Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Friday, January 07, 2000

CHRONOTHERAPY
Most if not all species possess internal, 24-hour circadian clocks that regulate various functions according to the time of day. This isn't a terribly suprising revelation seeing how we evolved under the daily rhythms of the sun. What is surprising is the growing number of experimental results showing that human illness and the success of the treatment thereof can be dependent on the time of day. Probably the oldest and most well-known example of this is the prevalence of heart attacks and strokes in the morning hours as the blood pressure rises to meet the needs of our waking hours. Other temporally-dependent medical features of humans include:
  • post-surgical death is most likely at 1 AM,
  • peptic ulcers flare up at 2 AM,
  • blood pressure bottoms out at 3 AM,
  • asthma is at its worst at 4 AM, and
  • alcohol is least toxic to the body at 5 PM.
The discovery of the brain's central clock - a tiny and primitive region called the superchiasmatic nucleus - in 1972 provided the genesis of the fields of
chronobiology and chronotherapy which are, respectively, the study of circadian rhythms in humans and the use of the knowledge gained to enhance the treatment of illness.

Various related nuggets gleaned from the article "The tyranny of time" in the Dec. 18-30, 1999 issue of The Economist include:

  • human body clocks can apparently be reset by shining bright lights on the back of the knees (echoing the results of research on fish, rats and other critters showing that clock genes are expressed in many parts of the body);
  • the side effects of chemotherapy administered to women with ovarian cancer have been reduced by half by adjusting the time of day for the treatment;
  • computerized pumps for administering chemotherapy to colon cancer patients were able to infuse higher doses of medication if the dose was adjusted for time of day rather than given in a flat-rate regime;
  • two time-delayed blood pressure medications are on the market that are taken at bedtime and take effect shortly before the patient wakes to lessen the shock of morning blood pressure increases;
  • a night of sleep deprivation to break natural circadian rhythms can remarkably improve the state of those who suffer from chronic depression, with the anti-depressive effects of sleep deprivation sustainable for long periods.
It should be noted that chronotheraphy isn't a miracle cure for anything but can be used in combination with other medical procedures to obtain improved results in many cases. Related articles include A Time to Heal: Chronotherapy Tunes into Body's Rhythms and Circadian Rhythms and Chronotherapy: An Introduction to the Tick Tock of Your Internal Clock.
posted by Steven Baum 1/7/2000 03:34:48 PM | link

Thursday, January 06, 2000

BUSHWHACKING
A Jan. 3 article by Tamara Baker at
AMPOL discusses the recent story broken by the National Enquirer, the New York Post and Tony Snow at Fox "News" about a stripper claiming to have had an 18-month affair with Bush the Lesser. All three sources initially announced the story as a "smear campaign." That is, they didn't handle it the way they've handled every last rumor about Clinton for the last 7 years, by announcing the rumors the same way they announced every other story, i.e. as news, and then repeating every previous rumor in all succeeding stories about new rumors.

Baker goes on to posit that the story is nothing more than a red herring planted in Bush-friendly media outlets (both the Post and FOX are owned by Rupert Murdoch) in an attempt to distract attention from other rumors about the Shrub's wild 'n' crazy past, especially those nasty ones about cocaine use by the "just say no!" candidate who's done everything he possibly could in Texas to put more drug users in prison for longer periods of time. Such a ploy might be deemed necessary by a campaign team that, despite its best efforts, hasn't been able to suppress J. H. Hatfield's unflattering biography about Gov. Blow Monkey entitled Fortunate Son, which has been reprinted at Soft Skull Press. Especially since the new publishers claim that their updated edition contains corroboration of the charge that Bush the Younger got busted on a cocaine charge in 1972.

The main argument offered by Bush supporters against the book when it was originally published was an ad hominem charge about how the author was a convicted felon. This is strange in light of the fact that many of those same nutbars undoubtedly consider everything uttered by convicted felon G. Gordon Liddy on his rant/hate radio show to be equivalent to the Holy Gospel. There's also the matter of the shady pasts (and presents) of several others in the professional Clinton-haters squad, none of whom are considered unqualified to spread their propaganda because of personal pecadillos. It's going to be an interesting campaign, and I just can't wait to see another Clinton-bashing, womanizing, drug-using, lying right-wing self-announced hardass get nailed to a cross he had custom-made for Clinton.
posted by Steven Baum 1/6/2000 04:44:37 PM | link

CARPETBAGGERS
Rudy Giuliani's been bloviating much lately on Hillary Clinton being a carpetbagger who isn't qualified to be a Senator from New York. Let's take a look at some words penned by the younger, kindler, gentler Giuliana in the days before he decided that the homeless were the single greatest threat to civilization.
Quoth Giuliani in a 1964 editorial written for the Manhattan College student newspaper about the upcoming Senate race between Democrat Robert Kennedy and Republican Kenneth Keating:
The "carpetbagger" issue, which has so far been the only issue Sen. Keating has gotten any response on, is a truly ridiculous reason for not voting for a man in the year 1964. Without doubt, the Kennedy candidacy in New York is perfectly in accord with the Constitutional stipulation that a senator must be a resident of the state he represents on the day he is elected. Presently, Kennedy and his very large family reside in Glen Cove, Long Island, and so he will fulfill the Constitutional limitation. Also, it must be mentioned that the nomination of a man from one state to serve another in the United States is not without precedent. Rufus King, the first United States Senator from New York, was a Massachusetts native who moved into New York immediately before his election to the Senate. Rufus King had, only shortly before his election, served as a delegate from Massachusetts to the Constitutional Convention.

Actually, the main question is whether or not we in New York are going to make our decisions on a candidate by the standards parochialism which were outdated even in 1792, when New Yorkers chose a Massachusetts man because they felt he could best serve New York. Let us hope that cosmopolitan New Yorkers can rise above the ridiculous, time-worn provincial attitude that has so disunified our nation. A Kennedy victory will bring about the assertion of a most valuable precedent; that a representative from a particular state must be able to think and vote in the light of national needs and not to be tied only to local and sectional pressures.

Sure, hanging somebody on words they wrote decades ago probably isn't totally fair, but in this case it's a whole heap o' fun.
posted by Steven Baum 1/6/2000 04:27:30 PM | link

TEXAS MUSIC
Some metasites for exploring Texas music include:
Web sites of Texas musicians of whom I'm not unfond include: Okay, a couple aren't strictly Texan but they might as well be.
posted by Steven Baum 1/6/2000 03:06:58 PM | link

SEEDS 'N' STEMS AGAIN
While pursuing the links in
MandomongerFarm's "Inundated With Catalogs" entry, I noticed a couple of significant seed catalog omissions in Cyndi's Catalog of Catalogs. And, given that these are my two favorite seed catalogs year after year, I'm going to correct the problem here. The companies are:
Redwood City Seed Company
P.O. Box 361
Redwood City, California 94064

J. L. Hudson, Seedsman
P.O. Box 1058
Redwood City, California 94064

Hudson doesn't have an Internet presence and, indeed, doesn't even advertise a phone number, but his thick, black and white catalog has many hard-to-find plant (vegetable and otherwise) varieties you just won't find anywhere else. I especially enjoy his editorial material and his special Zapotec (from southern Oaxaca in Mexico) vegetable seed section as well as his excellent book section. All the seeds in his catalog are open pollinated, i.e. no hybrids will be found here, the reasons for which he makes crystal clear.

The Redwood City catalog is about half as thick as Hudson's and is similar in that it is also black and white, carries very rare seed varieties, and only features open-pollinated seeds. His selections of Native American seed varieties (especially corn) is probably unrivaled and his section on hot pepper seeds takes second place to no other. He's been my prime and nearly only source for hot pepper seeds over the last decade. He also has a short section featuring various plants used in the Mesoamericas for medicinal, religious or other purposes which I've not seen duplicated anywhere else. This probably has him high on the "enemies list" of the Holy War on Drugs generals, but until they can outlaw all plants they're not going to be sending the troops in here.

The germination rate of seeds from both of these sources is as high as I've found anywhere except for perhaps Shepherd's, and when a seed is intrinsically tricky to germinate they'll tell you and offer hints on how to help the process along. If you're at all interested in rare seed varieties or are an aficionado of the open-pollination movement both of these catalogs are must-haves, and you can even order the Redwood City stuff via the Web. You might also want to check out the List of Heirloom Seed Companies for other like-minded sources.
posted by Steven Baum 1/6/2000 10:37:49 AM | link

STRANGE LIT
I noticed I've not been doing this category much lately, so here's some vintage
Borges. The Book of Imaginary Beings was first released in 1957 and again in 1967 in an expanded edition under the title El Libro de los Seres Imaginarios, with the first English version revised, further enlarged and translated by the author and Norman Thomas di Giovanni in 1969. In the 1967 edition Borges tells us that:
A book of this kind is unavoidably incomplete; each new edition forms the basis of future editions, which themselves may grow on endlessly.
This reiterates one of the prime Borgesian themes, i.e. infinity, most famously exemplified by his universal library in The Library of Babel. Borges goes on to tell us that this book is, like one of his favorites The Anatomy of Melancholy by Robert Burton, "not meant to be read straight through; rather, we should like the reader to dip into these pages at random, just as one plays with the shifting patterns of a kaleidoscope." Good idea, that.
Baldanders
Baldanders (whose name we may translate as "Soon-another" or "At-any-moment-something-else") was suggested to the master shoemaker Hans Sachs (1494-1576) of Nuremberg by that passage in the Odyssey in which Menelaus pursues the Egyptian god Proteus, who changes himself into a lion, a serpent, a panther, a huge wild boar, a tree, and flowing water. Some ninety years after Sachs's death, Baldanders makes a new appearance in the last book of the picaresque-fantastic novel by Grimmelshausen, The Adventuresome Simplicissimus (1669). In the midst of a wood, the hero comes upon a stone statue which seems to him an idol from some old Germanic temple. He touches it and the statue tells him he is Baldanders and thereupon takes the forms of a man, of an oak tree, of a sow, of a fat sausage, of a field of clover, of dung, of a flower, of a blossoming branch, of a mulberry bush, of a silk tapestry, of many other things and beings. And then, once more, of a man.

Kujata
The Moslem cosmology, Kujata is a huge bull endowed with four thousand eyes, ears, nostrils, mouths and feet. To get from one ear to another or from one eye to another, no more than five thousand years are required. Kujata stands on the back of the fish Bahamut; on the bull's back is a great rock of ruby, on the rock an angel, and on the angel rests our earth. Under the fish is a mighty sea, under the sea a vast abyss of air, under the air fire, and under the fire a serpent so great that were it not for the fear of Allah, this creature might swallow up all creation.

Haokah, the Thunder God
Among the Dakota Sioux, Haokah used the wind as sticks to beat the thunder drum. His horned head also marked him as a hunting god. He wept when he was happy and laughed in his sadness; heat made him shiver and cold made him sweat.

The Troll
In England, after the advent of Christianity, the Valkyries (or "Choosers of the Slain") were relegated to the villages and there degenerated into witches; in the Scandinavian countries the giants of heathen-myth, who lived in Jotunnheim and battled against the god Thor, were reduced to rustic Trolls. In the cosmogony opening the Elder Edda, we read that in the Twilight of the Gods, the giants, allied with a wolf and a serpent, will scale the rainbow Bifrost, which will break under their weight, thereby destroying the world. The Trolls of popular superstition are stupid, evil elves who dwell in mountain crannies or in ramshackle huts. Trolls of distinction may bear two or three heads.

Hochigan
Ages ago, a certain South African bushman, Hochigan, hated animals, which at that time were endowed with speech. One day he disappeared, stealing their special gift. From then on, animals have never spoken again.

Descartes tells us that monkeys could speak if they wished to, but that they prefer to keep silent so that they won't be made to work. In 1907, the Argentine writer Lugones published a story about a chimpanzee who was taught how to speak and died under the strain of the effort.

Borges, ah! A related if bulkier tome is Manguel and Guadalupi's recently (1999) updated Dictionary of Imaginary Places.
posted by Steven Baum 1/6/2000 09:00:55 AM | link

Wednesday, January 05, 2000

ATTICA
Nearly 30 years on the class-action suit brought by 1,281 inmates over the storming of Attica prison after the uprising in 1971 has resulted in a
settlement of $8 million from New York State. All that remains is to poll the inmates as to whether they think the settlement fair. Some 400 are expected to reply, with another estimated 400 dead and the rest uninterested or not locatable.

On Sept. 9, 1971, after several months of prisoners petitioning the state of New York to ameliorate overcrowding and other bad conditions at Attica Prison, the prisoners rebelled and took over much of the prison. By the end of the day, 1,281 prisoners held 39 prison guards and other employees in D Yard. After three days of negotiations during which the prisoners' demands increased beyond the improvement of prison conditions to demanding the removal of the Attica superintendent as well as amnesty for everyone involved, Gov. Nelson Rockefeller, who had refused to engage in the negotiations, ordered in the troops. On Sept. 13 state troopers and guards lobbed tear gas into D Yard and followed it with 3000 rounds of ammunition. They killed 10 hostages, 29 inmates, and severely injured another 89. Also dead were three convicts and a prison guard who'd been beaten during the revolt.

State officials attempted to claim that the convicts had killed the hostages by slitting their throats, a claim that was belied by autopsy reports. All the deaths on Sept. 13 were caused by the trooper gunfire in what was to be the bloodiest prison uprising in U.S. history.

Related sites include:


posted by Steven Baum 1/5/2000 02:12:23 PM | link

METASTUFF
Metalinks w/o comment but w/ attribution. Even though I'm not overly fond of logrolling, the links I kind of want to remember and get back to are just getting buried in my bookmarks file. So even though this will *SNIFF* put me high on the "scooped" list, here they are.

posted by Steven Baum 1/5/2000 11:27:26 AM | link

ZERO TO THREE
Interesting book review in the 1/10/2000
New Yorker by Malcolm Gladwell. His essay "Baby Steps" covers John Bruer's The First Three Years, Alison Gopnik et al.'s The Scientist in the Crib, and Jerome Kagan's Three Seductive Ideas. The piece contrasts the research presented in these books with the "zero to three movement" that started with a White House conference convened by Hillary Clinton entitled "What New Research About Our Youngest Children Tell Us", with the basic message of the movement being that improving the first three years of a child's life while the brain is in rapid development can solve many of the societal problems exhibited later in life, a position Gladwell terms "infant determinism." You may have heard about it in its most oversimplified form via the "playing Mozart for junior will make him smarter" meme.

I expected this to be another tiresome media hatchet job on Hillary Clinton of the kind currently as numerous as the hagiographies were during the early years of the Clinton presidency, but it's more of an exposition of how the movement's message is oversimplified and how that might not be optimal in the long run. This message is best conveyed in the following passage from the article:

Kagan writes of a famous Hawaiian study of child development, in which almost seven hundred children, from a variety of ethnic and economic backgrounds, were followed from birth to adulthood. The best predictor of who would develop serious academic or behavioral problems in adolescence, he writes, was social class: more than eighty per cent of the children who got in trouble came from the poorest segment of the sample. This is the harsh reality of child development, from which the zero-to-three movement offers a convenient escape. Kagan writes, "It is considerably more expensive to improve the quality of housing, education and health of the approximately one million children living in poverty in American today than to urge their mothers to kiss, talk to, and play with them more consistently." In his view, "to suggest to poor parents that playing with and talking to their infant will protect the child from future academic failure and guarantee life success" is an act of dishonesty. But that does not go far enough. It is also an unwitting act of reproach: it implies to disadvantaged parents that if their children do not turn out the way children of privilege do it is their fault - that they are likely to blame for the flawed wiring of their children's brains."
This is not to imply that improved care to age 3 is not a good idea, but rather that it's a good idea in a larger picture including improvements all around. It's sort of like and not unrelated to the affirmative action arguments that focus on equality of opportunity for those entering college rather than for those entering kindergarten. A real and fixable larger problem is mostly ignored in favor of quick and cheap supposed "fixes." The lives of those one million can be significantly improved at a ridiculously low cost for the richest nation on earth, and given the high correlation between educational success and future economic success (and the lack thereof and crime, or at least those engaged in the sort of crimes society chooses to demonize and prosecute), it would seem to be a no-brainer. The next time some gung-ho supply-sider tells you how throwing money at something won't fix it, remind them how well it's worked for George Steinbrenner in the last couple of years.
posted by Steven Baum 1/5/2000 10:29:27 AM | link

WINING
The Dec. 18-30, 1999 issue of
The Economist features a 12-page wine survey consisting of 7 articles about various facets of wine making and economics. In the great tradition of USAToday, I'll reduce this to a handful of crunchy, easily digestible information nuggets, although I'll skip the pie charts.
  • France is no longer the king among winemaking countries. For instance, New Zealand sauvignon blanc is considered by many to be the best in the world, and Grange, Australia's most famous wine, has been said by wine guru Robert Parker to have "replaced Bordeaux's Petrus as the world's most exotic and concentrated wine." The first sign of slippage was probably the so-called "judgment of Paris," a blind tasting of top wines from France and California that took place twice in the late 1970s, with the latter winning both competitions.
  • While Australia and Chile have been making big inroads into international markets, the next big exporters will be Argentina, Eastern Europe and South Africa.
  • The U.S. and Australian wine industries are still relatively concentrated amongst few companies, while the French region of Bordeaux has an estimated 12,000 producers and Italy has close to a million winemakers.
  • European winemaking laws, epitomized by France's "appellation controlee" legislation, while mostly a good and needed thing when first enacted, are increasingly becoming economic hindrances. For instance, a law that limits the alchohol content of sauvignon blanc from Bordeaux to a maximum of 12.5% caused problems in 1999 since good weather produced a grape crop whose natural wine product would be over that limit. Thus, producers have to either break the law or water down the wine.
  • Labeling restrictions have led to French and Italian producers releasing some of their best wines labeled as, respectively, vin du pays and vino da tavola, names that used to be used for lower grade basic table wines. The regulations for these are fewer and less restrictive, which allows, among other things, producers to list the grape varieties used (i.e. something consumers are increasingly looking for) on the front label.
  • Fruit-flavored wines (e.g. Arbor Mist) have captured 5% of the U.S. market, and are forecast to reach as high as 20% in the next few years. This can be sold as "wine" since labeling laws allow a grape variety to be listed on the bottle without necessarily putting much of it in the bottle. This is happening because many people like the image of real wine but not the taste, so they're buying trainloads of - well - disguised wine coolers. As an aside, when casual consumers blind taste test whiskies, they invariably prefer the more expensive ones. It's just the opposite when they taste wine.
  • The prices for top wines have skyrocketed in the last decade, chiefly due to a growing Asian market full of people with boatloads of money buying up all the top stuff. The prices fell during the Asian crisis in 1997 but have returned to their previous dizzying heights. Quoth Jancis Robinson in Tasting Pleasure: Confessions of a Wine Lover:
    The difference in price between the world's most expensive and cheapest wines has widened to such an extent (ironically, at a time when the gap in quality is probably narrower than it has ever been, that I shall probably never feel able to buy the seriously sought-after wines again.
  • All winemakers want their customers to buy their most expensive wines. One recent popular ploy "is to create artificial scarcities by producing trophy wines in ludicrously small quantities." The top champagnes, interestingly enough, aren't ludicrously expensive since they aren't terribly scarce. Most were produced in large quantities for the M-word celebrations, although some "special" ones were produced in limited quantities.
  • The price differences between wines do not necessarily reflect objective quality differences. Some folks quoted in the article go so far as to drop the word "necessarily" from that sentence.
  • Wine consumption in France and Italy has halved in the past 30 years, and the average age of regular consumers has risen to 55 from 35. This is balanced by increasing numbers of oenophiles in several others countries including Britain, Scandinavia and the Americas.
  • Big business does not look kindly upon wine as a good business in which to be involved. The risks are much greater than for, say, the spirits or beer industries. Also, the entire sales of the California wine industry were $13 billion last year as compared to $47 billion for Hewlett Packard. One business guru says that wine should be considered as part of the luxury goods business rather than the drinks industry, and draws a comparison between wine and gourmet coffees.
  • Any way you look at it, the acreage of premium grapes and therefore the supply for winemaking is going to increase tremendously over the next several years, with all countries planning large increases in acreage. This should lead to very inexpensive and good bottles of wine being increasingly available. One analyst predicts supermarkets producing cheap house brands of a quality comparable to name brands costing twice as much. Many are predicting price wars.

posted by Steven Baum 1/5/2000 10:21:16 AM | link

Tuesday, January 04, 2000

ANNOYANCES
The first nominee for most annoying commercial of the millennium is the Nokia phone ad where the annoying yuppie minivan driver is lollygagging around what looks to be the edge of the Grand Canyon (but, unfortunately, not close enough to the edge). Some ostensibly badass dude pulls up about 30 yards away on his well-chromed Harley (although, given the conversations I've had with the local Harley mechanic down at Dudd's, he's more than likely a doctor, lawyer, dentist or airline pilot than a Hell's Angel), gives a smudge on the chrome a quick buff, and the yuppie git casts a longing glance in his direction. Unless they're going for homoerotic overtones, I'm assuming he's pining for the fjords of motorcycle dude's lifestyle. Then, all of a sudden, the annoying yuppie yob's well-chromed Nokia cellphone rings, he answers it, babbles something about being "almost there," disconnects, and gives a smudge on the chrome a quick buff after another glance at badass motorcycle dude. The Heck's Angel's been watching this entire scene (although in an affectedly disinterested and therefore way kewl way) but, upon the completion of the call and the chrome counterbuff, they exchange meaningful glances. The message? Assuming once again that they're not going for some homoerotic thing we're apparently supposed to make a connection between the wild 'n' (not "and") free biker lifestyle and the use of a cellphone. If it had been much more nauseauting, I'd have made a connection with the big white phone in the powder room, and as it was I really wanted to make a connection between Mr. Smashy and both the yuppie and the dude. Anyone found anything more annoying yet from those wonderful folks who brought you
"the wonderful folks who brought you Pearl Harbor"?
posted by Steven Baum 1/4/2000 10:13:01 PM | link

CHUCKLES
This graphic from a
defaced page is one of the funniest things I've seen in a while.

Smoking Ass Monkey in a Meat Chair

posted by Steven Baum 1/4/2000 04:22:41 PM | link

MUSIC
Poking around at the
Rhino site is always a whole passel o' fun. Some of the new (and old) releases I can't wait to get into my grubby little paws include: It'd be hard to go wrong with any of the 100 Essential Rhino CDs.
posted by Steven Baum 1/4/2000 03:12:32 PM | link

BIG LIT
The current
Encyclopedia Britannica has been available online for a while now, and I've just discovered that the classic 11th Edition will also be available online in the near future (with one source indicating a special initial price of $129 for the electronic edition and another containing a message from the president of the Digipedia Partnership that's apparently running the project). I was lucky enough to snag a copy of that huge edition at Moe's back in 1994, and it's a fine pre-modern reference standard as well as just fun to dip into here and there. Okay, I really got the 12th edition, but it's just the 11th edition with an extra volume covering the not insignificant events from 1910-1922. (I also picked up the 3-volume reprint of the 1st edition a few years before that, with my main recollection of browsing through that being a lengthy article on midwifery.) As an oceanographer, the first thing I read was George Darwin's (the son of Charles) article on tides, which is considered a landmark in the field.

The first volume (A to Androphagi) of the 11th is available online in plain and rich text formats. The site at which it's available states that it "is out of copyright; but the trademark holder still enjoins use of the name." On the official Britannica copyright page it shows that the currently valid copyrights start with the 12th edition. The online EB, predictably enough, has an article about encyclopaedias that includes information about their 11th and other editions. And, to be evenhanded about things, I should mention Joseph McCabe's The Lies And Fallacies Of The Encyclopedia Britanica: How Powerful And Shameless Clerical Forces Castrated A Famous Work Of Reference, the entirety of which is available online at the Secular Web site.
posted by Steven Baum 1/4/2000 01:39:54 PM | link

YAMMERING
It's more difficult than I thought it'd be to get back into doing this on a quasi-regular basis, even after only a week off. It's taken me a week to spin back up, although the obscene amounts of happy juice I've consumed in the preceding half-fortnight might have something to do with the lag. By the way, you know you're getting old when you add aching knees to your standard list of hangover symptoms.
posted by Steven Baum 1/4/2000 11:30:19 AM |
link

Monday, January 03, 2000

YAFL
NPR's
100 most important American musical works of the 20th century nicely cleanses the palate of the bad taste left by the list of the previous entry. Those choosing this list are actually aware of most of the significant American composers and their works, and thus we see such names as John Coltrane, Samuel Barber, Robert Johnson and the Modern Jazz Quartet rather than (analogous to the previous list) Ricky Martin (for Grisham), the Partridge Family (for Silverstein), Pantera (for Rand), etc., ad nauseaum.

The use of "important" rather than "best" also allows them to choose ostensible clunkers like John Cage's "4:33" which, while not terribly entrancing or elevating in themselves, did exert an important influence on the work of many others. This is analogous to the huge novels of Joyce which, while unreadable for many (most?), have influenced most of his successors. In music, fiction, fashion and many other areas those who go to extremes (some of the haute coutere stuff just makes me shudder) are most useful in showing the less brave other avenues down which they can travel, if not quite as far.

The deeper I look into this list, the more I think they've done a masterful job at choosing works that "significantly changed the musical landscape, opened new horizons, or in itself had a major effect on American culture and civilization." For instance, while I probably wouldn't put Nirvana's "Smells Like Teen Spirit" on a "100 best" list, it certainly and significantly changed the pop music landscape in the early 90s. And "Rapper's Delight," while not the best thing that's come out of rap, definitely was the first huge example thereof that expanded the genre. And Johnny Cash's almost despairingly spare "I Walk the Line" has shown many (although not nearly enough) in country music that less can be much, much more.
posted by Steven Baum 1/3/2000 11:24:56 PM | link

YAFL
I can't be terribly enthralled by any compilation of the supposedly
100 Best Writers of the Century that omits H. L. Mencken, Edmund Wilson, P. G. Wodehouse and James Thurber while listing Judy Blume, Charles Bukowski, Edgar Rice Burroughs, Agatha Christie, Allen Ginsberg, John Grisham, Robert A. Heinlein, Barbara Kingsolver, Toni Morrison, Ayn Rand, Shel Silverstein and Amy Tan. Who would seriously place *any* of the latter with the former and - let's face it - the grocery lists of any of the four are better than anything Grisham could ever hope to write. This is by far the worst top 100 list I've yet encountered.
posted by Steven Baum 1/3/2000 03:28:06 PM | link

A MAN, A PLAN, A CANAL - PANAMA!
The hysterical worst-case scenarios offered by the usual suspects about ceding control of the
Panama Canal to Panama have masked some very real and pragmatic difficulties that have arisen in recent years. The container (i.e. those big semi-trailer boxes) trade among Asia, North America and Europe has increased 6 to 8% yearly since 1990 to the point where the Canal has become a bottleneck, with waits of several days common. The Canal is also too small to handle the bigger container ships being built. A faster but more expensive ($500 per container) method that is increasingly being used is transferring the containers to railroad cars and shipping them across the U.S., which can get, for example, Japanese electronics to the east coast up to a week sooner than shipping via the Canal.

This situation has led to the commissioning of a $20 million study by Parsons Brinckerhoff to gauge the feasibility of a "dry canal" or "land bridge" across Nicaragua. The CINN project, if funded, will cost $1.4 billion and begin construction in mid-2000. It will consist of deep-water container ports and free-trade zones on both coasts connected by a 210-mile high-speed railway. A Nicaraguan "land bridge" route would cost about half the $1500-$2000 per container price of the U.S. land bridge route, and would offer comparable shipping times.

This isn't a new idea, by the way. The Germans started building a railroad at Monkey Point on the east coast of Nicaragua in 1903. The project foundered, though, and the U.S. Marines engaged in one of the many invasions in the sordid history of U.S.-Nicaragua "relations" in 1910 to stop any further commercial deals between Nicaragua and interested investors in Europe and Japan. The canal idea goes back even further, with the King of Spain ordering a study in 1567 for the feasibility of a canal across Nicaragua. When the U.S. decided to build a canal, there was a competition between Nicaragua and Panama for the honor, which was won after a Panamanian lobbyist ran a scare campaign in the U.S. featuring a Nicaraguan stamp showing a volcano erupting. It was pretty much a foregone conclusion, though, since the same U.S. interests that supported (spiritually and materially) Panama's "revolt" from Columbia in 1903 to become an independent republic also wanted the canal there, and the infinitely flexible and extensible Monroe Doctrine offered a government guarantee of success.

Nicaragua isn't the only country attempting to build a land bridge, though. Other projects being considered include similar land bridges across Honduras and Mexico and a wet canal across Columbia. Panama plans to invest $3 billion through 2005 to upgrade the canal as well as widen it at its narrowest points. There is also some talk of upgrading the current Panamania train system to provide a supplemental route for containers.
posted by Steven Baum 1/3/2000 01:09:44 PM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger