Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Friday, May 12, 2000

NINE HUNDRED GRANDMOTHERS
Ceran Swicegood was a promising young Special Aspects Man. But, like all Special Aspects, he had one irritating habit. He was forever asking the question: How Did It All Begin?

They all had tough names excepct Ceran. Manbreaker Crag, Heave Huckle, Blast Berg, George Blood, Move Manion (when Move says "Move," you move), Trouble Trent. They were supposed to be tough, and they had taken tough names at the naming. Only Ceran kept his own - to the disgust of his commander, Manbreaker.

"Nobody can be a hero with a name like Ceran Swicegood!" Manbreaker would thunder. "Why don't you take Storm Shannon? That's good. Or Gutboy Barrelhouse or Slash Slagle or Nevel Knife? You barely glanced at the suggested list."

I'll keep my own," Ceran always said, and that is where he made his mistake. A new name will sometimes bring out a new personality. It had done so for George Blood. Though the hair on George's chest was a graft job, yet that and his new name had turned him from a boy into a man. Had Ceran assumed the heroic name of Gutboy Barrelhouse he might have been capable of rousing endeavors and man-sized angers rather than his tittering indecisions and flouncy furies.

Thus begins the title story in R. A. Lafferty's
Nine Hundred Grandmothers, one of the best anthologies of sciffy short stories ever published. My first memory of Raphael Aloysius Lafferty is picking up one of his paperbacks in a bookstore in the mid-1970s, turning it over, and seeing a Harlan Ellison blurb singing the praises of "that madman Lafferty!" I really can't compare him to other writers as he's sui generis in (and out of ) the genre. His mixture of wit, satire, fractured reality and humor hasn't been replicated by anyone else with whom I'm familiar. His story titles alone should warn you that you're not dealing with some genre hack, e.g. "Ginny wrapped in the sun," "Snuffles," "Thus we frustrate Charlemagne," "Hog-belly honey," "The hole in the corner," and "What's the name of that town?"

Lafferty wrote 200 short stories and over a dozen novels from his first piece sold in 1959 to his retirement from writing in 1980 due to a stroke. He suffered a bad stroke in 1994 and is also rumored to have Alzheimer's, although he's alive as of this writing. He didn't start writing until after the age of 45, which may explain some of the qualities in his writing you don't find in younger writers. Other significant facts - from a brief fan bio - include that he never drove a car, drank (heavily until he started writing at which point he cut back), and read and memorized Grolier's "History of the World" at the age of ten.

He's always been more recognized and respected by writers than fans, although he's in no way some dry-as-dust who wrote inscrutable, esoteric prose. Indeed, his prose reads as easily as does Wodehouse's or Thurber's (and was probably written just as painstakingly to make it so). I envy those who are going to dip into 900 Grandmothers or any other Lafferty for the first time. I should also warn those who think that the wack fantasies churned out by Pournelle et al. (about military supermen saving civilization from the fatal mistakes of deluded liberal scientists) are the apotheosis of the field should avoid Lafferty like the plague (although I'll be happy to help any ambitious Pournelle fans with any of the big words or tricky concepts they'll find in Lafferty).
posted by Steven Baum 5/12/2000 04:06:32 PM | link

WIT OF THE STAIRCASE
Ever thought of some hugely witty comeback about five minutes too late? Or should that question be: How many times has that happened in the last week? Well, I can't help you with the memory thing seeing how I can't even help myself in that regard, but I can offer a phrase to use as a sort of excuse which, given that it's in French wherein the translation of "damn but my 'rhoids hurt today" sounds witty to non-speakers, just might save you some valuable karma. The phrase is "esprit d'escalier", and translates into "spirit of the staircase" or, more broadly "wit of the staircase", i.e. the wit that arrives (a day late and a dollar short) after you've traversed the staircase.

This is one non-English phrase appreciated even by irrascible British schoolmarm Henry Fowler in the 1908 edition of The King's English. His general advice about non-English words is:

...all words not English in appearance are in English writing ugly and not pretty, and that they are justified only (1) if they afford much the shortest or clearest, if not the only way to the meaning (this is usually true of the words we have called really English), or (2) if they have some special appropriateness of association or allusion in the sentence they stand in.
Lucky for us that Henry offers our phrase one of his special dispensations for use in English prose:
The French have had the wit to pack into the words esprit d'escalier the common experience that one's happiest retorts occur to one only when the chance of uttering them is gone, the door is closed, and one's feet are on the staircase. That is well worth introducing to an English audience; the only question is whether it is of any use to translate it without explanation. No one will know what spirit of the staircase is who is not already familiar with esprit d'escalier; and even he who is may not recognize it in disguise, seeing that esprit does not mean spirit (which suggests a goblin lurking in the hall clock), but wit.
Hmmm, given that "goblin lurking" aside perhaps I should have referred to him as a "ghoulish schoolmarm."
posted by Steven Baum 5/12/2000 09:55:13 AM | link

BREAKTHROUGH BOOKS - II
It's been pointed out to me that the
Economic Disasters and Dysphoria section of BreakthroughBooks contains some juicy and timely nuggets. What with all the criticism of and controversy surrounding the World Bank and IMF, the middle volume of a Keynes biography promises some interesting reading:
Since 1973, the global economy has stumbled from one economic crisis to another: stagflation in the 1970s, Latin American debt problems in the 1980s, and global financial problems today. In each instance, financiers have turned to the World Bank and the IMF for help. Critics contend that these organizations, controlled by the U.S. Treasury, have only exacerbated problems. The second volume of Robert Skidelsky's three-volume biography JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES, VOLUME TWO: THE ECONOMIST AS SAVIOR, 1920-1937, offers a glimpse of what the global economy might have looked like without the World Bank and IMF. The book's central drama unfolds at Bretton Woods, where Keynes, as head of the British delegation, clashed with the U.S. delegation over policies for controlling postwar international payments. The adoption of the American proposal for an IMF and World Bank over Keynes's `bancor' plan-which was not tied to any national currency-was a victory of political power over enlightened thought.
And the stock market for the last decade and especially the last couple of months makes the following pair seem especially readworthy:
There's no place for economic disasters in traditional neoclassical economic theory, with its assumptions about the efficiency of markets and the rationality of investors. Yet bubbles and busts are perennial features of capitalist societies. In recent years, economists have started to think about these phenomena as more than just inexplicable aberrations, in no small part thanks to Charles Kindleberger, whose MANIAS, PANICS AND CRASHES: A HISTORY OF FINANCIAL CRISES , 3rd ed. remains the most comprehensive and rigorous look at the long history of financial hysteria. Kindleberger's reflections on the importance of a `lender of last resort' seem especially relevant, considering the recent debate over the proper role of the IMF and the World Bank. From a different angle, Peter Bernstein's AGAINST THE GODS; THE REMARKABLE STORY OF RISK, a history of the concept of risk, provides invaluable-and entertaining-insight into exactly why investors act the way they do and how `rationality,' at least in the short term, remains such an elusive goal.
And since we're on economics here, I should put in yet another plug for Paul Krugman, whose witty and concise prose style and ability to piss off the entire political spectrum make reading him an essential step in inoculating yourself against economic nonsense.
posted by Steven Baum 5/12/2000 09:32:04 AM | link

Thursday, May 11, 2000

BREAKTHROUGH BOOKS
Lingua Franca has a nicely bookish section called BreakthroughBooks where "we ask the experts to recommend the groundbreaking books in their field." Each issue contains a Breakthrough section for a different field, and they're collecting all the categories they've done online. The sections I've checked out include food and eating, jazz, exploring the universe, reference books, and neglected fiction. The latter section includes the following recommendation by the editor of the (out of print) 29-volume Complete Oxford Mark Twain:
Another neglected treasure is 1601 & Is Shakespeare Dead? (1882; currently available from Oxford), in which Shakespeare, Sir Francis Bacon, and other luminaries sit around the Elizabethan fireside talking dirty. Written during the summer of 1876, this bawdy language experiment helped Twain get his creative juices flowing for another project-also a language experiment of sorts-that he began that same summer: Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.
If it weren't for Twain and Ambrose Bierce pissing on literary respectability, those would have been pretty grim years for American literature. Or is that littature?
posted by Steven Baum 5/11/2000 03:22:19 PM | link

A JOINT COMMUNIQUE?
Lake Effect just prompted a strong wave of nostalgia with an entry mentioning Barney Miller as being one of the greatest sitcoms ever. We heartily concur here at EthelCo. It definitely had the best theme ever (available in WAV format), with that jazzy upright bass line starting things out. I'll steal a summary from elsewhere:
The trials and tribulations of Captain Barney Miller of New York City's 12th Precinct. Others around the station house were Detective Sergeant Amenguale, the Puerto Rican; Detective Stanley Wojohowicz, the naive, trusting one; Detective Nick Yemana, the one who made the awful coffee; Detective Phil Fish, the old one who acted and sounded like every breath might be his last; Detective Ron Harris, the wisecracking, ambitious, nicely dressed one; Detective Arthur Dietrich, the know-it-all; Inspector Frank Lugar, the often incoherent superior; Officer Carl Levitt, the uniformed officer who wanted to become a detective; and Lt. Scanlon, of Internal Affairs and always trying to find some dirt on the 12th Precinct.

Aside from The Honeymooners, Barney Miller was the sit-com that most approximated a one-act play. Almost every episode took place in one room of a rundown, filthy police station in Greenwich Village. Barney Miller managed to develop its main characters without showing their home lives (or their bare butts), thanks to perceptive writing and scenes that were long enough for actors to breathe. The show is also rare among workplace comedies in that a steady stream of character actors drop in to spice up each episode.

I remember an article (probably from TV Guide) that had several real cops saying it was the most realistic cop show they'd ever seen. Why? All the detectives ever did was fill out paperwork and deal with a never-ending stream of walk-in problem cases. In the entire 8 year run (as far as I can recall) there was only one episode dealing with one of the cast shooting someone. Chano - played by Gregory Sierra - shot and killed a couple of bank robbers in one episode, although the shooting was offscreen and the episode was about his difficulties in dealing with the reality of killing two other people.

What most likely wasn't an accurate reflection of reality was the witty banter in the precinct house. Not many precinct houses in the history of the planet have had as dry a wit as Dietrich (played by Steve Landesberg) in their midst. (As an aside, does anyone else remember a comedy special called "The Steve Landesberg Show"?) The title of this entry comes from a quip Dietrich made after Captain Miller had explained to the precinct how he and his estranged wife had had a fruitful meeting that morning vis a vis getting back together, i.e. "Are you going to issue a joint communique?" It's secondarily a comment on the politics of the time. Another great Dietrich line was prompted by him noticing a device that'd been confiscated from a student's science project and commenting "Hey, where'd you get the A-bomb?" (A plethora of other favorite Barney Miller quotes are available.)

All the regulars from the show are still alive and kicking, except for Jack Soo who died of cancer during the show's original run and was the subject of a touching tribute episode. Where are they now? information is available for each of them, with Landesberg apparently having been in an episode of a show I've never heard of ("Twice in a Lifetime") in January of this year. I'd be willing to bet that none are starving since the rerun residuals from a popular 8-year TV series can be considerable, especially if you didn't let the studio screw you hard on your original contract.

Does anyone know if reruns are currently being shown? I don't recall having seen an episode for several years.
posted by Steven Baum 5/11/2000 11:18:44 AM | link

SAVE BIG BUCKS
Although I'm not making a penny from saying this, I've had enough good experiences dealing with them to note that
Bookpool is currently selling all O'Reilly trade titles at 45% off. The recent titles I'm finding terribly useful include UNIX Backup and Recovery and Using and Managing PPP, with the horror stories interspersed in the former providing much entertainment in addition to the expected enlightenment. Other recent non-O'Reilly titles with which I'm pleased are Professional PHP Programming, Professional Apache (with the cover photo of the author making him look like Buckaroo Banzai) and MySQL. All of the above volumes are proving to be valuable as references as well as how-to guides. I got them all from Bookpool in a single order in which I saved $150.
posted by Steven Baum 5/11/2000 09:36:51 AM | link

Wednesday, May 10, 2000

"GENTLEMAN" McCAIN
John McCain has gotten an even bigger free ride from the media than Gov. Blow Monkey as regards the skeletons in his closet. The sorts of things that would get Clinton weeks of hysterical denunciations in the nutbar as well as mainstream press are - when McCain or Shrub are involved - mentioned only to denounce them as scurrilous rumors. For instance, John McCain's extremely violent temper is well-known to the press corps, but stories about his outbursts are confined to being swapped at after-hours booze-ups rather than the banner headlines Clinton would get if he, say, told a reporter asking him if he'd killed Vince Foster to "FUCK OFF, SHIT-FOR-BRAINS!"

You can bet that the details in Jeffrey St. Clair's and Alexander Cockburn's column (over at Eat the State) revealing one particularly ugly McCain outburst will never make it to Fox, CNBC, C-SPAN or any of the "centrist" "news" programs at the Little Three. When the University of Arizona wanted to build seven telescopes on Mount Graham in national forest lands in the late 1980s, they went to McCain. He introduced legislation that would exempt the project from compliance with the Endangered Species Act, the Antiquities Act, and the Native American Religious Freedom Act (the latter because the mountain is sacred to the San Carlos Apache). St. Clair and Cockburn continue:

In the spring of 1989, the Forest Service began to raise questions about the project. Worried about the impacts on the endangered Mt. Graham red squirrel, Jim Abbott, the supervisor of the Coronado National Forest, ordered a halt to road construction at the site. The delay infuriated McCain. On May 17, 1989, Abbott got a call from Mike Jimenez, McCain's chief of staff. Jimenez told Abbott that McCain was angry and wanted to meet with him the next day. He told Abbott to expect "some ass-chewing." At the meeting, McCain raged, threatening Abbott that "if you do not cooperate on this project [bypassing the Endangered Species Act], you'll be the shortest tenured forest supervisor in the history of the Forest Service." Unfortunately for McCain, there was a witness to this encounter, a ranking Forest Service employee named Richard Flannelly, who recorded the encounter in his notebook. This notebook was later turned over to investigators at the General Accounting Office.
...
Environmentalists attempted to bring an ethics complaint against McCain, citing a federal law that prohibits anyone (including members of Congress) from browbeating federal agency personnel. The Senate ethics committee never pursued the matter. When the GAO report, condemning McCain, surfaced publicly, McCain lied about the encounter, calling the allegations "groundless" and "silly."
One can almost hear the words "disgruntled", "former" and "employee" being chanted as the GAO report was released in 1990. A couple of years later, two environmentally-concerned physicians visited McCain's office.
The doctors say that at the mention of the words "Mt. Graham" McCain erupted into a violent fit. "He slammed his fists on his desk, scattering papers across the room," Silver tells us. "He jumped up and down, screaming obscenities at us for at least 10 minutes. He shook his fists as if he was going to slug us. It was as violent as almost any domestic abuse altercation."
But, on the plus side, at least McCain isn't a coke dealer or, far worse, a dope smoker.
posted by Steven Baum 5/10/2000 02:47:21 PM | link

OIL AND COCAINE
According to Michael Klare, oil and natural gas are the real reasons behind the push for a $1.3 billion "emergency military aid package" to Colombia. In
Quest for Oil Drives Aid to Colombia, he details how the U.S. is increasingly looking towards South America as a supplier of hydrocarbon fuel sources due to instability in the Middle East. Klare describes recent national security strategic decisions:
While much of our imported oil comes from the Persian Gulf, [President Clinton] reported in 1997, "we are ... undergoing a fundamental shift in our reliance on imported oil away from the Middle East. Venezuela is now the number one foreign supplier to the United States ... and Venezuela and Colombia are each undertaking new oil production ventures." These ventures will become increasingly important, he added, as domestic oil production declines and the United States becomes increasingly dependent on imported supplies.
So why is military aid needed by the petroleum industry in Colombia? We've been bombarded with horror stories about how the military aid is needed to stop evil commie druglord guerrillas (i.e. the perfect foils for Tom Clancy's next chamberpotboiler) in Colombia from forcing American children to do crack. Is this just another steaming load of propaganda? Apparently.
The fact is, however, that the greatest threat posed by the guerrillas to stability in Colombia is not their involvement in the drug trade, but rather their attacks on economic targets, especially the oil industry. For the past 10 years, the main rebel groups -- the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC, by its initials in Spanish) and the Army of National Liberation (ELN) -- have waged a relentless war of attrition against Colombian oil operations, especially those linked to foreign producers like British Petroleum (BP) and U.S.-based Occidental Petroleum.
This is the same Occidental Petroleum that - according to a recent Newsweek report - is lobbying as hard as some arms manufacturers for the $1.3 billion aid package.

Oil is currently Colombia's leading legal source of export income. It generates $3-4 billion per year and the Colombian government wants to significantly increase this over the next decade. This won't be possible if the continuing guerrilla attacks slow current oil production and discourage further exploration.

As Klare points out, while $1.3 billion may seem like a lot of money and will indeed lead to a lot of deaths, it won't be nearly enough to rid Colombia of the guerrilla groups. They're organized, dedicated, and defending territory that's every bit as strategically difficult to attack as - you guessed it - Vietnam. Basically, the options are continued escalation at the cost of many innocent and non-innocent lives (not to mention the long-term costs to the environment and indigenous cultures that the necessary counterinsurgency tactics would require), or some sort of negotiated peace. Don't bet the farm on the latter, especially given all the rhetoric about how the Gulf War erased the last vestiges of the Vietnam Syndrome. Yep, arrogance and stupidity are together again, and with bigger and better guns than ever.
posted by Steven Baum 5/10/2000 10:45:04 AM | link

Tuesday, May 09, 2000

COD
You wouldn't think that an entire book about cod called
Cod would be the sort of thing a grizzled reviewer would call a "corking good read", but it is. Mark Kurlansky's book - subtitled "A Biography of the Fish that Changed the World" - is a marvelous (and marvelously short) book about the pivotal role cod played in the discovery and exploration of North America. It is also a history of the effect of man on cod, the ending of which is not nearly as happy (i.e. the whore, played by Julia Roberts, doesn't marry the rich guy and drive off in the limo this time).

In the most startling passage in the book, we learn of the early significance of cod on exploration:

[In 1534], Jacques Cartier arrived, was credited with `discovering' the mouth of the St. Lawrence, planted a cross on the Gaspe Peninsula, and claimed it all for France. He also noted the presence of 1,000 Basque fishing vessels. But the Basques, wanting to keep a good secret, had never claimed it for anyone.
That's right, the Basques had been fishing the cod stocks off Newfoundland for at least 500 years before it was "discovered" by Cartier. And the Basques weren't the first to find good use for cod, i.e.
How did the Vikings survive in greenless Greenland and earthless Stoneland? How did they have enough provisions to push on to Woodland and Vineland, where they dared not go inland to gather food, and yet they still had enough food to get back? What did these Norsemen eat on the five expeditions to America between 985 and 1011 that have been recorded in the Icelandic sagas? They were able to travel to all these distant, barren shores because they had learned to preserve codfish by hanging it in the frosty winter air until it lost four-fifths of its weight and became a durable woodlike plank. They could break off pieces and chew them, eating it like hardtack.
There's also good evidence that, when the Hanseatic League cut British merchants off from the Icelandic cod supply in 1475, a couple of British merchants had not only discovered Newfoundland by 1481 but found and dried enough cod there such that they could tell the League to sod off in 1490 when they offered to renegotiate the Icelandic trade. The merchants chose not to publicize this discovery at the time.

The tremendous commercial value of cod was due to both its taste and its preservability. With only 0.3% fat and 18% protein when caught, the cod can be dried to have virtually no fat and 80% protein, a form that will last for months without spoiling even in the tropics. This was a tremendous attribute in the ages preceding refrigeration, and led to a huge cod fishing industry.

The remainder of the book details the grim and sordid history of this industry, from "so many cod you could walk across the water on them" to stocks today that are commercially extinct. Along the way we see governments nearly going to war over diminishing stocks as well as commercial fleets choosing to continue overfishing, even when told in no uncertain terms that such a choice would lead to commercial suicide (which it did). But, to be sure, the book is much more than a grim account of stupidity and greed. It weaves a fascinating tale of the interaction of cod and human civilization over the last thousand years, and is well worth the three or four hours it'll take to digest its 230 pages of narrative.
posted by Steven Baum 5/9/2000 05:16:26 PM | link

IT'S NOT MY PLANET, MONKEY BOY!
Having seen a rerun of the thing for the first time in a decade on the
sciffy channel, I figured there'd be a significant net presence for fans of The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension . Sure enough, we have: Probably the most notable thing about this 1984 production at this late date is the number of people in the cast who went on to bigger and (sometimes) better things. The cast included Ellen Barkin, Jeff Goldblum (the sharpness of whose self-promotion instincts also led him to appear in the other future star vehicle of that time, i.e. The Big Chill), Dan Hedaya, John Lithgow, Christopher Lloyd and Peter Weller (as well as the thankfully forgotten, now-dwelling-in-Branson-hell, horrifically awful Yakov Smirnoff). As you might suspect, Lithgow (playing Dr. Emilio Lizardo/Lord John Whorfin) and, to a lesser extent, Lloyd (playing John Bigboote) pretty much steal the show as riotously funny evil aliens. Lithgow's background commentary during the Yoyodyne scenes is particularly good, although it's easy to miss as you're marveling at the cheaply done exotic visuals.

Overall, Banzai's got everything a movie needs to become a cult item, e.g. a now-famous cast, bad editing, a quasi-exotic storyline and, of course, a memorable phrase or two. It could be part of a laid-back, bad sciffy movie rental night with, say, Doc Savage: The Man of Bronze, especially seeing how the books on which the latter was based influenced Banzai more than a little. I'd also recommend some sort of chemical enhancement to increase the pleasure by deadening (at least) your critical faculties for the evening, whether it be via a fine brew or six or in a manner more befitting the rastamen aliens.
posted by Steven Baum 5/9/2000 02:02:09 PM | link

IT'S A NATURAL MANDATE, Y'KNOW!
I told a friend about the
Confidence Games metalink I posted yesterday, which prompted him to further explore the archives at Lingua Franca. So I get an email from him today which contains - in addition to the usual stuff about extracting the pituitary glands of the very young in an attempt to achieve immortality - a link to an article entitled The Outrageous Pragmatism of Judge Richard Posner. He included this excerpt:
The principle of wealth maximization dictates that goods and rights are to be distributed to those who value them most. At the same time, the value you place on a right is determined by how much you are willing to pay while bargaining for it, and how much you are willing to pay for something often depends on how much money you already have. By this logic, the principle of wealth maximization suggests that there is no justification for making those who are already wealthy share what they have; it even suggests that their wealth alone is justification for giving them more. Worse, people with no wealth have no rights. Posner had tried to plug these gaps by arguing that wealth maximization was actually a principle for explaining how basic rights are originally distributed in, say, a hypothetical auction. But the unsettling idea that a person is entitled to a right only insofar as she can produce the wealth needed to acquire it recurred here as well. Posner's theory was, in effect, a tautology: Maximizing wealth was good because it created a just distribution of rights, and the reason that distribution was just was because it maximized wealth.
My friend offered the following comment on the above:
You know, even though [Ronald] Dworkin and others just laid slaughter to this 20 years ago, and Posner admits his efforts at making capitalism a moral philosophy were flat out wrong, after reading the above I still conclude that the right has yet to abandon this view. They're still running around clutching a text by some obscure Austrian economist they wouldn't understand if they attempted to read it. Oh, the times are-a-changin'.
He also informs me that - in a ranking of most-cited legal scholars - Posner comes in first by a wide margin and Dworkin second. Valuable beer points will be awarded to the first person to identify the obscure economist to whom he refers.

Addendum: Double beer points for identifying the origin of the "pituitary gland" aside in the first paragraph.
posted by Steven Baum 5/9/2000 10:25:06 AM | link

KUDOS
Those wacky, wonderful and talented folks at
Blogger have done it again. They've removed the 7200 character limit for posts so now I can drone on and on and on and on and on until I fall over backwards. No more two- or three-part entries, with each segment ending in a contrived cliffhanger in a crass attempt to increase readership and entice more nymphomaniacal groupies into my ever-increasing harem. And have I mentioned yet how great it is that those marvelous folks at Blogger have done all the programming grunt work for me so I can concentrate on the dithyrambunctious stuff? If it weren't for them, you probably wouldn't be reading all these witty, insightful and heartwarming gems. That's right, send all complaints to Blogger.
posted by Steven Baum 5/9/2000 10:02:13 AM | link

Monday, May 08, 2000

TRAVIS McGEE
I read my first
Travis McGee back in the mid-1970s, although I can't remember which one it was. Travis was a fictional detective created by John D. McDonald, and will undoubtedly be what he's remembered for in 100 years. The series began with The Deep Blue Good-By in 1964 and ended with The Lonely Silver Rain, published a year before the author's death in 1986. All told there were 21 titles in the series, of which I picked up 17 a couple of days ago for about $1.50 apiece. I'll snag the rest of them on ABEBooks as I reach those holes in the series.

In spite of the popularity of the series, only two movies were ever made featuring Travis McGee. The first (which I saw many years ago), was based on Darker Than Amber (1970) and featured Rod Taylor as Travis. The second, Travis McGee: The Empty Copper Sea (1983, made for television), featured Sam Elliot in that role.

McDonald was an extremely popular author in his day, having sold 75 million copies of the 78 books he published in his lifetime. Early in his career he churned out quite a few short stories for science fiction magazines (I've got a paperback collection of some of his early SF output), although he abandoned that genre for detective and mainstream fiction during the sixties. His most well-known novel other than those in the McGee series was probably Condominium (1977), a tale of a hurricane's devastating effects on those living in a Florida condominium. It has been called by one critic "that snowball in hell - a literate blockbuster." His most well-known story was probably Cape Fear, although it is far better known from the two movie versions than from the novel itself.

McDonald, who most likely wouldn't make any objective list of the best 100 authors of the 20th century, was nonetheless a fine storyteller. It's well worth picking up any of his books if you're looking for a pleasant read for a buck or two. His McGee series, on the other hand, should make it to near the top of any list of best detective series. And they're easy enough to find among his other output, i.e. if there's a color in the title then it's a Travis McGee novel. Fans of the Robert Parker "Spenser" novels should especially enjoy the McGee novels, seeing how the latter exerted more than a slight influence on the former.
posted by Steven Baum 5/8/2000 04:01:25 PM | link

META
That, being from elsewhere, which your humble narrator considers worth keeping if only for his own selfish purposes:

posted by Steven Baum 5/8/2000 01:53:10 PM | link

THE WEEKEND
The middle sister threatened disownment, so a weekend trip to Dallas (actually a 'burb called Garland but who's heard of that?) was mandatory. A few observations concerning said peregrination:

posted by Steven Baum 5/8/2000 10:25:49 AM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger