Reference Book Supplemental Reading


Encyclopaedic dictionaries - W. H. Wells, The Dial, Vol. IV, p. 123, 1883

Book Review: The Encyclopaedic Dictionary: a New and Original Work of Reference to all the Words in the English Language, with a Full Account of their Origin. Meaning, Pronunciation, and Use. By Robert Hunter, M. A., F.G.S. Assisted in Special Departments by Various Eminent Authors. With Numerous Illustrations. Small quarto. Vols. I and II, in four Parts,— A to Dee. London and New York: Cassell & Company.

A dictionary proper is a work that explains the meaning of words. An encyclopa-dia is a work that gives information on the whole circle of human knowledge. An encylopaedic dictionary is both in one.

In patriarchal times, when the lives of men extended into the centuries, and the literary accumulations of the world bore some relation to the capacity of the human mind, the curriculum of the student might be undertaken with a degree of satisfaction; but human life is now reduced to much narrower limits, and the stores of literature and science have increased a thousand fold. More, the Platonist, said he was obliged to cut his way through a crowd of thoughts as through a forest. The reader who enters a modern library can do no more than this.

Old books accumulate and new ones multiply, and most of them must of necessity pass out of use. But there are gems of thought in them and vital points of information that the world cannot afford to let die. Encyclopedias are therefore a necessity of the times. It is the office of the encyclopaedia to glean and preserve, in condensed form, the most valuable knowledge that is contained in all the books of all the ages.

The encyclopaedic element in dictionaries has a history that is worth reviewing. The largest and most complete of all our early defining dictionaries is that of John Minsheu, fol., London, 1017. It is a dictionary of English words, with definitions mostly in English" and Latin, and a laborious attempt to fix the derivation of words. It is decidedly encyclopaedic in its character, giving proper names of persons, places, etc. In the second edition, 1625, twenty-six lines are devoted to the word Littleton, nine to Casar, thirteen to Barnabas, sixteen to England, and fiftysix to forest. The account of day, with its sub-headings, is carried through two hundred lines. In the definitions and illustrations of law terms, it is specially full. Seventy-nine lines are given to the word fee, twenty-eight to plea, sixty-two to bailie, and thirty-three to exchequer.

The dictionaries of Bullokar, 1016; Cockcram, 1023, and Blount, 1056, contain only the "hard words" of the language. The dictionary of Edward Phillips, 1058, is encyclopaedic, and contains pretty full descriptions of words relating to biography, history, geography, mythology, etc. In the 0th edition of this work, 1700, "it was judged expedient to leave out all abstracts of the lives of eminent persons, poetical fictions, geographical descriptions of places," etc.

Most of the dictionaries that were published between 1058 and 1727 furnish more or less general information. The second volume of Bailey's dictionary, 1727, and Martin's dictionary, 1749, are more encyclopaedic in their cast than any that preceded them. Dr. Johnson's celebrated dictionary appeared in 1755. This work is held closely within the limits of a dictionary proper, and matters of information that do not aid in defining and illustrating the meaning of words are rejected. Of the dictionaries that appeared between 1755 and 1850, those of Wm. Rider, 1759, Marchant, 1760, Fenning, 1761, Barlow, 1772, Barclay, 1774, Ash, 1775, Marriott, 1780, and Craig, 1849, are in a large degree encyclopedic; but most of the others do not attempt to furnish general information.

Ogilvie's Imperial Dictionary, which was published in 1850, made still farther encroachments upon encyclopedic ground; and the new edition of the Imperial Dictionary, by Annandale, has added more encyclopaedic matter to the first edition, by Ogilvie, than Ogilvie added to the dictionaries of his predecessors. Such are the antecedents of Hunter's Encyclopedic Dictionary. Emboldened by the popularity and success of past efforts, and impressed with the belief that still farther progress is demanded, the author and his associates have explored the whole range of human knowledge, and incorporated in their work a condensed encyclopedia of general information.

The Encyclopaedic Dictionary will contain a larger vocabulary of words than any that has yet appeared. The definitions are copious, and furnish abundant evidence that much care and labor have been bestowed upon them. Many of them are fuller and more complete than in any previous work. But in the highest and most important requisites of a defining dictionary; in the construction of clear, concise, and happily worded definitions, and in the discrimination of nice and exact shades of meaning, the Encyclopedic Dictionary can hardly be said to have risen to the standard attained by Webster and the Imperial. The author is over-sensitive about copying from his predecessors, and in his care to avoid this obligation he sometimes loses valuable forms of expression and nice shades of discrimination that might be borrowed from others without infringing upon the rights of any.

The illustrative quotations are well chosen. A large portion of them are new and are accompanied by references to the exact places where they are to be found.

In the grouping and discrimination of synonyms, the Encyclopedic Dictionary is exceedingly defective. Instead of original and careful discrimination by the editors, it contains copious and extended extracts from Crabb. If the same space had been filled with well selected synonyms, and with a brief discrimination and illustration of the most important of them, as in Webster, and Worcester, and Ogilvie, it would have greatly increased the value of the work.

Pictorial definitions are coeval with the history of language, and they were much more largely employed in primeval times than they have been at any later period. It is generally believed that all writing began with pictorial representation. The language of the ancient Egyptians and that of the early Mexicans, were largely represented by pictures. The Orbis Pictus of Comenius, the prince of educational reformers, was published in 1657. It was not a dictionary, but a collection of Latin sentences, the object of which was to teach the use of Latin words. Each subject was illustrated by an engraving, with references by numbers from the different parts of the cut to corresponding words in the sentence. These illustrations foreshadowed the pictorial illustrations of words that have since been introduced in the dictionaries of Bailey, and Ogilvie, and others. The illustrative cuts of the Encyclopedic Dictionary are well executed and greatly enhance the value of the work. They are more numerous than those of any previous dictionary.

Another excellent feature is the insertion of obsolete spellings, showing the different stages through which words have passed. Thus with the word air we have a.yre, aire, aier, eyr, eir; and with contain we have contayne, contene, conteini, conteyne, contienen, kunteyne, conteynyn.

The authors of dictionaries have in many cases copied the pronunciation of words from Walker and other recognized authorities, without subjecting it to the test of present usage. Many serious errors have by this means been introduced and perpetuated ;n most of the popular dictionaries. In noting the pronunciation of words, Hunter has introduced several important improvements upon the dictionaries now in general use in Great Britain. The sound of o in lo.it, doth, etc., is made distinct from the sound of o in not. Ogilvie, Stormonth, Nuttall, and Donald make it o in not. The sound of a in care, prayer, etc., is made distinct from that of a in fate. Ogilvie, Stormonth, Nuttall, and Donald make it a in fate. The marking of Hunter in these classes of words agrees with that of Haldeman, who is probably the best orthoe'pical authority in this country.

For the purpose of ascertaining the present usage in the pronunciation of certain classes of words by the best speakers in England, and especially in southern England, 1 recently entered into a correspondence with a number of prominent educators and scholars in Great Britain, who occupy favorable positions on the hill-tops of observation. Of nine correspondents who have favored me with their views on these questions, five agree that o in lost, cloth, etc., is intermediate between o in not and a in aw; three would give it the sound of a in aw ; and only one endorses the sound of o in not, as given by Ogilvie, Stormonth, Nuttall, and Donald.

The faults of Hunter in noting the pronunciation of words are as great as his excellences. The notation marks and the keywords at the foot of the pages abound in imperfections. The sound of ng in sing is not marked in the first volume. In the second volume this sound is indicated by a dot placed over the n; but no corresponding mark is found in the list of key-words. The syllables ble and die in able, addle, etc., are represented by bel and del—e as in camel. Wycliffe and Milton wrote battel, but battle is correctly pronounced bat-tl, and never with a vowel sound in the last syllable. The word bench is chosen as a key-word for ch sounded as sh. Ogilvie and Stormonth give to ch in bench the sound of sh; but Nuttall and Smart give it the sound of ch in chin. A key-word that is ambiguous is worse than useless. The author's definition of cedilla (s) is, " a mark placed under the French c, in order to give it the sound of s." Chin and §ell are both given with the cedilla, as key-words. This introduces confusion where a distinction should be sharply drawn, and departs from the author's own definition of cedilla.

A in ask, clasp, etc., is marked with the sound of a in father. Ogilvie, Stormonth, and Donald go to the opposite extreme and mark this sound short, as in at. The correct sound is intermediate between a in at and a in father. Worcester and Webster give the intermediate sound, and several of my English correspondents assure me that the intermediate sound is generally employed by the best speakers in England. In the word clink, n has the sound of ng, but Hunter gives it the proper sound of n, as in sin. The word canary is improperly pronounced ca-nar-y, a as in fare. In the words chameleon, Crustacea, calcareous, etc., e in the third syllable is marked with the sound of e in met, but no correct speaker ever gives it this sound.

The vowel sounds are in all cases carefully marked in the Encyclopaedic Dictionary. In Worcester and Webster the vowel sounds in most of the unaccented syllables are not indicated. In the early editions of the Imperial Dictionary the author expressed himself very strongly against " the practice of noting the sound of the vowels in the unaccented syllables;" but in the newly revised edition of the Imperial, these sounds are all marked. Every vowel sound must have some quality; and no pronouncing dictionary can lay any just claim to completeness if it fails to tell what that sound is. The vowels in unaccented syllables are now marked in nearly all of the English dictionaries, and they have also been marked by Prof. Haldeman in the Clarendon Dictionary, recently published in this country.

In executing a work of such magnitude as this, involving such a variety and multiplicity of details, it is impossible to avoid an occasional misstatement, or incorrect form of expression, or other lapse. Many examples like the following might be pointed out. Under the word bee it is stated that " when bees become too numerous in a hive, a fresh queen is nurtured, under whose auspices they swarm." It is nearly a hundred years since Huber discovered that the old queen leads the first swarm, and the most careful observations of bee-raisers since his time have confirmed his statement on this point. In the same article occurs the sentence : "The first-named are abortive females, and do all the work of the society ; they are armed with a sting, and their larvae, if treated with specially rich food, can develop into perfect females." The language implies that their larva? means the larvae that spring from them, whereas these larvae are in fact the larvae from which they themselves come. Under a, an, occurs the expression, "an before a vowel." But in " many a one," a is used before the vowel o, which here has the consonant sound of w; and in "a unit," a is used before the vowel u, which has the conspnant sound of y. It should read, " an before words commencing with a vowel sound."

The Encyclopaedic Dictionary is a work of laborious and independent research, and the portion already completed is executed with great ability. In the amount of encyclopaedic information it contains, in the extent of its vocabulary, and in the introduction of historic spellings, it holds a position in advance of all previous dictionaries.

The first part, or divisional volume, was issued in 1879. Four of these parts are now published, extending in the alphabet to Des. It will be completed in twelve or fourteen parts, each containing about 384 pages ; and they are to appear at the rate of about three parts a year.

Parallel with the publication of Hunter's Dictionary, and on a still broader and more comprehensive plan, is the preparation of the great Dictionary of the Philological Society of London, under the editorial direction of Dr. J. A. H. Murray, the first pages of which are already in print.

The lexicographic labors of Ogilvie, and Annandale, and Hunter, and of the Philological Society, mark a high order of British scholarship, and are an honor to the British nation. W. H. Wells.


Bernard Quaritch - Dean Sage, Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 85, 1900, p. 843

Bernard Quaritch, who died in London in December last, was widely known as the great bookseller of his day; but comparatively few know the remarkable qualities and the intelligent and unremitting labor without which he never could have attained this high position. Mr. Quaritch was a rare union of the merchant, the scholar, and the bibliophilist, with the added and indescribable literary quality which made him the delight of all who knew him. He was not a man of " blandishments ; " on the contrary, his demeanor was rather forbidding to strangers. He was impatient of differences of opinion, especially on matters connected with books ; he was frank, sometimes unpleasantly so, in the expression of his views, and the openness of his egotism was amusing to some, and the reverse to others.

My acquaintance with Mr. Quaritch began twenty years since at his shop, 15 Piccadilly, where I looked about, unquestioned, for some time, and finally seeing a book I wanted, asked the price of it from an elderly man who seemed connected with the establishment. It was so much higher than I expected that I made some remark indicating my opinion, whereupon I was told that the price was low, and that I shared with many of my countrymen their objection to paying a fair amount for a good book. Somewhat nettled by this charge I said, " You must be Mr. Quaritch, for my friend Judge - , of Portland, told me you combined great knowledge of books with great rudeness." The mention of the name of Judge - appeased Mr. Quaritch at once. He intimated that though he did not admire Americans collectively, he had the highest opinion of many individuals among them, and wound up by showing ine a lot of his treasures, asking me to come again, which I did often during a stay of two months in London, laying the foundations of a friendship to which Mr. Quaritch contributed, up to his death, unnumbered kindnesses.

In 1880 Mr. Quaritch printed privately a pamphlet called Bernard Quaritch's Letter to General Starring, Special Agent of the U. S. Treasury in London. The object of this letter was to set himself right with General Starring regarding a charge which had been made or inspired by a bookseller in New York, that he had made fraudulent entries at the New York Custom House of certain books which were dutiable by reason of their having been printed inside of twenty years. The pamphlet is thoroughly in keeping with Mr. Quaritch's manly, straightforward nature, and a chapter of it is entitled History of my Life as a Bookseller and Publisher. He came to London from Prussia, his native country, in 1842, when twenty-three years of age, having had an apprenticeship of five years in the bookselling and publishing business in Nordhausen and Berlin. In London he found employment with Mr. Bohn, the well-known publisher and bookseller, with whom he remained four years, an intervening year being passed with a bookseller in Paris. In his earlier days with Mr. Bohn, when employed as general utility man and porter at 24s. a week, his confidence in the future was so great that he once said to his employer, " Oh, Mr. Bohn, you are the first bookseller in England, but I mean to become the first bookseller in Europe."

In 1847 Mr. Quaritch started in business for himself, settling at 16 Castle Street, Leicester Square, with a capital of £10. He says: " My exceptional industry, coupled with exceptional business aptitude, not to mention the enjoyment of an iron constitution (nowise impaired by an abstemious and frugal private life devoted to study), produced corresponding but unexpected results. My progress was marvelous, and surprised everybody. I worked day and night, and soon developed from a stallkeeper. selling penny books, into one of the leading second hand booksellers of London." It can be seen from this paragraph that Mr. Quaritch did not hesitate to mention his own virtues, but it is none the less true that he never claimed any which he can not justly claim. Thirteen years of his work in Castle Street enabled him to remove in 1860 to 15 Piccadilly, where the rest of his laborious and useful life was spent. The first opusculum of The Sette of Odd Volumes, an association which I shall speak later, was printed in 1880, with the title, B. Q. A Biographical and Bibliographical Fragment. From this sketch came much of my information about Mr. Quaritch's career as a bookseller and book lover. From the time he began business for himself he made a specialty of collecting linguistic and philological works. Oriental and European. He published Turkish, Arabic, and Persian grammars and dictionaries, formed great collections of Oriental manuscripts, and indeed up to his last days did not abate his interest in Oriental literature and publication. His knowledge of books, especially those of the scarcer and older classes (for these he had his choicest affections), was simply amazing, and the result of natural ability, a memory which appeared absolutely perfect, great love of the work, and an appetite for it which made everything else in life secondary. Holidays with him were opportunities afforded for catching up on work a little behindhand, were generally, I think, if not always, thus employed by him, and his attitude toward idlers — as he considered all who were not constantly employed — was that of more or less open disapproval. He once wrote of a near relative: - is just now traveling for the benefit of my health (he is very well) in Ireland. I am as usual at my post." In spite of his incessant labors at his desk in the back and dimly lighted part of his shop, where his shining bald head could be discovered from near the outer door, he was always ready to drop his work for a time to converse, on book topics, with any one he knew and thought worthy. A friend from this country once walked into 15 Piccadilly, having just come from the shop of Jamrach, the famous animal dealer, where he had been looking at the hippopotami, boa constrictors, and other ■wonders of nature. " Where have you been this morning? " said Mr. Quaritch. " At Jamrach's, looking at his curiosities," was the reply. " Who in the world is Jamrach ? " " Curiously enough, that is just what he said about you when I told him I was coming here." Another once telling him how fortunate he had been in leaving Germany and starting his career in England was answered in perfect seriousness, " Well, if I had stayed in Prussia I might have been a von Moltke."

The great monument left by Mr. Quaritch is in his wonderful catalogues, the first complete indexed one having been issued in 1860, and including about 7000 entries. This was followed by a larger one in 18G2, and in 1868 one of 15,000 titles. In 1870 another of 1194 pages appeared, the last section of which was entitled Catalogue of Manuscripts, both Blocks and Productions of the Printing Press. This contained sixteen Greek manuscripts, a manuscript Evangelisterium executed in 1040, a manuscript German Bible with a large engraved initial 1445, two Caxton's Gutenberg's Catholicon, and three copies of Eliot's Indian Bible. The Bibliotheca, Xylographica Typographica and Palseographica came three years later, and is a work of great and increasing value, wherein about 1300 examples from the early presses of various countries are accurately described in chronological sequence from actual inspection. Tn the preface to another great catalogue in 1874, Mr. Quaritch says: " No such catalogue of valuable books and manuscripts has ever been issued, and it is unlikely that it can ever be done again, owing to the increasing rarity of good old books, and the fact that, financially considered, the capital to acquire it realizes less than the percentage of profit readily secured by ordinary investment. Whether, further, any bookseller will be blessed with such uniform good health, such universality of range in all branches of literature, and, I may add, such a devotion to his trade, time alone will tell. Anyhow, this catalogue has been the greatest effort in my career as a bookseller. . . . I trust that my house will remain, as it has been, useful to scholars and collectors from all countries. I will cheerfully devote the remainder of my life to gratify their wishes."

Mr. Quaritch meant every word he said in the above quotation. He knew he was the greatest living bookseller, and mentioned the fact as something patent and irrefutable. He was also perfectly sincere in stating his willingness to devote his life to gratifying the wishes of scholars and collectors, and he did it. He would take as much trouble in searching out some obscure, cheap book for which he might get 10s. as for one worth £100. and his customers could rely on his most unselfish efforts in either case. In 1880 Mr. Quaritch produced his greatest catalogue, which contains the descriptions of over 28.000 books, in 2395 pages. This enormous work, by reason of the rarity and extraordinary value of the books and manuscripts it describes, and its copious index, is a veritable monument of bibliography, bibliophily, and typography, which will be regarded with wonder and veneration so long as the love and use of books exist. Mr. Quaritch, in the interesting preface to the catalogue, says : " People who are ignorant of the real value of books, and who probably confound expensive articles with dear ones, exclaim against the heavy prices to be found in my catalogues. It is as though they were incapable of seeing that the choicest copies of the best editions must necessarily command a far higher appraisement than ordinary copies of other issues. . . . In fact, a first copy of any edition of a book is, and ought to be, more than twice as costly as any other."

These catalogues and the numerous subsequent ones issued by Mr. Quaritch have the greatest value for collectors and book lovers, not only by reason of the enormous quantity of rare and valuable books mentioned, but for the full and exact bibliographical notes they contain, a large proportion of which are the original work of Mr. Quaritch, and the assistants whom he had educated and trained and inspired with his own love and appreciation of letters. Many of these catalogues — I think all those Mr. Quaritch considered important ones — have prefaces or introductions from his own hand which are really essays on books, that his peculiar individuality of style make as interesting as they are valuable. These catalogues are frequently, perhaps generally, confined to books on one or a few kindred subjects, and I know of none which do not include many items of great importance. One before me, dated 1890, is entitled A Catalogue of Medieval Literature, especially of the Romances of Chivalry and Books relating to the Customs, Costumes, Art, and Pageantry of the Middle Ages. There are 461 titles, most of the books being rare, and many manuscripts of great value, the most precious one, priced at £850, being the illuminated manuscript of the Roman de la Rose of the fifteenth century. The introduction is a compendious and most interesting history of the literature of chivalry, and it is doubtful if there exists anything on the subject in which so much information is packed in a dozen pages. Another is A Catalogue of Bibles, Liturgies, Church History, and Theology. Of the 1000 titles (circa) 441 are Bibles, the two most valuable priced at £500 and £420 respectively. Then come collections of missal books, hagiology, and church history, all not in manuscript being from early presses, and about 200 titles of books on " the Church in the British Isles," mostly of the seventeenth century and earlier. It is doubtful if this catalogue, as well as many others from the same source, could have been made outside of Mr. Quaritch's establishment, as neither the material nor the skill in arranging and describing them existed elsewhere.

In 1890 Mr. Quaritch sent to New York, in charge of his son, what he called in his catalogue " a peerless collection of books and manuscripts exhibited to the Bibliophiles of America," and on the reverse of the title-page was this legend : " Hos artium et litterarum flores speciosos rarissimosque Populo Americano sapientiae veterum haeredi capiti scientiae novorum legendos, eligendos, diligendos commendat. B. Q." The interesting " foreword " begins : " There is, I believe, neither exaggeration nor brag in the statement I venture to make, that so many book rarities as are described in the present list can nowhere in America be found united in a single assemblage. A similar assertion applied to European libraries other than public collections would be no less true."

I will not attempt to specify the treasures of press and binding in this rare lot of books and manuscripts, and fortunately a large proportion of the whole remains in this country.

The constant and unfailing supply of desiderata that Mr. Quaritch always had on hand was due to his prodigious knowledge of books, which led him to judge with almost unerring certainty what was best worth buying from any of the large collections coining to the auction block, and his courage in purchasing at the great sales and elsewhere the best that was offered. He was truly the autocrat of the auction room, and nothing, apparently, stopped him when something came up that he wanted or fancied. As long ago as 1873 his purchases at the Perkins sale of books and manuscripts amounted to £11,000, which was a small sum as compared with the cost of many of his later acquisitions, those from the Ashburnhain sale reaching nearly £40,000.

In a letter from Mr. Quaritch in 1896 he concludes some remarks on a notorious scene which had lately taken place in the House of Commons with these words: " Physical force is the ' ultima ratio ' of government, and I am an advocate of it even in private life. In my fights — at sale rooms — I give and take no quarter." When the great Spencer library was sold, in 1892, to Mrs. Rylands, who gave it to the city of Manchester, Mr. Quaritch, who was authorized too late to treat for its purchase by a gentleman of New York, wrote, " My collection of books is more valuable and useful than the Spencer library, and may be had for £120,000. This is about one half paid for the Spencer library." He afterward told me that the collection he spoke of could be selected from his stock then on hand on the lines of the Spencer collection, and would be equal in most respects, and superior in a good many.

Mr. Quaritch never hesitated to express his opinion, favorable or unfavorable, on any subject; and when it came to a question of the genuineness of some rare manuscript or early printed book, he was likely to give his views in strong language. The famous Columbus letter was a case in point. A letter purporting to be such was owned by a New York collector, and sold at his sale, I think in 1891. Of this letter Mr. Quaritch says : " The owner deliberately bought in preference a forgery, when he could have had from Maisonneuve in Paris the genuine first Spanish Columbus letter. I hear the letter fetched $4300. Surely no sane person would have bought it." Mr. Quaritch bought the Maisonneuve letter, which he afterward sold to the Lenox Library in New York. He wrote of it in 1892: " So long as my Spanish Columbus letter remains in my hands, the Chicago show is imperfect."

In the remarkable catalogue issued in February, 1895, entitled Bibliotheca Hispana, containing about 2400 titles of books in Castilian, Catalan, and Portuguese, Mr. Quaritch has a preface from which I quote the following : " I am desirous of becoming recognized as their London agent by all men outside of England who want books. The need of such an agent is frequently felt abroad by the heads of literary institutions, libraries, and book lovers generally. They shrink from giving trouble to a bookseller in matters which require more attention and effort than the mere furnishing of some specific article in his stock, and they must often wish it were possible to have the services of a man of experience and ability at their constant command. Such services I freely offer to any one who chooses to employ them. No fee is required to obtain them, and not a fraction is added to the cost of the supplies. ... I ask for nothing but the pleasure of attending to the wants of those who are as yet without an agent in London. Whether the books to be procured through my intervention be rare or common, single items or groups, the gems of literature and art or the popular books of the day, I shall be happy to work in every way for book lovers of every degree."

This was the proclamation of a man who loved books and all who loved books, and many in this country can bear witness to the fervor and industry with which he carried out his offer in letter and spirit. His great wisdom and the accumulations of over half a century of book lore were at the service of anybody, high or low, who would take the trouble to ask of him. Outside of his kindliness and generosity, so universally extended, as a matter of business he was content with fair profits on his bargains, and one could always feel, in buying high-priced books from Mi*. Quaritch, that no defect would be unmentioned by the seller, and that the buyer was not paying more than the value of the article.

Mr. Quaritch was incomparably the best informed, most munificent, and most liberal bookseller of this or any age, and it is very doubtful if the man lives who has the combination of knowledge, industry, enthusiasm, and high principles necessary to fill his place. In the Letter to General Starring before mentioned, he says: " My conduct ever since I was a man has been such as to win the respect and confidence of most people. Though I am what is called in England only a tradesman; the standard of in v honor is as high as that of the best in the land. The character of the Chevalier Bayard — sanspeur et sans reproche — has been my ideal through life." This and other quotations I have made from what Mr. Quaritch has written might be taken to indicate an egotism that is sometimes, if not often, the mark of hoastfulness rather than performance ; but this conclusion would be far from correct in Mr. Quaritch's case. He was a man of absolute truthfulness, and his knowledge of books and of his own strong, masterful character was so profound and accurate that what would be extravagance of statement in ordinary men was generally within the facts when said by him.

The principal if not the only recreation of the latter years of Mr. Quaritch's laborious life came from his connection with the famous club known as The Sette of Odd Volumes. This association was the outgrowth of frequent meetings of Mr. Quaritch and a few friends which lasted for several years, and in 1878 they resolved themselves into a permanent club called " Odd Volumes, — united once a month to form a perfect Sette," the odd volumes being the different members. While the object of the club was stated, in the rules formulated by Mr. Quaritch, to be " conviviality and mutual admiration," the real idea was to make it an intellectual aristocracy, to which only representative men of their various vocations should be eligible. Mr. Quaritch was thrice made president, in 1878,1879, and 1882, and his addresses on these and on other occasions before the Sette are most interesting, being full of learning, information, and humor. These are preserved in the Year Books of the " Sette," which also has had " issued " to it about seventy privately printed " opuscula " and '• miscellanies." Of these Mr. Quaritch contributed A Short Sketch on Liturgical History and Literature, and an Account of the Great Learned Societies and Associations and of the Chief Printing Clubs of Great Britain and Ireland ; also, not included in the opuscula, Palaeography, Notes upon the History of Writing and the Medieval Art of Illumination. This beautiful and important work, with its magnificent illustrations, was extended from a lecture delivered before the Sette of Odd Volumes by Mr. Quaritch, who privately printed 199 copies for his personal friends. The monthly dinners of the club, held of late years at Limmers Hotel, to which a member has apparently the privilege of inviting any number of guests, will always be considered, by those fortunate enough to have attended, as the most interesting gatherings in London ; and there amongst bis old friends, all distinguished in some way in letters, science, or arts, Mr. Quaritch appeared at his best. The Sette of Odd Volumes shared with his books his choicest affections, and it will mourn, with the happily fast increasing body of book lovers, the loss of that wise and wonderful man who, on the foundation of integrity, ability, and untiring industry, built up a name and fame which shall last as long as the flowers of literature are admired and cherished.


The Encyclopaedic Dictionary - The Critic, March 23, 1889, p. 141

The Time it takes to produce a dictionary or cyclopaedia worthy of the name is proverbial—that is'to say, one which has had the benefit of fresh investigations of the meaning, derivation and different uses of words. Here is a dictionary or encyclopaedia—for it strives to unite within reasonable limits the better features of each—which was mooted as far back as 1872 by the members of the then existing firm of Cassell, Fetter & Galpin. Seventeen years have passed; the firm is now Cassell & Co., Limited; the editor is lucky enough to survive, but he is now called Rev. ' Dr." instead of the Rev. ' Mr.' R. Hunter. With him were associated John Williams, M.A., of Trinity College, Oxford, and later, S. J. Herrtage, B.A., who are responsible for the general arrangement, the philology, etc., while Dr. Hunter supplied the greater number of passages which reflect the cyclopaedic side of the work. Other scholars have revised the words belonging to their specialties.

The present reviewer confesses to a prejudice against this dictionary in 1879, when its first volume appeared, a prejudice based partly on the already large number of books of reference and the unlikelihood that there was room for another; partly on the apparently retrograde movement implied in an alliance between cyclopaedia and dictionary. The glossary of a former age had been expanded perforce, and separated into several branches. Was not this a return to mediaeval methods ? And could a re-union of two main branches be advisable in the present day, when the growth of materials for lexicons and cyclopaedias renders the latter more and more exhaustive ? Theoretically, there was no opening for a work of reference on such a scheme; practically, the venture is a success.

' The Encyclopaedic Dictionary ' is not only very full but includes technical, slang and. dialect words which are usually left to special dictionaries; it gives words of special coinage, semi-naturalized and compound words that are hybrid. Like all other dictionaries, it is defective in derivations owing to misconceptions that have arisen in England through the lack of profound and unbiased scholarship. Lines of study which may lead to conclusions wounding to old prejudices and national pride are avoided in Great Britain; consequently the origins of the language have never been thoroughly examined, and English lexicographers— and American, too—follow the mediaeval chroniclers in statements which are opposed to what we learn of human conduct in other parts of the world. ' Very few words were borrowed by the invaders from the original inhabitants (Celts or Kelts). . . . The few survivals tend to show how complete was the extermination of the Celts; they prove that " the Celtic women were kept as slaves, while their husbands, the old owners of the land, were slaughtered in heaps."'

This quotation fronvKington Oliphant is only a sample of the Englishman's ignorance of his own ancestry, and of the course of affairs in any country which is occupied by a foreign race. Of course there is no proof that the Old British husbands were ' slaughtered in heaps' any more than the Saxons, save at certain battles; that is merely picturesque writing. It is, however, pretty well fixed for a fact that the Latinized British population of towns not only survived, but were not enslaved. In the country the Kelts that remained became enslaved; but that the Saxons slaughtered them needlessly is contrary to all precedent, and would argue the Saxons blind to their own interests. But this superficial class of English philologists accepts without protest conclusions drawn from statements of old writers full of race pride. Were a grand exception to common rules of conquest true in the case of the Angles, Saxons and Jutes, it would always be certain that the women of these ' husbands in heaps' would teach the next generation of their taskmasters to speak Old British, and thus affect the Teutonic dialects.

While in this respect ' The Encyclopaedic Dictionary ' is no worse than others, being a victim to the folly of AngloSaxo-mania, it is better than others in the clearness of its print, the use of bold-faced type and lettering of different calibres, the justness of its definitions, the abundance of Scottish dialect words used by Burns and Sir Walter, and the care which has been expended on all parts of the alphabet. The editor says well: 'Many, no doubt, of those who have from time to time to refer to existing dictionaries, cannot have failed to notice how the last few letters, say from S to Z, have been compressed in order to squeeze the whole work into the space originally allotted to it. So notorious is this, that an experienced student of glossaries, dictionaries and similar works, once declared that, if he ever had to compile a dictionary, he would begin with the letter Z and work backward." The editor thinks he has succeeded not only in guarding against this weakness, but in adding the chief distinction of LittrfS's French Dictionary and the work Dr. Murray is editing from materials collected by the Philological Society—namely, the historical side of words It can not be held that he has been able to push this feature quite so far as he indicates; but we ought to be thankful that he has introduced dates as much as he has. It has greatly increased the usefulness of the work. Pictures also play a part, not as in the new edition of the 'Conversations Lexicon,' published by Brockhaus for the Germans, which has a wealth of plates and cuts in the text, but still to a fair degree. The preface to the last volume is a very good review of the origins of the English language, with the limitation* noted above; and in the same volume is an appendix containing an outline of lexicography, a list of dictionaries, phrases and quotations from modern and classical languages, Scriptural, classical and other names, with rules for their pronunciation, and a table of abbreviations and contractions. The appendix is neither so full nor so good as that of the last Webster's Dictionary, but for such extended lists space is not forthcoming.

In fine, 'The Encyclopaedic Dictionary' is an extremely useful work, judiciously edited, and complete without great bulk. The typographical arrangement is such as to present the most important matter to the eye of the reader in the boldest type, and relegate the less essential to such forms as the student who has time to examine can explore at his leisure.