Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Friday, November 03, 2000

SPINALYSIS
And now for answers to some of the excuses offered for Shrub's
1976 DUI arrest.

EXCUSE: It was a youthful indiscretion and he's more responsible now.
REPLY:He was 30 years old at the time and had his younger sister in the car as a passenger. How responsible is that?

EXCUSE:It only happened the one time and he's really, really sorry.
REPLY:The current Maine laws provide for a 90 day driver's license suspension for a first offense. That is, a 90 day suspension after MADD's spent two decades attempting to get DUI classified and punished as a worse crime than genocide. Shrub got a 540 day suspension in 1976 for a supposed first offense. What's wrong with this picture?

EXCUSE: At least he didn't lie about it.
REPLY: Bush replied in the negative as to whether he had ever been arrested when asked by a Dallas Morning News reporter in 1998, and has at the very least waffled if not repeating the denial when similar questions have been asked since then.

EXCUSE: This is just the evil liberals trying to influence the election by leaking negative information.
REPLY: In the first place, the story was broken by a reporter for the local Fox News affiliate. Kevin Kelly, the news director for the station "said his station broke the story after one of its reporters learned of the arrest while covering an unrelated matter at the local courthouse." According to Kelly:

"Somebody made a reference to it," Kelly said. The reporter followed up with phone calls, including one to the Maine Department of Secretary of State. Kelly said the department responded with a fax that detailed the 1976 arrest. Kelly said the reporter also talked to the arresting officer, who verified the incident.
In the second place, even if Gore had personally broken the news at a national news conference, it wouldn't have made it any less a fact than it is. And do you really think the banshee shrieks of Karen Hughes et al. would be pathetically attempting to blame the messenger if the story were about Gore? Where's all that faux deep concern for the future of the commonweal (that rears its well-practiced head if Gore even belches audibly) now?

EXCUSE: Bush "is a real guy who made mistakes", while Gore has done "illegal" things (brayed on Geraldo by Barbara Olson).
REPLY: Gales of raucous laughter. The complete lack of shame of these unctuous toadies is almost endearing.

EXCUSE: Sure he was on the cover of "Crack Whore" magazine, but he was young and needed the money.
REPLY: Ooooops, wrong cultural referent.

This also might shed some light on why Bush got his Texas driver's license number changed in 1995, the exact reason for which has yet to be uncovered. The traditional hobby horse "security" was trotted out as an official excuse at the time, and if it meant "securing" Shrub's political future then it wasn't wholly inaccurate. An excerpt from a letter to BushWatch explains the possible connection between the two incidents:

In 1996, my husband applied for a driver's license in California. After more than 20 years, a Maine report of a speeding ticket unpaid by my husband was sent to the California DMV. This had never come up before in his applications for driver's licenses in at least three other states. Apparently, Maine put all of its unresolved motor vehicle arrests, including everything from speeding to DUIs, online sometime around or before 1996. Given Poppy's Kennebunkport connections, did Dubyah get a "heads up" on Maine's intention to do this and is that why he changed his driver's license?

posted by Steven Baum 11/3/2000 09:55:23 AM | link

SHRUB'S DUI ARREST
They either forgot to bribe someone to make it disappear or they thought nobody would find it, but the Shrub camp had to fess up about his
1976 arrest for drunken driving. As with Shrub's numerous other pecadillos, I really don't care about his failings in themselves as much as in the context of what he supposedly stands for and against. I really don't care that he's not much more than a punk-ass frat boy born with a silver spoon in his mouth who, after having his fill of drinking, drugs, and whoring, expects to take his rightful, natural place in a position of power. What does bother me, though, is his often demonstrated propensity to use whatever power he obtains to attempt to maximally punish others for doing what he did as often and as much as he wanted for many years, and with absolutely no negative consequences. In which paisley universe does that give one honor, integrity or credibility?

Let's take another look at part of the dirty laundry list of the man who never tires of chanting how he's going to return honor and integrity to the White House. By the way, the "only allegations" crowd might want to pause briefly to ask themselves what accusations routinely made against Gore are also "only allegations."

  • an admitted DUI arrest for which his spinmeisters couldn't manufacture plausible deniability;
  • an allegation of insider stock trading whose validity rests not on whether it was technically a violation (it was indeed) but on whether his claim that the SEC lost his report form is true (or maybe his dog ate it);
  • his avoiding military service in Vietnam by getting daddy to pull National Guard strings, and then apparently not even honoring that commitment;
  • a sworn deposition that he lied under oath about not telling his underlings to intervene in an ongoing investigation of a crooked funeral home chain (that, by the way, contributed a great deal of money to his gubernatorial campaigns in Texas);
  • Larry Flynt's allegations that during Shrub's wild years he knocked up a woman to whom he wasn't married and got her an abortion (i.e. the same "Consider the Source" Flynt who was bang-on about Bob Livingston and Henry Hyde);
  • allegations in Counterpunch that he not only did but sold cocaine while partying his way through Yale, with his coy and evasive statements about his past experiences with illegal drugs not exactly instilling doubt as to their veracity;
  • his constant crowing about a supposedly brilliant business career that's been really nothing much more than using his father's name to pump money and favors out of those wanting to curry dad's favor;

posted by Steven Baum 11/3/2000 12:14:48 AM | link

Wednesday, November 01, 2000

MARKET FUNDAMENTALISM
The unquestioned belief in the purity and goodness of the free market is the most pernicious and popular religious doctrine currently being propagated in the U.S. Questioning the supposed supreme wisdom of the free market is a heresy beyond even shouting "GOD IS DEAD!" in the national town square where the Church of Bislam reigns supreme (although altogether too many combine the two ideologies into a worst of both worlds melange that's spawned any number of nauseauting offspring along the lines of Jim and Tammy Faye). But there are critics who'll unabashedly speak out about the curious incompleteness of the prelate's garb. One such critic recently gave a speech in which he first attacked the doctrine that collective acts of individual selfishness miraculously coalesce into the maximal good for all:
Market fundamentalists... [claim] that the common interest is best served by everybody looking out for his own interests. This claim is false... There are many political and social objectives which are not properly served by the market mechanism... These include the preservation of competition and of stability in financial markets, not to mention issues like the environment and social justice.
He went on to mention the effect of free market ideology on political democracy:
By promoting market values into a governing principle, market fundamentalism has undermined our society. Representative democracy presupposes moral values, such as honesty and integrity, particularly in our representatives. When success takes precedence over integrity, and politics is dominated by money, the political process deteriorates.
He also weighed in against the dogma - presented as if originally found on stone tablets - that the gods of the free market benevolently push markets toward stable equilibria:
The concept of equilibrium is very misleading when it is applied to financial markets and macroeconomic problems. Economic equilibrium is a useful concept when markets deal with known quantities. But financial markets don't deal with known quantities... As a consequence, the future cannot be known, and the bias expressed in the market participants' decisions becomes an important factor in determining the course of events... There are times when the participants' bias is self-correcting... but at other times the bias is self-reinforcing until it becomes unsustainable, and on these occasions markets exhibit a boom-bust pattern.
So just who is this scurrilous critic of the prevailing religious orthodoxy? Undoubtedly some pinko lefty who couldn't make real money - the purest and indeed only real form of validation for one or one's ideas - if his life depended on it. So who was it? Karl Marx? Noam Chomsky? Ralph Nader? Nope. It was billionaire George Soros in a
speech at Harvard University, although he develops his themes at greater length in The Crisis of Global Capitalism (with an upcoming sequel entitled Open Society : The Crisis of Global Capitalism Reconsidered).
posted by Steven Baum 11/1/2000 10:27:31 PM | link

MORE INTEGRITY
The GOP, in addition to wanting to return integrity to the White House, is also planning to further dignify the House if they retain control. They're planning to rescind one of the provisions of the
Contract with America - the poll-driven ploy that was instrumental in bringing them to power in 1994 - that they actually bothered to put into law afterwards. The provision in question that they acted on was the fourth, i.e. "limit the terms of all committee chairs."

In a Roll Call article about Speaker Dennis Hastert postponing the selection of new committee chairman from Nov. 13 until January, we learn that one of the reasons for the delay is to allow House members to have time to change some Conference rules:

But Hastert did say there is interest among his fellow GOP lawmakers in revisiting some of the Conference rules, adding that Members require time to review and discuss those potential rule changes.

"We want to make sure that if people want to change the rules, they have the time to do it," said Hastert.

One of the GOP rules likely to attract scrutiny and debate is the six-year limit on committee

There has been talk in some GOP circles that the rule, instituted in 1995, needs to be overturned because several Members have retired rather than give up coveted committee posts and return to the rank and file.

According to some Republicans, those retirements threaten to erode the GOP majority, as well as deprive Congress of the institutional experience of long-term members.

It's instructive to contrast the phrase "deprive Congress of the institutional experience of long-term members" with the fiery "clear out the dead wood" rhetoric used at the time. It's equally instructive to contrast their planned nuking of one of their supposed sacred changes with the rhetorical flourish that immediately preceded the listing of the Contract's items:
On the first day of the 104th Congress, the new Republican majority will immediately pass the following major reforms, aimed at restoring the faith and trust of the American people in their government.
If those reforms were indeed "aimed at restoring the faith and trust of the American people," then where exactly are they aiming when they rescind those reforms?
posted by Steven Baum 11/1/2000 09:32:47 AM | link

FUNERALGATE
Given the proppensity of such things to disappear in recent weeks, I'll repeat in its entirety an article entitled
It's His Funeral by Robert Bryce in the Oct. 27 Austin Chronicle. I should also remind those reading this that the 7 years and $100 million spent futilely attempting to prove that the current President and his wife acted illegally in what's called the "Whitewater scandal" was begun based on allegations that were (and still are) pathetically thin gruel compared to what's currently available on Funeralgate. I wonder what those who maintained and still do that "lying under oath" is sufficient grounds for impeachment and removal from office will say about this. Actually I don't. It will join dodging military service and hard drug use in the graveyard of things that no longer matter. After all, there are more important matters to attend to, like returning honor, dignity and integrity to the White House.
As much as Gov. George W. Bush might want to kill it, Funeralgate just won't die. The latest development in the apparent influence-buying scandal involves testimony by former Texas Funeral Service Commission chairman Dick McNeil, who says that he spoke with Bush about the agency's investigation into Service Corporation International during a fundraiser at the Fort Worth Zoo in 1998. McNeil's testimony directly contradicts Bush's sworn statement, dated July 20, 1999, which says he had "no conversations" with any TFSC officials about the agency's investigation into SCI, which is headed by Bush contributor and family friend Robert Waltrip.

McNeil's deposition, taken on Oct. 17, is the fourth time that Bush's sworn statement regarding the SCI investigation has been contradicted. It also calls into question Bush's statement that he has "no personal knowledge of relevant facts of the investigation" or "any dispute arising from this investigation."

The deposition says that after McNeil introduced himself to Bush at the zoo, the governor replied, "Have you got -- you and Bob Waltrip -- are you and Mr. Waltrip got your problems worked out? And I said, no, we're still trying to work on that, Governor."

McNeil, a Bush appointee, then said, "I hope that we have not been an embarrassment to you or to any of this administration." To this, he recalls Bush replying, "You're not an embarrassment to me. He said, do your job." McNeil said it was the first time he had ever met Bush and that their conversation lasted about 30 seconds.

Bush's sworn statement on the SCI matter has already been impeached by Bush himself on two occasions. Last August, once in Iowa and once during a press conference in Austin, Bush admitted that he had spoken to Waltrip about the state's investigation while Waltrip was in the office of Joe Allbaugh, Bush's chief of staff (and now campaign manager). Bush said he didn't have a conversation with Waltrip. Instead, he said he had "only a brief exchange with him that lasted only a few seconds."

The other contradiction came from Johnnie B. Rogers, SCI's longtime lobbyist, who confirmed that Bush spoke to him and Waltrip about the TFSC investigation while the two were in Allbaugh's office on April 15, 1998.

Adding further intrigue is the news that the state's investigation of SCI, which began in 1998 under the direction of former executive Eliza May, has uncovered additional violations by the funeral home giant. In August 1998, a subcommittee of the agency recommended the company be fined $445,000 for a raft of violations which included the use of unlicensed embalmers. Last month, during a meeting of the TFSC board, officials from the Texas attorney general's office told the board members that they had discovered about 40 additional violations committed by SCI, the world's largest funeral company. If the agency seeks a fine for each violation, the company could face an additional $200,000 in penalties.

While the case against SCI continues to be problematic for the TFSC, which has been in disarray ever since May was fired last year (the agency is facing sunset review and will likely be dissolved by the Legislature), May's whistleblower lawsuit against Bush, Waltrip, SCI, and the TFSC heralds more problems for Bush. McNeil's deposition is "flatly inconsistent with the governor's sworn statement," said May's lawyer, Charles Herring Jr. "And we will renew our efforts to depose the governor after the election."

n August, state district judge John Dietz, a Democrat, ruled that May's lawyers could not depose Bush or key staffers, including Allbaugh, until after the election. The case is set for trial in April. The TFSC's case against the SCI is supposed to be handled by the State Office of Administrative Hearings, but no date has been set.


posted by Steven Baum 11/1/2000 08:55:55 AM | link

Tuesday, October 31, 2000

APACHE TOOLBOX
If you've ever attempted to compile the
Apache web server with PHP or any of the available mod_* squad of ancillary programs, then you're well aware of what a monumental pain in the ass it is. Even if you carefully read the installation instructions for everything, you still have to figure out exactly what is needed to fix what are all too often conflicting instructions among the various packages. This procedure almost inevitably results in hours of tedious and maddening trials and errors, after which you'll either have a working configuration with the desired functionality or an overwhelming desire to drink yourself into a stupor. While I've managed both at different times, I'd really like to find a better way.

The folks who've put together the Apache Toolbox have gone and satisfied my greatest desire in life (well, that is, if you ignore the one involving five Swedish masseuses, 10 gallons of safflower oil, a casaba melon, 3 cattle prods, a Popeil pocket fisherman, and the original cast album for "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum"). Their package includes an interactive installation script that allows you to choose any workable combination of a host of program options, automatically download the source code, and compile them all so they work together correctly. The options for inclusion with Apache include:

  • GD, a graphics library for fast web graphics creation;
  • MySQL, the popular database backend;
  • PHP, the HTML-embedded scripting language for creating dynamically generated web pages;
  • Zend Optimizer, which uses multi-pass optimizations to more than double the running speed of PHP applications;
  • OpenSSL, a toolkit implementing the Secure Sockets Layer ( SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols as well as a full-strength, general purpose cryptography library;
  • mod_throttle, a module for user-specific bandwidth throttling;
  • WebDAV, which implements a set of HTTP extensions for collaboratively editing and managing files on remote web servers;
  • mod_fastcgi, a module providing support for the FastCGI protocol;
  • mod_auth_nds, a Novel NDS authentication module;
  • mod_layout, a module providing header and footer directives for wrapping pages created both statically and dynamically via other methods;
  • mod_gzip, a content acceleration module that can compress both static and dynamic output;
  • mod_dynvhost, a module for dynamic virtual hosting;
  • mod_roaming, a module for using Apache as a Netscape Roaming Access server, i.e. for storing Netscape preferences, bookmarks, etc. on the server;
  • mod_access_referer, a module providing access control based on "Referer" HTTP header content;
  • mod_auth_sys, a module providing basic authentication using system user accounts;
  • mod_bandwidth, a module enabling server wide or per connection bandwidth limits;
  • mod_perl, provides an embedded Perl interpreter to avoid CGI overhead; and
  • mod_auth_ldap, an LDAP authentication module.
Hell, the only thing missing is mod_swedish_bikini_team.
posted by Steven Baum 10/31/2000 10:22:31 AM | link

WHERE HAVE YOU GONE?
Richard Ben Cramer - most famous to date for his 1000+ page tome on the 1988 Presidential campaign
What It Takes (which is nearly as good as Hunter Thompson's Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail, although the supporting cast isn't as interesting) - has just released the 500+ page Joe DiMaggio: The Hero's Life, a book that will most likely earn him more notoriety in the long run. John Gregory Dunne reviews the book in the Oct. 30, 2000 New Yorker. From him we find an answer to Paul Simon's eternal question (as well as a hint as to one of the obsessions of his post-baseball life):
When he was new in town, DiMaggio was a regular at Polly Adler's Manhattan whorehouse. Adler was the most famous bawd of her time. She was discreet, paid off the right people, hired the best-looking girls, served expensive food and drink, catered to every recherche taste, and in her sunset years, when she was no longer running hook shops, wrote the best-selling memoir "A House is Not a Home." Adler's girls plied their trade on satin sheets, and these were the cause of a DiMaggio complaint: they were so slippery that the Yankee Dipper's knees could not get traction. Adler immediately bought a set of plain cotton sheets, which were reserved for future visits and which were known as DiMaggio Sheets. They may be the only memento of his career that he did not later autograph and offer for sale.
Neither was Mr. Coffee - the romantic dream of a goodly portion of the distaff populace - a good choice to fulfill the "happily ever after" myth:
DiMaggio's marriage to [first wife] Dorothy Arnold was a disaster. Its single asset was a son, Joe Jr., or Butchie, who served only to point up that his father was no more interested in being a parent than he was in being a husband. DiMaggio regarded women as property, like bats and gloves, and referred to them as "broads." A wife was a broad who was meant to stay at home, give up her career, if she had one, and not try to share the limelight with her famous husband. Nor was she to wear two-piece bathing suits or low-cut necklines, or complain when the man of the house continued his boys'-night-out existence with Hemingway and Toots Shor, with an occasional side trip with a broad to Jimmy Cannon's apartment at the Edison for what he liked to call "a good pump." The marriage did not survive the war, which Sgt. DiMaggio spent playing ball for various service teams, mainly in Hawaii. He did not contest the divorce, in part because Dorothy had put private detectives on his case who compiled a dossier of hotel rooms into which he had disappeared with pumpable women wearing the kind of clothes he would not allow his wife to wear.
Then we have perhaps the most famed and mythologized marriages of the 20th century, which began on a typically romantic note:
In Lost Angeles for an exhibition game the year after his retirement, he saw a publicity photograph of a blonde in a halter and short shorts in a local newspaper, and, with the sexual imperialism he seemed to regard as his divine right, he ordered a middle man to set up a meeting in a Sunset Strip restaurant. The blonde was two hours late, a mortal sin for a broad when dealing with a divinity like Joe DiMaggio. She was also not quite clear who he was (she had never seen a baseball game), but thought he dressed nicely; like a tycoon or a congressman. The blonde was Marilyn Monroe.
The marriage lasted all of nine months, with the following scene on the set of one of Monroe's most famous films (and involving probably her most lasting iconographic impression) providing a typically endearing moment:
While Marilyn was doing exteriors for "The Seven Year Itch" in New York, she shot a scene in which she cooled herself over a subway grating, and her skirt, as the script demanded, blew up over her head. There was take after take, her cotton panties exposed in every one, the flashbulbs from the still cameras aimed at her crotch outling her pubic hairline. DiMaggio left the location in a rage, and that night he beat her up in the suite at the St. Regis Hotel.
DiMaggio didn't even appreciate (or wasn't capable of understanding) what Paul Simon had done for his undeserved appeal as someone evoking a simpler, better age:
"I just did a Mr. Coffee commercial," he told Simon when the latter introduced himself in a restaurant. "I haven't gone anywhere."
Expect Cramer to get pilloried by the usual suspects who don't want to hear of the emperor's birthday suit.
posted by Steven Baum 10/31/2000 07:44:41 AM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger