Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Friday, December 03, 1999

PRECIS
The latest issue of Scientific American Presents, their thematic quarterly, is called "Extreme Engineering" and presents ambitious, state-of-the-art projects from the past, present and future. A reminder that sometimes it's okay to say no is the "Greatest projects never built" section. While many have probably heard of Frank Lloyd Wright's planned mile-high skyscraper in Chicago (details about which can be found in the Dover reprint of Donald Hoffman's
Frank Lloyd Wright, Louis Sullivan and the Skyscraper), most have never heard of the similarly ambitious plan of Desire Despradelle a half century earlier in the same city. He wanted to build a 1500-foot-high obelisk (i.e. three times as high as the Washington monument) out of granite on the shores of Lake Michigan. The only problem was that the base couldn't support the weight of the spire above it, so the project never got off the ground. Wright's mile-high beastie, while structurally possible and sound, would have caused several logistics problems such as getting all the planned workers to the building in less than 10 hours each day and getting them all to the higher floors without the elevator shafts using up half the interior space.

The dreams of past architects have paled in comparison to those of some of their civil engineering compatriots. In 1928 a German engineer named Herman Sorgel announced a plan to build a dam across the Strait of Gibraltar. Why? It would increase the land area of Europe and Africa by gradually draining a large part of the Mediterranean. This would create 90,000 additional square miles of land in about a century, with much of the additional land appearing in the Adriatic and Aegean Seas. The problems mentioned include stranding current ports far away from the sea and raising sea level in the rest of the world by three feet. While discussing this we climate modelers also hypothesized that it would significantly raise the summer temperatures in the area since the Mediterranean is the only thing keeping African and Europe from being one huge land mass which would cause the climate to be more continental (i.e. colder winters and warmer summers as in central Asia) in the drained areas.

A similar damned idea was forwarded by Soviet engineer Pyotr Borisov in 1957 to construct a dam across the Bering Strait between Alaska and Siberia. Cold water would be pumped out of the Arctic region and warm water would be drawn in. The would eventually melt the ice cap and warm the Russian tundra. It would also change the climate in many other countries in less predictable ways and, given our understanding of the present climate system, probably affect the climate in many other more distant locations in unpredictable ways.

A project I heard about in my civil engineering days that's not mentioned in the article involved moving vast quantities of fresh water from Canada and the Great Lakes to the western parts of the United States, using part of the Rocky Mountains as a vast intervening reservoir. As I recall, the Great Lakes governors signed a treaty to keep their water when they heard about this. Another ambitious water project would have three nuclear plants built between west Texas and the Mississippi River to pump water 1000 miles uphill to fill the need that will exist when the Ogallala Aquifer (an artifact of the last ice age) dries out in a very short time. I'm trying to dig up details on these two, but most documentation is in the grey literature.
posted by Steven Baum 12/3/1999 04:59:52 PM | link

Thursday, December 02, 1999

YAMMERING
De Beers sure as hell isn't letting the millenium get away from them. Their millenium campaign is in full blitz mode, with the basic message being "spend $2K for Y2K." The commercials are, as usual, masterpieces of emotional manipulation. Swelling romantic tunes provide a musical backdrop for hubby handing over a $2K bauble to the wifey, whose look of raw lust upon receiving the rock informs even the the most rockheaded of male viewers that the diamond isn't the only thing he's going to be giving her that night. But, to ensure that the message isn't missing even the dunderest of heads, one spot goes so far as to show the wife, in full raging heat, dragging hubbie into the bedroom, closing the door, and emitting an orgasmic squeal (after making sure the brats won't interrupt in mid-bonk). Is the old John Thomas not getting much external action as you approach the millenium? For only $2K you can get more action than Johnny Wad, and the name John is most appropriate.

Advertising and product placement in this country raised the percentage of women receiving diamond engagement rings from under 50% in 1950 to nearly 90% today, and from 1% in 1945 to over 70% today in Japan. The traditional German bride wore a pair of gold bands until 1967, when an advertising campaign suggested the addition of a third band studded with diamonds (called a triset). Creating new and expensive traditions has been a hallmark of the De Beers empire since Harry Oppenheimer took over the reins from his father before WWII. Another tradition has been to ensure a monopoly to the point where 90% of the worldwide diamond market was controlled by De Beers in the early 1990s. The birth and growth of De Beers is detailed in Stefan Kanfer's The Last Empire: De Beers, Diamonds and the World (upon which a PBS Nova episode was based about 6 years ago although, unfortunately, their episode archive doesn't go back that far).

The 90s haven't been kind to De Beers, though. According to Jacob Ward's A Web Site is Forever in The Standard, they've fallen on such "hard" times that their world market share has dropped to around 50%. Their notorious ability to co-opt and gain control of each new diamond source as it appears has slipped, with sources in the Congo, Australia, Brazil, Venezuela, Canada and Russia all opting to market their diamonds independently in recent years. They spent $68 million on advertising last year and will probably double that this year in an attempt to stabilize their losses and possibly regain some market share. So mortgaging the farm for another diamond is not only the best way to say "I love you" (i.e. the only legitimate way) and charge up that flagging sex life, it's a way to help save a pitiful, helpless monopoly from the horrors of the free market. Just remember to ask explicity for De Beers when you're carting next year's food budget down to the jeweler's.

On a side note, De Beers has been getting flooded with requests for the source of that classical music theme they use in their commercials since the first time they used it. It was composed by Karl Jenkins, a Welsh-born composer, and can be found on his Diamond Music CD. The piece is called "Palladio."
posted by Steven Baum 12/2/1999 07:45:31 PM | link

LIT
The same shipment that brought my latest Updike brick also contained the
James Thurber volume from the Library of America series, i.e. Thurber: Writings and Drawings. Although I've got most if not all of the individual Thurber collections, this 1000+ page volume contains selections (by Garrison Keillor) from just about all of them in a nicely produced and suprisingly compact format. While there's no Thurber I don't like, I'm especially fond of his drawings (of dogs) and his fables (about dogs). Okay, he also produced both on topics other than dogs, but he does dogs extremely well.

A goodly selection of Thurber's fables (with the full collection available in Fables for Our Time and Famous Poems Illustrated) is included and, although he wasn't as vicious as Bierce in Fantastic Fables, he still manages to make some sharp points. A personal favorite is "The Bear Who Let It Alone" (note the conspicuous lack of a dog):

In the woods of the Far West there once lived a brown bear who could take it or let it alone. He would go into a bar where they sold mead, a fermented drink made of honey, and he would have just two drinks. Then he would put some money on the bar and say, "See what the bears in the back room will have," and he would go home. But finally he took to drinking by himself most of the day. He would reel home at night, kick over the umbrella stand, knock down the bridge lamps, and ram his elbows through the windows. Then he would collapse on the floor and lie there until he went to sleep. His wife was greatly distressed and his children were very frightened.

At length the bear saw the error of his ways and began to reform. In the end he became a famous teetotaller and a persistent temperance lecturer. He would tell everybody that came to his house about the awful effects of drink, and he would boast about how strong and well he had become since he gave up touching the stuff. To demonstrate this, he would stand on his head and on his hands and he would turn cartwheels in the house, kicking over the umbrella stand, knocking down the bridge lamps, and ramming his elbows through the windows. Then he would like down on the floor, tired by his healthful exercise, and go to sleep. His was was greatly distressed and his children were very frightened.

Moral: You might as well fall flat on your face as lean over too far backward.

If you've never Thurbered then this is a great place to start. Or get a copy for one of those uncultured louts you hang around with in bars for about the cost of one night's bar tab.
posted by Steven Baum 12/2/1999 03:57:33 PM | link

Tuesday, November 30, 1999

SOLIDARITY
It's 11:15 PM on November 30 here in College Station, Texas. I'm flashing back to the mid-1980s when the death of Rock Hudson served as a wake-up call to the boneheads then occupying the White House. His passing made it impossible for them to continue clinging to the fantasy that the victims were all horrible people who'd chosen to die and burn in hell forever. It's funny how ephemeral irrational hatred becomes when things get personal. But, then again, history bulges with despots counting on hatred bred on ignorance as the way to gain and maintain power. And all the years and all the technological advances (up to and including the present cyber-hysteria) haven't really changed things all that much. Go to your favorite search engine and enter "kill + fags" and see what sickening bullshit you find if you don't believe me. Shed a tear for the deserving, ignore those who thrive on hatred, and I'll see you in a few.
posted by Steven Baum 11/30/1999 11:22:20 PM |
link

META-LIT
If you've no idea what to get that finicky literati on your shopping list, then any of the above will do just fine (although only the second and last are still in print). Those are the titles of the four books that have collected John Updike's nonfiction output over the last 32 years, and I just got my copy of the last one today to complete my collection. I opened it to the preface, foolishly thinking that I'd catch the man slacking off and fool myself into thinking I could write such a preface given a month or five. I started reading:
'More matter, with less art," Queen Gertrude advises Polonius; she sounds like a modern magazine editor. The appetite in the print trade is presently for real stuff - the dirt, the poop, the nitty-gritty - and not for the obliquities and tenuosities of fiction. A writer is almost never asked to write a story, let alone a poem, instead he or she is invited to pen introductions, reviews, and personal essays, preferably indiscreet. (Pen them, then fax them. Instant modemed communication and rapidly overlapping semes are a la mode.) Human curiosity, the abettor and stimulant of the fiction surge between Robinson Crusoe's adventures and Constance Chatterley's, has become ever more literal-minded and impatient with the proxies of the imagination. Present taste runs to the down-home divulgences of the talk show - psychotherapeutic confession turned into public circus - and to investigative journalism that, like so many heat-seeking missiles, seeks out the intimate truths, the very genitalia, of Presidents and princesses. It is as if, here at the end of the millenium, time is too precious to waste on anything but such central, perenially urgent data.
Sure, I'm going to write like that right after I take off from the foul line to complete a 360 tomahawk dunk while lugging a keg of beer under the other arm.

Each of Updike's bricks (they weigh in at several pounds and 600-900 pages apiece) not only directly supply several days of pleasurable reading, but indirectly lead to months or even years of similar literary pleasures. There's apparently not much worth reading he hasn't read and digested utterly, including many novels not originally written in English. I've found that when he likes a book I'll probably like it. Indeed, his taste and filters are so good that even when he doesn't like a book I'll probably like it. Not only do I agree with the authors to whom he introduces me, but if I'm already familiar with one an Updike review is almost inevitably consonant with my impressions. For me, Updike supplies the same guarantees about fiction that Philip Morrison has always supplied about nonfiction.

Updike is arguably the premiere American belletrist of the latter half of this century, with Edmund Wilson probably getting the nod for the first half. The only literary essay collection I go back to as often as any of Updike's is Gore Vidal's United States, which collects 40 years of his nonfiction output. It isn't a strange coincidence that I was first introduced to Wilson by Vidal. The impressive quality and quantity of Updike's output is nicely summarized by one of the blurbs on the back cover of his latest:

If the printed word disappeared, a future race could reconstruct a significant body of 19th and 20th century literature from Updike's work alone.
If you haven't yet encountered Updike's collections, I envy you. If you have, then what's keeping you from More Matter?
posted by Steven Baum 11/30/1999 09:57:10 PM | link

SITINGS
Check out my page of
Online Dictionaries, Glossaries and Encyclopedias. I've not touched it for well over two years and, due to many complaints about dead links, have spent the last couple of nights updating and expanding. It now features 159 dictionaries, 190 glossaries and 90 encyclopedias of various shapes, sizes and flavors. Enjoy.
posted by Steven Baum 11/30/1999 09:16:53 PM | link

SITINGS
The 1999
Discovery Channel Eco-Challenge is being held in southern Argentina, i.e. in Patagonia. It started on November 28 at the Argentine ski resort Bariloche, and has a cut-off date of December 12. 51 teams from 31 nations started the race, with the eventual winners expected to take about 10 days to finish. The race will not be broadcast until next spring, but the web site will have frequent updates on the progress of the competitors. In addition to the updates, the site features detailed team rosters and links to other coverage sites. Fewer teams are expected to finish this year than last since the weather in Patagonia is notoriously fickle during the austral spring. You can relive last year's Moroccan Eco-Challenge at the Discovery Channel archives. I always get really fired up when I watch this or the Iron Man Triathlon in Hawaii, but if I go down to the pub and have a few beers those dangerous urges go away. Ultimate frisbee currently satisfies my sports jones, and I don't need to start training 6 hours a day as opposed to my current 6 hours a week.
posted by Steven Baum 11/30/1999 09:26:08 AM | link

Monday, November 29, 1999

BLOG LIT
As if it needs to be said that there's nothing new under the sun (even if you slap the cyber- prefix on it), Bill's pointed out to me the journals kept and published by the French brothers Goncourt (Edmund Louis Antoine and Jules Alfred Huot de Goncourt) for over 40 years in the latter half of the 19th century. The "Journal des Goncourt" was begun in 1851 and for four decades told its readers more than they may have wanted to know about why the Goncourt's books were insufficiently appreciated, why their contemporarys' (de Maupaussant, Zola and Flaubert) books were overly appreciated, and why some paintings were better than others. They also reported on quite a bit of what they heard and saw amongst their contemporaries.

As the years went by, the interval between a Goncourt hearing something and its appearance in print got increasingly shorter, although the last brother died before it shrunk from the original couple of months to the feared couple of days. I say "feared" because they weren't averse to repeating, say, that Emile had referred to Guy as a "talentless, thieving ratbastard" or its polite equivalent (in, of course, an outrageous French accent). A blog makes the turnaround time an even shorter and more frightening quantity such that I can get likkered up and immediately spread vague and scurrilous rumours about the predilictions of certain Canadians of my acquaintance for certain large, furry ursine creatures found in the far north. It's a damned good thing that I'm above that sort of petty backstabbing and rumormongering.
posted by Steven Baum 11/29/1999 04:04:31 PM |
link

VANITIES REVISITED
More unsurprising reactions from the locals about the bonfire collapse. It seems that the
Darwin Awards featured a nomination for the incident on their pages, albeit briefly. It was apparently removed with the only remaining evidence being letters on their flames page. A typical letter goes:
"As a reader who thinks the majority of your stuff is funny, I draw the line at someone making a mockery out of the loss of 12 lives. I believe the Aggie bonfire should be removed from your page immediately."
To be fair, one person posting something similar on a local newsgroup admitted that his attitude was probably hypocritical. I wonder how much hate mail that tiny protocol slip got him. After all, any deviation from the party line is equivalent to having killed one of the 12 with your bare hands.

Another local poster had an adverse reaction to comments made by Bill Maher on Politically Incorrect, opining that:

"After watching Bill Maher stutter through his opening monologue, he brought up the topic of the bonfire collapse. If it were possible, I believe I lost even more respect for him."
This is unsurprising even given the number of times in my years here I've heard the chant of "PC!" used as a (and usually the) rebuttal to an argument. It's funny how someone with little or no respect for Maher somehow manages to keep forcing himself to watch his show. Being of a suspicious mind, I can't help but think that this is more a matter of a specific disagreeable subject rather than overall displeasure with the show.

On the same local newsgroups featuring these attitudes the tasteless jokes and remarks about the Kennedys began almost immediately after the recent plane crash, and as long as I've read them there have been no qualms about being as tasteless as is possible as long as the target is perceived to be liberal. For a place that proclaims as loudly, smugly and often as A&M about how religious and very, very special it is, it's amazing how that injunction about "doing to others as you would have them do unto you" is so quickly and conveniently forgotten.

On a brighter note, I've just learned that the person chosen to head the investigation is not an aggie, so perhaps something will result from it other than a hostile glare at the gods of probability, a pat on the back, and redoubled hubris. I suppose I should state at this point that my official policy about hate mail is to feature it prominently sans identification, although if any author objects strongly enough I'll be more than happy to include an attribution.
posted by Steven Baum 11/29/1999 01:48:29 PM | link

MUSIC/YAFL
More furshlugginer top 100 lists concerning albums. I seem to have this obsessive/compulsive thing going here. *shrug* Like whomever said, give in to temptation quickly so you don't get all shagged out fighting it.

posted by Steven Baum 11/29/1999 10:35:42 AM | link

MUSIC
The current (11/29)
Austin Chronicle is, as expected, filled with well-deserved tributes to Doug Sahm. Perhaps the best news can be found in Ken Lieck's Dancing About Architecture column, i.e. Rhino may issue a Doug Sahm boxed set sometime in the not-to-distant future. Given some of the talentless hacks who've thus far been "honored" in this fashion, this is long overdue, especially given Sahm's output over the last half century. Cabalistic experts will apparently be required for the task, since according to Lieck, "Due to the fact that his dozens of releases came out on dozens of labels, and have been repackaged in dozens of configurations, rounding up the complete Sahm catalogue may be nearly as impossible as culling Duke Ellington's recorded output!" One thing that comes out clearly in all the tributes is that Sahm was a musician's musician. If he wasn't sufficiently appreciated by the general public, his peers sure as hell knew who and how good he was.
posted by Steven Baum 11/29/1999 09:55:44 AM | link

Sunday, November 28, 1999

PRECIS
Elsewhere in the 11/28/99 NYTimes, we find "Cold War Without End" by
Jacob Weisberg in the Magazine section. Although the pulling down of the Berlin Wall a decade ago all but ended the Cold War, it's still being played out in a series of dueling revisionist, counter-revisionist and even counter-counter-revisionist accounts being written about the last 80 years. A central bone of contention involves the recent release of the Venona Documents, a collection of decrypted Soviet messages from the 1940s concerning attempts to infiltrate the U.S. government. Various people are mentioned in the documents, including J. Robert Oppenheimer and I. F. Stone, the famous liberal journalist who died in 1989. With Stone, for instance, the documents mention that he met with KGB agents in the 1940s. Those wishing to discredit him read this as proof that he was a KGB agent, while those without such a pressing need admit the lack of any proof of recruitment.

Among those most enraged by the accusations against Stone is his son Jeremy, the president of the Federation of American Scientists. The younger Stone's recent memoirs Every Man Should Try: Adventures of a Public Interest Activist lend irony to the situation since he describes someone therein as fitting the description of a mole inside the Manhattan Project. Fellow scientists reading the memoir recognized Philip Morrison in Stone's description, prompting Morrison to issue a denial pointing out significant discrepancies between himself and the person described as the mole. Stone publicly accepted the denial, perhaps realizing he wasn't doing his father any good by playing the same game himself. Weisberg points to all these obsessive battles as being more a sign of a continued ideological struggle than of a concern for history, especially since everyone involved is either still a "leftist" or a "reformed leftist."

Timothy Ferris - in "A Space Station? Big Deal!" - describes various even more ambitious space-related projects including space elevators and hotels, Mars colonization, lunar mining, cruises to the moon, tiny interstellar probes, a Europa probe, and even bioengineered life forms adapted to survival in space, e.g. a space squid. All of the concepts are niftily illustrated by Bob McCall in the style of mid-60s to mid-70s science fiction magazine and book covers. Ferris's Coming of Age in the Milky Way and The Whole Shebang are related books well worth a read.

"Safety in Numbers" by Robert Frank tells how we've become "macroeconomic-data junkies" in our mad rush to capitalize on the stock market. He claims that all the information (e.g. capacity utilization, consumer price index, housing starts and building permits, etc., ad nauseaum) ostensibly for making better financial decisions is really a "palliative to ease our anxiety about the eventual downturn." I decided long ago to occasionally glance at the forest and ignore the trees, i.e. to put money into a diversified set of mutual funds and check the numbers when I get a hardcopy statement each quarter. I know people who do a lot more and, what the hell, I suppose it's as fun a hobby as most. For me, the mutual fund's a lot better than the pathetic interest one gets in a savings account, and I'm not yet ready to start stuffing the mattress. Besides, if the stock market utterly fails then I think my chief worries aren't going to be financial.
posted by Steven Baum 11/28/1999 09:55:23 PM | link

LIT
Several promising candidates for acquisition in today's (11/28/99) NYTimes Book Review including:
  • The New Sweet Style by Russian emigre novelist Vassily Aksyonov is described as "an exuberantly lugubrious comedy and a boisterously brilliant commentary on the writing and reading of fiction." A picaresque novel in which our hero Korbach starts out in the Soviet Union, moves to America, and ends up at an archeaological site in Israel. The titular allusion to Dante is revisited in the novel.
  • The Walking Tour by Kathryn Davis, a Kafka Prize winner (no, not that Kafka), is constructed as a whodunit within a whodunit, with a fatal accident 30 years old being investigated by someone in a future whose circumstances are themselves a mystery. This novel packed "with nests of stories and symbolic digressions" is described as "brilliant and sometimes unbearable." Hell: A Novel, her previous effort, also sounds good.
  • There and Back Again: By Max Merriwell by Pat Murphy is a homage to Tolkien that turns The Hobbit into a space opera. The author "knows when to pay homage to her inspiration and when to leave it alone. She also leavens the mix with sly references to Lewis Carroll and to Alfred Jarry" (the latter of whom somewhat influenced the proto-industrial band Pere Ubu).
  • Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language by Stephen Pinker (of The Language Instinct fame) explains his words-and-rules theory (hence the title) of how the mind works, which combines the competing symbolist and behaviorist schools by positing "that every language contains both a system of rules and an associationist network," with the bifurcation point revealed by the past-tense forms of English verbs that Pinker studies professionally. Apparently this is a bit more technical and narrow focused than his earlier book.

posted by Steven Baum 11/28/1999 09:22:02 PM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger