Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Friday, April 28, 2000

CLEAR AS MUD
So I'm making the final corrections on the page proofs of our upcoming
Nature paper (the publication details of which I'll supply when they're available), when I encounter the request "AUTHOR: please clarify 'epeiric'". I'll be the first the fess up that this is a bit of jargon on our part. The word means "a sea connected with the ocean but situated on a continent or continental shelf", and is used almost interchangeably with "epicontinental." (By the way, that definition is from the New Shorter Oxford, the two volumes of which are used to settle disputes hereabouts, whether the settlement involves the contents of the books or the heft of the books being placed not unfirmly upside the head of some recalcitrant mofo.) I have a problem with this request. Once again: sure, it's jargon, but jargon can be useful. For instance, it allows one to use a single word like, e.g. "epeiric" rather than a long phrase like, e.g. "a sea connected ... or continental shelf" in a paper. This is especially useful when the paper is to appear in a journal like, e.g. Nature, that imposes severe length restrictions on submissions.

Another problem I have (yes, I know, but if we go into all of them we'll be here all day and, well, I've got a pocketful of beer money and it's late Friday afternoon and, well, you get the picture) with this request is best illustrated by a sentence from the abstract of another Nature article (i.e. the first article I found upon opening the first copy within reach):

CASK/LIN-2, a MAGUK required for EGF receptor localization and signalling in Caenorhabditis elegans, contains a calmodulin-dependent protein kinase-like domain followed by PDZ, SH3 and guanylate kinase-like domains.
That is, if they're really worried that Johnny Lunchpail and Suzie Sixpack are going to lead unfulfilled lives if, while reading Nature during lunch at McDonald's, they have to stop and look up the word 'epeiric' in our article, how the hell are they even going to be able to get out of bed the next morning if they have to parse that (truly) abstract sentence from the other article? If our wee bit of jargon is going to discourage them, then that MAGUK etc. stuff will make them despondent if not suicidal.

I was going to suggest on the page proofs that if 'epeiric' were unacceptably vague, then perhaps they would prefer the crystal clarity of "CASK/LIN-2 ..." instead. But, unfortunately, cooler heads prevailed and a pleasant, diplomatic, and jargon-free response was offered in place of my ever-so-witty, almost-Wildean bon mot. And don't even get me started on another request they made about a half paragraph before that, i.e. "AUTHOR: please clarify 'domed.'"
posted by Steven Baum 4/28/2000 04:53:21 PM | link

Thursday, April 27, 2000

BEAT THE BOOTS
The title of this entry is also the title of an
8-album Frank Zappa boxed set (now out of print) released in 1991 in an attempt to make legitimate versions of his most popular bootleg albums available. I picked up the cassette version of this (complete with the "Beat the Boots!" t-shirt) about 5 years ago, and it's afforded me many a fine hour of listening pleasure (with the first three times I heard all 8 cassettes being on the 22 hour drive from Ohio back to Texas).

According to Clinton Heylin's Bootleg: The Secret History of the Other Recording Industry:

Zappa's own bootleg series, on the other hand, was actually the genuine article. Beat the Boots I and II consisted of two eight-album boxed sets that were simply counterfeits of existing bootlegs, dubbed direct from the original versions, complete with pops and crackles and original artwork. Zappa, though, was just as vehemently opposed to bootlegs as Dylan. The first volume even included one bootleg, As An Am Zappa, on which he is complaining about bootleggers who attend his concerts being able to release his newest songs before him. THe Beat the Boots volumes were not intended to legitimize this part of his oeuvre but to undercut the bootleggers and make Zappa money from the bootlegger's industry (and make money they did). One bootlegger even threatened to sue Zappa for the artwork to 'Tis the Season to Be Jelly, which was, of course, copyrighted and which Zappa was illegally appropriating.
Heylin documents the love-hate relationships artists have had with bootleggers over the years, as well as the predictable and usually laughable worst-case scenarios and wolf-crying of the recording industry (i.e. the no-talent cokeheads who'd commodify their mothers if they could clone them). The recording industry has always tried to conflate bootleggers and pirates, although the differences are more stark than those between night and day. The former release between 1,000-10,000 copies of individual recordings, nearly all of which are snagged by obsessive fans who've already bought everything legally available (and probably more than once). The latter copy officially released albums (as opposed to the live shows and studio out-takes of the former) and sell them in huge quantities to those who buy them instead of the official releases. In other words (and to put it in bean counter terminology), the former don't cost the bean counters anything while the latter do.

The bootleggers aren't all saints, though. Many release crap in an attempt to make quick buckage. Nothing escapes Sturgeon's Law (i.e. 95% of everything is shit). But, when they're good, they're damned good. There aren't many instances when the officially released live albums of a given group or performer are better than the best available bootlegs, with the only exceptions I can think of at the moment being the Allman Brothers' Live at Fillmore East and Santana's Lotus. And in the case of Led Zeppelin, one of the most revered bands in r&r history, the bootlegs save their devoted legion of fans from the travesty that is their official live album. It was recorded at the end of a tour when the band members were either exhausted or utterly drugged out or both. The bootleggers supplied Zep fans with the good live performances they craved. And, as Heylin relates, even the most obsessive, fanatical, and crazed Zep fan would be more than satisfied by the most herculean feat in the history of bootlegging:

Between 1984 and 1987 Rock Solid churned out nearly a hundred titles, of which the most extravagant was the ultimate in boxed-sets. After Dylan's ten-album and twenty-album boxed-sets (the latter, History, coming from Europe, the Beatles' eleven-album set and Zappa's trio of ten-plus platters [insert massive drooling from your humble author here] (The Mystery Box, The History and Collected Improvisations of Frank Zappa and Twenty Years of Frank Zappa), Rock Solid produced a seventy-album acrylic case of Led Zeppelin live recordings. It was a project that went beyond collecting (and reason), simply to prove a point (or two) - that it could be done and that it would sell. Not surprisingly, The Final Option, as it was appropriately named, was a logistical nightmare.
Only 150 of those monster sets were produced, and if I'm ever feeling really, really, really evil, I'll mention it to a Zep freakazoid I've known for about a decade. He'll spend the rest of his life looking for one of those puppies, which probably go for tens of thousands of semolians these days.

Getting down to brass tacks, the book's well worth a read (especially if you snagged it from the $1 bin like I did) if you're interested at all in the subject, and fascinating if you're personally interested in any of the masssively bootlegged artists of the last 30 years. By the way, if you're interested in obtaining such things these days, check out the "import" section at your local music emporium. Various draconian laws passed in the last couple of decades (and detailed in the book) that don't really distinguish between bootlegging and piracy have increased the risk involved in purveying such items.
posted by Steven Baum 4/27/2000 11:35:12 PM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger