Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Wednesday, January 03, 2001

BEDAZZLED
The original version of
Bedazzled (1967) is once again available on tape. This is a riotously funny take on the Faustian deal schtick directed by Stanley Donen and starring Dudley Moore and the greatly missed late comic genius Peter Cook. It doesn't cost much more than a ticket to the remake, and it's infinitely better.
posted by Steven Baum 1/3/2001 11:24:09 AM | link

NEW YEAR'S RESOLUTIONS?
The closest I've ever come to formalizing the "New Year's resolution" concept was when the local TV newsfolk needed some happytalk to begin the year about 5 years ago. They showed up at a local commercial gym I frequented at the time and asked the various sweatyfolk what they were resolving to do in the upcoming year. Given that I'd probably lose a "most telegenic" contest to a warthog with tertiary syphilis and leprosy, I figured the talking heads would pass me by and let me get on with my anti-girlyman activities. But they must have been hung over or something, and before I knew it a microphone had been placed before my hirsute visage. I managed (with some difficulty) to ignore the advice of the devils on my left and right shoulders and mumbled something about losing 20 lbs. in the upcoming year.

This exceptionally witty bon mot of course made it on the air, utterly destroying my reputation as the local equivalent of Oscar "I wish I'd said that" Wilde or James "you will, Oscar, you will" Whistler. It had the additional bonus of giving everyone I knew who'd seen it an excuse to continually annoy me with queries as to whether I'd actually dropped the score of pounds in question. I'll cut the dramatic tension short and admit that I lost around twelve and then regained them. I wasn't up to the task then and will remain so until I lose my taste for expensive, heavy beers.

I've come up with a possible way to lose the poundage without losing the suds, though. If I hit the rec center all five days that I'm not playing ultimate frisbee and sweat like a "Cool Hand Luke" extra for at least 30 minutes on the elliptical aerobic stairclimber thingies each day, I can probably get to below 200 lbs. for the first time in *mumble* years. I might have to work on the post-sweating modus operandi a wee bit as well, with the major task at hand being attempting to internalize the fact that beer isn't a sports drink (although it's still a sandwich in a glass).

But, given that even with an extra 20 lbs. or so to drag around the field I'm still bringing punks half my age to their knees on the ultimate field, I may not get too obsessed with the beer thing. At least not until I'm carried off said field with a knee joint flexing in a fun new direction. Have I mentioned lately that I'm not unloathing of the young?
posted by Steven Baum 1/3/2001 10:23:40 AM |
link

Tuesday, January 02, 2001

COOPER CANNED
It seems the rumors I heard while back in cental Ohio over the holidays were true. John Cooper "led" my alma mater to yet another season ending loss and
has been fired as the coach of the Ohio State football team. He was 113-43-4 overall in his 13 seasons at OSU, but was 2-10-1 against Michigan and 3-8 in bowl games. You don't survive forever at OSU by not winning against Michigan and in bowl games.

He's had as much talent in the 90s as anybody except for maybe the big three Florida teams, a fact reflected in his 108-25-1 record if you subtract the 5-18-1 record he had in the last two games of the season. And although the Michigan and bowl things contributed quite a bit to his dismissal, there are three games that almost surely sealed his fate. The first was his home loss to 17-point underdog Michigan State in 1998 with perhaps the most talented OSU team to ever hit the field. That team was so good it could phone in entire halves of games and still win, but unfortunately it phoned in well over three quarters against MSU.

The next nail in his coffin was the Minnesota game this season. His team had just pounded Wisconsin at their place to avenge an embarassing home loss the previous year, and headed home for a homecoming game against a team that hadn't beat them at Ohio Stadium since 1949. Three quarters worth of phoning this one in led to a 29-17 loss that dropped them from the undefeated ranks and out of the top 10. He also lost to Michigan at home and at Purdue in the regular season, but the team was out of zombie mode for about two quarters against Michigan and played well the whole game against Purdue.

The last nail was pounded in yesterday at the Outback Bowl, where his team never got out of the phone booth in a 24-7 loss to a South Carolina team that had gone 0-11 the previous year and that had suspended its best running back for the game. I figured Lou Holtz would outcoach him and maybe even eke out a win with his less physically talented yet infinitely more motivated team, but I didn't expect to see OSU sleepwalk through the entire game, running the plays in the game misplan as if they were involved in some half-speed practice session. In other words, Cooper couldn't even motivate his team with his job on the line.

I've been following OSU football since the first game I can remember in 1969, and I can't remember a game in which the team was more ill-prepared and less motivated than in the Outback Bowl yesterday. I was so furious after one mechanical three-and-out series in the second half that I had to take my dog for walkies to calm down. After the game I sent an email to the OSU athletic director requesting that they find someone who could motivate a starving dog to eat a raw steak to replace a man who apparently can't. I additionally suggested that digging up the bones of Woody Hayes and propping them up on the sidelines would be an improvement over the present situation.

Sure, I know (in the words of a classic 70s TV commercial) that it's only a dart game, but I'll be damned if dart games don't still manage to piss me off now and then.
posted by Steven Baum 1/2/2001 02:12:27 PM | link

Sunday, December 31, 2000

NEW YEAR'S GRUB
For tomorrow's New Year's Day festivities I've just started smoke cooking a 15 lb. turkey and a 10 lb. ham, which will probably be joined by a 6 lb. frozen salmon if I can crawl out of hangoverland early enough tomorrow. Tonight it's out for a bit of spiced wine, back to the homestead to further perfect my bloody mary recipe with habanero sauce, and then down to Duddley's Draw as the witching hour draws near to roar incomprehensible conversational tidbits at all the folks I know down there and receive same. I can't think of any New Year's resolutions as I reached perfection several years back, but I'm sure I'll come up with something frighteningly psychotic and violent while the triphammers play the Anvil Chorus in my brain tomorrow morning.
posted by Steven Baum 12/31/2000 05:28:27 PM |
link

MANDATE FROM MARS
The Shrub's 5-4 victory in the recent presidential "election" is apparently insufficient for the GOP spinmeisters. Their confidence in the legitimacy of their victory is such that they're now attempting to conjure a mandate from a 400,000+ loss in the popular vote. So, you ask, how in the world can a party that's never tired of denying Clinton any sort of mandate because he received a plurality rather than a majority in his two victories now claim that someone who didn't even receive a plurality has a mandate?

It's easy if you ignore reality and logic, a talent the GOP's developed into high art over the last 20 years. A prime example is the fantastical flight of fancy offered in Gary Geipel's "End the pronouncements of doom; we have a winner, and he has a mandate" in the Dec. 14 Commentary. So what's the basis for this "mandate"? Just this:

5 million more Americans cast votes for Gov. Bush in 2000 than for Gov. Clinton in 1992.
That's right. Shrub has a mandate because he got more votes in an election in 2000 than did Clinton in an entirely different election eight years earlier. In the paisley reality concocted by Geipel et al. it doesn't matter how Shrub did against his actual opponent, but rather how he did against someone else in a fantasy election in which it is assumed that both candidates would do exactly the same as they did in the elections that took place in the real world. All other things are assumed rather than hypothesized to be equal. That a third party candidate received over 10% of the vote in 1992 and that Shrub didn't actually run against Clinton in that election are merely irrelevant tangential matters.

Geipel spins further Tolkienesque tales to assuage readers fearing cranial implosion if they accept his thesis based solely on the time-space warp paralogic thus far offered. It seems that in addition to getting more votes in this election than someone else in another election, Shrub also received higher quality votes than Gore did in this election. You read that correctly. The same GOP that gives lip service to "one man, one vote" (see the recent 5-4 majority opinion by Scalia et al., for example) is claiming out of the other side of its mouthpiece that some votes are worth more than others. Bush's votes were better because he ...

... dominated overwhelmingly among bedrock constituencies: the entrepreneurs of the Sunbelt, the individualists of the Rocky Mountains and the families of the agricultural Heartland.
The lower quality votes are of course cast by the "nonbedrock constituencies" comprising blacks, hispanics, women, etc. This explains why the GOP tried so hard and successfully to deprive blacks of the vote in Florida and elsewhere. If you keep 25% of blacks from voting, it's the same as letting them vote and only counting each vote 75% as much as "bedrock constituency" votes. It's also a hell of a lot more feasible than attempting to resurrect the 3/5 provision the Founding Fathers had to stick in the Constitution to get the slave-owning states to sign. Ah, but a Broderbund wannabe can dream, can't he?
posted by Steven Baum 12/31/2000 03:43:05 PM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger