwood
Mac in the 1970s, why on earth would you want to see them
reunited as middle-aged has-beens in the late 1990s,
performing a nostalgia stage act of 25-year-old hit songs?
How could you look at the once-svelte Stevie Nicks and
not cringe to see her overweight and stuffed like a sausage
into some girdle or corset torture device so constricting she
literally could not move in it, her pancake make-up thick
and hard as china, her hair a straw fright wig, her once
fetchingly crackled voice a scary croak?
Or how about the middle-aged Eric Clapton? Were you
still thinking Clapton was God by, say, 1980? How about
after the easy-listening Miller Beer commercials? How
about after his son died and he wrote that hideously
mawkish song for him and then would not stop playing it
everywhere he went, year after year?
Reminds of a true tale about Clapton about 15 years
back. Michelob was just rolling out a new commercial
campaign featuring Clapton droning some tune about
the night and all its mystery and glamor, when they
found out he'd just entered alcohol rehab. The
campaign lasted just a bit longer than the classic
"from those wonderful folks who brought you Pearl
Harbor" campaign for Honda.
When I want to listen to Clapton, I get out my 4 CD
Cream set, or the "Layla" album with Duane Allman.
With Dylan I spin "Blood on the Tracks" or "Desire", the last good albums he made before he joined the
"religion of the month" club. I don't touch any
Little Feat that doesn't include Lowell George, who
died in 1978. And as for Fleetwood Mac, I won't rush
madly for the radio to turn it off if they're being
played, but the only album (a vinyl album, that is) I have
of that band includes Peter Green in the line-up, and
doesn't include either Lindsey Buckingham or Stevie
Nicks.
posted by Steven Baum
8/23/2001 03:06:03 PM |
link