Powered by Blogger

Ethel the Blog
Observations (and occasional brash opining) on science, computers, books, music and other shiny things that catch my mind's eye. There's a home page with ostensibly more permanent stuff. This is intended to be more functional than decorative. I neither intend nor want to surf on the bleeding edge, keep it real, redefine journalism or attract nyphomaniacal groupies (well, maybe a wee bit of the latter). The occasional cheap laugh, raised eyebrow or provocation of interest are all I'll plead guilty to in the matter of intent. Bene qui latuit bene vixit.

The usual copyright stuff applies, but I probably won't get enraged until I find a clone site with absolutely no attribution (which, by the way, has happened twice with some of my other stuff). Finally, if anyone's offended by anything on this site then please do notify me immediately. I like to keep track of those times when I get something right.

Google!


How to blog?

METABLOGGING

Blog Madness
Blog Portal
linkwatcher
Monitor

BLOGS (YMMV)

abuddhas memes
alamut
apathy
arms and the man
baghdad burning
bifurcated rivets
big left outside
boing boing
booknotes
bovine inversus
bradlands
bushwacker
camworld
cheek
chess log
cogent provocateur
cool tools
counterspin
crooked timber
delong
digby
drat fink
drmike
d-squared
dumbmonkey
electrolite
eschaton
estimated prophet
ezrael
fat planet
flutterby!
follow me here
geegaw
genehack
ghost
glare
gmtplus9
hack the planet
harmful
hauser report
hell for halliburton
honeyguide
hotsy totsy club
juan cole
kestrel's nest
k marx the spot
kuro5hin
lake effect
lambda
large hearted boy
leftbanker
looka
looking glass
macleod
maxspeak
medley
memepool
metagrrrl
mike's
monkeyfist
more like this
mouse farts
my dog
norbizness
off the kuff
orcinus
pandagon
pedantry
peterme
philosoraptor
pith and vinegar
plastic
portage
q
quark soup
quiggin
randomwalks
rip post
rittenhouse
see the forest
shadow o' hegemon
sideshow
simcoe
south knox bubba
slacktivist
smudge
submerging markets
sylloge
synthetic zero
talking points
tbogg
twernt
unknownnews
vacuum
vanitysite
virulent memes
whiskey bar
windowseat tv
wood s lot

TECH

Librenix
use perl
rootprompt
slashdot
freshmeat
Ars Technica
32BitsOnline
UGeek
AnandTech
Linux Today
Tom's Hardware
DevShed


"When they say, 'Gee it's an information explosion!', no, it's not an explosion, it's a disgorgement of the bowels is what it is. Every idiotic thing that anybody could possibly write or say or think can get into the body politic now, where before things would have to have some merit to go through the publishing routine, now, ANYTHING." - Harlan Ellison



JOLLY OLD PALS
Old pals Rumsy and Saddam


Other stuff of mild interest to some:
unusual literature
scientific software blog
physical oceanography glossary
computer-related tutorials and texts

Friday, November 19, 1999

YAMMERING
For what it's worth, I'm one of those arrogant INTP bastards on the
Keirsey Temperament Sorter although, to be truthful, on a lot of the questions (perhaps 40%) I really didn't have any clear preferences and basically flipped a coin. They've got me dead to rights on the "...they have less and less desire, if they ever had any, to direct the activities of others. Only when forced by circumstance do they allow themselves to take charge of activities..." part, though. That and my lack of $50 million go a long way towards explaining why I'm not in the presidential race.
posted by Steven Baum 11/19/1999 04:55:09 PM | link

MUSIC
His first and last taste of international fame was when the Sir Douglas Quintet's "She's About a Mover" approached the top of the charts during the so-called British invasion. The group's name and the style of the song were part of a deliberate attempt to cash in on that fad by the group led by Doug Sahm, a legendary Texas musician who was found dead yesterday at age 58 in a lodge in Taos, New Mexico. My introduction to Sahm's music came when I picked up a used copy of his 1973 album "Doug Sahm and Band" in Columbus, Ohio. To tell the truth, I bought it because this was my heavy Bob Dylan period and he was listed as having performed on a couple of the tracks. I listened to it a few times, found it OK, and didn't think much more about it until I moved to Texas in 1983 and, shortly thereafter, picked up the CD version of the 1980 compilation
The Best of Doug Sahm & the Sir Douglas Quintet 68-75. Damn but that album was a joy to find and has been a pleasure to listen to (it's definitely in the top 25 of my "most played" list) over the last 15 years. The only negative thing I can say about the album is that it didn't include "She's About a Mover", which I assumed had something to do with the legalities that plague the recording world.

He started young - sitting on Hank Williams' knee at the age of 5 and regularly performing on radio stations in his hometown of San Antonio by the age of 10. He was a musical prodigy who played steel guitar, fiddle, mandolin and guitar, all of them quite well. The Quartet was formed (by notorious Texas music producer Huey P. Meux) shortly before their big hit in 1965, with that group a continuous unit until around 1975 and intermittently active through their last album release a few years ago. More recently he's obtained at least regional reknown with the formation of the Texas Tornados (as a planned Tex-Mex version of the Traveling Willburys that exceeded their inspiration in both longevity and quality) in 1989, a group also featuring keyboard player Augie Meyers, vocalist and guitarist Freddy Fender, and accordianist Flaco Jiminez. What they didn't know about Tex-Mex music wasn't meant for mortals to know. Over the years he also released several other solo albums, played in a band with Amos Garrett for a while, and has played on dozens of albums by other artists who knew talent when they heard it. A discography lists the nearly 100 albums in which he was involved.

I've never heard any music in which he was involved that I didn't like, and I can't even recall any isolated clinkers I'd want to skip past. My favorite is still the 1973 Quintet compilation listed above, although The Last Real Texas Blues Band from 1997 is a close second, and any of the more recent albums still in print are well worth having. Now he can join Townes van Zandt in that great Texas musical deity all-star jam session way on the other side of the Pecos where the chili's always as red hot as the music, the beer's always cold, and Bob Wills is yelping along on every tune.
posted by Steven Baum 11/19/1999 02:09:43 PM | link

SCIENCE
Computers in Science and Engineering is a very good source for information about new and old methods in scientific programming. The full text is available in hardcopy and online, and although you have to become a member of the IEEE Computer Society to get the complete text online, some current articles are avaiable to all in PDF format. Two regular features stand out for me: the "Scientific Programming" column edited by Paul Dubois and the "Computing Prescriptions" column of William J. Thompson. Dubois, chief developer of the Basis framework for scientific program development, presides over a column that consistently provides interesting reviews of recent advances in scientific programming. Recent columns - mostly written by guest experts - include: Thompson, author of Computing for Scientists and Engineers and Atlas for Computing Mathematical Functions, offers monthly tutorials on specific topics in numerical methods. His recent columns include: The rest of the journal is also usually interesting, with recent issues focusing on computational finance, dynamic fracture analysis, massive data visualization, computational biology and cosmology and computation. This should definitely be on your "A"-list if you're involved in scientific programming.
posted by Steven Baum 11/19/1999 11:04:20 AM | link

YAMMERING
"Those kids died to see the bonfire burn."

"Absolutely not because people gave their lives for it. If we don't burn it, they died for nothing."

There are far too many quotes like these popping up around here. It wasn't a war and they didn't go into this expecting to die. It's gruesome and disrespectful to say such things. I'm starting to suspect that most people are more upset by the cancellation of the burning of the bonfire than by the deaths. To be blunt, not that many people knew the students well enough to grieve rather than feel sorrow for them, while the majority of the undergrad population obsesses (and I chose that word judiciously, by the way) about the bonfire year round. I've few doubts that most will genuinely grieve the loss of the bonfire next week, but holding up the dead as a reason to go ahead and burn it - despite the fact that those officially investigating the incident undoubtedly don't want all the evidence to go up in flames - just isn't right.
posted by Steven Baum 11/19/1999 10:00:37 AM |
link

Thursday, November 18, 1999

YAMMERING
Those infernal helicopters seem to have finally buggered off. It's been like that scene from Apocalypse Now all day around here what with the dogs of hype buzzing around getting visuals for their reports on the bonfire collapsing and killing somewhere between 9 and 11 students so far. I notice it's even been picked up by the NYTimes, and CNN's been on it since early in the AM. Texas A&M had an official memorial service tonight attended by 10,000, including BushJr, the somber crowds of which I encountered both going to and coming back from the rec center.

There's going to be a lot of shit hitting the fan hereabouts when the grief subsides, especially when (not if) the lawyers discover the standards followed (i.e. not) on what is essentially a very large and dangerous construction project. There was an article in the local paper today ostensibly outlining all the safety precautions taken that did nothing but highlight how utterly lacking they were. For instance, to ascertain how much the pile may be leaning one way or another a couple of students in charge on that shift (3 shifts, 24 hours a day) would walk around the stack and eyeball it. Given that the best available explanation is that one of the guy wires snapped to initiate the disaster, a more objective method may have been in order. The civil engineering department was asked to make a set of safety recommendations about 6 years ago, only to have them all ignored. The lawyers are gonna have a field day with that.

The most disturbing aspect is a widespread attitude that "it was just an accident and nobody's at fault". Structures fall down for reasons, usually because either something was designed or implemented incorrectly, as is amply illustrated in that classic of engineering popularization Why Buildings Fall Down by Matthys Levy and Marto Salvadori. Sure, assigning blame isn't going to bring the students back, but burying your head in the sand will do neither that nor ensure that this doesn't happen again. There's been a lot of locally televised talk about not "disturbing" the tradition by abolishing or even significantly modifying future bonfires, but if ten or so body bags isn't a disturbance of epic proportions then what the hell is? Apparently I've hit the anger stage quicker than most.
posted by Steven Baum 11/18/1999 11:35:35 PM | link

STRANGE LIT
When I wrote a piece about Karl Kraus recently I'd completely forgotten about another book I had called
Half-Truths and One-and-a-Half Truths: Selected Aphorisms, a collection of Krausian wit and vitriol as collected by Harry Zohn. As you might suspect, I attempt to alphabetize and/or categorize every decade whether I need to or not. There it was snuggled between Jerry Mander's Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television and Lewis Thomas's A Long Line of Cells (his collected essays), so I pulled it out to share some more of Kraus with the unafflicted.
If someone calls me vain and mean, I know that he trusts me and has something to confess to me.

I no longer have collaborators. I used to be envious of them. They repel those readers who I want to lose myself.

Many desire to kill me, and many wish to spend an hour chatting with me. The law protects me from the former.

For two weeks now I haven't heard a German word and haven't understood an Italian one. This way one can manage to live with people; everything goes like clockwork and no irksome misunderstanding can arise.

Most writers have no other quality than the reader: taste. But the latter has the better taste, because he does not write - and the best if he does not read.

There are writers who can express in as little as twenty pages what I occasionally need as many as two for.

A Weltanschauung is a good horse. But there is a difference between a fine equestrian and a horse dealer.

Sentimental irony is a dog that bays at the moon while pissing on graves.

Satires which the censor understands are rightly prohibited.

The making of a journalist: no ideas and the ability to express them.

Psychoanalysis is that illness for which it regards itself as therapy.

How is the world ruled and led to war? Diplomats lie to journalists and believe these lies when they see them in print.

Many of those who were full of enthusiasm on 1 August 1914 and also had butter hoped there would be even more butter on 1 August 1917. They can still remember the enthusiasm.

The Judas kiss which Christian civilization gave to the human spirit was the last sexual act it permitted.

Ingratitude is often disproportionate to the benefaction received.

This one's on backorder from the University of Chicago Press.
posted by Steven Baum 11/18/1999 10:53:24 PM | link

STRANGE LIT
A classic first published in 1930 that mixes a cynical (i.e. mostly accurate) view of how history is created with occasionally sidesplitting humor is
1066 and All That, a Memorable History of England comprising all that parts you can remember, including 103 Good Things, 3 Bad Kings, and a 2 Genuine Dates by Walter Sellar and Robert Yeatman. From the first chapter where "Ceasar invades Britain" to the last chapter called "A Bad Thing" (whose entirety is "America was thus clearly top nation, and History came to a ."), this thin volume edifies, entertains and embiggens all who read it. The best and most concise description I've seen of this is that it is "how Bertie Wooster would recall his history lessons" (and, indeed, its first publication was contemporary to the setting of the Wodehouse stories).

This is primarily a satire of how standard history is presented in schools as a series of almost random facts about events nearly always described as (if not in the following words made popular by the book then in some equivalent way) Good and Bad Things. The authors play fast and loose with facts (while ignoring all but two dates since they're "not memorable"), but correctly present the general sense of British history while simultaneously sneaking in more than a dash of revisionism by poking fun at myths commonly presented as fact. In the preface they trenchantly and wittily state that, "History is not what you thought. It is what you can remember. All other history defeats itself," and then allude to the construction of history being based on ideology as much as fact. These lads were apparently deconstructionists before it was even a word.

A section from Chapter 22, "Edward I: A Strong King," captures well the flavor of the book:

Edward I was thus a strong King, and one of the first things he did was to make a strong arrangement about the Law Courts. Hitherto there had been a number of Benches there, on all of which a confused official called Justinian had tried to sit. Edward had them all amalgamated into one large bench called the King's Bench, and sat on it himself.

Edward I, who had already (in his Saladin days) piously decimated several thousand Turks at Nazareth, now felt so strong that he decided to Hammer the Scots, who accordingly now come right into History.

The childless Scotch King Alexander the Great had trotted over a cliff and was thus dead; so the Scots asked Edward to tell them who was King of Scotland, and Edward said that a Balliol man ought to be. Delighted with this decision the Scots crossed the Border and ravaged Cumberland with savage ferocity; in reply to which Edward also crossed the Border and, carrying of the Sacred Scone of Scotland on which the Scottish Kings had been crowned for centuries, buried it with great solemnity in Westminster Abbey.

A working knowledge of the basics of English history isn't required to enjoy the book, but one's pleasure does seem to increase with knowledge of the actual events pithily described therein.
posted by Steven Baum 11/18/1999 04:31:39 PM | link


posted by Steven Baum 11/18/1999 01:48:58 PM |
link

STRANGE LIT
In the
First, Second and Third Cuckoos, Kenneth Gregory collects "witty, amusing and memorable letters" to the London Times from 1900 through 1985. All are of course out of print in the USA, but I was fortunate enough to find the second volume on the dollar shelves at the local Half Price. The Times' letters section has been a favorite of many for a long time, with the correspondents never having been afraid to express an opinion on any topic. The letters column itself is no exception. A certain Nicholas Albery suggested in 1981:
"You are improving the appearance of The Times. But as for the contents, the best and cheapest improvement would be to make fuller use of your resourceful readers by having at least two pages a day of readers' letters (as well as readers' articles) as with the Sunday Times's 'Opinion' page.

My ideal would be a bulky Times Readers' Supplement, published separately. The rest of the paper, let's face it, is pretty boring."

The readership of the Times has always been a bit conservative and resistant to the changes wrought by modernism, as expressed in this 1910 missive from Mr. H. B. Devey:
"Motor-cars are bad enough, but they do not come into one's house or garden. With aeroplanes total strangers may drop in, through the roof, for a little chat at any time. I fear the law cannot protect one against such intrusion. If aviation becomes popular I shall have spikes, with long strong prongs, fixed on the chimneys of my house, and the word 'Danger' painted in large red letters on a flat part of the roof. If any flying machines come down in my garden I shall send for the police to remove the occupants, whom I shall sue afterwards for any damage to my trees or shrubs."
The cost of the Times has even been a concern to those of a thrifty bent (whether by needs or by nature), as evidenced by this note from Mr. Alfred de Rothschild (yes, one of *those* Rothschilds) in 1914 upon the reduction of the price to one penny:
"I hope I may be allowed to send you my most heartfelt congratulations. The Times has hitherto been a luxury, but now it will become a household word."
The classic British "well then, let's see what we can do about this, old bean" attitude also shines through in such letters as this one from Mr. H. C. B. Mynors in 1963:
"An article in today's issue discusses how to send a message from an express train. Faced with this same problem on the same line, I consulted the steward in charge of the dining-car. He provided me with pencil and paper, made an incision in a large potato, and himself lobbed the potato to the feet of a porter as we ran through Peterborough, with my message wedged in it but clearly visible. The stationmaster did what was necessary.

The steward would not take anything: he was glad to be of service."

Then there are those topics whose interest to many is apparently bubbling right beneath the surface, just waiting to be released by a single ostensibly innocuous query to the Times. Such floods of interest have been triggered by letters about how trousers first came to be turned up at the cuff, the proper or improper presence of marmalade at the English breakfast table, the silly nicknames of many World War II generals, the hygienic problems of sharing the communion cup, and the proper phrase with which to end a letter. In that last matter, a correspondent wrote complaining about how the then-current standard letter closures just didn't fit his needs. A torrent of suggestions poured in as to possible alternatives, the most amusing of which was probably the suggestion of Sir (and Mrs. Jan Pahl) to close with:
"Yours till the cows come home."
The letters keep coming and can be found on the editorial pages of the online London Times today.
posted by Steven Baum 11/18/1999 11:22:56 AM | link

YAMMERING
So do any of the clever people out there have any ideas as to how to keep
linkwatcher from getting so many false positives for new content? I doubt I'm the only one getting tired of seeing nothing more than new banner ads or whatever's causing the difference utility to indicate in the affirmative.
posted by Steven Baum 11/18/1999 11:06:49 AM | link

BAD NEWS
Every year they build a huge bonfire here at Texas A&M. They light it on the day before they play their traditional rival the University of Texas in football. It's a huge, towering thing over 100 feet high held together (literally) by miles of baling wire and a centerpole anchored by several guy wires. It is not at all a stable configuration for the hundreds of huge logs used to build it. If anything were to happen to disturb this configuration the stack would not fall gently. Last night at around 3:30 AM something did. The reason why is still unclear, but the ugly and tragic facts so far include five students dead and at least 30 in the hospital. Those poor kids. This is a grim semester here at A&M with this happening not long after six other students were killed by a driver falling asleep at the wheel of his truck and veering off the road, in an incident the police who first arrived at the scene called the most upsetting they'd ever seen. Until now.
posted by Steven Baum 11/18/1999 09:05:41 AM |
link

Wednesday, November 17, 1999

SCIENCE
Bioluminescence is light produced by chemical reactions in organisms. It most commonly and dramatically occurs in the bow waves or wakes of ships as the single-celled algae called dinoflagellates are mechanically excited by the water movement. According to the New Scientist, studying this phenomenon has recently led two groups of scientists in slightly different directions. While one group in the Ukraine was nearly charged with treason, another group in San Diego made a breakthrough in understanding the complexities of fluid in motion.

On October 15 the local Feds raided the Institute of Biology of the Southern Seas in Sevastopol, Ukraine, interrogating four researchers and searching their homes (and you thought this sort of thing vanished with the Evil Empire, didn't you?). What had these rogue oceanographers (we're all rogues, really) done to provoke the Man? They had been releasing the results of three decades of Soviet studies of the global distribution of bioluminescent plankton via funding provided by European agencies. It turns out that even submerged submarines - if they're close enough to the surface - leave a surface wake that can trigger the flashes of the bioluminescent plankton. And, if enough is known about the geographic and seasonal distribution as well as the typical behavior patterns of the plankton, the movements of the submarines can be tracked from satellites. A German U-34 sub was destroyed in the Mediterranean in 1918 after its position was revealed by glowing plankton, and in 1998 the Navy admitted that the U.S. military had developed a way of using bioluminescence to detect subs. So the scientists were giving away ship positions - at least indirectly - which partly explains although doesn't justify their government's thuggish reaction.

A fluid dynamicist named Jim Rohr working for the Navy in San Diego had a much more pleasant experience. While watching the wake-induced bioluminescence on an evening cruise in the waters off San Diego, he wondered if the brightness of the wake could somehow be related to the velocity of the water in the wake. Knowing the velocity field- notoriously difficult to measure in the lab and an even bigger nightmare in the field - more accurately would allow more efficient boat hulls to be designed. Pumping plankton-infested water through clear pipes in the lab showed a nearly perfect correlation between the speed of the water flow and the intensity of the luminescence, even across different plankton species. In pipe flow the faster the water is moving through the pipe the larger the difference is between the fastest moving water in the center of the pipe and the slowest near the pipe's walls.

There is a force caused by these differences in relative motion called the shear stress, and the greater the stress the greater the force - called the drag in the context of fluid dynamics. We experience this force when we feel the wind rush past our bodies since the wind velocity closest to us is less than that further away. The bioluminescent plankton were reacting to the shear stress, with higher stress causing greater light intensity. When either full-size boat hulls or models are tested, it is extremely difficult to identify the areas causing the greatest drag. The shear can't be directly measured, so hundreds or even thousands of laborious point measurements are made and the shear is calculated from these. Imagine how much easier it would be to just tow the hull through plankton-filled water and look for the brightest spots.
posted by Steven Baum 11/17/1999 06:16:54 PM | link

STRANGE LIT
"That spongy, water-licking Wolfsleach was down on the grass doing sport with Marr, and when he saw me romping toward him with choppers flaring, he whirled in gummy panic and gave Marr a great kick in her hind parts that sent her spinning over on all fours, whimpering her sorrows at pleasure abated and leaking drool from her yellow mouth. Agh, you wench, I thought, you thrust-throated, humping dog; oh, the Devil take you. So I tagged her one on the fly, a quick bite that tozed gristle and fur, and kept on going. Blech and blah, woof and roar - oh, you mangy huffers with pig's feet for brains, here humping away to heart's content - and in *my* yard! There goes dignity, as the barrel-eyed Two Foots would say. Well, you'll taste the poison of my fangs, you'll get Hooker's come-upper-ance and what-for. You'll have my claw studs where dogger was. Woof-woof and arf-arf, damn you all."
The use of a canine first-person narrator in a story is a gimmick sure to grab my attention, and it does much more than that in
Shakespeare's Dog by Leon Rooke. Mr. Hooker is a gruff yet philosophical bowser who calls William Shakespeare (amongst many other things, e.g. Shagspere, Shakespizzle and Shakespoot) his master. He wishes to save the young Will from the depredations and degradations of Anne Hath-her-way and push him on to greater things (although not to what you're thinking since he is as vitriolic about his master's scribblings as most other things).

This is another of those Rabelaisian romps (now that's never been used before) like Robert Nye's Falstaff or David Madsen's Memoirs of a Gnostic Dwarf that elicits gales of laughter while not offering much more in the way of injury to its historical or fictional origins than a knee in the groin. According to a profile of Leon Rooke at Northwest Passages, a Canadian literature site, he won that country's Governor General's Award for this book. Ah, some good news. While Amazon lists this as out of print, this site offers the book for sale for a cheap $4.95 Canadian.
posted by Steven Baum 11/17/1999 11:21:26 AM | link

SITINGS
Linkwatcher (where the management is for the moment on top of my netgodz list for his "fresh blogs" feature) notes a Salon article about writing a novel in three days. While this is impressive, it falls short of the mark. In Mike Ashley's Book of Science Fiction Lists which I described earlier today (or yesterday depending on your time zone) there is a list called "The 10 Fastest or Most Compulsive Writers" in which, at #2 (behind only Barry Malzberg), Lionel Fanthorpe (noted earlier in this forum for his unique combination of prolificity and prose style) describes the events of November 3, 1962 during which he started a 50,000 word novel called "Radar Alert" at 6 AM and finished it at 5 PM, just in time to mail it before the Post Office closed. He used a battery of typists who would transcribe tapes as he dictated them, which absolves him of having to claim that he typed 76 words a minute during the feat.

Other SF writers who performed similar feats include Malzberg (whose "Phase IV" was written in three days), Lester Dent (of Doc Savage fame) who regularly churned out 56,000 words a day by dictaphone and typewriter, Bob Silverberg (who wrote one novel in 3 1/2 days under heavy pressure) and E.C. Tubb (who wrote "Menace from the Past" in 32 hours over four days). Tubb also tops the "10 Most Pseudonymous SF Writers" list with 45 nom de plumes, none of which are Kilgore Trout, by the way. I'm usually one of the first in line to slag SF writers but, to be fair, what many lacked in quality they made up for in quantity, and occasionally some even attained both (well, Silverberg did a couple of times).
posted by Steven Baum 11/17/1999 12:38:25 AM | link

Tuesday, November 16, 1999

PRECIS
Sweet Jesus is the December issue of
Wired ever a fat sow! When I saw it bulging out of my mailbox like Orson Welles in a Speedo, I thought that maybe someone had read my piece on Philip Morrison and was sending me a bulging sack of books to make at least one of my dreams come true. But no, it was just the latest issue of the magazine that last fascinated me when they ran Neal Stephenson's long piece on underwater transcontinental cables several years back. I flipped through the pages to get to the index to see if anything interested, and flipped some more, and more, and after resting for a bit finally got there. Hmmm, a coupla possibilities. Let's get on to the letters pages ... flip flip flip flip flip flip flip ... here we are. Great jumping jehosophat! It's page 71! I stretched my fingers, cracked my knuckles, and poured a Young's Oatmeal Stout in preparation for the long haul. Let's itemize as we slog through:
  • neat animated woodcut display on page 89 (og want);
  • Jorn's big hirsute, smiling face on page 104 in a cutting edge photo about blogs (og want hair) with what are either other bloggers or Jorn's groupies in the background (og jealous either way);
  • a plethora of garish graphical displays as if Corel Draw dropped acid (og shrink away);
  • risk bidness, microsoft bidness, sunglass bidness, aol-wannabe (shudder) bidness, get-down-to-bidness! bidness (blech, og nod off);
  • 3 million pages of high tech toys (og kinda sorta want);
  • another well-deserved Young's (og belch);
  • silicon valley all-time geniuses find Gore not a perfect match (og shocked and appalled!);
  • whoa!! a nice article on navigating spacecraft among planets (og nod happily);
  • pink explosion!!! (og run away!);
  • four whole pages (two with writing!) on IPv6 (og humbly contrite);
  • drifting ... drifting ...
  • Eric Dolphy and Don Byron given nods in the music section (og agree);
  • whew!!! (og finish)
Given the veritable plethora (I at least miss you, Howard) of pages pimping high-tech gizmos and gadgets, this issue reminds me of nothing less/more than the current spate of men's magazines that are basically ads about toys, articles about toys, and articles (and covers) featuring almost naked babes. And, looking at the Wired cover featuring a winged babe spreading herself for the future and giving a wee bit of full sidal nudity, the distinction pretty much eludes me, and I don't think we can blame the beer for this one.

I stopped buying Wired at the newstand over a year ago, and only get it now because they offered a year via snailmail (hot damn! more street cred!) for twelve bucks. R.I.P. Wired. If you want the science, try Scientific American; if you want the tits, try Playboy; if you want the bidness, try Forbes or Bidness Week; if you want the bleeding edge, try the bleeding net, for chrissake! Just avoid this rotting corpse.
posted by Steven Baum 11/16/1999 10:44:53 PM | link

MUSIC
Nothing like listening to
Goodbye Yellow Brick Road all the way through for the first time in probably 20 years to push the curve back up towards its manic phase. I was biking back from the rec center - where I damned near entered a bench press competition (against those half my age) announced towards the end of a two-hour workout for no other reason than cantankerous, grizzled orneriness - when I decided to stop by the used CD store for the first time in several months. The bargain bin yielded several adequate finds, but nothing noteworthy until I spotted that all too familiar yellow cover. Sure, I've still got a vinyl copy that crackles nearly as much as my knees, but I've also got three dead turntables and another not long for this world. It was a steal at nine bucks.

Within the narrow technical confines of post-1950 pop music, some have been better than others, and some much better. Reginald Dwight aka Elton John was better than anyone from about 1970 to 1975, and he peaked within that period with this album. You had to have been a (reasonably) typical early teen in 1973 to fully appreciate how incredibly bloody huge and important this album and the singles from it were. I was 13 and this was the second album I ever bought (yes, I got started late and, no, I'm never telling what the first one was). Elton had a deft melodic touch (Bernie Taupin wrote all the lyrics) with ballads and could hold his own with the heavier stuff (witness "Saturday night's alright for fighting"). He was also writing overt songs about lesbians ("All the young girls love Alice"), reggae-influenced tunes ("Jamaica jerk-off"), and offering a Marilyn Monroe tribute ("Candle in the wind", which has had a bit of recent fame in a slightly different guise) in 1973 well before it was trendy to do any of these.

There's really not an obvious clinker on the album (although "Dirty little girl" could probably have been omitted without causing any damage and the muses were obviously more than a little squiffed during the creation of "Social disease"). Speaking of which, the number of lyrics I remember from the album despite the toll of years and other things well attests to the quality and staying power of this pop classic. My favorites are still "Roy Rogers" and "Harmony", most likely because of that nostalgia whore/sentimental moody side thing that rears its misty-eyed head when I'm not looking. You could do a whole lot worse in the way of pop music in the last 30 years than this album, and I'm not terribly sure you could do much better.
posted by Steven Baum 11/16/1999 08:04:40 PM | link

FOOD LIT
My recent piece on Frank X. Tolbert's
A Bowl of Red prompted me to once again pick up my favorite and most tattered cookbook for a leisurely browse. Texas on the Halfshell: A Cookbook of Tex-Mex, Barbecue, Chili and Lone Star Delights by Phil Brittin and Joseph Daniel is the most authentically Texan cookbook I've encountered, with my qualifications to judge such a thing based on being here 17 years and garnering an accolade or three (including a trophy) for my BBQ brisket. You really need only three things to make a quality brisket in the traditional Lone Star style:
  • a cut of beef called a brisket;
  • some dry rub; and
  • a barbecue pit.
It's just as simple as rubbing the spices comprising the dry rub into the brisket and cooking it until it's tender. And there aren't even that many devilish details that one has to deal with, although experience has taught me that:
  • you can use either what are called packer- or butcher-trimmed brisket cuts, with the former being larger, fattier and about 50% cheaper, although the latter cooks faster and is more suited to smaller gatherings;
  • commercial mixes labeled "brisket rub" will do just fine, and mostly consist of the book's recommended ingredients of salt, pepper, and paprika as well as occasional extras like hotter peppers in powder or sauce form, ground cumin, powdered onion, etc.;
  • don't spare the rub, i.e. coat the brisket liberally on both sides, the edges, and under the flap that's usually there;
  • you don't need to marinade the brisket with either the rub or a liquid marinade since the cooking process will perform all the required tenderization - rub it up and put it on your waiting pit;
  • an adequate barbecue pit can be created in many different ways ranging from actually digging a pit the old-fashioned way to using a grill to using any of several commercially available smokers - with your results improving as you gain experience with your particular set-up;
  • in any set-up remember that you're cooking with indirect heat and smoke (i.e. smoking) rather than direct heat (i.e. grilling), since the latter will cook but not tenderize the meat;
  • the most flavorful brisket results from cooking it fatty side up, although good results can be obtained with either fatty side down or turning (but not too often as that cools your cooking area);
  • do not start your fire with a petroleum-based starter fluid - this imparts a nasty flavor to the meet which, although it is far worse when grilling, can still effect the flavor when you're smoking something;
  • if you're not turning the brisket then only open your apparatus to add more charcoal or whatever fuel you're using;
  • keep the temperature between 150 and 250 deg. F and cook the brisket for between 8 and 20 hours, although there's a lot of slop here depending on average temperature (higher means less time), the size of the brisket (large means more time), and just how tender you want the final product (the longer the more tender with no chance of overly drying it out unless you leave it on for far more than 20 hours);
  • remove it, let it sit for about 10 minutes or so to allow the internal juices to redistribute themselves, slice and serve with appropriate side dishes.
If you do things right it will be so tender and flavorful you won't even need barbecue sauce, although several good recipes are given in the book, with my favorite being Marceia's Ol' Fashioned Sauce although I leave out the brown sugar for a more piquant result.

Halfshell also features sections on chili (making it a good supplement to the Tolbert book), Tex-Mex (the Texas interpretation of Mexican cooking) and traditional Texas cooking (really a hodge-podge of recipes from the many regions and cultures that have settled this bloody huge state). It's colorfully written (due to both the prose style and the names of many of the recipes, e.g. mouth of hell chili, slang jang, outlaw coleslaw, stir crazy cake, etc.) and a worthy addition to any kitchen shelf. If Joe Bob reviewed cookbooks rather than B-movies, he'd surely give this one a hearty "check it out!", even given its lack of midget fu, cheesy dialogue and an odd number of breasts.
posted by Steven Baum 11/16/1999 02:51:54 PM | link

SITINGS
In
The Enforcer by Michelle Cottle in the New Republic the strictly controlled access to BushJr by his campaign team is detailed. Cottle offers that,
Instead of debates, probing interviews, and lengthy Q&As, Team Bush schedules quickie news conferences (six or seven questions a pop), numerous speeches on warm and fuzzy broad themes, and periodic opportunities for journalists to talk policy details with campaign advisers.
In other words, the man who would be President, who snuck through Yale with a high C average (i.e. no progeny of wealthy alumni ever gets below a C average), gives the sound bites while the string-pullers answer the toughies (e.g. "Is Montana in Iraq or Pakistan?").

In regards to the candidate's "wild 'n' crazy youthful exuberance," Cottle describes an exchange between Bush the Lesser and a reporter cut short by chief handler Karen Hughes:

Other times Hughes simply shuts down the conversation. Just after the governor's reelection in 1998, Slater pressed Bush about whether he had ever been arrested. "He said, `After 1968? No.' I said, `What about before 1968?' He said, `Well ...' and at that moment Karen stepped in and said, `Wait a minute, I've not heard this.' She clearly wasn't prepared for whatever it was he was about to say, and he shut up." Slater argued that it was better for the governor to deal with any revelations sooner rather than later, and Bush agreed to get back to him on the matter. "To this day I have no idea what he was going to say," says Slater. "After she got to him, he shut up."
Another incident probably not unrelated to Shrub's "keg 'n' coke" years had him getting a new driver's license in early 1995. That is, a new license with a new number which, strangely enough, makes it very much more difficult to dig up skeletons in his closet.

Personally I don't care if all the rumors concerning Bush the Younger's neotenous phase are true. He's either qualified for the job now or he isn't. But, given the constant, tiresome and shrill demands of his party for moral purity in others, their penchant for saying "well, that's different" when their appendages show up where they're not supposed to, and their 7 year jihad against Clinton that turned up only one remotely actionable incident (which occurred several years after they started the witch hunt), I'm finding the whole BushJr thing most viscerally pleasing. The GOP chose to lower it, so they shouldn't whine when it's their turn at the limbo bar.
posted by Steven Baum 11/16/1999 12:37:15 PM | link

STRANGE LIT/YMFL
[Now that I've got that Sweet Pollyanna Purebred stuff out of my system.] While rummaging through the back (i.e. junk) room looking for the power cord for the heating element component of my rotisserie (which produced a delicious roasted turkey via the alternative of mesquite charcoal when I couldn't find the cord), I found my copy of
The Illustrated Book of Science Fiction Lists (1982) by Mike Ashley (who's compiled quite the list of anthologies of various stripes himself). It consists of four sections:
  • What is this thing?, i.e. short and topical lists such as "5 of the First Fictional Voyages Through Time" and "5 Novels About Other Dimensions";
  • Expert opinion, i.e. lists chosen by writers such as "Aldiss's 10 Most Important British SF Novels" and "The 10 Stories Pohl is Most Pleased to Have Bought as an Editor";
  • The recordholders, i.e. lists of the most prolific writers and anthologists, the shortest stories, the longest careers, etc. (with this section having lost some accuracy in this 18 year old book); and
  • Oddities and entities, i.e. a grab bag of lists like "10 Parent-Child Writers," "50 SF Writers Who Were Pro-Vietnam and 50 Who Were Anti," and "20 SF Books Written by Non-SF Writers."
One of my favorites is a list compiled by George Scithers - a former editor of "Isaac Asimov's Science Fiction Magazine" - of the 10 last lines he hopes he's seen the last of. They are:
  • "...but it was all a dream!"
  • "...and then the Sun went nova!"
  • "...for the horrible monsters were really from Earth!"
  • "...and so, Eve, we'll have to populate this empty planet."
  • "...I'm calling this planet I created in school, Earth."
  • "...for the time-traveller has *caused* what he had traveled in time to prevent!"
  • "...but - but you mean I'm already dead?"
  • "...for the invaders' spaceship was too small to notice!"
  • "...they were really unborn babies!" (ants, frogs, robots or giant lobsters)
  • "...for it was the evil extraterrestrials that had made them all go mad." (or wage war, or invent science fiction, or develop rocketry)
I'll offer a few more:
  • "... for Ggbxbngm, Mprtgnbprtd, Bvdgwrtfg and the rest of their group of [trolls, elves, lads/lasses, talking dogs, etc.] had completed their journey. defeated the evil wizard, and returned the sacred [sword, amulet, gem, scroll, enema] to it's rightful place."
  • "... for that ruin poking up through the ground was the Statue of Liberty!"
  • "... for he/she had transcended physical reality and become part of the [web, cosmos] itself."
  • "... and thus the military superengineer saved the deluded liberals from the consequences of the failed liberal social policies of the 60s, built an escape ship out of gumption and patriotism, and was humping the bejesus out of the hot wife of the foolish pacifist scientist who had blindly led them into danger."

posted by Steven Baum 11/16/1999 09:56:59 AM | link

EDITORIAL
I've added a copyright notice seeing how it's apparently necessary to point out the difference between right and wrong to the growing number of sleazy thieves on the web. As I write this, somebody's attempting to pirate my
Linux Metapage, which I created as an aid for myself and put on the web in the hope that it'd also be useful to others. While checking my referrer logs yesterday, I noticed an unfamiliar URL, so I checked it out. Imagine my surprise when I found my Metapage on someone's else's site. It's worse than that, though. It was the entirety of that site with two modifications. The preface had been stripped off and a banner ad tacked onto the bottom. By the way, the header states explicitly that my intention was to have no ads on the page. Tracing the thing backwards to a certain company that makes it easy for sticky-fingered, no talent, ethically challenged pond scum to stick banner ads on pages in the pathetic hope of making millions, I further found a proud announcement by the perpetrators of their new and helpful web page. May a thousand starving rottweilers find the bacon-wrapped bodies of these people and anyone else who thinks being barely clever and wholly corrupt are substitutes for real work and experience.
posted by Steven Baum 11/16/1999 09:11:01 AM | link

Monday, November 15, 1999

YAMMERING
I'm having a bit of trouble working up any sort of jones for
Epinions. I've been browsing around thereabouts for a few days now, but can't seem to find any reason why'd I'd want to foist my opinions on an unsuspecting public there rather than here. I don't much care who agrees or disagrees with me, and the money thing isn't remotely an issue. The only section with any appeal for me is the book section, and I've found no discernible correlation between the writing styles or books reviewed by the most popular reviewers and my tastes. The Web of Trust looks interesting, but Amazon's already doing the same sort of thing and it's worked very well for me to date. And I don't like that bit about "removing offensive content" seeing how the usual nervous nellies that run such sites will remove damned near anything that offends anybody to cover their asses legally (with this sentence probably a good candidate for the reaper over there). Does anyone else see a first-order contradiction between "We want to know what you think, even if it hurts!" and "We reject or remove material containing offensive content or language."? I just don't see the attraction of trading control over my content for a few pieces of copper.
posted by Steven Baum 11/15/1999 03:23:51 PM | link

SITINGS
Several years ago when airline bean counters were searching for a ways to "save" money, they hit upon the idea of recycling air in the passenger cabin. The previous practice of exchanging cabin air for fresh air from outside the airplane consumed precious fuel since the air had to be heated, so why not just recycle it and save money at a minor cost to the passengers and crew of slightly staler air? This was a win-win synergy whose time had come. But, the law of unexpected consequences, which seems to preferably afflict those prone to tunnel vision, reared its ugly head, bared its fangs, and bit the bean counters on the ass.

"Rain in the plane" by Krista Foss reports that while the ban on smoking made the decision seemingly even more of a no brainer (although hindsight shows it to be that anyway), the matter of the effects of moisture wasn't considered. When the air is recycled the 100 or so grams of moisture exuded per hour by every passenger remains on the plane. It accumulates and is driven outwards by the difference in pressure between the cabin and the exterior, collecting in the 10 cm wide insulation-filled space between the inner skin and the fuselage. It collects there until the saturation point is reached and then returns to the cabin in the form of dripping or even flowing water, usually when the plane is angling to either climb or land. There are more than a few cases when people have been completely drenched.

Aside from that sort of "inconvenience," the water presents additional problems. Planes fly at altitudes above 30,000 feet where the temperature can reach -50 C and below, so the water freezes and the plane undergoes the not well understood stress of many freeze/thaw cycles. Water is also a corrosive agent which usually finds its way to every available nook and cranny, and can of course cause electrical short circuits in the shorter term. The big wet blanket of insulation can also serve as a breeding ground for fungus, mold and microbes. At a recent meeting of flight attendants from all over the world it was reported that they increasingly suffer from respiratory illnesses.

So what's the big deal? There's no proof that any of the above possibilities are happening and the illness thing may just be the hysterical conglomeration of a few scattered events. Well, the problem is that in addition to the the above possible problems, this practice is saving little or even no money. The additional 500-700 kg of weight added to the weight of a large aircraft costs up to $500,000 a year in additional fuel, and soaked insulation is less effective so it costs even more to heat the plane which, you might recall, was the original reason for instituting the change. It is also expensive to either dry the insulation or replace it, with the common practice being to check the insulation only every four years or so. One wonders how much it would have cost to hire a couple of aeronautical or ergonomic engineers to study the idea for even a week before madly rushing this stroke of genius into application.
posted by Steven Baum 11/15/1999 01:35:26 PM | link

Sunday, November 14, 1999

STRANGE LIT
When the late Frank X. Tolbert - a long-time Dallas newspaper columnist - first wrote
A Bowl of Red in 1966, he had no idea it would spawn the World Championship Chili Cookoff in Terlingua, Texas, which in turn spawned thousands of similar eat 'til you infarct and drink 'til you puke festivals of decadent self-indulgence. That chain of events is detailed by Tolbert in later editions of the book. The original cookoff was conceived as a prankish promotion for the book, with a famous Beverly Hills restauranteur slated to face off against the chief cook of the 20-year-old Chile Appreciation Society International, the reknowned Wick Fowler. New York-based humorist H. Allen Smith was tapped as a substitute when Fowler's planned opponent fell ill. Smith had written an article called "Nobody knows more about chili than I do" that featured anti-Texas rants and the even more unpardonable sin of a chile recipe calling for kidney beans.

The first Cookoff in 1967 was a draw as the judge with the deciding vote claimed he couldn't continue because his taste buds had been paralyzed by sampling Smith's chile. That and the Cookoffs that followed featured an always colorful cast of contestants and judges, quantities of beer and tequila sufficient to paralyze the Fifth Fleet, and eventually even winners. It's still taking place today (although I hear it split into two separate factions a few years back), and has been joined by thousands of similar contests nationwide and even worldwide.

The book is much more than a retelling of the early years of the Cookoff, though. It starts by telling of the cultlike devotion of many (including LBJ) to "a bowl of genuine Texas red," and then spends a bit of time describing the proper ingredients (coarsely ground beef, chili peppers, oregano, ground cumin, and chopped garlic gloves). A brief discourse on canned chili and chili powder varieties is followed by descriptions of popular chili variations as well as other traditional southwestern delicacies. These include drugstore chili (with beans), tamales and enchiladas, son of a bitch stew (made with marrow gut, the long tube connecting the stomachs of bovines), black-eyed peas and pinto beans, jalapeno corn bread, native Indian foods, and hot sausage and barbecue. Places in Texas famous for serving these are also described, although most are probably long gone. This book is a fine blend of history and the culture of food. If you're at all a fan of "a bowl of red" then you'll feel similarly about A Bowl of Red.
posted by Steven Baum 11/14/1999 10:42:36 PM | link

STRANGE LIT
Before the TV series and the movie there was
MASH, the book, originally published in 1969 by the pseudonymous Richard Hooker. It was fortunate that Robert Altman obtained the film rights, since it resulted in a film nearly as good and funny as the book. The first couple of years of the series were also pretty good, following closely the style and attitude of the film. It slowly degenerated - with a few outstanding episodes sprinkled here and there - into a forum in which the point that "war is hell" was overly stated rather than covertly revealed. Not willing to leave bad enough alone, the bodysnatching ghouls of TV Land relieved the corpse of its heart and brain, replaced them with tripe, and released the horrible "After MASH" to wreak havoc in the heartland.

Hooker, while also infected with the sequel bug, knew what was good for him (and us) and produced a string of nearly equally entertaining sequels to the original book. The books in the series are:

  • MASH (1969)
  • MASH Goes to Maine (1973)
  • MASH Goes to New Orleans (1975)
  • MASH Goes to Paris (1975)
  • MASH Goes to London (1975)
  • MASH Goes to Morocco (1976)
  • MASH Goes to Las Vegas (1976)
  • MASH Goes to Hollywood (1976)
  • MASH Goes to Vienna (1976)
  • MASH Goes to Miami (1976)
  • MASH Goes to San Francisco (1976)
  • MASH Goes to Texas (1977)
  • MASH Goes to Montreal (1977)
  • MASH Goes to Moscow (1977)
  • MASH Mania (1979)
I went through most of them about 20 years ago and, after recently spotting a few in a used book store, bought and started to reread them. They were funny then and they're still funny, with a gradual waning in quality through the later books. This ain't Shakespeare, but it's high quality humorous writing well worth the buck or so it'll cost you to carry them out of a used book store. And they were pretty good sellers in their time, so it's not that difficult to find them today.

A brief passage from the second of the series gives a typical taste (or perhaps lack thereof) of what to expect:

Hawkeye, now on his second martini, laughed because he remembered Jocko's matchless performance at the Windsor Fair. Jocko and a fellow VA employee had erected a tent, proclaimed themselves specialists from the United States Public Health Service, and offered free rectal examinations for only fifty cents (to cover the cost of the glove). Remembering that they'd made over three hundred dollars before they were run off, Hawkeye said, "Maybe you're right, Jocko. We'll see."
If this isn't to your liking, then you're probably better off sticking to Garrison Keillor. Addendum: I failed to mention that book numbers 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13 and 14 in the series were co-written with William E. Butterworth. There's also a nice gallery of covers that also offers synopses of each book.
posted by Steven Baum 11/14/1999 03:18:52 PM | link


Comments?
Archive

LISTS

Books
Software

uPORTALS

cider
crime lit
drive-in
fake lit
hurricanes
os
scripting
sherlock
texas music
top 100
weirdsounds
wodehouse

LEISURE

abebooks
alibris
amazon
bibliofind
bookfinder
hamilton
powells

all music guide
best used cds
cd bargains
second spin
raven's links

ampol
arts & letters
atlantic
art history
attrition
bibliomania
bitch
bizarre
bizarro
bloom country
bob 'n' ed
bob the angry flower
callahan
chile pepper
classical music
cnnsi
crackbaby
cult films
culture jamming
discover
disinformation
dismal scientist
electric sheep
espn
exquisite corpse
feed
fine cooking
fishbowl
fluble
fried society
fry and laurie
hotel fred
hotendotey
hypocrisy network
jerkcity
last cereal
leisure town
logos
london times
mappa mundi
miscmedia
mp3lit
mr. chuck show
mr. serpent
national geographic
new scientist
no depression
not bored
obscure store
onion
on-line books
parking lot is full
pearly gates
phrase and fable
probe
red meat
rough guides
salon
Simpleton
sluggy freelance
spacemoose
spike
straight dope
strenua inertia
suck
superosity
tawdry town
too much coffee man
toon inn
verbivore
vidal index
yes minister
you damn kid





Powered by Blogger